9 best Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense alternatives in 2026
We rank Suped first among these Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense alternatives for replacing DMARC reporting and hosted authentication. Suped is our product, with source verification, detailed failure investigation and hosted record management. A switch needs a plan for SPF and DKIM delegations as well as reporting continuity. This comparison covers DMARC functionality; gateway filtering and application email relay need separate decisions. Suped is hosted SaaS, with no self-hosted or on-premise edition.
Published 19 Oct 2026
Updated 19 Oct 2026
9 min read
Summarize with
We independently evaluate software using direct hands-on testing alongside public documentation and verified user reviews. Missed a tool worth covering? Tell us about it.
What to check before leaving Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense
Preserve hosted authentication
01.
Proofpoint's product documentation includes hosted SPF, DKIM and DMARC, so changing the reporting address alone does not complete a switch. Suped has hosted versions of those protocols, plus hosted MTA-STS/TLS-RPT. We recommend inventorying DNS delegations and DKIM selectors before cutover, keeping signing configuration at each sending service under explicit ownership.
Resolve sender exceptions
02.
A source name is not proof that the sender is authorized. Suped's verified and unverified source workflow, detailed authentication views and failure alerts support the investigation of unfamiliar sources and legitimate senders with broken authentication. Compare matching-domain SPF or DKIM results with the visible From domain, and investigate forwarding before changing policy.
Budget the complete migration
03.
Compare the full domain set and a 90-day monitoring window, including any separately counted marketing subdomain. Suped publishes Basic at $19/month and Pro at $99/month, with negotiated enterprise capacity and $7-per-domain monthly MSP pricing. Check retention and account separation alongside subscription cost, and distinguish a temporary trial from ongoing free monitoring.
9 products at a glance
| ||
|---|---|---|
01. | Suped | |
02. | OnDMARC | |
03. | Valimail | |
04. | EasyDMARC | |
05. | PowerDMARC | |
06. | Dmarcian | |
07. | Sendmarc | |
08. | DMARCAnalyzer | |
09. | Agari Brand Protection |
How we tested all 9 products
We assess all nine products against the same 90-day monitoring framework: a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp and one support desk sender. The findings are based on documented capabilities, public pricing and available G2 review evidence; the window is a common evaluation scenario, not a claimed completed deployment. We compare price and included domains/email volume, sender classification, authentication edge cases and supported hosted protocols. The cases are an aligned SPF pass, an aligned DKIM pass, an SPF pass with an unrelated visible From domain, a DKIM pass on a subdomain under relaxed and strict matching, forwarding with SPF failure, an unauthorized spoof sample with no aligned authentication, and an unknown sender needing classification. Expected protocol behavior guides the comparison: either aligned mechanism passes DMARC, an unrelated SPF pass alone does not, and surviving aligned DKIM can preserve a pass after forwarding. We also check onboarding and DNS handoff responsibilities, enforcement controls, report drilldowns, alerts, account separation and documented support scope. Retention must cover the evaluation window, while quote-only allowances and unconfirmed package entitlements remain questions to resolve before purchase.
9
products evaluated
90
day live test window
3
domains tested
6
edge cases per tool
The test rig
We ran every platform against one controlled environment for 90 days: a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain and a parked domain. Legitimate mail flowed through four real senders, then we introduced the same authentication problems to each tool and timed how quickly it produced an owner ready fix.
Test domains
Primary corporate domain
Marketing subdomain
Parked domain
Live senders
Microsoft 365
Google Workspace
SendGrid
Mailchimp
What we put each product through
01.
Onboard all three domains and reach a verified DMARC state.
02.
Resolve an unknown sender from report evidence alone.
03.
Explain a forwarded mail SPF failure that still passed DKIM.
04.
Triage a spoofing sample sent to the parked domain.
05.
Move a domain from p=none toward p=reject safely.
06.
Flatten an SPF record nearing the ten lookup limit.
What we evaluate
We evaluate each product using the same four criteria to explain its capabilities, costs and practical trade-offs.
Pricing and value
01.
Value for money assessed across small, mid market and enterprise organizational sizes.
Technical features
02.
Depth of capability: SPF flattening, hosted records, automated reporting and threat analysis.
Support quality
03.
Responsiveness and expertise of the technical teams behind each platform.
Ease of use
04.
Speed of setup and quality of ongoing day to day operating experience.
Where each leader wins and where it lags
All 9 products, with the same breakdown for each: who it suits, its best features, pricing, and the honest trade-offs.
01.
Suped
5 / 5(55)Suped is our DMARC and email authentication platform, and our number-one recommendation for readers replacing Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense's DMARC workflow. The practical reason is coverage of the work a migration actually creates: verify legitimate sources, investigate authentication failures, and maintain hosted authentication after the DNS handoff. Suped has hosted DMARC, SPF and DKIM, plus hosted MTA-STS/TLS-RPT. It is hosted SaaS only. Replacing gateway filtering or an application email relay requires a separate decision; those capabilities are outside this recommendation.
#1
our rank
$19/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
We put the migration inventory first. Suped's hosted DMARC lets administrators manage policy in the dashboard after DNS setup, hosted SPF manages authorized senders, and SPF flattening addresses the 10-DNS-lookup limit. Hosted DKIM manages TXT and CNAME selectors; it does not remove the need to configure signing at the sending service. Source verification and detailed authentication records support the next step: deciding which legitimate senders need remediation before changing enforcement. SAML SSO, organization roles and API access are relevant to enterprise operations, alongside separate client organizations for MSP workflows.
User experience
The documented workflow starts with adding a domain, publishing the reporting destination and verifying that data is arriving. We can then review verified and unverified sources, filter individual records by source or reporter, and inspect SPF, DKIM and DMARC results in detail. CSV downloads help preserve investigation evidence outside the platform. During a Proofpoint switch, that gives administrators a concrete sequence for reconciling the previous source inventory with newly received reports, without treating every unfamiliar source as authorized.
Support
Suped's documentation covers DNS setup verification, authentication issue remediation and checks that confirm changes have taken effect. Failure alerts and summary emails support ongoing monitoring after the handoff, while documented ConnectWise PSA, HaloPSA and Autotask integrations connect client issues to existing service operations. For a migration involving hosted authentication, we recommend agreeing the DNS change owner and rollback process before cutover. Confirm the required onboarding assistance and contractual support commitments for the selected subscription; no response-time comparison is claimed here.
Suitability
We recommend Suped to organizations open to hosted SaaS that want to replace Proofpoint's DMARC reporting and hosted authentication workflows, including enterprise teams and MSPs. Corporate authentication, marketing subdomain exceptions and parked-domain policy deserve the same attention regardless of organization size. Suped's enterprise pricing is negotiated, with capacity up to unlimited by agreement, and its MSP plan has per-domain billing with unlimited email volume and retention. The purchase should cover the actual billable domain set, access requirements and support scope, rather than assuming the entry plan covers an entire migration.
Who should use Suped
- Organizations replacing Proofpoint DMARC reporting and hosted authentication with a hosted SaaS workflow.
- Enterprise teams that need SAML SSO, roles and negotiated capacity alongside source investigation.
- MSPs that need separate client organizations, client reports and documented PSA integrations.
- Administrators who need to explain forwarding failures and visible From mismatches before approving enforcement changes.
Pricing structure
- The ongoing free plan includes 1 domain, 1,000 emails per month and 14 days of retention. The initial 14-day trial has no limits; those trial terms are separate from the ongoing free allowance.
- Basic is $19/month for up to 100,000 emails per month, 2 domains and 90 days of retention. Pro is $99/month for up to 1 million emails per month, 10 domains and 365 days of retention.
- Budget the corporate domain, marketing subdomain and parked domain explicitly. Suped counts qualifying subdomains separately, so do not assume Basic covers all three monitored assets.
- Enterprise pricing is negotiated, with capacity up to unlimited by agreement. The MSP plan is $7 per domain per month, with unlimited email volume and retention.
Strengths
- The documented product covers reporting, sender investigation and hosted authentication, so a Proofpoint migration can address those tasks within Suped.
- Enterprise access controls and MSP organization management keep the recommendation relevant beyond a single-domain deployment.
Trade-offs
- Suped has no self-hosted or on-premise edition, and its ongoing free plan does not cover this full multi-domain, 90-day scenario.
- A seamless import of Proofpoint history and sender classifications is not established here. Preserve exports and confirm any import requirements before cancellation.
Verdict
Try Suped, free
02.
OnDMARC
4.8 / 5(104)OnDMARC documents Dynamic Services for hosted authentication and an Investigate workflow. For a Proofpoint migration, its entry price needs to be read alongside retention and SPF lookup allowances.
#2
our rank
$9/month, billed annually
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
Dynamic Services covers DMARC, SPF and DKIM, with MTA-STS/TLS-RPT and BIMI also listed. Express retains a 10-SPF-lookup allowance; unlimited Dynamic SPF is listed on Essentials and above.
User experience
Investigate and forensic reporting provide documented investigation paths, while Event Hub handles security and audit events. Preserve the current sender inventory when recreating those workflows after Proofpoint.
Support
The pricing page lists several support services, but the available text does not reliably establish every plan entitlement. Confirm migration assistance and any SLA in the order rather than assuming Express includes them.
Suitability
We would compare its Dynamic Services delegation model with the authentication records currently hosted by Proofpoint. Event Hub is a specific workflow consideration where its documented event outputs are already relevant.
Who should use OnDMARC
- Administrators comparing Dynamic Services with an existing hosted SPF, DKIM and DMARC inventory.
- Teams assessing the documented Investigate and Event Hub workflows against their current investigation process.
Pricing structure
- Express starts at $9/month billed annually, with up to 4 domains, 1 million monthly emails and 30 days of history.
- Express lists up to 10 SPF lookups. Essentials adds unlimited Dynamic SPF, 25 active sender domains and 1 year of history, with current pricing Not publicly listed.
- Enterprise and Premier pricing is Not publicly listed. Confirm the final domain allowance, parked-domain terms and support scope in the quote.
- A 14-day trial is available without a credit card. It is not an ongoing free tier.
Strengths
- The documented hosted protocol set is relevant when replacing delegated Proofpoint authentication records.
- Express publishes both its domain and email-volume allowances, enabling a concrete initial package check.
Trade-offs
- Express's 30-day history does not retain the full 90-day evaluation window.
- The entry package does not provide unlimited Dynamic SPF, and higher-tier prices require a quote.
Verdict
View OnDMARC alternatives
03.
Valimail
4.6 / 5(441)Valimail separates free DMARC visibility from paid authentication management. That distinction matters when the Proofpoint deployment being replaced already manages SPF and DKIM.
#3
our rank
$5,000/year
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Monitor provides aggregate reporting and sender discovery; Enforce adds authentication automation. Subdomain management and reporting start with Premium, while source IP visibility is listed on Enterprise.
User experience
Named sending services support source review, but Monitor excludes source IP visibility and downloadable reports. Those limits affect reconciliation of unknown senders and historical investigation evidence.
Support
Monitor includes knowledgebase access without onboarding assistance or an account manager. Starter lists onboarding and a dedicated account manager; additional service entitlements need quote confirmation.
Suitability
Existing Monitor users can compare the paid Enforce workflow with the functions they currently run in Proofpoint. We would validate the marketing subdomain and investigation requirements before selecting a package.
Who should use Valimail
- Existing Monitor users evaluating the move into paid authentication management.
- Administrators checking named-sender automation against a documented inventory of legitimate services.
Pricing structure
- Monitor is an ongoing $0 plan with 5 users. It does not include DMARC policy and sender management through SPF/DKIM configuration.
- Enforce Starter starts at $5,000/year. Current official included domain, email-volume and sending-service limits are not publicly specified in the pricing evidence.
- Enforce Premium and Enterprise pricing is Not publicly listed. Premium is the first tier listing subdomain management and reporting.
- API access is an add-on on Starter and Premium; it is included on Enterprise. Confirm retention, source IP access and any service add-ons before budgeting.
Strengths
- The distinction between Monitor and Enforce makes the boundary between visibility and record management explicit.
- Paid packages document authentication automation relevant to a hosted SPF and DKIM migration.
Trade-offs
- Monitor is not a replacement for Proofpoint-hosted authentication management, and it omits downloadable reports and source IP visibility.
- Subdomain management requires Premium, while several allowances and add-on prices need sales confirmation.
Verdict
View Valimail alternatives
04.
EasyDMARC
4.8 / 5(165)EasyDMARC packages managed DMARC and sender identification across volume-based plans. A Proofpoint switch needs a package-level check because hosted protocol management and administration controls are split across tiers.
#4
our rank
$35.99/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Plus includes aggregate and failure reports with managed DMARC and vendor identification. Premium adds EasySPF and managed MTA-STS; managed DKIM and API access are Enterprise or MSP capabilities.
User experience
Subdomain detection and email investigation are listed, but included domain counts remain important when separating marketing traffic. Review source filters and exports against the evidence retained during the Proofpoint deployment.
Support
Plus lists knowledgebase access, while Premium includes email support and a dedicated customer success manager on yearly billing. A dedicated DMARC engineer is listed with Enterprise and MSP packages.
Suitability
We would assess the exact managed-record functions required for the DNS handoff, rather than purchase on monitoring volume alone. Existing EasySPF use is a specific record-management consideration, not a reason to assume broader suitability.
Who should use EasyDMARC
- Teams mapping an existing managed DMARC or EasySPF configuration into a Proofpoint migration plan.
- Administrators comparing package-level domain limits with separately managed marketing subdomains.
Pricing structure
- Free includes 1 domain, 1,000 emails per month, 14 days of history and 1 user. It is separate from the advertised free trial.
- Plus starts at $44.99/month, or $35.99/month billed annually, at 100,000 emails per month. It includes 2 domains, 3 months of history and 1 invited user.
- Premium starts at $89.99/month, or $71.99/month billed annually, at 100,000 emails per month. It includes 4 domains, 1 year of history and unlimited users.
- Enterprise and MSP pricing is Not publicly listed. Extra domains require sales contact, and exceeding the selected volume quota removes report/dashboard access until an upgrade.
Strengths
- Published tiers distinguish reporting, managed DMARC and additional hosted protocol functions.
- The entry paid plan includes vendor identification and failure reports for source investigation.
Trade-offs
- A full hosted DKIM migration and API access require Enterprise or MSP packaging.
- Domain caps and quota-triggered loss of report access need attention during overlapping migration monitoring.
Verdict
View EasyDMARC alternatives
05.
PowerDMARC
4.9 / 5(234)PowerDMARC lists hosted protocols alongside aggregate and forensic reporting. Its Basic entry price does not include every function needed to replace Proofpoint-hosted authentication and operational alerts.
#5
our rank
$6.42/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Basic includes hosted DMARC and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT, with hosted SPF as an add-on and no hosted DKIM. Hosted DKIM, API access and alert management are listed on higher quote-based packages.
User experience
Sender identification, domain groups and a DNS timeline support source review during a migration. Basic includes raw XML download/upload but excludes DMARC CSV export and separate SPF/DKIM analytics.
Support
Basic lists tutorials, with email support and implementation services as add-ons in the pricing evidence. Confirm the assistance required to recreate delegated SPF records and DKIM selectors.
Suitability
The narrow comparison is its Basic hosted-service bundle against the records and reporting exports being replaced. We would confirm the quoted package before relying on managed SPF, DKIM or alerts.
Who should use PowerDMARC
- Administrators comparing Basic's hosted DMARC and TLS reporting with an existing delegated-record inventory.
- Teams that already use raw XML evidence and want to verify the same investigation path after migration.
Pricing structure
- Free is for personal domains only, with 1 active domain, 10,000 compliant emails per month, 10 days of history and 1 user.
- Basic's lowest published band is $8/month, or $6.42/month billed annually, for 10,001 to 50,000 compliant emails. It includes 5 active domains, 2 users and 1 year of history.
- At 50,001 to 100,000 emails, Basic is $15/month or $12/month billed annually. Its higher volume bands increase the price, and hosted SPF costs extra.
- Enterprise, API and Partner Program prices are Not publicly listed. Basic has a 15-day trial; it is separate from the personal-use free plan.
Strengths
- Basic publishes a year of retention and raw XML handling, both relevant to retaining migration evidence.
- The billing basis excludes phishing and invalid email volume, according to the vendor's pricing policy.
Trade-offs
- Basic omits hosted DKIM, alert management and API access, while hosted SPF is an add-on.
- Support add-ons and volume bands make the lowest advertised price incomplete for many hosted-authentication migrations.
Verdict
View PowerDMARC alternatives
06.
Dmarcian
3.5 / 5(5)Dmarcian centers on enriched DMARC reporting and source analysis. Replacing Proofpoint's report view is a different scope from replacing its hosted SPF and DKIM services.
#6
our rank
$19.99/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Sources enrichment, automatic subdomain detection and aggregate processing are common capabilities. Basic adds Alert Central and forensic processing, while API access and SSO are listed on Enterprise.
User experience
Source enrichment supports classification of the sending services found during the handoff. Domain groups and user access controls are tier-dependent, so map business-unit access before moving the portfolio.
Support
A 30-day paid-plan trial is documented. We would confirm implementation help and the ownership of DNS remediation directly; the published pricing evidence does not establish a migration service commitment.
Suitability
Dmarcian is relevant when evaluating a reporting-led replacement with authentication records administered separately. That is a workflow scope to assess, rather than a like-for-like claim for all Proofpoint hosted services.
Who should use Dmarcian
- Teams comparing source-enriched aggregate reporting while retaining direct administration of authentication records.
- Administrators checking active-domain allowances separately from parked or inactive domain coverage.
Pricing structure
- Personal is an ongoing free plan for non-business use only: 2 active domains, 1,250 messages per month, 1 user and 1 month of history.
- Basic is $24/month or $19.99/month billed annually. It includes 2 active domains, 100,000 legitimate reported messages per month, 1 user and 3 months of history.
- Plus is $240/month or $199/month billed annually, with 8 active domains, 1 million messages, 3 users and 1 year of history.
- Enterprise is $600/month or $499/month billed annually, with 15 active domains, 5 million messages and unlimited users and history. Custom terms and a 30-day trial are available.
Strengths
- The published model separates active domains from unlimited inactive domains and excludes forwarded or fraudulent traffic from priced volume.
- Basic's three-month history and source enrichment are relevant to a migration monitoring window.
Trade-offs
- A replacement for Proofpoint-hosted SPF and DKIM is not established by the product evidence used here; scope those functions separately.
- Basic has one user, and SSO and API access require the published Enterprise package.
Verdict
View Dmarcian alternatives
07.
Sendmarc
4.9 / 5(42)Sendmarc publishes guided and managed authentication packages with quote-based paid pricing. The migration comparison needs to distinguish configuration assistance from ongoing record management.
#7
our rank
Not publicly listed
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
The published Advanced package lists authentication configuration, failure reports and MTA-STS/TLS reporting. Premium lists ongoing DMARC, SPF, DKIM and BIMI management with managed service offerings.
User experience
The documented workflow includes source review and movement toward enforcement, with user access and audit logs listed on paid packages. Verify exports and account separation against the current Proofpoint investigation process.
Support
Advanced lists email and knowledgebase support, while managed service offerings are associated with Premium. Agree who executes DNS changes and how remediation is handed back to the internal team.
Suitability
We would assess its documented managed implementation against the DNS responsibilities in the current operating model. The quote must define who changes records and who maintains them after enforcement.
Who should use Sendmarc
- Teams comparing a written managed-implementation scope with the responsibilities in their current Proofpoint agreement.
- Administrators verifying whether configuration assistance or ongoing authentication management is included in the quote.
Pricing structure
- Paid starting price: Not publicly listed. Request a quote for the precise configuration and management scope.
- The published Advanced package lists 4 active domains, 4 parked domains, unlimited subdomains, 12 months of history and 5 portal users. Confirm record-volume sizing in the quote.
- Premium lists unlimited email volume, domains, history and users, with ongoing authentication management. Its price is Not publicly listed.
- Free Basic Reporting is labeled a Free Trial: 1 domain, up to 5,000 email records, 21 days of history and 1 user. Do not budget it as a permanent free tier.
Strengths
- The configuration-versus-management distinction helps define the DNS and enforcement responsibilities being transferred.
- Published paid packages identify parked-domain and subdomain coverage relevant to a complete portfolio migration.
Trade-offs
- No current official paid starting price is published, so subscription and service costs require a quote.
- Configuration coverage does not establish ongoing hosted management; confirm each record type and operational responsibility.
Verdict
View Sendmarc alternatives
08.
DMARCAnalyzer
0 / 5(0)DMARCAnalyzer is sold as Mimecast DMARC Analyzer, with official Fundamentals and Standard packages. We compare its DMARC functions only, without treating the wider Mimecast security platform as part of the replacement.
#8
our rank
Not publicly listed
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
The documented product includes aggregate, forensic and TLS reporting with a setup wizard and recommendation engine. SPF delegation is an add-on, so reporting package limits do not describe the whole authentication handoff.
User experience
Filters and source views cover location and IP-level investigation. Purchased access inside Mimecast's Cloud Integrated console is a specific existing-console consideration, not evidence of broader DMARC suitability.
Support
Implementation and managed services are available as Standard add-ons, not Fundamentals inclusions. Confirm the services order covers the required DNS handoff and enforcement work.
Suitability
Existing Mimecast Cloud Integrated users have a documented in-console access route after purchasing DMARC Analyzer. We would compare that access path and the separately priced DMARC scope with a dedicated Suped deployment.
Who should use DMARCAnalyzer
- Existing Mimecast Cloud Integrated users checking the documented purchased DMARC Analyzer access route.
- Administrators comparing Fundamentals retention with Standard's additional services and domain options.
Pricing structure
- Current official starting price: Not publicly listed. Reseller prices and historical price books are not treated as current vendor checkout prices.
- Fundamentals includes 5 active domains, unlimited inactive domains, 3 active users, 90 days of retention and 2 million monthly DMARC emails.
- Standard lists 5, 25, 50, 100 or 250+ active domains, unlimited inactive domains and users, 365 days of retention and unlimited monthly DMARC email volume.
- SPF delegation is an add-on. Standard offers implementation and managed-service add-ons; a trial is advertised, with no ongoing free tier established.
Strengths
- Fundamentals publishes a 90-day retention window and explicit domain and message allowances.
- Source-level investigation and separate implementation options make the reporting and service scope identifiable.
Trade-offs
- Current official prices are not public, and hosted SPF delegation has a separate cost.
- Fundamentals does not offer the Standard implementation or managed-service add-ons, so required assistance changes the package decision.
Verdict
View DMARCAnalyzer alternatives
09.
Agari Brand Protection
4 / 5(1)Agari Brand Protection is now presented as Fortra DMARC Protection. Its documented DMARC and hosted authentication functions are relevant here; wider Fortra security capabilities are outside this comparison.
#9
our rank
Not publicly listed
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
Product materials list hosted DMARC, SPF and DKIM, with sender identification and enforcement assistance. New-sender alerts and APIs are also documented, although public tier-level entitlements are limited.
User experience
Reporting covers protected domains, authenticated volume and policy performance. Validate the drilldown and export path for unknown senders rather than assuming historical Proofpoint classifications transfer.
Support
The product datasheet lists professional-services onboarding with purchase. Exact migration responsibilities and continuing support commitments need confirmation in the current agreement.
Suitability
An existing Fortra purchasing relationship is a narrow contracting consideration. We would still assess the standalone DMARC scope and hosted-record handoff against Suped, without using wider security bundling as a DMARC advantage.
Who should use Agari Brand Protection
- Existing Fortra buyers reviewing the exact DMARC scope available through their current purchasing route.
- Administrators mapping hosted SPF and DKIM records to a quoted replacement service.
Pricing structure
- Current commercial starting price: Not publicly listed. The public purchase route requests a quote.
- Historical standalone price lists are not current commercial prices and are excluded from this comparison's starting price.
- Current included domains, message allowances and retention are not publicly specified in the evidence reviewed. Obtain them in writing with onboarding scope.
- No ongoing free tier is established. General Fortra bundle discounts do not establish a standalone DMARC price.
Strengths
- The documented hosted authentication set is relevant to replacing Proofpoint's delegated SPF and DKIM records.
- Professional-services onboarding is described in product materials, providing a concrete scope to confirm in the quote.
Trade-offs
- Current pricing and key operating allowances require a quote, limiting an exact public cost comparison.
- Public product-level capabilities do not establish every package entitlement, including any MTA-STS/TLS-RPT hosting requirement.
Verdict
View Agari Brand Protection alternatives
Replace Proofpoint DMARC workflows with Suped
Suped
Get started
Plan the authentication handoff
Use hosted DMARC, SPF and DKIM to manage authentication after the initial DNS migration. Include hosted MTA-STS/TLS-RPT where transport policy and TLS reporting are part of the scope.
Investigate sender exceptions
Reconcile verified and unverified sources, inspect authentication details and configure failure alerts before approving policy changes.
Budget the actual domain set
Compare Basic at $19/month and Pro at $99/month with the required domains and retention. Use negotiated enterprise terms or $7-per-domain monthly MSP pricing for the corresponding operating model.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from another platform?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
How we keep this ranking honest
Suped is our product. We apply the same documented migration requirements to every entry, checking official product descriptions and pricing against domain coverage, sender investigation, hosted protocol scope and retention. We distinguish current public prices from historical reseller figures, and trials from ongoing free tiers. G2 averages and review counts accompany the entries; they do not establish that a DNS migration will succeed. The findings are documentation-based, with unavailable prices and unverified package details identified for confirmation. Our review process checks those material details when updating the comparison, without claiming measured setup times, support response times or enforcement outcomes.
Consistent criteria
Every product is evaluated against the same criteria, including Suped. We compare capabilities, costs and practical trade-offs.
Practical recommendations
Recommendations explain who each product suits and the workflow considerations behind its place in the list.
Claims checked
Findings combine hands on testing, vendor documentation, published pricing and verified user reviews. Pricing reflects public plans as of the dates shown.
Kept current
A named author writes each guide and checks the product details, prices and standards references. We recheck pages on a fixed schedule.
