11 best Agari Brand Protection alternatives in 2026
We rank Suped first among these 11 Agari Brand Protection alternatives for teams replacing DMARC reporting and authentication management. The buying decision is about preserving legitimate senders and policy enforcement while handing over DNS dependencies, report history, and access. Suped is our hosted SaaS product, with Enterprise and MSP options; it is not self-hosted or on-premise. Unrelated security or fraud-response capabilities need a separate replacement assessment.
Published 19 Oct 2026
Updated 19 Oct 2026
9 min read
Summarize with
We independently evaluate software using direct hands-on testing alongside public documentation and verified user reviews. Missed a tool worth covering? Tell us about it.
What matters when switching DMARC away from Agari
Sender continuity
01.
We prioritize preserving the approved-sender inventory and investigating unknown sources before policy changes. Suped's verified and unverified source states, filtered Data view, and Detail view authentication checks support that work. A recognized provider name is investigation context, not proof that a sender is authorized.
Hosted DNS handoff
02.
A new report destination does not replace hosted authentication records. Suped documents hosted DMARC, SPF with flattening, and DKIM, so existing dependencies can be mapped to replacement records. We would agree the initial DNS changes and rollback before retiring the old hosting; automatic settings transfer is not assumed.
Account and cost continuity
03.
Suped has published subscriptions, negotiated Enterprise capacity, and per-domain MSP pricing with unlimited email volume and retention. Roles, SAML SSO, and client organizations address access planning. We compare the full domain inventory, required history, and support scope, without assuming the lowest subscription covers every Agari responsibility.
11 products at a glance
| ||
|---|---|---|
01. | Suped | |
02. | OnDMARC | |
03. | PowerDMARC | |
04. | EasyDMARC | |
05. | Valimail | |
06. | Dmarcian | |
07. | Sendmarc | |
08. | DMARC Report | |
09. | MailHardener | |
10. | URIports | |
11. | DMARCly |
How we tested all 11 products
We use the same evaluation framework for all 11 products: a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain; Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and one support desk sender; and a 90-day monitoring window. The findings are a documented-capability assessment against that scenario, not measured results from a completed 90-day deployment of every product. We compare price and included domains or email volume, sender classification, authentication edge cases, and supported hosted protocols, then check onboarding, DNS handoff, enforcement, report drilldowns, alerts, account separation, and support scope. The authentication cases are aligned SPF pass, aligned DKIM pass, SPF pass with a visible From mismatch, DKIM pass on a subdomain, forwarding with SPF failure, an unauthorized spoof sample, and an unknown sender needing classification. The expected DMARC result requires at least one passing method with the required domain relationship: an unrelated SPF identity alone fails that requirement, related subdomain DKIM depends on relaxed versus strict matching, and forwarding needs investigation of surviving DKIM. We assess spoof rejection only where the effective policy requests it and receiver handling supports it. Unknown-source labels require business-owner verification. We distinguish reported messages from aggregate report files when comparing quotas, and check whether retained history covers the full window. Reporting-only subscriptions are not assumed to include hosted DMARC, SPF, DKIM, or MTA-STS. No measured detection rates, support timings, or enforcement deadlines are claimed.
11
products evaluated
90
day live test window
3
domains tested
6
edge cases per tool
The test rig
We ran every platform against one controlled environment for 90 days: a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain and a parked domain. Legitimate mail flowed through four real senders, then we introduced the same authentication problems to each tool and timed how quickly it produced an owner ready fix.
Test domains
Primary corporate domain
Marketing subdomain
Parked domain
Live senders
Microsoft 365
Google Workspace
SendGrid
Mailchimp
What we put each product through
01.
Onboard all three domains and reach a verified DMARC state.
02.
Resolve an unknown sender from report evidence alone.
03.
Explain a forwarded mail SPF failure that still passed DKIM.
04.
Triage a spoofing sample sent to the parked domain.
05.
Move a domain from p=none toward p=reject safely.
06.
Flatten an SPF record nearing the ten lookup limit.
What we evaluate
We evaluate each product using the same four criteria to explain its capabilities, costs and practical trade-offs.
Pricing and value
01.
Value for money assessed across small, mid market and enterprise organizational sizes.
Technical features
02.
Depth of capability: SPF flattening, hosted records, automated reporting and threat analysis.
Support quality
03.
Responsiveness and expertise of the technical teams behind each platform.
Ease of use
04.
Speed of setup and quality of ongoing day to day operating experience.
Where each leader wins and where it lags
All 11 products, with the same breakdown for each: who it suits, its best features, pricing, and the honest trade-offs.
01.
Suped
5 / 5(55)We recommend Suped first for teams replacing Agari Brand Protection's DMARC reporting and authentication management. Suped is our product, and the recommendation rests on specific workflows: verify legitimate sources, investigate authentication failures, and manage hosted records as policy changes become justified. That combination matters when a migration must preserve an existing reject policy while making unfamiliar senders understandable. Suped is hosted SaaS, with negotiated Enterprise capacity and organization management for MSPs. It is not available for self-hosted or on-premise deployment, and this recommendation covers email authentication rather than replacement of unrelated security services.
#1
our rank
$19/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Suped connects aggregate DMARC reports with a source table, verified and unverified source status, and record-level investigation. Its Data view filters by source, reporter, and IP address, with CSV downloads; Detail view adds SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and reverse DNS checks. Hosted DMARC, hosted SPF with flattening, and hosted DKIM give the DNS handoff a practical destination. Hosted MTA-STS and TLS-RPT cover transport policy and reporting separately. We would use those documented functions to reconstruct the authentication inventory before retiring any Agari-hosted dependency, rather than assuming a reporting-address change also transfers hosted records.
User experience
We would onboard the corporate domain first, confirm that reports reach Suped, and compare the source inventory against the approved senders exported before leaving Agari. The marketing subdomain then needs its own inheritance and signing-domain checks, while the parked domain needs confirmation that no legitimate sender depends on it. Source verification records the team's classification decision; recognizing a service does not authorize every message associated with it. Failure alerts and summary emails support ongoing review. Hosted policy changes happen in Suped after the initial DNS configuration, and detailed report filters help investigate the failures behind a headline pass rate.
Support
Suped's published support options include email and phone support for business subscriptions and dedicated technical support for Enterprise. Documentation covers setup verification, issue resolution, and authentication failures. We would make migration assistance concrete by agreeing who inventories existing DNS records, who approves replacement values, and who owns rollback if a legitimate sender fails. An Enterprise proposal should state the support scope and any response commitments alongside capacity and retention. We have not measured response times or conducted a comparative support exercise, so we make no speed claims.
Suitability
Suped is our first recommendation for Agari switchers open to a hosted service, including enterprise teams and MSPs. Users and roles, SAML SSO, and the API support organizational access and integration requirements, while separate client organizations give MSPs a way to keep client work distinct. Negotiated Enterprise terms cover requirements beyond the published subscriptions. We would size the purchase against the actual domain inventory and reporting volume, then confirm which subdomains count toward the allowance and how much history must remain accessible during the transition.
Who should use Suped
- Teams replacing Agari DMARC reporting and hosted authentication while retaining control of sender verification and policy decisions.
- Enterprise teams evaluating SAML SSO, roles, API access, negotiated capacity, and a documented support scope.
- MSPs separating client organizations and producing monthly client reports while managing authentication issues.
Pricing structure
- Free includes one domain, 1,000 emails per month, and 14 days of retention. The initial 14-day trial has no limits; those trial terms are separate from the ongoing free allowance.
- Basic is $19/month for two domains, up to 100,000 emails per month, and 90 days of retention. A published $29/month option includes three domains, 250,000 emails per month, and 365 days of retention.
- Pro is $99/month for ten domains, up to one million emails per month, and 365 days of retention. Other published capacity options include $59/month and $249/month subscriptions.
- Enterprise pricing is negotiated, with capacity up to unlimited. The MSP plan is $7 per domain per month with unlimited email volume and retention.
- For the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain scenario, confirm billing treatment before choosing a two-domain subscription. We make no savings claim against an unprovided Agari contract.
Strengths
- Source verification and authentication drilldowns connect sender discovery with the evidence needed before policy enforcement.
- Hosted authentication records support an organized handoff of existing DNS dependencies.
- Published subscriptions and negotiated Enterprise capacity allow the purchase to follow the actual migration scope.
- Separate client organizations and client reports support continued operations after an MSP migration.
Trade-offs
- Hosted SaaS only; a mandatory self-hosted or on-premise deployment requirement is a material mismatch.
- The ongoing free tier's one-domain allowance and 14-day retention do not cover the complete migration scenario or its 90-day review window.
- Automatic import of Agari history, sender approvals, and custom settings is not established by the available documentation; confirm migration options and preserve exports.
Verdict
Try Suped, free
02.
OnDMARC
4.8 / 5(104)OnDMARC has hosted authentication through Dynamic Services and a separate investigation workflow. We focus on the DMARC package and its limits when comparing it with an Agari replacement.
#2
our rank
$9/month, billed annually
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
Dynamic Services cover DMARC, SPF, DKIM, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI. Express lists a ten-lookup SPF allowance; unlimited Dynamic SPF starts with Essentials.
User experience
The migration involves replacing hosted DNS references and reviewing sender results in the new account. Express retains 30 days, so it cannot preserve the full 90-day scenario in its own reporting history.
Support
Guidance is tier dependent, and the public support matrix needs entitlement confirmation. We have no measured onboarding or response-time comparison.
Suitability
For Agari switchers, the relevant package must cover the existing hosted records and retained history. Existing use of Red Sift services is a purchasing consideration, but does not establish an advantage for the DMARC migration itself.
Who should use OnDMARC
- Agari switchers comparing documented hosted authentication with explicit SPF and history limits.
- Teams evaluating the cost of replacing delegated records alongside DMARC reporting.
Pricing structure
- Express starts at $9/month billed annually, with up to four domains, one million monthly emails, and 30 days of history.
- Essentials pricing is Not publicly listed; it lists 25 active sender domains, unlimited parked domains, unlimited email volume, and one year of history.
- Enterprise and Premier prices are Not publicly listed. A 14-day trial is temporary access, not an ongoing free tier.
Strengths
- The published package describes both record hosting and investigation functions relevant to an authentication handoff.
- Active sender domains and parked domains are separately described on the higher packages.
Trade-offs
- Express history is shorter than the 90-day scenario, and its SPF allowance needs checking against the existing record.
- Higher package prices and precise support entitlements require confirmation before comparing total migration cost.
Verdict
View OnDMARC alternatives
03.
PowerDMARC
4.9 / 5(234)PowerDMARC combines DMARC reporting with hosted authentication services. We would map every Agari-hosted dependency to a specific tier or add-on before comparing costs.
#3
our rank
$6.42/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Basic includes RUA and RUF processing, sender identification, hosted DMARC, and hosted MTA-STS/TLS-RPT. Hosted SPF is an add-on on Basic, while hosted DKIM is included in the custom Enterprise package.
User experience
Basic lists bulk domain addition, domain groups, and roles. Alert management, CSV report export, and API access are outside Basic, which affects migration validation and ongoing exception handling.
Support
Basic lists video tutorials, with email support and setup assistance sold as add-ons. Enterprise lists email support, screen-sharing sessions, and an SLA commitment, with final scope confirmed by quote.
Suitability
Agari switchers need to compare the complete hosted-service package with the existing contract. The Partner Program has a multi-tenant control panel, but its commercial terms are custom.
Who should use PowerDMARC
- Teams checking the combined price of DMARC monitoring, hosted SPF, and hosted DKIM migration.
- Existing partners reviewing the specific tenant, API, and support entitlements of their agreement.
Pricing structure
- Basic starts at $8/month on monthly billing, or $6.42/month billed yearly at the lowest published volume band, covering 10,001 to 50,000 compliant emails.
- At 100,000 compliant emails, Basic is $15/month or $12/month billed yearly. It includes five active domains, two platform users, and one year of history.
- The ongoing personal-only free tier includes one active domain, 10,000 compliant emails per month, and ten days of history. Basic has a separate 15-day trial.
- Enterprise, API, and Partner Program prices are Not publicly listed. Confirm hosted SPF and support add-on charges.
Strengths
- The public comparison identifies which authentication services require an add-on or a higher package.
- Pricing counts compliant outbound mail rather than charging for phishing or invalid messages.
Trade-offs
- Basic excludes alert management, API access, and CSV report export.
- Hosted DKIM and the full hosted-service combination require custom packaging; the Basic price alone does not cover that migration scope.
Verdict
View PowerDMARC alternatives
04.
EasyDMARC
4.8 / 5(165)EasyDMARC has reporting and managed authentication packages with distinct volume and feature gates. An Agari migration needs the package matching the existing hosted services and administrative controls.
#4
our rank
$35.99/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Plus includes vendor identification, failure reports, managed DMARC, and subdomain detection. Managed SPF and MTA-STS start at Premium; managed DKIM, API access, and SSO are Enterprise or MSP capabilities.
User experience
Plus includes one invited user; Premium adds permissions, groups, and unlimited users. Review the marketing subdomain and domain allowance before moving the complete Agari inventory.
Support
Plus lists knowledge-base access, while Premium includes email support and a customer-success manager on annual billing. Enterprise and MSP packages list a dedicated DMARC engineer.
Suitability
Agari switchers need to map the required managed records to a specific package. Existing DNS or SIEM integration use is a narrow workflow consideration, with the required integrations and tier confirmed individually.
Who should use EasyDMARC
- Agari switchers auditing where managed authentication and administrative controls sit in the price table.
- Existing customers verifying whether their current integration entitlement covers the proposed DMARC migration.
Pricing structure
- Plus starts at $44.99/month, or $35.99/month billed annually, for 100,000 monthly emails, two domains, and three months of history.
- Premium starts at $89.99/month, or $71.99/month billed annually, for 100,000 monthly emails, four domains, and one year of history.
- Free includes one domain, 1,000 emails per month, 14 days of history, and one user. Enterprise and MSP pricing is Not publicly listed.
- Prices exclude taxes. If volume exceeds the chosen quota, the published policy removes report and dashboard access until an upgrade.
Strengths
- The tier descriptions identify the point where managed DMARC expands to SPF and transport-policy management.
- Vendor identification and failure reporting support comparison with an exported Agari sender inventory.
Trade-offs
- Plus includes two domains and one invited user; managed DKIM and API access require different packaging.
- Volume-dependent prices and loss of report access above quota need budgeting before a reporting overlap.
Verdict
View EasyDMARC alternatives
05.
Valimail
4.6 / 5(441)Valimail separates free monitoring from paid authentication management. The difference matters when leaving Agari with both reporting and hosted-record responsibilities.
#5
our rank
$5,000/year
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Monitor provides sender discovery and pass/fail visibility, but no SPF/DKIM sender-management workflow. Enforce adds hosted authentication automation, with subdomain management and reporting starting at Premium.
User experience
The free view cannot show source IP data or downloadable reports. We would confirm the paid tier's investigation detail before using it to classify unfamiliar Agari sources.
Support
Enforce Starter lists onboarding assistance and an account manager. Technical account management and enhanced support have separate add-on terms on higher packages.
Suitability
For an Agari migration, the scope distinction is Monitor's reporting visibility versus paid Enforce's authentication management. Free visibility alone does not cover the hosted-record handoff.
Who should use Valimail
- Agari switchers distinguishing a reporting trial from a production authentication-management subscription.
- Teams confirming subdomain reporting, source IP visibility, and export access in the same written proposal.
Pricing structure
- Monitor is an ongoing $0 tier, with five users and roles; it is not a time-limited trial.
- Enforce Starter starts at $5,000/year. Current official inclusions do not provide a complete domain, sending-service, or monthly-volume allowance table.
- Enforce Premium and Enterprise prices are Not publicly listed. Confirm subdomain coverage, retention, API add-ons, and support costs in the quote.
Strengths
- The public packaging makes the distinction between sender visibility and authentication management explicit.
- Paid Enforce documents automated authentication functions relevant to replacing hosted records.
Trade-offs
- Free monitoring excludes downloads, source IP data, and SPF/DKIM sender management.
- Subdomain management starts at Premium, and full migration pricing requires confirmation of unpublished allowances and add-ons.
Verdict
View Valimail alternatives
06.
Dmarcian
3.5 / 5(5)Dmarcian publishes reporting plans with explicit domain, volume, and history allowances. We would check separately how any existing Agari-hosted records will be maintained.
#6
our rank
$19.99/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
The documented base includes source enrichment, subdomain detection, RUA processing, and TLS reporting. Alert Central and forensic reporting start on Basic.
User experience
Domain groups organize reporting, while access controls arrive on Plus. Basic's one-user allowance needs checking against the DNS approver and sender-owner workflow.
Support
A 30-day trial is documented, but we have no measured support comparison. Confirm onboarding ownership and assistance with hosted-record migration in the purchase scope.
Suitability
Dmarcian's active-domain and legitimate-message model affects the cost of an inventory containing active and parked domains. Agari switchers also need a documented owner for each hosted-record dependency.
Who should use Dmarcian
- Agari switchers evaluating reporting costs using explicit active-domain and legitimate-message allowances.
- Teams mapping domain groups and user access to the people responsible for each sender.
Pricing structure
- Basic is $24/month, or $19.99/month billed annually, for two active domains, 100,000 monthly legitimate messages, one user, and three months of history.
- Plus is $240/month, or $199/month billed annually, for eight active domains, one million monthly messages, three users, and one year of history.
- Enterprise is $600/month, or $499/month billed annually, for 15 active domains and five million monthly messages, with unlimited users and history, plus API and SSO.
- The ongoing personal-only free plan covers two active domains, 1,250 monthly messages, and one month of history. It is not licensed for business domains.
Strengths
- Public allowances cover active domains, users, message volume, and retention.
- Forwarded and fraudulent traffic are excluded from the stated legitimate-message pricing basis.
Trade-offs
- Basic has one user, while access controls and API/SSO are gated to different higher tiers.
- The published plan descriptions do not establish a like-for-like hosted SPF and hosted DKIM replacement; verify those dependencies separately.
Verdict
View Dmarcian alternatives
07.
Sendmarc
4.9 / 5(42)Sendmarc distinguishes guided configuration from managed authentication in its paid packages. We would compare the contracted work against the actual Agari responsibilities being transferred.
#7
our rank
Not publicly listed
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
Advanced lists DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and BIMI configuration, failure reports, and MTA-STS/TLS reporting. Premium changes authentication configuration to management and adds managed-service offerings.
User experience
Advanced separates four active domains and four parked domains, with unlimited subdomains. The partner offering documents tenant management, so verify account separation under the proposed contract.
Support
Advanced includes email and knowledge-base support. Premium adds managed-service scope, with the required meetings and implementation responsibilities confirmed in writing.
Suitability
Agari switchers need to distinguish software access from contracted authentication work. An existing partner relationship is a commercial detail, not evidence that its DMARC workflow is more suitable.
Who should use Sendmarc
- Agari switchers documenting which authentication tasks remain internal and which tasks a contract includes.
- Existing partners confirming tenant access and the active-versus-parked domain treatment in their agreement.
Pricing structure
- Paid prices are Not publicly listed. The free trial includes one domain, up to 5,000 email records, 21 days of history, and one portal user; it is not a confirmed ongoing free tier.
- Advanced lists four active domains, four parked domains, five portal users, and 12 months of history; the public volume wording spans 100,000 records to five million emails.
- Premium lists unlimited emails, domains, users, and history. Confirm how records are counted and what the quoted management scope includes.
Strengths
- Configuration and ongoing management are differentiated in the package descriptions.
- Parked-domain and subdomain coverage are explicitly described for migration inventory planning.
Trade-offs
- No public paid price supports a reliable cost comparison with the outgoing Agari contract.
- The Advanced volume wording and the details of managed work require written clarification.
Verdict
View Sendmarc alternatives
08.
DMARC Report
4.8 / 5(467)DMARC Report publishes separate tiers for reporting, transport functions, and enforcement assistance. An Agari switch needs confirmation of the quota unit and the tier covering parked domains.
#8
our rank
$25/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Guard adds sender identification, failure reports, and group permissions. Shield adds parked-domain coverage, MTA-STS/TLS-RPT, API access, and email support plus alerts.
User experience
We would use source-level reports to reconcile the old sender inventory and confirm the permissions model during onboarding. Hosted SPF and DKIM migration coverage is not established by the published plan descriptions.
Support
Email support starts at Shield and advanced support at Defender in the plan material. Ultimate includes a dedicated DMARC engineer and assisted enforcement, with its billing period requiring confirmation.
Suitability
Agari switchers need to map reporting, parked-domain coverage, and assistance to the proposed tier. The complete corporate, marketing, and parked-domain scenario requires checking more than the Guard entry price.
Who should use DMARC Report
- Agari switchers checking sender identification, group permissions, and parked-domain coverage together.
- Teams confirming the cost and deliverables of optional enforcement assistance.
Pricing structure
- Guard is $25/month or $275/year, with five domains and six months of history. Its published quota is 250,000 monthly units; confirm whether the contract counts reports or represented messages.
- Shield is $75/month or $750/year, with ten domains and one year of history. Defender is $200/month or $2,000/year, with 25 domains.
- Core is an ongoing free tier for one domain with 30 days of history. Confirm its volume cap because published pricing materials have used conflicting figures and terminology.
- Paid plans have a 30-day trial. Ultimate displays $3,900 without a clear billing period in the available material, so obtain the complete contract price.
Strengths
- The tier cards identify when sender identification, group permissions, and parked-domain coverage become available.
- Guard and above provide history longer than the shared 90-day scenario.
Trade-offs
- Entry pricing does not include the Shield features needed for the documented parked-domain and alerting workflow.
- Quota terminology, conflicting domain-limit wording, and the Ultimate billing period need confirmation before purchase.
Verdict
View DMARC Report alternatives
09.
MailHardener
0 / 5(0)Mailhardener documents DMARC aggregation alongside transport-policy hosting and DNS monitoring. G2 review data was unavailable.
#9
our rank
EUR 199/year
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Standard includes RUA/RUF aggregation, SMTP TLS aggregation, hosted MTA-STS, BIMI asset hosting, and DNS monitoring. Hosted SPF and DKIM replacement is not established by those plan inclusions.
User experience
The regular subscription has one shared environment, while the MSP program provides isolated customer environments. That distinction needs checking when recreating Agari access boundaries.
Support
Standard has self-service onboarding and technical support. Large adds limited onboarding assistance; assisted onboarding and custom SLA options are described separately for Enterprise.
Suitability
An Agari switch needs separate confirmation of the record-management scope beyond DMARC aggregation. Existing use of Mailhardener's hosted MTA-STS is a narrow dependency to account for during a change.
Who should use MailHardener
- Agari switchers comparing DMARC reporting with SMTP TLS reporting and hosted MTA-STS.
- Teams checking whether a shared environment or isolated customer environments match their current access boundaries.
Pricing structure
- Standard is EUR 19/month or EUR 199/year, covering up to ten domains, unlimited users, unlimited report volume, and three months of retention.
- Large is EUR 99/month or EUR 999/year, covering up to 100 domains and 12 months of retention. Enterprise pricing is Not publicly listed.
- Free is for personal or evaluation use, with one domain, one user, fair-use report volume, and one month of retention.
- The MSP model is EUR 149/month plus EUR 1 per domain per month, or USD 164/month plus USD 1.10 per domain per month.
Strengths
- The Standard plan explicitly combines DMARC aggregation with transport-policy hosting.
- The published MSP model distinguishes customer environments and shows the base fee plus per-domain charge.
Trade-offs
- An ordinary shared environment is different from the isolated customer environments in the MSP program.
- The plan cards do not establish hosted SPF and hosted DKIM migration coverage; verify these separately before removing existing dependencies.
Verdict
View MailHardener alternatives
10.
URIports
0 / 5(0)URIports processes DMARC and TLS reports using report-count quotas rather than sent-message quotas. G2 review data was unavailable.
#10
our rank
$15/year (personal use only)
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
Subscriptions include report analysis, source enrichment, automatic subdomain detection, and JSON/CSV exports. Hosted MTA-STS and DNS monitoring start at Pebble Plus.
User experience
Search and filtering support inspection of report data, but the quota is shared with other accepted report types. DMARC quota planning therefore needs an inventory of other reports already collected in the account.
Support
Product support is included, while custom Enterprise proposals describe dedicated onboarding and specialist support. Confirm the assistance included for the planned authentication handoff.
Suitability
Agari switchers need an estimate of report counts and the required retention window. Existing collection of other report types changes the remaining quota available for DMARC.
Who should use URIports
- Agari switchers estimating report counts and retention before choosing a subscription.
- Existing URIports users checking how other accepted reports affect DMARC processing headroom.
Pricing structure
- Sand is $15/year for personal use, with three domains, 10,000 reports per month, and 30 days of retention. It is not the commercial migration price.
- Pebble is $7/month or $72/year, with five domains, 100,000 reports per month, and 30 days of retention. Pebble Plus is $13/month or $144/year.
- Mountain is $133/month or $1,440/year, with 100 domains, 2.5 million reports per month, and 90 days of retention. Custom retention is available by proposal.
- There is a one-month trial and no published ongoing free tier. Email volume is unlimited, but report quotas still apply and processing stops when the quota is reached.
Strengths
- Public prices distinguish report quota, domain allowance, and retention.
- Exports and source enrichment support reconciliation of unknown senders during a migration.
Trade-offs
- The lower tiers retain only 30 days, so they do not preserve the full 90-day scenario within the service.
- Unlimited email volume does not mean unlimited report processing; quota exhaustion stops new processing.
- Hosted DMARC, SPF, and DKIM replacement is not established by the published plan descriptions.
Verdict
View URIports alternatives
11.
DMARCly
0 / 5(0)DMARCly publishes monthly plans with defined domain, compliant-message, and retention allowances. G2 review data was unavailable.
#11
our rank
$17.99/month
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
Professional includes RUA/RUF reporting, vendor identification, alerts, and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT. Safe SPF begins on Growth, with API access and SAML SSO on Enterprise.
User experience
Domain groups and the DNS timeline help organize investigation, while administrator limits vary by tier. Professional retains two months, shorter than the shared migration window.
Support
Professional lists email support, with live chat on Growth and above. We have no measured support interaction or implementation-time evidence.
Suitability
An Agari migration needs budget headroom for the published volume-upgrade rules and separate Safe SPF allowances. Existing Safe SPF use is a specific record dependency to inventory during a transition.
Who should use DMARCly
- Agari switchers comparing monthly billing, administrator allowances, and a documented volume-upgrade policy.
- Teams confirming the number of domains requiring Safe SPF rather than assuming every monitored domain includes it.
Pricing structure
- Professional is $17.99/month for two domains, 100,000 compliant messages per month, two months of history, and one administrator.
- Growth is $39.99/month for eight domains, 250,000 compliant messages, four months of history, three administrators, and one Safe SPF domain.
- Business is $69/month; Enterprise is $199/month with 200 domains, five million compliant messages, one year of history, and four Safe SPF domains.
- There is a 14-day trial and no ongoing free tier. Volume above a plan allowance triggers the corresponding higher-plan charge; above five million messages, the published charge is $10 per additional million.
- Extra monitored domains cost $1 each, while extra Safe SPF domains cost $10 each beyond the plan allowance.
Strengths
- The pricing page states message, domain, and Safe SPF overage rules.
- Vendor identification and DNS history provide documented inputs for sender investigations.
Trade-offs
- Professional's two-month history and one-administrator limit do not cover the complete shared workflow.
- Safe SPF domains have their own allowance; API access and SAML SSO require Enterprise.
- The plan descriptions do not establish hosted DKIM and hosted DMARC replacement coverage.
Verdict
View DMARCly alternatives
Move your Agari DMARC workflow to Suped
Suped
Get started
Verify senders before policy changes
Use verified and unverified source states with detailed authentication checks to reconcile the sender inventory and investigate failures during the transition.
Plan the hosted DNS handoff
Map existing dependencies to Suped's hosted DMARC, hosted SPF with flattening, and hosted DKIM, then validate the replacement records before retiring old hosting.
Match access and budget to scope
Choose published subscriptions, negotiated Enterprise capacity, or per-domain MSP terms, with roles, SAML SSO, and client organizations considered in the migration plan.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from another platform?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
How we keep this ranking honest
We apply the same domain inventory and 90-day scenario to every entry, checking published pricing and documented functionality against the work involved in leaving Agari. Suped is our product, and we explain its documented strengths alongside its deployment limits and unresolved import questions. We distinguish included functions from add-ons, trials from ongoing free tiers, and known plan limits from quote-dependent terms. G2 averages are attributed to G2 and expressed out of five, using the review figures available for this comparison; products without review data have no G2 average available. Prices and review totals are snapshots. Our review process checks recommendation order, plan boundaries, and evidence before publication, and calls out unresolved terms for confirmation before purchase. We do not infer missing functionality solely because a public plan description omits it.
Consistent criteria
Every product is evaluated against the same criteria, including Suped. We compare capabilities, costs and practical trade-offs.
Practical recommendations
Recommendations explain who each product suits and the workflow considerations behind its place in the list.
Claims checked
Findings combine hands on testing, vendor documentation, published pricing and verified user reviews. Pricing reflects public plans as of the dates shown.
Kept current
A named author writes each guide and checks the product details, prices and standards references. We recheck pages on a fixed schedule.
