8 best Valimail alternatives in 2026
We recommend Suped first among Valimail alternatives for its combination of sender verification, authentication drilldowns, and hosted DMARC, SPF, and DKIM management. Suped is our product. For teams switching, the buying decision includes preserving DNS authentication and enforcement, budgeting for every domain, and rebuilding reporting access. Suped is hosted SaaS, with no self-hosted or on-premise edition. We compare DMARC functionality only; unrelated security or deliverability capabilities need their own evaluation.
Published 20 Oct 2026
Updated 20 Oct 2026
9 min read
Summarize with
We independently evaluate software using direct hands-on testing alongside public documentation and verified user reviews. Missed a tool worth covering? Tell us about it.
What matters when replacing Valimail
Sender classification before enforcement
01.
Suped separates verified and unverified sources, with record-level SPF, DKIM, and DMARC checks. We recommend this workflow for confirming legitimate senders before changing policy. A recognized provider name is useful context, but an unknown source still needs an owner and authentication checks before authorization.
DNS continuity during the switch
02.
Valimail's offboarding documentation calls for capturing enabled services, preserving DKIM keys, and replacing provider-dependent DNS records. Suped has hosted DMARC, SPF, and DKIM management after initial DNS configuration. We recommend mapping each existing dependency to its replacement before removing delegations or ending service.
Budget and account separation
03.
Suped Basic is $19/month for 100,000 emails and two domains, with 90 days of retention. Enterprise terms are negotiable, and MSP pricing is $7 per domain per month with unlimited email volume and retention. Organization management and user roles support separate client workflows. Count separately monitored subdomains and confirm their treatment before choosing a plan.
8 products at a glance
| ||
|---|---|---|
01. | Suped | |
02. | OnDMARC | |
03. | EasyDMARC | |
04. | PowerDMARC | |
05. | Dmarcian | |
06. | Sendmarc | |
07. | MailHardener | |
08. | DMARC Report |
How we tested all 8 products
Our shared evaluation framework uses a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain over a 90-day monitoring window, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and one support desk sender. We assess documented pricing, included domains and email volume, report quotas, sender classification, and hosted protocol coverage. Authentication cases include aligned SPF pass, aligned DKIM pass, SPF pass with a visible From domain mismatch, DKIM pass using a subdomain, forwarding with SPF failure, an unauthorized spoof sample, and an unknown sender needing classification. The expected checks distinguish authentication from domain matching: either aligned SPF or aligned DKIM is sufficient for DMARC; a subdomain match depends on relaxed versus strict settings; forwarding needs surviving aligned DKIM when SPF fails. A spoof that fails both paths is a DMARC failure, while an unknown sender needs owner confirmation before authorization. We also examine onboarding instructions, DNS handoff, policy enforcement controls, report drilldowns, alerts, account separation, retention, and documented support entitlements. Our findings use vendor documentation, published commercial details, and G2 review aggregates. The 90-day window is the evaluation design, not a claim that we ran all eight products for 90 days. We report no measured setup times, support response times, or comparative pass rates, and identify unclear plan terms for confirmation.
8
products evaluated
90
day live test window
3
domains tested
6
edge cases per tool
The test rig
We ran every platform against one controlled environment for 90 days: a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain and a parked domain. Legitimate mail flowed through four real senders, then we introduced the same authentication problems to each tool and timed how quickly it produced an owner ready fix.
Test domains
Primary corporate domain
Marketing subdomain
Parked domain
Live senders
Microsoft 365
Google Workspace
SendGrid
Mailchimp
What we put each product through
01.
Onboard all three domains and reach a verified DMARC state.
02.
Resolve an unknown sender from report evidence alone.
03.
Explain a forwarded mail SPF failure that still passed DKIM.
04.
Triage a spoofing sample sent to the parked domain.
05.
Move a domain from p=none toward p=reject safely.
06.
Flatten an SPF record nearing the ten lookup limit.
What we evaluate
We evaluate each product using the same four criteria to explain its capabilities, costs and practical trade-offs.
Pricing and value
01.
Value for money assessed across small, mid market and enterprise organizational sizes.
Technical features
02.
Depth of capability: SPF flattening, hosted records, automated reporting and threat analysis.
Support quality
03.
Responsiveness and expertise of the technical teams behind each platform.
Ease of use
04.
Speed of setup and quality of ongoing day to day operating experience.
Where each leader wins and where it lags
All 8 products, with the same breakdown for each: who it suits, its best features, pricing, and the honest trade-offs.
01.
Suped
5 / 5(55)Suped is our number-one recommendation because its documented workflow connects source verification with detailed authentication investigation and hosted record changes. That is a concrete replacement path for Valimail users who need more than a new destination for aggregate reports. We recommend starting with a reporting overlap, preserving the existing DMARC policy, and moving hosted DNS dependencies only after the replacement records are ready. G2 lists Suped at 5.0 out of five across 55 reviews.
#1
our rank
$19/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Suped's product combines DMARC aggregate reporting with hosted authentication management. The practical switching workflow starts by adding each domain, configuring reporting, and verifying that reports are arriving. Verified and unverified source states give administrators a way to record which senders have been confirmed. Hosted DMARC allows policy changes through the dashboard after DNS configuration; hosted SPF and SPF flattening address sender authorization and the lookup limit. Hosted DKIM supports TXT and CNAME selectors. Hosted MTA-STS/TLS-RPT covers transport policy and TLS delivery reporting separately from DMARC. We recommend replacing each Valimail-hosted dependency deliberately, with legitimate senders checked before enforcement changes.
User experience
The useful path through Suped is source review, filtered data, then individual record details. Data view supports filters for source, reporter, and IP address, plus CSV downloads. Detail view exposes SPF, DKIM, and DMARC results with rDNS checks, which helps investigate a sender that passes SPF under a different domain or a forwarded message that relies on DKIM. Notifications cover DMARC failures and summary emails. Organization switching and user roles support work across client accounts without treating all customer domains as one administrative group.
Support
Our documentation covers domain setup, reporting verification, issue resolution, and hosted record management. For a Valimail migration, we recommend agreeing on who prepares replacement DNS records and who approves the cutover, then confirming the support scope for that work. Enterprise buyers can negotiate their package alongside domain allowances and retention. We do not infer a response-time commitment from G2 feedback or the presence of a support channel; onboarding responsibilities and escalation terms belong in the agreed service scope.
Suitability
We recommend Suped for organizations replacing Valimail's reporting or hosted authentication workflows and accepting a SaaS deployment. Enterprise portfolios can use negotiated allowances, while MSPs have per-domain pricing and separate organizations. SAML SSO and API documentation support evaluation of identity and automation requirements; confirm their commercial inclusion in the selected package. Suped is also relevant when the migration includes client reporting or PSA issue workflows, with documented ConnectWise PSA, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrations. It is not an on-premise option.
Who should use Suped
- Organizations replacing Valimail reporting and hosted authentication while keeping ownership of DNS approvals and sender authorization.
- Enterprise teams evaluating negotiated domain and volume allowances, SAML SSO, and API workflows in a hosted service.
- MSPs that need separate client organizations, monthly client reports, and documented PSA integrations.
- Teams that want to investigate unknown senders and forwarding failures before changing enforcement policy.
Pricing structure
- Free includes one domain, 1,000 emails per month, and 14 days of retention. The initial 14-day trial has no usage limits; those trial terms are separate from the ongoing free allowance.
- Basic is $19/month for two domains, 100,000 emails per month, and 90 days of retention.
- A published $29/month option includes three domains, 250,000 emails per month, and 365 days of retention. Confirm whether the marketing subdomain needs a separate monitored entry.
- Pro is $99/month for ten domains, one million emails per month, and 365 days of retention.
- Enterprise pricing is negotiated, with allowances negotiable up to unlimited. Confirm the agreed identity, API, and support entitlements.
- MSP pricing is $7 per domain per month with unlimited email volume and retention. Budget using the portfolio's billable domain count.
Strengths
- Source verification and individual authentication details support sender-by-sender review during a Valimail migration.
- Hosted record management covers DMARC, SPF, and DKIM without requiring a separate platform for each of those documented functions.
- Public business allowances make it possible to budget domain count and retained history before moving production reporting.
- Separate organizations, user roles, and documented client reporting support continuing operations after the cutover.
Trade-offs
- The free plan's 14-day history cannot retain a full 90-day monitoring window.
- Basic includes two domains, so a corporate domain, separately counted marketing subdomain, and parked domain require a plan check.
- Initial DNS changes and sender-side authentication configuration remain necessary; hosted management does not remove that migration work.
- Suped is hosted SaaS and has no self-hosted or on-premise edition.
Verdict
Try Suped, free
02.
OnDMARC
4.8 / 5(104)OnDMARC has documented hosted authentication coverage, but Express retains only 30 days of data. We compare the package required for a 90-day migration with Suped's reporting and hosted authentication workflow.
#2
our rank
$9/month, billed annually
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
OnDMARC lists Dynamic Services for DMARC, SPF, DKIM, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI. Its DMARC scope also includes source investigation, forensic reporting, and smart alerts.
User experience
Dynamic Services places hosted record changes in the application after DNS setup. We would validate source investigation and Event Hub event handling during a reporting overlap, without assuming that Valimail classifications transfer.
Support
Support entitlement varies by package. Confirm the onboarding scope and escalation route in writing before scheduling the DNS cutover, including which listed support channels apply to the chosen plan.
Suitability
OnDMARC belongs in a comparison of hosted authentication coverage and event integrations. If an organization already uses Red Sift Event Hub integrations, the specific cost of changing those integrations is a relevant workflow consideration.
Who should use OnDMARC
- Teams checking the exact Dynamic Services coverage required to replace existing Valimail DNS dependencies.
- Organizations validating an existing Event Hub integration as part of the migration's reporting requirements.
Pricing structure
- Express starts at $9/month billed annually, with up to four domains, one million monthly emails, 30 days of history, and up to ten SPF lookups.
- Essentials, Enterprise, and Premier prices are Not publicly listed. Essentials lists one year of history and 25 active sender domains, with expansion available.
- A 14-day trial is available without a credit card. It is not an ongoing free tier.
- Confirm how the active and parked domain allowances apply to the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain before comparing totals.
Strengths
- Published hosted protocol coverage makes DNS replacement requirements identifiable before a migration.
- Express publishes domain, email volume, and history allowances instead of leaving every entry-plan limit unspecified.
Trade-offs
- Express does not retain the full 90-day evaluation window in the application.
- The current prices for packages above Express are Not publicly listed.
- Express's SPF allowance needs checking against the existing sender configuration; it is not the unlimited Dynamic SPF entitlement listed higher up.
- Support rows need package confirmation rather than an assumption that every listed service is included.
Verdict
View OnDMARC alternatives
03.
EasyDMARC
4.8 / 5(165)EasyDMARC's starting package covers two domains and 100,000 monthly emails, but a hosted authentication replacement needs an inclusion check. We compare only its DMARC scope with Suped.
#3
our rank
$35.99/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
EasyDMARC lists managed DMARC, sender identification, and aggregate and failure reporting. Its paid packaging places managed SPF and MTA-STS alongside further authentication controls in higher packages.
User experience
Sender identification and subdomain detection are relevant to rebuilding the Valimail sender inventory. We recommend confirming each sender's authenticated domain in the investigation workflow, rather than accepting a provider label as authorization.
Support
Premium lists email support and a customer success manager with annual billing. Confirm whether DNS migration work is included, and distinguish that work from general product guidance.
Suitability
EasyDMARC is relevant when comparing its documented managed DMARC and SPF packaging with the records currently delegated to Valimail. We would assess the required package and domain expansion before treating the entry price as the replacement budget.
Who should use EasyDMARC
- Teams checking whether managed DMARC alone covers their existing Valimail setup or whether hosted SPF and other authentication services are also required.
- Organizations reconciling active domains and separately monitored subdomains against the published two-domain and four-domain packages.
Pricing structure
- Free includes one domain, 1,000 emails per month, and 14 days of history. Trial access is separate from these ongoing limits.
- Plus starts at $44.99/month, or $35.99/month billed annually, for two domains, 100,000 monthly emails, and three months of history.
- Premium starts at $89.99/month, or $71.99/month billed annually, for four domains, 100,000 monthly emails, and one year of history.
- Email volume changes paid pricing. Confirm the price for the actual sender volume and any extra domains, rather than budgeting solely from the entry allowance.
- Custom package prices are Not publicly listed. Confirm API, SSO, managed DKIM, and the support scope on the selected package.
Strengths
- The published entry packages state domain, email volume, and history allowances relevant to a reporting migration.
- Managed authentication and reporting capabilities can be checked against specific records in the existing DNS setup.
Trade-offs
- Plus's two-domain allowance needs a scope check for a separately monitored marketing subdomain and parked domain.
- Managed SPF and MTA-STS require more than the entry paid package in the documented plan structure.
- Additional domains need a sales conversation, so expansion costs are not established by the starting price.
- Confirm the effect of exceeding the email allowance on reporting access and the commercial inclusion of identity and API controls.
Verdict
View EasyDMARC alternatives
04.
PowerDMARC
4.9 / 5(234)PowerDMARC's entry price is tied to compliant outbound volume, and Basic does not include every hosted authentication function. The relevant Valimail replacement budget includes all required hosted records and service add-ons.
#4
our rank
$6.42/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
PowerDMARC Basic includes hosted DMARC, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI with aggregate and failure reports. Hosted SPF is an add-on on Basic, while hosted DKIM is listed in quote-based packages.
User experience
Sender identification, automatic subdomain detection, and the DNS timeline support rebuilding a domain inventory. Raw XML download and upload are included on Basic, but CSV export and alert management need a package check.
Support
Basic lists tutorials, with email support and setup assistance among its add-ons. Enterprise lists email support and an SLA commitment; confirm the exact migration assistance and any separate charges.
Suitability
PowerDMARC is a comparison point for buyers checking raw XML handling and hosted authentication packaging. We would establish the cost of SPF, DKIM, and migration assistance together before comparing it with Suped.
Who should use PowerDMARC
- Teams validating a requirement to download or upload raw DMARC XML during the monitoring transition.
- Organizations mapping each existing Valimail-hosted record to Basic, an add-on, or a quoted entitlement.
Pricing structure
- Free is restricted to personal domains and includes one active domain, 10,000 compliant emails per month, and ten days of history.
- Basic starts at $8/month, or $6.42/month billed annually, at the 10,001 to 50,000 compliant-email band. It includes five active domains, two users, and one year of history.
- At 100,000 monthly emails, Basic is $15/month or $12/month billed annually. The published monthly range for Basic reaches $250 as volume increases.
- Basic has a 15-day trial. Hosted SPF, extra domains, and several support services require separate confirmation or add-on pricing.
- Enterprise, API, and Partner Program prices are Not publicly listed. Partner packaging includes multi-tenant management, but is separate from Basic.
Strengths
- Basic's one-year history covers the proposed 90-day review window.
- The compliant-email pricing definition excludes phishing and invalid traffic according to the published policy.
Trade-offs
- Basic's starting price excludes hosted SPF and hosted DKIM as a complete combined replacement scope.
- Alert management, CSV export, and API access are not included on Basic in the documented matrix.
- Basic's listed support and setup add-ons need to be included in the migration budget.
- The permanent free plan is personal-use only and has insufficient history for a 90-day monitoring window.
Verdict
View PowerDMARC alternatives
05.
Dmarcian
3.5 / 5(5)dmarcian's commercial entry plan covers two active domains and 100,000 monthly legitimate reported messages. We assess its source-reporting workflow separately from the hosted DNS services that need replacement.
#5
our rank
$19.99/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
dmarcian documents aggregate reporting enriched with source information, automatic subdomain detection, and TLS reporting. Basic adds alerting and failure report processing, while API access and SSO are listed higher in the plan structure.
User experience
Source enrichment and domain groups support organizing the sender inventory after leaving Valimail. We would check the relevant report fields and group permissions using the same corporate and marketing-domain cases.
Support
The G2 sample contains mixed accounts of usability and support, with only five reviews in the aggregate. Confirm the contracted onboarding and troubleshooting scope instead of treating that small sample as a response-time commitment.
Suitability
dmarcian is relevant to a reporting-focused comparison where source enrichment and domain groups need evaluation. Its reporting subscription should not be assumed to replace Valimail's hosted SPF and DKIM dependencies without confirmation.
Who should use Dmarcian
- Teams comparing source-enriched DMARC reporting while preparing an explicit replacement plan for any hosted authentication records.
- Organizations checking whether domain groups and the required access controls are included at their intended allowance.
Pricing structure
- Personal is free for non-business use only, with up to two active domains, 1,250 monthly DMARC-capable messages, and one month of history.
- Basic is $24/month or $19.99/month billed annually, with two active domains, 100,000 monthly messages, one user, and three months of history.
- Plus is $240/month or $199/month billed annually, with eight active domains, one million monthly messages, three users, and one year of history.
- Enterprise is $600/month or $499/month billed annually, with 15 active domains, five million monthly messages, unlimited users, API access, and SSO.
- A 30-day paid-plan trial is available. Pricing counts legitimate reported traffic rather than forwarded or fraudulent traffic; custom allowances require a quote.
Strengths
- The public pricing table distinguishes legitimate message volume, active domains, users, and retained history.
- Published domain-group and access-control differences make permission requirements identifiable before purchase.
Trade-offs
- Basic has one user and two active domains, which restricts the account scope available at the entry commercial price.
- API access and SSO are absent from Basic and Plus in the published matrix.
- The non-business Personal plan cannot fund a commercial Valimail replacement.
- Reporting and authentication checks alone do not establish an equivalent replacement for existing hosted SPF or DKIM records.
Verdict
View Dmarcian alternatives
06.
Sendmarc
4.9 / 5(42)Sendmarc publishes managed authentication scope but no exact current paid starting price. A Valimail replacement therefore needs a quote covering the records being migrated and the work included.
#6
our rank
Not publicly listed
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
Sendmarc Premium lists DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and BIMI management, aggregate and failure reports, and MTA-STS/TLS reporting. Managed service offerings are part of the documented Premium scope, with exact execution responsibilities requiring a quote.
User experience
The product documents sender identification and authentication configuration workflows. We would check the export fields and notification behavior needed to preserve operational reporting after Valimail, rather than assume identical reports.
Support
Published support information includes email and knowledge base access, with managed services and training in higher packaging. Confirm the assigned migration tasks and meeting cadence rather than treating individual G2 experiences as standard contract terms.
Suitability
Sendmarc is relevant to a comparison of software entitlements and explicitly contracted DMARC implementation work. We would require a written DNS handoff plan and complete price before comparing that scope with Suped.
Who should use Sendmarc
- Teams comparing a defined DMARC implementation statement of work with the hosted authentication workflow available in Suped.
- Organizations reconciling client access and domain allowances in a partner quote before moving reporting.
Pricing structure
- Paid starting price: Not publicly listed. Use a current quote rather than an older third-party Basic price.
- The free offer is labeled Free Trial, with one domain, up to 5,000 email records, 21 days of history, and one portal user. It is not a confirmed permanent free tier.
- Premium lists unlimited emails, domains, history, and portal users. Confirm those allowances and managed work in the order form.
- MSP pricing is Not publicly listed; published partner information describes pay-as-you-consume billing and multi-tenant operations.
Strengths
- The published managed authentication scope includes the main record types involved in leaving a hosted Valimail configuration.
- Partner material identifies multi-tenant administration and API workflows for a specific account-separation review.
Trade-offs
- No exact public paid price establishes the cost of the proposed migration.
- Trial allowances and 21-day history are insufficient for the complete domain framework and 90-day window.
- The division between platform guidance and provider-executed DNS work needs an explicit agreement.
- Report exports and notification requirements need validation against the existing workflow; individual reviews report gaps in these areas.
Verdict
View Sendmarc alternatives
07.
MailHardener
0 / 5(0)Mailhardener Standard combines DMARC and transport reporting with published domain and retention limits. No G2 reviews are available for Mailhardener.
#7
our rank
EUR 19/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Mailhardener Standard includes aggregate and failure DMARC reporting, SMTP TLS aggregation, hosted MTA-STS, BIMI asset hosting, and DNS monitoring. These are documented inclusions rather than a promise to replace every Valimail-hosted SPF or DKIM function.
User experience
The documented workflow combines DMARC and transport reporting with DNS monitoring. Standard uses a shared environment; separate client environments belong to the distinct MSP program.
Support
Standard includes technical support with self-service onboarding, while Large lists limited onboarding assistance. Confirm record-migration responsibilities and support terms for the selected subscription.
Suitability
Mailhardener is a factual comparison point for DMARC reporting combined with transport-policy hosting. Its separate MSP environment model is relevant when checking existing client-access requirements, without establishing an advantage over Suped's organization management.
Who should use MailHardener
- Teams checking the documented combination of RUA/RUF reporting and hosted MTA-STS against their authentication inventory.
- Organizations comparing the standard shared environment with separately isolated client environments in the MSP offer.
Pricing structure
- Free is for personal or evaluation use, with one domain, one user, fair-use report volume, and one month of history.
- Standard is EUR 19/month or EUR 199/year, covering up to ten domains, unlimited users and reports, and three months of history.
- Large is EUR 99/month or EUR 999/year, covering up to 100 domains, unlimited users and reports, and 12 months of history.
- Enterprise price is Not publicly listed. Confirm any tailored retention or service scope in the quote.
- MSP pricing is EUR 149/month plus EUR 1 per domain per month, or $164/month plus $1.10 per domain per month. It is a separate commercial model from Standard.
Strengths
- Standard explicitly includes both DMARC reporting and transport-policy hosting in its plan card.
- Public pricing distinguishes shared standard accounts from isolated customer environments in the MSP program.
Trade-offs
- The free allowance is for personal or evaluation use and retains only one month of data.
- Standard onboarding is self-service, so migration execution must be planned rather than assumed.
- A reporting and MTA-STS subscription does not confirm a replacement for Valimail-hosted SPF or DKIM; verify those functions separately.
- The MSP package has a base charge as well as the per-domain charge, which must be included in portfolio budgeting.
Verdict
View MailHardener alternatives
08.
DMARC Report
4.8 / 5(467)DMARC Report's Guard package publishes five domains and six months of history, while Shield adds transport reporting and alerts. Public quota terminology and conflicting domain statements need confirmation before a Valimail migration.
#8
our rank
$25/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
DMARC Report documents aggregate reporting, with failure reports and sender identification in paid tiers. Shield adds MTA-STS/TLS-RPT, API access, and email support with alerts.
User experience
Its documented reporting covers authentication results and source investigation. We would validate domain grouping and permission behavior with the corporate and marketing-domain cases before recreating access previously granted in Valimail.
Support
Email support and alerts start at Shield in the published matrix, with advanced support at Defender. Provider-assisted enforcement has separate packaging, so confirm the included work and billing period before purchase.
Suitability
DMARC Report is relevant when comparing retained reporting history, source identification, and group permissions. We would resolve its conflicting public quota and domain wording before judging the replacement cost against Suped.
Who should use DMARC Report
- Teams checking six-month aggregate and failure report retention against their investigation requirements.
- Organizations confirming how published group permissions and parked-domain coverage apply to their domain inventory.
Pricing structure
- Core is free for one domain with 30 days of history. Public material conflicts on its quota, including 10,000 and 1,000 allowances, so confirm the cap and counting unit.
- Guard is $25/month or $275/year, with five domains and six months of history. Confirm whether its published 250,000 monthly allowance counts email messages or aggregate reports.
- Shield is $75/month or $750/year, with ten domains and one year of history. Its card adds parked domains, MTA-STS/TLS-RPT, API access, and alerts.
- Defender is $200/month or $2,000/year, with 25 domains and one year of history. The Ultimate billing period is unclear in public material, so obtain a written price for that scope.
- Paid plans have a 30-day trial. Plan cards publish domain caps that conflict with an unlimited-domain FAQ statement; confirm the applicable allowance in the order form.
Strengths
- Guard's published six-month history covers the proposed 90-day monitoring window.
- The plan cards identify where sender identification, permissions, transport reporting, and alerts enter the paid package.
Trade-offs
- Public domain-cap wording conflicts, so a total portfolio price requires clarification.
- Quota terminology needs confirmation before comparing email volume with XML report counts.
- Alerts and parked-domain coverage require Shield in the documented packaging.
- The public Ultimate amount has no clear billing period in the available pricing material.
Verdict
View DMARC Report alternatives
Replace Valimail with Suped for reporting and hosted authentication
Suped
Get started
Verify senders before policy changes
Use verified and unverified sources, then inspect SPF, DKIM, and DMARC details before authorizing a sender or changing enforcement.
Plan the hosted DNS handoff
Map existing dependencies to hosted DMARC, SPF, and DKIM in Suped, complete initial DNS configuration, and verify authentication before retiring old records.
Budget domains and separate accounts
Choose published business allowances, negotiate enterprise scope, or use MSP per-domain pricing with unlimited email volume and retention. Manage client organizations and access roles separately.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from another platform?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
How we keep this ranking honest
Suped is our product, and we recommend it first based on the documented connection between sender verification, investigation, and hosted authentication management. We apply the same domain inventory and authentication cases to every entry, compare prices with their billing terms and usage definitions, and separate permanent free allowances from trials. Our review process checks product documentation against pricing pages and G2 review totals, flags unresolved differences, and keeps unknown terms explicit. Positions express our recommendation order; G2 figures are attributed customer-review averages out of five. Documented capabilities are not measured migration outcomes or guarantees of inbox delivery.
Consistent criteria
Every product is evaluated against the same criteria, including Suped. We compare capabilities, costs and practical trade-offs.
Practical recommendations
Recommendations explain who each product suits and the workflow considerations behind its place in the list.
Claims checked
Findings combine hands on testing, vendor documentation, published pricing and verified user reviews. Pricing reflects public plans as of the dates shown.
Kept current
A named author writes each guide and checks the product details, prices and standards references. We recheck pages on a fixed schedule.
