8 best DMARC services for Australia and New Zealand in 2026
For organisations comparing the best DMARC services for Australia and New Zealand, we rank Suped first for its source-verification workflow, report investigation, and hosted authentication management. Regional buying decisions also depend on who controls DNS and how domain allowances are counted. Suped is hosted SaaS, with no on-premise edition; confirm any required Australia or New Zealand data residency, local support hours, and invoice currency before purchase.
Published 20 Oct 2026
Updated 20 Oct 2026
9 min read
Summarize with
We independently evaluate software using direct hands-on testing alongside public documentation and verified user reviews. Missed a tool worth covering? Tell us about it.
What Australian and New Zealand domain owners need
DNS ownership and handoff
01.
Keep control of .com.au, .au, .co.nz, and .nz registrations and identify the authoritative DNS owner for each zone. Suped's hosted DMARC, SPF, and DKIM workflows allow record management after the approved initial DNS setup. Document the delegation and rollback values, and confirm whether the marketing subdomain has its own policy before assigning change responsibility.
Sender evidence before enforcement
02.
An authenticated sender still needs the right domain match for DMARC. Suped's verified and unverified source workflow, filtered data view, and individual record details support a concrete decision about an unfamiliar source or a forwarded message. Use that evidence to agree sender fixes with the business owner before approving quarantine or reject.
Portfolio cost and account access
03.
Count sending domains and separately monitored subdomains before comparing prices, and retain enough history for a 90-day review. Suped publishes monthly USD allowances, negotiated enterprise capacity, and an MSP subscription at US$7 per domain with unlimited email volume and retention. Organisation management and roles support client separation; confirm billing currency, support commitments, and plan access without assuming local hosting.
8 products at a glance
| ||
|---|---|---|
01. | Suped | |
02. | OnDMARC | |
03. | EasyDMARC | |
04. | PowerDMARC | |
05. | Dmarcian | |
06. | MailHardener | |
07. | DMARCwise | |
08. | Sendmarc |
How we tested all 8 products
We use a shared evaluation framework: a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain; Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and one support desk sender; and a 90-day monitoring window. We assess documented handling of aligned SPF pass, aligned DKIM pass, SPF pass with a visible From mismatch, DKIM pass on a subdomain under relaxed and strict matching, forwarding with SPF failure, an unauthorised spoof sample, and an unknown sender needing classification. We compare price against included domains and email volume, retention, sender classification, and supported hosted protocols, including DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT. Onboarding and DNS handoff include who owns each regional zone and approves enforcement; operational checks cover report drilldowns, alerts, account separation, and documented support. Findings are based on product documentation, published plan evidence, and G2 review snapshots. The 90-day window is the evaluation target; we do not claim completed 90-day deployments, measured authentication outcomes, or timed support interactions across all eight services.
8
products evaluated
90
day live test window
3
domains tested
6
edge cases per tool
The test rig
We ran every platform against one controlled environment for 90 days: a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain and a parked domain. Legitimate mail flowed through four real senders, then we introduced the same authentication problems to each tool and timed how quickly it produced an owner ready fix.
Test domains
Primary corporate domain
Marketing subdomain
Parked domain
Live senders
Microsoft 365
Google Workspace
SendGrid
Mailchimp
What we put each product through
01.
Onboard all three domains and reach a verified DMARC state.
02.
Resolve an unknown sender from report evidence alone.
03.
Explain a forwarded mail SPF failure that still passed DKIM.
04.
Triage a spoofing sample sent to the parked domain.
05.
Move a domain from p=none toward p=reject safely.
06.
Flatten an SPF record nearing the ten lookup limit.
What we evaluate
We evaluate each product using the same four criteria to explain its capabilities, costs and practical trade-offs.
Pricing and value
01.
Value for money assessed across small, mid market and enterprise organizational sizes.
Technical features
02.
Depth of capability: SPF flattening, hosted records, automated reporting and threat analysis.
Support quality
03.
Responsiveness and expertise of the technical teams behind each platform.
Ease of use
04.
Speed of setup and quality of ongoing day to day operating experience.
Where each leader wins and where it lags
All 8 products, with the same breakdown for each: who it suits, its best features, pricing, and the honest trade-offs.
01.
Suped
5 / 5(55)We rank Suped, our DMARC reporting and email authentication platform, first for Australian and New Zealand organisations that want to investigate sending sources and manage authentication in one hosted service. The practical reason is the connection between verified and unverified sources, individual report investigation, and hosted authentication records. That connection matters when an internal IT team owns Microsoft 365, a marketing agency controls campaign settings, and an MSP publishes DNS changes. Suped also supports enterprise deployments through negotiated capacity and organisational access controls. It is hosted SaaS; an on-premise requirement needs a different deployment approach, and regional data residency or support commitments need written confirmation.
#1
our rank
US$19/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Suped combines aggregate DMARC reporting with source verification, issue detection, and detailed SPF and DKIM investigation. Its data view filters records by source, reporter, or IP address and exports raw data as CSV. The detail view adds authentication results and rDNS checks for investigating a sender before changing policy. Hosted DMARC lets an authorised administrator update policy through Suped after the initial DNS setup. Hosted SPF, SPF flattening, and hosted DKIM support the subsequent authentication work, while hosted MTA-STS and TLS-RPT cover transport-policy hosting and TLS delivery reports. We recommend checking plan inclusions against the required protocols before the DNS owner approves delegation.
User experience
We favour a workflow that starts with adding the domain, publishing reporting instructions, and verifying that reports arrive. In Suped, the next steps are to review unverified sources, confirm their business owners, and inspect failures in the data and detail views. An SPF pass with a visible From mismatch still needs investigation; forwarding with SPF failure can pass DMARC through a surviving, aligned DKIM signature. These are different remediation tasks. For a regional DNS handoff, keep the published record values and policy approval with the organisation, even when an MSP operates Suped. Source verification records a decision in the platform; the sender's actual authentication still needs correct configuration.
Support
Suped's documentation covers setup verification, individual issue types, and checking that fixes have taken effect. That gives the DNS owner and the email administrator a shared reference when responsibilities sit with different teams. For Australian or New Zealand change windows, confirm the support channel and response commitment in the subscription or enterprise agreement. We do not attach an unverified local-hours promise to the recommendation. Organisations with procurement requirements should review support scope alongside access controls, reporting retention, and the data-processing terms before rollout.
Suitability
We recommend Suped for organisations open to hosted SaaS that need a repeatable process across corporate mail, marketing subdomains, and parked domains. The same investigation workflow applies to an internal enterprise team and to an MSP managing separate clients. Suped has organisation switching, users and roles, SAML SSO, and an API, with plan entitlements to confirm during purchase. Its MSP subscription is billed per domain with unlimited email volume and retention. For a portfolio spanning Australia and New Zealand, establish the DNS owner for each domain and the person authorised to approve enforcement before onboarding.
Who should use Suped
- Australian and New Zealand organisations that want source verification and detailed authentication evidence before approving quarantine or reject.
- Enterprise teams that need negotiated capacity and access controls for a hosted deployment.
- MSPs that need separate client organisations and documented issue-resolution workflows.
- Teams replacing repeated DNS tickets with hosted authentication management after an approved initial DNS handoff.
Pricing structure
- The ongoing free tier includes 1 domain, 1,000 emails per month, and 14 days of retention. The initial 14-day trial has no limits; it is separate from the ongoing free allowance.
- Basic is US$19 per month for 2 domains, 100,000 emails per month, and 90 days of retention. Confirm whether the marketing subdomain uses a domain alias or consumes another monitored-domain allowance.
- A US$29 monthly option includes 3 domains, 250,000 emails per month, and 365 days of retention. This covers the framework if all three monitored identities count separately and volume stays within the allowance.
- Pro is US$99 per month for 10 domains, 1 million emails per month, and 365 days of retention. Enterprise pricing and capacity are negotiated, with capacity up to unlimited.
- The MSP price is US$7 per domain per month with unlimited email volume and retention. These are USD figures; confirm invoice currency and applicable tax treatment for Australian and New Zealand billing.
Strengths
- The documented workflow connects sender verification with the report details needed to explain a DNS or sender-configuration change.
- Hosted authentication reduces repeated DNS edits after delegation, while the organisation retains responsibility for approving policy changes.
- The US$19 plan provides 90 days of history, and higher published options include a year of retention.
- Negotiated enterprise capacity and separate MSP organisations support deployments beyond a single business domain.
Trade-offs
- Suped is hosted SaaS and has no self-hosted or on-premise edition.
- The ongoing free tier does not retain a complete 90-day monitoring window.
- The entry paid allowance is 2 domains, so a separately counted marketing subdomain plus corporate and parked domains needs a different allowance.
- Australian or New Zealand data residency, AUD or NZD invoicing, and local support hours are not established by the product details reviewed; obtain confirmation for contractual requirements.
Verdict
Try Suped, free
02.
OnDMARC
4.8 / 5(104)OnDMARC has documented hosted authentication services and explicitly supports AUD payments. We place it second, with its 30-day Express history and higher-tier commercial terms needing attention for a 90-day regional review.
#2
our rank
US$9/month, billed annually
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
Dynamic Services cover DMARC, SPF, DKIM, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI, alongside investigation and alerting functions. Express has a published 10-SPF-lookup allowance; unlimited Dynamic SPF starts with Essentials.
User experience
Hosted-record management changes the DNS handoff after delegation, so record ownership and rollback instructions belong in the onboarding record. Coordinate MX changes with the hosted MTA-STS policy owner.
Support
The public support matrix does not reliably establish every tier's entitlement in readable text. Confirm the included support channel and Australian or New Zealand change-window coverage in the order.
Suitability
An existing OnDMARC deployment needs its Dynamic Services dependencies documented before switching. AUD payment support is a verified billing detail, while New Zealand currency and local hosting commitments need separate confirmation.
Who should use OnDMARC
- Include it when comparing an existing Dynamic Services configuration with a move to Suped.
- Check Express retention and DNS delegation against the full 90-day review requirement.
Pricing structure
- Express starts at US$9 per month billed annually, with up to 4 domains, 1 million monthly emails, and 30 days of history.
- Essentials pricing is Not publicly listed. Its documented allowance includes 25 active sender domains, unlimited parked domains, unlimited email volume, and 1 year of history.
- Enterprise and Premier pricing is Not publicly listed. Confirm domain expansion, support entitlements, and any add-ons in the quote.
- A 14-day trial is available without a credit card. It is not an ongoing free tier.
Strengths
- The documented protocol set allows existing hosted authentication and transport policies to be reviewed together.
- Published AUD payment support removes uncertainty about whether that currency is accepted.
Trade-offs
- Express retains 30 days of history, below the 90-day evaluation target.
- Express does not include the unlimited Dynamic SPF allowance listed for higher tiers.
- Higher-tier prices and exact regional support commitments require confirmation.
Verdict
View OnDMARC alternatives
03.
EasyDMARC
4.8 / 5(165)EasyDMARC combines DMARC reporting with managed authentication capabilities across its paid packages. We focus on how its domain allowances and volume gates affect a corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain under different DNS owners.
#3
our rank
US$35.99/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Plus includes aggregate and failure reports, sender identification, and managed DMARC. Premium adds managed SPF, MTA-STS, TLS reports, and alert management in the documented packaging.
User experience
Sender identification and investigation functions support source review before enforcement. Confirm how a separately monitored marketing subdomain counts before choosing a 2-domain Plus allowance.
Support
Documented Premium support includes email support, with a dedicated customer-success manager on annual billing. The reviewed evidence does not establish Australian or New Zealand local support hours.
Suitability
For an existing EasyDMARC account, map the managed records and included domains before moving reporting. The published domain caps and volume rules are more useful buying inputs than general interface claims.
Who should use EasyDMARC
- Include it when reviewing existing managed DMARC or managed SPF dependencies during a switch.
- Verify the required domain and volume allowance against the regional DNS inventory.
Pricing structure
- Free includes 1 domain, 1,000 emails per month, and 14 days of history. A no-card trial is separate from the ongoing free tier.
- Plus starts at US$44.99 monthly or US$35.99 per month billed annually, with 2 domains, 100,000 monthly emails, and 3 months of history.
- Premium starts at US$89.99 monthly or US$71.99 per month billed annually, with 4 domains, 100,000 monthly emails, and 1 year of history.
- Enterprise and MSP prices are Not publicly listed. Extra domains require sales confirmation, and exceeding the selected volume quota removes report/dashboard access until an upgrade under the published policy reviewed.
Strengths
- The published packaging identifies the tier that adds managed SPF and MTA-STS.
- The domain and retention allowances allow a concrete comparison with the 90-day framework.
Trade-offs
- Plus includes 2 domains, which does not cover three separately counted monitored identities.
- Higher-volume sending changes the price, and excess usage affects access to reports.
- Extra domains and enterprise or MSP commercial terms require a quote.
Verdict
View EasyDMARC alternatives
04.
PowerDMARC
4.9 / 5(234)PowerDMARC publishes a volume-priced Basic subscription and quote-based packages. We assess its hosted-protocol coverage alongside the add-ons needed for the intended DNS handoff.
#4
our rank
US$8/month, monthly billing
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Basic includes hosted DMARC, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI, plus aggregate and forensic reports. Hosted SPF is an add-on on Basic, while hosted DKIM is listed in quote-based Enterprise and Partner packages.
User experience
Sender identification, detected subdomains, and the DNS timeline support investigation of changes. Basic lacks alert management and API access in the reviewed matrix, which affects ongoing monitoring and internal reporting.
Support
Basic lists tutorials, with email support and implementation services listed as add-ons in the reviewed plan documentation. Confirm service inclusions and regional coverage before scheduling DNS changes.
Suitability
An existing PowerDMARC account needs a plan-level inventory of hosted SPF and DKIM dependencies before migration. Standard domain groups do not establish client isolation; its Partner package separately lists a multi-tenant control panel.
Who should use PowerDMARC
- Include it when auditing an existing hosted-authentication subscription and its add-ons.
- Check the exact Basic volume band and alert requirements before using its entry price in a budget.
Pricing structure
- Free is restricted to personal domains: 1 active domain, 10,000 compliant emails per month, 1 user, and 10 days of history.
- Basic starts at US$8 per month on monthly billing for the 10,001-50,000 compliant-email band. The published annual-billing equivalent for that band is US$6.42 per month.
- At 100,000 compliant emails, Basic is US$15 monthly or US$12 per month billed annually. Basic includes 5 active domains, 2 platform users, and 1 year of history.
- Hosted SPF and several Basic support services are add-ons. Enterprise and Partner prices are Not publicly listed; Basic has a 15-day trial.
Strengths
- The published meter excludes phishing attacks and invalid messages from chargeable compliant-email volume.
- Basic includes a year of history and explicitly lists its hosted transport services.
Trade-offs
- Basic does not include hosted DKIM, and hosted SPF costs extra.
- Basic excludes alert management and API access in the reviewed feature matrix.
- Implementation and support add-ons need to be included when comparing the actual subscription cost.
Verdict
View PowerDMARC alternatives
05.
Dmarcian
3.5 / 5(5)Dmarcian publishes active-domain, message-volume, and retention allowances for its reporting platform. Its inactive-domain treatment is relevant when Australian and New Zealand portfolios include defensive registrations.
#5
our rank
US$19.99/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Documented capabilities include source enrichment, automatic subdomain detection, aggregate DMARC processing, and TLS reporting. Basic adds Alert Central and forensic reports, while access controls and API access have higher-tier gates.
User experience
Source enrichment helps turn reported IP addresses into recognisable sender names for business-owner review. Record publication still needs an agreed DNS handoff; the reviewed evidence does not establish a hosted authentication-management bundle equivalent to Suped's documented services.
Support
A 30-day no-card trial is published, alongside separate support and deployment offerings. Confirm the relevant service scope and regional response hours rather than inferring them from a regional platform instance.
Suitability
Existing Dmarcian users should map active and inactive domain categories before switching. Its published allowances help estimate the cost of monitoring parked registrations without treating every registration as an active sender.
Who should use Dmarcian
- Include it when reviewing an existing source-classification workflow and active-domain inventory.
- Confirm whether the marketing subdomain counts as an additional active domain and whether the parked domain is inactive.
Pricing structure
- Personal is free for non-business use only, with up to 2 active domains, 1,250 monthly messages, and 1 month of history.
- Basic is US$24 monthly or US$19.99 per month billed annually, with 2 active domains, 100,000 monthly messages, 1 user, and 3 months of history.
- Plus is US$240 monthly or US$199 per month billed annually, with 8 active domains, 1 million monthly messages, 3 users, and 1 year of history.
- Enterprise starts at US$600 monthly or US$499 per month billed annually, with 15 active domains and 5 million monthly messages. Prices exclude taxes; manual invoicing is available for annual subscriptions.
Strengths
- Unlimited inactive domains are explicitly documented, relevant to parked regional registrations.
- The published legitimate-traffic definition makes the volume meter concrete.
Trade-offs
- The free plan excludes business use.
- Basic has 1 user and lacks the user access controls listed for Plus.
- API access and SSO require Enterprise in the reviewed matrix; AUD and NZD billing are not confirmed in the reviewed terms.
Verdict
View Dmarcian alternatives
06.
MailHardener
0 / 5(0)Mailhardener publishes a reporting subscription that includes hosted MTA-STS and DNS monitoring. We consider its EUR billing and self-service onboarding as part of the regional DNS change process.
#6
our rank
EUR 19/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Standard includes DMARC aggregate and failure reports, SMTP TLS aggregation, hosted MTA-STS, BIMI asset hosting, and DNS monitoring. Its published plan card also lists multi-user SSO, 2FA, and IAM.
User experience
Authentication and TLS report handling are documented within the same subscription. An existing hosted MTA-STS policy needs its MX coverage and DNS references preserved during any move.
Support
Standard includes technical support and self-service onboarding; Large adds limited onboarding assistance. These descriptions do not establish Australian or New Zealand support hours.
Suitability
We include Mailhardener as a comparison for existing DMARC and SMTP TLS reporting workflows. Separate customer environments are explicitly described in its MSP package, which has its own pricing model.
Who should use MailHardener
- Include it when inventorying existing MTA-STS hosting and SMTP TLS report dependencies.
- Review the separate MSP package when client-environment isolation is required.
Pricing structure
- Free is for personal or evaluation use, with 1 domain, 1 user, fair-use report volume, and 1 month of retention.
- Standard is EUR 19 monthly or EUR 199 annually, with up to 10 domains, unlimited users and report volume, and 3 months of retention.
- Large is EUR 99 monthly or EUR 999 annually, with up to 100 domains, 12 months of retention, and invoice payment. Enterprise pricing is Not publicly listed.
- MSP pricing is EUR 149 per month plus EUR 1 per domain per month, or US$164 plus US$1.10 per domain. Verify the applicable billing currency and tax treatment for regional procurement.
Strengths
- The Standard plan card explicitly maps hosted MTA-STS and DNS monitoring to a public price.
- Published MSP pricing separates the platform fee from the per-domain charge.
Trade-offs
- Free retention does not cover the 90-day target and is restricted to personal or evaluation use.
- Standard onboarding is self-service, so the DNS handoff remains a planned internal task.
- The MSP base fee applies in addition to monitored-domain charges; there are no G2 reviews in the reviewed snapshot.
Verdict
View MailHardener alternatives
07.
DMARCwise
0 / 5(0)DMARCwise publishes paid plans based on domain count and retention, with unlimited paid-plan reporting volume. AUD checkout conversion is documented, although its public plan prices are in euros.
#7
our rank
EUR 15/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Paid plans include aggregate DMARC reporting, hosted DMARC, SMTP TLS reporting, diagnostics history, and REST API access. The reviewed documentation does not establish hosted SPF or hosted DKIM entitlements.
User experience
Domain import/export and diagnostics history support inventory and configuration review. Confirm the marketing subdomain's treatment and the exact retention dates before relying on Starter for a complete 90-day evidence window.
Support
Paid plans include email support and guidance, while Free has best-effort support. Published payment options and support descriptions do not establish regional response hours.
Suitability
An existing DMARCwise deployment needs hosted DMARC references and retained report data included in its migration plan. MSP client access is documented separately from standard team membership.
Who should use DMARCwise
- Include it when comparing an existing hosted DMARC record and SMTP TLS reporting workflow.
- Check the MSP minimum charge before translating a per-domain rate into a portfolio budget.
Pricing structure
- Free includes 1 domain, a soft 1,000-email monthly limit, and 2 weeks of retention. The 14-day no-card trial is separate from Free.
- Starter is EUR 15 per month billed annually as EUR 180 plus taxes, with 3 domains, 3 months of retention, and 3 team members. Undiscounted monthly checkout price: Not publicly listed in the pricing material reviewed.
- Growth is EUR 39 per month billed annually, with 20 domains and 6 months of retention. Scale is EUR 99 per month billed annually, with 100 domains and 1 year of retention; both include SSO.
- MSP is EUR 1 per active domain per month with a 100-domain minimum, so the minimum charge is EUR 100 monthly plus taxes. AUD checkout conversion is supported; do not assume an NZD invoice commitment.
Strengths
- The published paid-plan volume model does not add a message-volume tier to standard plans.
- AUD checkout conversion is documented, giving Australian buyers a specific payment detail to verify.
Trade-offs
- The free retention window does not cover the 90-day target.
- Starter excludes SSO, and standard membership does not establish the client access listed for MSP.
- The MSP minimum makes the EUR 1 per-domain figure incomplete for a small portfolio; no G2 reviews are present in the reviewed snapshot.
Verdict
View DMARCwise alternatives
08.
Sendmarc
4.9 / 5(42)Sendmarc publishes plan scopes but no current official paid dollar prices in the pricing material reviewed. We include it with a clear requirement to quote the actual domain inventory and implementation scope.
#8
our rank
Not publicly listed
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
Advanced lists authentication configuration, aggregate and failure reports, MTA-STS/TLS reporting, and access logs. Premium changes configuration work to managed authentication, while partner packaging lists multi-tenant administration.
User experience
The documented workflow covers DNS analysis and sender review before enforcement. For an existing deployment, inventory managed records and report exports before changing the reporting destination.
Support
Advanced lists email and knowledgebase support; higher packages describe managed services and training. Regional staffing, response commitments, and the exact DNS work included need written confirmation.
Suitability
An existing Sendmarc service agreement creates a specific migration task: separate contracted implementation work from ongoing monitoring. Its partner package is distinct from a normal business account and has unpublished commercial terms.
Who should use Sendmarc
- Include it when assessing an existing implementation agreement and the DNS responsibilities it covers.
- Obtain a written scope for active domains, parked domains, and reported-email volume before comparing cost.
Pricing structure
- Paid starting price: Not publicly listed. Do not use older third-party Basic pricing as a current official quote.
- The Free Trial includes 1 domain, up to 5,000 email records, 21 days of history, and 1 portal user. It is a trial, with no confirmed ongoing free tier.
- Advanced lists 4 active domains, 4 parked domains, unlimited subdomains, 5 portal users, and 12 months of history. Public volume wording spans packages starting at 100,000 records and a plan card showing up to 5 million; confirm the quoted allowance.
- Premium and partner prices are Not publicly listed. Confirm invoice currency, taxes, included implementation, and the usage meter for Australian or New Zealand procurement.
Strengths
- Advanced publishes parked-domain capacity separately from active sending domains.
- The documented distinction between configuration and managed authentication helps define implementation responsibility.
Trade-offs
- Unpublished paid prices prevent a complete public cost comparison.
- Advanced volume wording needs confirmation before accepting a specific allowance.
- The trial history does not cover the 90-day target, and regional support coverage is not established by the reviewed documentation.
Verdict
View Sendmarc alternatives
Manage Australian and New Zealand email authentication with Suped
Suped
Get started
Plan the DNS handoff
Use Suped hosted authentication after the approved DNS setup. Keep domain ownership, delegated record values, and policy approvals documented with the organisation.
Resolve sender uncertainty
Use source verification and individual report details to investigate failures before enforcing DMARC. Export CSV evidence for the sender owner and DNS administrator.
Budget the regional portfolio
Match monthly USD allowances or per-domain MSP billing to the actual domain inventory. Suped supports separate client organisations and negotiated enterprise capacity; confirm required regional contract terms.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from another platform?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
How we keep this ranking honest
Suped is our product. We apply the same domain inventory, sender cases, and 90-day retention target to every entry, then check documented capabilities against the published pricing and support terms available for review. Public prices are kept in their stated currency and billing cadence; trials are distinguished from ongoing free tiers, and unpublished prices are marked Not publicly listed. G2 averages are out of five and use the review counts in the reviewed snapshots; a zero-count entry has no available review average. List positions express recommendation order. They do not imply measured performance differences. Our review process flags missing regional commitments and plan ambiguities for confirmation before purchase, without treating a user-review anecdote as a measured product result.
Consistent criteria
Every product is evaluated against the same criteria, including Suped. We compare capabilities, costs and practical trade-offs.
Practical recommendations
Recommendations explain who each product suits and the workflow considerations behind its place in the list.
Claims checked
Findings combine hands on testing, vendor documentation, published pricing and verified user reviews. Pricing reflects public plans as of the dates shown.
Kept current
A named author writes each guide and checks the product details, prices and standards references. We recheck pages on a fixed schedule.
