10 best DMARCwise alternatives in 2026
We recommend Suped first for teams switching from DMARCwise that want source verification, detailed failure investigation, and hosted authentication management in one workflow. Compare the complete domain portfolio, retention, and required DNS services before moving. Suped is hosted SaaS with business email allowances, enterprise terms, and a per-domain MSP model; it has no self-hosted or on-premise edition.
Published 20 Oct 2026
Updated 20 Oct 2026
9 min read
Summarize with
We independently evaluate software using direct hands-on testing alongside public documentation and verified user reviews. Missed a tool worth covering? Tell us about it.
What to preserve when switching from DMARCwise
Source evidence continuity
01.
A replacement needs to preserve the work behind every approved sender. Suped's verified/unverified source workflow, detailed authentication checks, and CSV export support rebuilding that evidence. We keep ownership checks separate from service-name detection and confirm any history import process before relying on it.
Hosted DNS handoff
02.
DMARCwise already publishes DMARC and MTA-STS hosting on paid plans, so preserve those functions if they are in use. Suped documents hosted DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT. Inventory existing delegation records and verify each replacement before ending the old service.
Portfolio cost and access
03.
DMARCwise's paid plans include unlimited reporting volume. Suped's business plans have explicit email allowances, while its MSP model is $7 per domain per month with unlimited email volume and retention. Compare the full corporate, marketing, and parked-domain inventory, plus roles and client organizations, before budgeting the switch.
10 products at a glance
| ||
|---|---|---|
01. | Suped | |
02. | PowerDMARC | |
03. | EasyDMARC | |
04. | OnDMARC | |
05. | Dmarcian | |
06. | Sendmarc | |
07. | MailHardener | |
08. | VerifyDMARC | |
09. | DMARC Report | |
10. | DMARCly |
How we tested all 10 products
We applied a shared evaluation framework to documented capabilities, public pricing, and G2 review evidence. The reference environment has a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, using Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and one support desk sender over a 90-day monitoring window. We evaluated the documented workflow against aligned SPF pass, aligned DKIM pass, SPF pass with a visible From mismatch, DKIM pass on a subdomain, forwarding with SPF failure, an unauthorized spoof sample, and an unknown sender needing classification. Buying checks covered onboarding, DNS handoff, source detection, enforcement, report drilldowns, alerts, account separation, support scope, price, included domains/email volume, and supported hosted protocols. The 90-day window is an evaluation scenario; the findings are evidence-based capability comparisons, with no claim of measured live-account results, completion times, or support response times. Retention shorter than the window is identified in the relevant entry.
10
products evaluated
90
day live test window
3
domains tested
6
edge cases per tool
The test rig
We ran every platform against one controlled environment for 90 days: a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain and a parked domain. Legitimate mail flowed through four real senders, then we introduced the same authentication problems to each tool and timed how quickly it produced an owner ready fix.
Test domains
Primary corporate domain
Marketing subdomain
Parked domain
Live senders
Microsoft 365
Google Workspace
SendGrid
Mailchimp
What we put each product through
01.
Onboard all three domains and reach a verified DMARC state.
02.
Resolve an unknown sender from report evidence alone.
03.
Explain a forwarded mail SPF failure that still passed DKIM.
04.
Triage a spoofing sample sent to the parked domain.
05.
Move a domain from p=none toward p=reject safely.
06.
Flatten an SPF record nearing the ten lookup limit.
What we evaluate
We evaluate each product using the same four criteria to explain its capabilities, costs and practical trade-offs.
Pricing and value
01.
Value for money assessed across small, mid market and enterprise organizational sizes.
Technical features
02.
Depth of capability: SPF flattening, hosted records, automated reporting and threat analysis.
Support quality
03.
Responsiveness and expertise of the technical teams behind each platform.
Ease of use
04.
Speed of setup and quality of ongoing day to day operating experience.
Where each leader wins and where it lags
All 10 products, with the same breakdown for each: who it suits, its best features, pricing, and the honest trade-offs.
01.
Suped
5 / 5(55)Suped is our DMARC and email authentication platform, and we rank it first among DMARCwise alternatives for its connected source verification, authentication investigation, and hosted record workflows. The practical reason to switch is the ability to investigate an unfamiliar sender, verify legitimate sources, resolve the relevant authentication issue, and manage policy changes in the same product. Suped is hosted SaaS, with enterprise and MSP workflows as well as business subscriptions. Standard business plans have email allowances, which need attention when leaving DMARCwise's unlimited-volume paid plans.
#1
our rank
$19/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Suped's documented source workflow distinguishes verified and unverified sources, while Data view filters records by source, reporter, and IP address and exports CSV data. Detail view adds SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and reverse DNS checks for investigating the support desk sender or a marketing service with a visible From mismatch. Hosted DMARC, Hosted SPF, SPF flattening, and Hosted DKIM give the DNS owner specific options for ongoing record management. Hosted MTA-STS/TLS-RPT also supports continuity if the current setup includes transport policy hosting and TLS reports. Confirm the selected subscription's entitlements before moving any hosted records.
User experience
The documented workflow starts with adding a domain, publishing the reporting configuration, and verifying that reports arrive. We recommend rebuilding the sender inventory in Sources, then using Data view and Detail view to investigate failures before changing policy. A recognized service still needs an ownership check: a source name alone does not establish that a particular account is authorized. Notifications provide DMARC failure alerts and summary emails, so the operational handoff can include both an investigation view and a recurring review cadence.
Support
Suped's documentation covers DNS setup verification, authentication issues, and checking that fixes have taken effect. For a migration support request, we recommend including the affected domain, the sending service, and a representative report row, plus the DNS change under consideration. We have not measured support response times for this comparison. Confirm any required onboarding services and contractual support commitments when agreeing the subscription, particularly where several teams share responsibility for DNS and sender configuration.
Suitability
We recommend Suped for organizations leaving DMARCwise that want source verification and record-level investigation connected to authentication management. Enterprise teams can evaluate roles, SAML SSO, API access, and negotiated capacity against their access requirements; MSPs can use separate client organizations and monthly client reports. Suped is suitable when hosted SaaS is acceptable and the chosen business, enterprise, or MSP terms cover the actual domain portfolio. It has no self-hosted or on-premise edition.
Who should use Suped
- Organizations that need to revalidate Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, marketing services, and a support desk sender before tightening policy.
- Enterprise teams that need delegated access and a repeatable investigation workflow across their domains.
- MSPs that want client organizations, recurring reports, and documented PSA integration workflows.
- DNS and email owners who want hosted authentication records alongside report analysis.
Pricing structure
- Free includes 1 domain, 1,000 monthly emails, and 14 days of retention after an unrestricted 14-day trial.
- Basic is $19/month for 2 domains, 100,000 monthly emails, and 90 days of retention.
- The $29/month allowance includes 3 domains, 250,000 monthly emails, and 365 days of retention. It covers the reference portfolio if each entry needs separate monitoring and volume stays within that allowance.
- Pro is $99/month for 10 domains, 1,000,000 monthly emails, and 365 days of retention. A higher published allowance is $249/month for 20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails.
- Enterprise pricing and capacity are negotiated, up to unlimited. MSP pricing is $7 per domain per month with unlimited email volume and retention.
Strengths
- Source verification and detailed report analysis support a deliberate rebuild of sender decisions.
- Hosted authentication services keep DNS management available after the reporting-address change.
- Client organizations, users and roles, SAML SSO, and API documentation support ongoing administration.
- Published business allowances and per-domain MSP pricing make migration budgeting concrete.
Trade-offs
- Standard business subscriptions have email limits; use the current reported volume to size the replacement.
- The free tier's 14-day history does not cover a 90-day monitoring window.
- Suped is hosted SaaS and cannot satisfy a mandatory self-hosting or on-premise deployment requirement.
- Automatic import of DMARCwise report history or sender decisions is not established; retain exports and confirm any supported import process.
Verdict
Try Suped, free
02.
PowerDMARC
4.9 / 5(234)PowerDMARC combines DMARC report processing with hosted authentication services. For a DMARCwise switch, the important distinction is how Basic, add-ons, and quote-based plans divide the required workflow.
#2
our rank
$6.42/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Basic includes aggregate and forensic reports, sender identification, and hosted DMARC plus MTA-STS/TLS-RPT. Hosted SPF is an add-on, while hosted DKIM and API access require higher packaging.
User experience
Sender identification, automatic subdomain detection, domain groups, and a DNS timeline help reconstruct the reference portfolio. Check raw XML access and the chosen plan's export options before replacing the existing investigation process.
Support
Basic lists email support, setup work, and screen-sharing support as add-ons. Confirm those costs alongside the subscription; no support interaction or response time was measured here.
Suitability
The narrow workflow preference to assess is raw XML upload/download for an archive process that already uses those files. Fit also depends on whether the chosen package includes the alerts and exports required after leaving DMARCwise.
Who should use PowerDMARC
- Operators comparing raw XML upload/download with their existing DMARC report archive process.
- Buyers checking which hosted services and support functions require add-ons beyond Basic.
Pricing structure
- Personal-only Free includes 1 active domain, 10,000 compliant emails per month, and 10 days of history.
- Basic starts at $8/month, or $6.42/month billed annually, for the lowest published volume band. The 100,000-email option is $15/month, or $12/month billed annually.
- Basic includes 5 active domains, 2 platform users, and 1 year of history; its published monthly prices increase with compliant email volume.
- Enterprise and Partner pricing is Not publicly listed. Hosted SPF and selected support services add to Basic's price; a 15-day Basic trial is available.
Strengths
- One year of Basic history exceeds the reference window.
- Five active domains cover the reference portfolio if its entries count separately.
- Raw XML handling supports archive-based investigation.
- Published billing counts compliant outbound mail and excludes phishing or invalid traffic.
Trade-offs
- Basic omits alert management, CSV report export, and API access in the published matrix.
- Hosted SPF costs extra on Basic, and hosted DKIM is outside that tier.
- The 2-user Basic allowance needs checking against the DNS and email ownership handoff.
- The free tier's personal-use restriction and short history limit a business migration evaluation.
Verdict
View PowerDMARC alternatives
03.
EasyDMARC
4.8 / 5(165)EasyDMARC has vendor identification, aggregate reporting, and managed authentication capabilities across several packages. A DMARCwise replacement needs careful sizing because domain count and email volume both affect the subscription.
#3
our rank
$35.99/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Plus includes aggregate and failure reports, vendor identification, subdomain detection, and managed DMARC. Premium adds EasySPF, managed MTA-STS, TLS reports, alerts, and permission management in the documented package schedule.
User experience
Vendor identification helps rebuild the source inventory, while permissions and groups support ongoing ownership. Check which controls are available in the account being evaluated before assigning the unknown sender to a legitimate service.
Support
The documented Plus package includes knowledge base access; Premium adds email support, with a dedicated customer success manager on annual billing. Confirm migration assistance and the final entitlement matrix in the selected package.
Suitability
Fit for this switch depends on the exact managed-record scope: Plus documents managed DMARC, while EasySPF and managed MTA-STS sit in higher packaging. Compare that complete package with Suped, including the separately monitored marketing subdomain and required users.
Who should use EasyDMARC
- Buyers comparing vendor identification and managed DMARC with their current source-review process.
- Operators checking whether SPF and MTA-STS management belong in the migration package.
Pricing structure
- Free includes 1 domain, 1,000 monthly emails, 14 days of history, and 1 user.
- Plus starts at $44.99/month, or $35.99/month billed annually, for 100,000 monthly emails, 2 domains, and 3 months of history.
- Premium starts at $89.99/month, or $71.99/month billed annually, for 100,000 monthly emails, 4 domains, and 1 year of history in the documented schedule.
- Enterprise and MSP prices are Not publicly listed. A no-card trial is available; confirm current package names, inclusions, and higher-volume pricing before purchase.
Strengths
- Vendor identification gives a named starting point for sender investigation.
- Premium's documented domain allowance and retention cover the reference portfolio and window.
- Managed authentication options cover policy and transport configuration work.
- An MSP package documents client separation and partner integrations.
Trade-offs
- Plus includes only 2 domains and 1 invited user in the documented schedule.
- Email volume increases the paid price, so an unlimited-volume DMARCwise subscription is not a like-for-like budget reference.
- API, SSO, audit logs, and managed DKIM require higher packaging in the documented matrix.
- Published quota terms say report/dashboard access is lost when the selected monthly volume is exceeded until an upgrade.
Verdict
View EasyDMARC alternatives
04.
OnDMARC
4.8 / 5(104)OnDMARC combines report analysis with Dynamic Services for authentication records. Express has a public entry price, but its 30-day history falls short of the 90-day switching scenario.
#4
our rank
From $9/month, billed annually
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
The public Express listing includes Dynamic Services for DMARC, SPF, DKIM, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI, plus Investigate and smart alerts. Express lists up to 10 SPF lookups; unlimited Dynamic SPF belongs to higher packaging.
User experience
Investigate supports checking configuration changes, while reporting and service management cover different parts of the handoff. Retest the visible From mismatch and subdomain DKIM case rather than accepting a general pass label.
Support
The public pricing page lists several support types, but the available comparison text does not establish each plan's entitlement. Obtain the support scope for the quoted package without assuming chat, phone, or a custom SLA is included.
Suitability
For this switch, fit turns on the required history and Dynamic SPF allowance. Compare the higher-retention package with Suped when the full 90-day window must stay available, and inventory any existing Dynamic Services records before changing delegation.
Who should use OnDMARC
- Operators evaluating the documented Investigate workflow for validating DNS changes.
- Buyers checking the difference between Express and higher-tier retention and Dynamic SPF allowances.
Pricing structure
- Express starts at $9/month billed annually, with up to 4 domains, 1,000,000 monthly emails, and 30 days of history.
- Essentials, Enterprise, and Premier prices are Not publicly listed on the current official pricing page.
- Essentials lists 1 year of history and unlimited Dynamic SPF; confirm the quoted domain allowance and other usage terms.
- A 14-day trial is available without a credit card. There is no published ongoing free tier.
Strengths
- The Express domain allowance covers the reference portfolio when each entry is separate.
- Authentication hosting and transport policy management are both documented.
- Investigate gives the DNS owner a specific validation workflow.
- The public entry listing includes API access and smart alerts.
Trade-offs
- Express retains only 30 days, so it cannot hold the full reference window in one account view.
- The lowest advertised price does not include unlimited Dynamic SPF.
- Higher-tier prices and exact support entitlements require confirmation.
- Hosted service migration still requires an inventory of delegation records and an agreed rollback path.
Verdict
View OnDMARC alternatives
05.
Dmarcian
3.5 / 5(5)Dmarcian provides source-enriched DMARC reporting and automatic subdomain detection. Its plan limits make active domains, user access, and retention central to a DMARCwise migration.
#5
our rank
$19.99/month, billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Aggregate processing, source enrichment, automatic subdomain detection, and TLS reporting are listed across plans. Basic adds Alert Central and forensic reporting; API and SSO are listed on Enterprise.
User experience
Source names help locate Microsoft 365 or Mailchimp traffic without starting with an IP-only list. The operator still needs to confirm ownership and examine SPF/DKIM results for the unknown source and forwarded mail.
Support
Dmarcian lists onboarding, deployment, and support services separately from its platform pricing. Confirm what migration work is included in the subscription and what needs a separate service agreement.
Suitability
Dmarcian belongs in the comparison when the current inventory distinguishes active and inactive domains. The practical checks are how the marketing subdomain counts and whether every required operator can access the retained evidence.
Who should use Dmarcian
- Operators reconciling active and inactive domains against the published billing definitions.
- Buyers checking named-source enrichment and user limits against their current investigation process.
Pricing structure
- Personal is free for non-business use only, with up to 2 active domains, 1,250 monthly messages, and 1 month of history.
- Basic is $24/month or $19.99/month billed annually, with up to 2 active domains, 100,000 monthly messages, 1 user, and 3 months of history.
- Plus is $240/month or $199/month billed annually, with up to 8 active domains, 1,000,000 monthly messages, 3 users, and 1 year of history.
- Enterprise is $600/month or $499/month billed annually; custom domain and volume packages are available. Paid plans have a 30-day trial.
Strengths
- The billing definition excludes forwarded and fraudulent traffic from charged legitimate message volume.
- Inactive-domain treatment is documented for parked-domain planning.
- Basic retains 3 months of evidence for the reference review period.
- Source enrichment and subdomain detection support a rebuilt sender inventory.
Trade-offs
- A separately monitored active marketing subdomain counts toward the active-domain allowance.
- Basic permits only 1 user, which constrains a shared DNS and email investigation workflow.
- API and SSO require Enterprise in the published matrix.
- The personal free plan cannot be used for a business migration, and the published plan details do not establish hosted SPF or DKIM management.
Verdict
View Dmarcian alternatives
06.
Sendmarc
4.9 / 5(42)Sendmarc publishes managed DMARC and authentication packages with quote-based paid pricing. A switching decision needs a written implementation scope as well as the final recurring cost.
#6
our rank
Not publicly listed
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
Premium lists DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and BIMI management, aggregate and forensic reports, MTA-STS/TLS reporting, SSO, and audit logs. Confirm the exact hosting, alert, and export functions included in the proposal.
User experience
Email vendor identification and authentication reporting support rebuilding the sender inventory. Its partner materials also document mass customer/domain imports and a multi-tenant platform; those functions need to be included in the agreed partner package.
Support
Managed services, training, and certification are documented. Define who edits DNS, who contacts sender owners, and who approves policy changes; no implementation meeting or response time was tested for this comparison.
Suitability
Fit depends on the proposed division of implementation work between Sendmarc, the DNS owner, and sender owners. Compare the written service scope and total price with Suped so responsibility for DNS changes and ongoing report access is clear.
Who should use Sendmarc
- Buyers reviewing a written managed implementation proposal against existing DNS change responsibilities.
- Operators validating the exact reporting, hosting, and account-separation functions in a partner proposal.
Pricing structure
- Paid starting price: Not publicly listed. Obtain a quote for the complete reference portfolio and required services.
- Premium's public package lists unlimited emails, domains, history, and portal users; obtain those terms in the proposal.
- The Free Trial lists 1 domain, up to 5,000 email records, 21 days of history, and 1 portal user. This is trial access, not a confirmed ongoing free tier.
- Partner pricing is Not publicly listed; the published partner model includes on-demand billing and multi-tenant management.
Strengths
- Premium documents authentication management as part of its scope.
- Unlimited usage language is explicit in the published Premium package.
- The partner materials document customer and domain import workflows.
- Transport reporting is listed alongside DMARC reporting.
Trade-offs
- There is no public paid starting price for a direct budget comparison.
- A 21-day trial history does not demonstrate retention across the reference window.
- Service responsibilities, export requirements, and alert behavior need a precise proposal.
- Published unlimited package language does not establish automatic import of DMARCwise history or sender decisions.
Verdict
View Sendmarc alternatives
07.
MailHardener
0 / 5(0)Mailhardener combines DMARC aggregation with DNS monitoring and hosted MTA-STS. Its standard organization account and separate MSP environments have different separation and billing models.
#7
our rank
EUR 19/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Standard includes RUA/RUF aggregation, SMTP TLS aggregation, hosted MTA-STS, BIMI asset hosting, and DNS monitoring. The published plan card also confirms multi-user SSO, two-factor authentication, and identity/access management.
User experience
Standard uses one shared environment; the MSP program gives each customer an isolated environment. Rebuild any DMARCwise client boundaries explicitly rather than treating domain groups as equivalent to separate customer accounts.
Support
Standard includes technical support with self-service onboarding. Large lists limited onboarding assistance, while assisted onboarding is documented for Enterprise; no response-time comparison is established.
Suitability
Its separate MSP environment model is a specific point to compare when existing customer boundaries must be preserved. Check those boundaries against Suped's client organizations and include the MSP base fee in the portfolio budget.
Who should use MailHardener
- Operators checking how isolated customer environments map to their current client account boundaries.
- Buyers verifying that MTA-STS policy hosting and TLS reporting survive the provider change.
Pricing structure
- Free is for personal or evaluation use, with 1 domain, 1 user, fair-use reports, and 1 month of retention.
- Standard is EUR 19/month or EUR 199/year for up to 10 domains, unlimited users and report volume, and 3 months of retention.
- Large is EUR 99/month or EUR 999/year for up to 100 domains and 12 months of retention. Enterprise pricing is Not publicly listed.
- The separate MSP offer is EUR 149/month plus EUR 1 per domain, or $164/month plus $1.10 per domain; it lists no onboarding fee.
Strengths
- Standard's published report volume is unlimited.
- The domain allowance covers the reference portfolio and allows additional domains within the same tier.
- Transport policy hosting and DNS monitoring are included on Standard.
- MSP account separation is explicitly documented.
Trade-offs
- Client isolation requires evaluating the separate MSP package rather than assuming it exists in Standard.
- The free account retains only 1 month of evidence.
- The available plan cards do not establish hosted SPF or hosted DKIM management as included services.
- Standard's self-service onboarding leaves the migration change plan with the customer; confirm any additional assistance.
Verdict
View MailHardener alternatives
08.
VerifyDMARC
0 / 5(0)VerifyDMARC publishes low entry pricing for DMARC and TLS report monitoring. Its 2,000-email Personal allowance is the main qualification on the advertised $1/month price.
#8
our rank
$1/month
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
All published plans include 90-day report history, source enrichment, policy suggestions, subdomain detection, regression alerts, API access, and Google/Microsoft SSO. MTA-STS validation and TLS-RPT processing are documented separately from a guaranteed production hosted-authentication service.
User experience
Bulk import and the domain-management API help rebuild a domain inventory. Account-wide admin access and client isolation still need separate checks before replicating a multi-customer DMARCwise arrangement.
Support
Priority support is listed only on Large. The public plan details do not establish an implementation service or response-time commitment for the entry plans.
Suitability
VerifyDMARC is a monitoring comparison with explicit quotas and a 90-day history window. Fit depends on whether the required replacement stops at report analysis or also includes the hosted authentication management documented by Suped.
Who should use VerifyDMARC
- Operators comparing sending-side authentication reports with receiving-side TLS failure reports.
- Buyers checking API access and regression alerts against their monitoring workflow and monthly quota.
Pricing structure
- Personal is $1/month or $10/year for 10 domains, 2,000 reported monthly emails, and 1 admin.
- Starter is $25/month or $250/year for 25 domains, 500,000 reported monthly emails, and unlimited admins.
- Medium is $50/month or $500/year for 100 domains and 2,000,000 monthly emails. Large is $100/month or $1,000/year for 200 domains and 5,000,000 monthly emails.
- There is a 30-day trial with no credit card required and no ongoing free plan. Prices exclude applicable taxes.
Strengths
- The public plan history matches the reference window.
- The entry domain allowance accommodates separately monitored reference domains.
- API access and SSO are documented across plans.
- Published quota warnings occur at 80% and 100% of the monthly email limit.
Trade-offs
- Personal's 2,000-email limit is far below a typical mixed corporate and marketing workload.
- Incoming DMARC processing stops temporarily after quota is exceeded until the next month or an upgrade.
- Published reporting capabilities do not establish a full hosted SPF and DKIM replacement.
- Unlimited admins do not establish isolated client tenants; verify the required account boundaries.
Verdict
View VerifyDMARC alternatives
09.
DMARC Report
4.8 / 5(467)DMARC Report publishes aggregate reporting, sender identification, and higher-tier transport reporting. Its public pricing contains conflicting domain-limit language that needs resolving before a DMARCwise portfolio transfer.
#9
our rank
$25/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Guard adds failure reports, Email Vendor ID, and group/permission management. Shield adds parked-domain coverage, MTA-STS/TLS-RPT, API access, and email support plus alerts in the published plan cards.
User experience
Authentication-result filtering supports inspection of noncompliant sources and subdomain traffic. Several G2 comments describe an initial learning curve; that feedback does not establish a measured usability difference against Suped.
Support
Shield lists email support and alerts, while Defender lists advanced support. Ultimate includes assisted enforcement and a dedicated DMARC engineer; the exact implementation scope and billing period need written confirmation.
Suitability
For this switch, the relevant package is the one that includes the required parked-domain coverage, alerts, and transport reporting. Compare its confirmed domain allowance and permissions with Suped after resolving the conflicting public limit descriptions.
Who should use DMARC Report
- Operators assessing aggregate-plus-failure reporting with explicit parked-domain coverage.
- Buyers validating group permissions and a written domain allowance before transferring a portfolio.
Pricing structure
- Core is free with 1 domain and 30 days of history. The main plan card lists a 10,000 monthly allowance; confirm the billing unit and operational cap before relying on it.
- Guard is $25/month or $275/year, with 5 domains and 6 months of history on the plan card.
- Shield is $75/month or $750/year, with 10 domains and 1 year of history. Defender is $200/month or $2,000/year, with 25 domains on the plan card.
- Paid plans have a 30-day trial. The Ultimate listing shows $3,900 without a clear billing period in the available pricing detail, so confirm its total contract cost.
Strengths
- Paid retention exceeds the reference window.
- Guard documents named vendor identification and permission management.
- Shield explicitly includes parked-domain coverage.
- The published partner offer includes discounted list pricing, subject to confirming the complete package.
Trade-offs
- Plan cards show paid domain caps while the FAQ says paid domains are unlimited; obtain a written allowance.
- Pricing material uses report and message terminology inconsistently, so confirm the metered unit.
- Alerts, API access, and parked-domain coverage are outside Guard's published plan-card scope.
- The Ultimate billing period is unclear in the available public price detail.
Verdict
View DMARC Report alternatives
10.
DMARCly
0 / 5(0)DMARCly publishes monthly reporting plans with vendor identification and alerts. Its entry plan's 2-month history and 2-domain limit need attention in the 90-day migration scenario.
#10
our rank
$17.99/month
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
Professional lists aggregate and forensic reporting, forensic report encryption, subdomain detection, vendor identification, a DNS timeline, and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT. Safe SPF starts on Growth, with a separate allowance for that service.
User experience
Domain groups and user allowances determine how the DNS owner and email owner can share the investigation. Examine raw authentication identities when classifying the forwarded sample and the visible From mismatch.
Support
Professional lists email support; Growth and higher list live chat support. These are published channels, with no response-time measurements or support interactions claimed here.
Suitability
Fit turns on the 90-day history requirement and how many domains need Safe SPF. Growth covers the reference window, but its single included Safe SPF domain needs comparison with the full hosted SPF scope required after the move.
Who should use DMARCly
- Operators checking the included Safe SPF domain allowance against their current hosted SPF inventory.
- Buyers comparing explicit monthly quota rules with their observed legitimate sending volume.
Pricing structure
- Professional is $17.99/month for 2 domains, 100,000 compliant monthly messages, 1 administrator, and 2 months of history.
- Growth is $39.99/month for 8 domains, 250,000 compliant monthly messages, 3 administrators, 4 months of history, and 1 Safe SPF domain.
- Business is $69/month for 15 domains and 1,000,000 compliant monthly messages. Enterprise is $199/month for 200 domains and 5,000,000 compliant monthly messages.
- A 14-day trial is included, with no permanent free tier published. Additional DMARC domains cost $1 each, and additional Safe SPF domains cost $10 each under the published rules.
Strengths
- Monthly paid prices and volume rules are public.
- Growth's domain allowance and 4-month retention cover the reference portfolio and window.
- Vendor identification and a DNS timeline support source review after the switch.
- Forensic report processing and encryption are listed in the entry package.
Trade-offs
- Professional's 2-month retention falls short of the reference window.
- Growth includes Safe SPF for only 1 domain, with separate charges for additional coverage.
- API access, SAML SSO, and user access control require Enterprise in the published matrix.
- Exceeding a message allowance triggers a temporary move to a covering tier; volume above 5 million incurs published extra charges.
Verdict
View DMARCly alternatives
Switch from DMARCwise with a clear Suped handoff
Suped
Get started
Rebuild source evidence
Use verified/unverified sources, record-level authentication checks, and CSV exports to review legitimate senders and investigate unknown traffic.
Coordinate hosted DNS
Plan the replacement of hosted DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT records with the DNS owner, then verify that reporting and policies remain available.
Size the full portfolio
Match business allowances, negotiated enterprise capacity, or the $7-per-domain MSP model to actual sending volume and the required account boundaries.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from another platform?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
How we keep this ranking honest
Suped is our product. We use the same reference environment and buying checks for every entry, comparing documented authentication workflows, hosted protocols, usage allowances, and support entitlements. Our evidence review checks public package details against the stated migration needs and flags conflicting or unpublished limits. We distinguish a true free tier from a trial and document-specific claims from measured results. G2 figures are review averages out of five with their review counts; products without reviews have no meaningful G2 average. The list order expresses our recommendation for this switching workflow. Before purchase, verify current checkout terms and obtain any unresolved domain, volume, service, or retention allowance in writing.
Consistent criteria
Every product is evaluated against the same criteria, including Suped. We compare capabilities, costs and practical trade-offs.
Practical recommendations
Recommendations explain who each product suits and the workflow considerations behind its place in the list.
Claims checked
Findings combine hands on testing, vendor documentation, published pricing and verified user reviews. Pricing reflects public plans as of the dates shown.
Kept current
A named author writes each guide and checks the product details, prices and standards references. We recheck pages on a fixed schedule.
