12 best Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark alternatives in 2026
We recommend Suped, our DMARC platform, first among Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark alternatives for readers who need summary emails backed by sender investigation and authentication fixes. Its ongoing free tier has one domain, 1,000 monthly emails, and 14 days of history. This selection includes paid options and restricted free tiers. Suped is hosted SaaS, with no self-hosted or on-premise edition.
Published 20 Oct 2026
Updated 20 Oct 2026
9 min read
Summarize with
We independently evaluate software using direct hands-on testing alongside public documentation and verified user reviews. Missed a tool worth covering? Tell us about it.
What matters when replacing a free weekly DMARC digest
Investigate beyond the digest
01.
Postmark's free summary lists the top ten sources with up to five IPs each and seven days of history. Suped connects summary emails to source verification, filtered records, and SPF/DKIM detail. Its $19/month paid allowance retains 90 days; the ongoing free tier retains 14 days. We prioritize an investigation that continues after the weekly email.
Keep DNS changes accountable
02.
Moving aggregate reporting changes where evidence arrives. Enforcement also requires fixing legitimate senders and preserving the intended domain policy. Suped documents issue resolution and hosted DMARC, SPF, and DKIM management after the initial DNS handoff. We check hosting separately from record validation, including MTA-STS/TLS-RPT, so a reporting subscription is not mistaken for managed DNS configuration.
Budget for the whole domain portfolio
03.
The corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain need explicit coverage and sufficient history. Suped publishes paid domain and volume allowances, offers negotiated enterprise terms up to unlimited, and has separate MSP client organizations at $7 per domain per month. We check subdomain counting and account permissions before relying on any free-plan headline.
12 products at a glance
| ||
|---|---|---|
01. | Suped | |
02. | DMARCwise | |
03. | MailHardener | |
04. | DMARC Report | |
05. | Dmarcian | |
06. | DMARCDKIM.com | |
07. | PowerDMARC | |
08. | EasyDMARC | |
09. | DMARCEye | |
10. | SimpleDMARC | |
11. | VerifyDMARC | |
12. | Mail Tower |
How we tested all 12 products
We assessed documented capabilities against a shared framework: a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain; Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and one support desk sender; and a 90-day monitoring window. We compared price and included domains/email volume, sender classification, authentication edge cases, and supported hosted protocols, distinguishing DMARC/SPF/DKIM management from validation and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT reporting from hosting. The cases are aligned SPF pass, aligned DKIM pass, SPF pass with a visible From mismatch, DKIM pass on a subdomain, forwarding with SPF failure, an unauthorized spoof sample, and an unknown sender needing classification. Expected outcomes depend on the authenticated domain and the applicable DMARC domain-matching rules: one qualifying SPF or DKIM pass is sufficient; raw SPF pass with a mismatched From domain is insufficient by itself; subdomain DKIM depends on relaxed or strict policy; and forwarding can preserve DMARC through DKIM despite SPF failure. The spoof case assumes neither qualifying mechanism passes, while an unknown sender requires ownership investigation. We also assessed onboarding, the DNS handoff, enforcement steps, report drilldowns, alerts, account separation, and documented support. Findings are based on product documentation, public plan information, and attributed G2 feedback. The 90-day window defines the required coverage; it is not a claim of a completed 90-day deployment or measured support interaction. Starting-price metrics show paid entry prices; free-plan eligibility and limits are stated separately.
12
products evaluated
90
day live test window
3
domains tested
6
edge cases per tool
The test rig
We ran every platform against one controlled environment for 90 days: a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain and a parked domain. Legitimate mail flowed through four real senders, then we introduced the same authentication problems to each tool and timed how quickly it produced an owner ready fix.
Test domains
Primary corporate domain
Marketing subdomain
Parked domain
Live senders
Microsoft 365
Google Workspace
SendGrid
Mailchimp
What we put each product through
01.
Onboard all three domains and reach a verified DMARC state.
02.
Resolve an unknown sender from report evidence alone.
03.
Explain a forwarded mail SPF failure that still passed DKIM.
04.
Triage a spoofing sample sent to the parked domain.
05.
Move a domain from p=none toward p=reject safely.
06.
Flatten an SPF record nearing the ten lookup limit.
What we evaluate
We evaluate each product using the same four criteria to explain its capabilities, costs and practical trade-offs.
Pricing and value
01.
Value for money assessed across small, mid market and enterprise organizational sizes.
Technical features
02.
Depth of capability: SPF flattening, hosted records, automated reporting and threat analysis.
Support quality
03.
Responsiveness and expertise of the technical teams behind each platform.
Ease of use
04.
Speed of setup and quality of ongoing day to day operating experience.
Where each leader wins and where it lags
All 12 products, with the same breakdown for each: who it suits, its best features, pricing, and the honest trade-offs.
01.
Suped
5 / 5(55)Suped is our DMARC and email authentication platform, and we recommend it first for readers replacing Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark. Summary emails connect to source verification, individual report records, and authentication fixes, so the weekly review can lead to a specific action. Our ongoing free plan covers one domain, 1,000 emails per month, and 14 days of retention. Suped is hosted SaaS; it has no self-hosted or on-premise edition.
#1
our rank
$19/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Suped documents source verification and DMARC issue resolution alongside hosted DMARC, hosted SPF with flattening, hosted DKIM, and hosted MTA-STS/TLS-RPT. That combination matters when a digest identifies a failing service but the next step requires a DNS change. We can investigate the reported authentication results, correct the legitimate sender's configuration, and review fresh evidence before changing policy. Hosted DNS services still require an initial handoff through the domain's DNS administrator.
User experience
We start by adding the domain, configuring aggregate reporting, and verifying that reports arrive. The data view filters records by source, reporter, and IP address, with CSV downloads for investigation. The detail view adds SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and reverse-DNS checks. Verified and unverified source states help separate a recognized service name from a sender we have actually authorized. Notifications include failure alerts and summary emails, keeping the digest workflow connected to detailed evidence.
Support
Our documentation covers reporting setup and issue resolution, including checking that a DNS change has taken effect. Suped offers SAML SSO and roles, with negotiated enterprise terms for organizations requiring a defined service scope. We recommend confirming onboarding responsibilities and contractual support commitments during procurement. We have not measured support response times for this comparison, and the G2 average is separate from any service commitment.
Suitability
We recommend Suped for organizations that want a hosted workflow after outgrowing email-only digests, including enterprise teams and MSPs. Enterprise pricing and capacity are negotiated, with allowances up to unlimited. MSPs can manage separate client organizations and generate monthly client reports. For the shared corporate-domain, marketing-subdomain, and parked-domain framework, confirm domain and alias treatment before selecting a plan; the entry price does not automatically establish coverage for every separately monitored entity.
Who should use Suped
- Organizations replacing a weekly summary with source verification and documented remediation steps.
- Enterprise teams that need negotiated capacity, SAML SSO, and role-based access in a hosted service.
- MSPs that need separate client organizations, client reports, and per-domain billing.
- DNS administrators who want hosted authentication management after the initial DNS handoff.
Pricing structure
- Free: one domain, 1,000 emails per month, and 14 days of retention. The initial 14-day trial has no usage limits.
- $19/month: two domains, 100,000 monthly emails, and 90 days of retention.
- $29/month: three domains, 250,000 monthly emails, and 365 days of retention.
- $59/month: six domains and 500,000 monthly emails; $99/month: ten domains and one million monthly emails. Both retain 365 days of data.
- $249/month: 20 domains, 2.5 million monthly emails, and 365 days of retention. Enterprise terms are negotiated, with capacity up to unlimited.
- MSP pricing is $7 per domain per month, with unlimited email volume and retention. Confirm the relevant plan's hosted-service and access entitlements.
Strengths
- The weekly review can continue directly into filtered records and authentication issue resolution.
- Hosted policy management provides a practical next step after identifying a failing authorized sender.
- Published domain, volume, and retention allowances make the monitoring budget explicit.
- Enterprise terms and separate MSP organizations support work beyond a single-domain digest.
Trade-offs
- The ongoing free plan cannot retain the full 90-day framework or cover several separately monitored domains.
- DNS access is still required for the initial reporting configuration and hosted-service delegation.
- Suped is hosted SaaS and does not meet a mandatory self-hosted or on-premise deployment requirement.
- Historical Postmark reports are not promised to transfer automatically; retain existing digests before switching.
Verdict
Try Suped, free
02.
DMARCwise
0 / 5(0)DMARCwise documents weekly digests and paid DMARC record hosting. Its free plan has a 1,000-email soft limit and two weeks of history, so a longer investigation requires a paid plan.
#2
our rank
EUR 15/month billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Paid plans combine aggregate reporting, DMARC hosting, SMTP TLS reporting, diagnostics history, and REST API access. Paid report processing is unlimited.
User experience
The documented record and diagnostics history provide context between weekly reviews. Free access has limited history and no additional team members.
Support
Free support is best effort. Paid plans include email support and guidance; a response-time commitment is not published in the plan details.
Suitability
The relevant preference is retaining a weekly digest while adding hosted DMARC. Check domain count and retention before treating the free workspace as the final destination.
Who should use DMARCwise
- Administrators comparing a digest workflow with DMARC record hosting on a paid subscription.
- Existing DMARCwise users checking whether the paid history and team allowances cover their switch.
Pricing structure
- Free: one domain, 1,000 monthly emails as a soft limit, two weeks of retention, and best-effort support.
- Starter: EUR 15/month billed as EUR 180/year plus taxes, with three domains, three members, and three months of history.
- Growth: EUR 39/month billed annually, with 20 domains and six months of history. Scale: EUR 99/month billed annually, with 100 domains and one year of history.
- Paid plans have a 14-day trial. The MSP plan is EUR 1 per active domain per month with a 100-domain minimum; client access is documented for that plan.
Strengths
- Paid reporting does not have a message-volume upgrade ladder.
- Published retention and domain allowances make the paid digest budget identifiable.
Trade-offs
- Free retention is too short for the 90-day framework, and Free excludes hosted DMARC and TLS reporting.
- Client access belongs to the MSP offer; standard team membership should not be assumed to provide client separation.
Verdict
View DMARCwise alternatives
03.
MailHardener
0 / 5(0)Mailhardener's Standard plan combines DMARC aggregation with SMTP TLS reporting and hosted MTA-STS. Its free access is restricted to personal or evaluation use.
#3
our rank
EUR 19/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Standard includes aggregate and failure-report processing, DNS monitoring, hosted MTA-STS, and BIMI asset hosting. The comparison matrix lists periodic reporting.
User experience
Standard onboarding is self-service, with three months of retention. Confirm the periodic-report cadence and source-investigation workflow before replacing a weekly email habit.
Support
Technical support is listed on Standard and Large. Large adds limited onboarding assistance; Enterprise lists assisted onboarding, with contractual scope requiring confirmation.
Suitability
An existing Mailhardener transport-policy deployment is a concrete workflow consideration. A switch still requires checking digest cadence and how domain permissions are assigned.
Who should use MailHardener
- Administrators already maintaining a Mailhardener MTA-STS policy alongside DMARC reporting.
- Personal-domain users evaluating a single domain before selecting commercial monitoring terms.
Pricing structure
- Free: personal or evaluation use, one domain, one user, fair-use report volume, and one month of retention.
- Standard: EUR 19/month or EUR 199/year, up to ten domains, unlimited users and report volume, and three months of history.
- Large: EUR 99/month or EUR 999/year, up to 100 domains and one year of history. Enterprise pricing: Not publicly listed.
- MSP: EUR 149/month plus EUR 1 per domain per month, with isolated customer environments.
Strengths
- Standard documents transport reporting and MTA-STS hosting alongside DMARC aggregation.
- The MSP package explicitly describes customer-environment isolation.
Trade-offs
- The free account is not an unrestricted ongoing business plan.
- The public text does not reliably establish every feature's availability on Free or the cadence of periodic reports.
Verdict
View MailHardener alternatives
04.
DMARC Report
4.8 / 5(467)DMARC Report adds paid sender identification and permission management to aggregate reporting. Alerts and parked-domain coverage are listed on Shield, which matters when replacing a digest across the full domain framework.
#4
our rank
$25/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Guard adds failure reports, Email Vendor ID, and group permissions. Shield adds parked-domain coverage, MTA-STS/TLS-RPT, API access, and alerts.
User experience
We would validate the unknown-sender drilldown during evaluation. G2 feedback includes both useful report filtering and requests for more contextual guidance.
Support
Shield lists email support and alerts, while Defender lists advanced support. Assisted enforcement is packaged separately on Ultimate; its billing unit needs confirmation.
Suitability
Existing DMARC Report users can compare group permissions with their current domain structure. Check the tier needed for the parked domain and scheduled reporting.
Who should use DMARC Report
- Administrators already using DMARC Report's vendor identification and domain-group permissions.
- Buyers checking how a paid report workflow handles parked domains and transport reports.
Pricing structure
- Core is free for one domain with 30 days of history. Published quota descriptions have used different counting units, so confirm the live allowance.
- Guard is $25/month or $275/year, with five domains and six months of history in the plan cards.
- Shield is $75/month or $750/year, with ten domains and one year of history. Defender is $200/month or $2,000/year, with 25 domains.
- Paid plans have a 30-day trial. Ultimate displays $3,900 without a clear billing period in the pricing evidence; obtain that unit before budgeting.
Strengths
- Paid source identification and permissions are explicitly packaged.
- The published tiers distinguish basic aggregation from alerts and transport reporting.
Trade-offs
- Core does not retain the full 90-day monitoring window, and alerts are a paid-tier consideration.
- Published domain and quota descriptions have conflicted; confirm the applicable limits and counting unit in writing.
Verdict
View DMARC Report alternatives
05.
Dmarcian
3.5 / 5(5)Dmarcian documents enriched sender sources and automatic subdomain detection. Its Personal plan is non-business only, so a commercial Postmark migration requires paid terms.
#5
our rank
$24/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Aggregate processing, source enrichment, TLS reporting, and subdomain detection are common capabilities. Alert Central and failure-report processing start on Basic.
User experience
The documented Sources workflow supports sender investigation. Basic retains three months, while the one-month Personal history cannot cover the full framework.
Support
G2 feedback includes helpful support as well as configuration and interface concerns. Confirm the selected plan's assistance rather than inferring a response commitment.
Suitability
The narrow workflow consideration is an existing Dmarcian Sources inventory. Business use, access controls, and retention need to be checked against the selected paid plan.
Who should use Dmarcian
- Administrators who already maintain sender classifications in Dmarcian Sources.
- Personal-domain owners who meet the non-business eligibility rule and short-history limit.
Pricing structure
- Personal is free for non-business use only: two active domains, 1,250 monthly DMARC-capable messages, one user, and one month of history.
- Basic is $24/month, or $19.99/month billed annually, with two active domains, 100,000 legitimate reported messages per month, and three months of history.
- Plus is $240/month or $199/month billed annually, with eight active domains, three users, and one year of history. Enterprise starts at $600/month or $499/month billed annually.
- Paid plans have a 30-day trial. Forwarded and fraudulent traffic is excluded from the stated pricing volume.
Strengths
- The pricing definition distinguishes legitimate reported traffic from fraud and forwarding.
- Basic explicitly adds alerting and failure-report investigation.
Trade-offs
- Personal is not eligible for ongoing business-domain monitoring.
- Basic has one user; access controls, API access, and SSO have separate tier gates.
Verdict
View Dmarcian alternatives
06.
DMARCDKIM.com
0 / 5(0)DMARCDKIM.com has a low-volume paid aggregate-report plan and a non-commercial free tier. Actionable alerts and transport reporting start above its Mini plan.
#6
our rank
EUR 4/month billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Mini lists DMARC analytics, SPF X-ray, and DNS monitoring. Basic adds failure reports, actionable alerts, MTA-STS/TLS-RPT, and webhooks.
User experience
Mini retains one month, so a 90-day investigation needs Basic or above. Verify digest scheduling separately from actionable alerts during evaluation.
Support
Mini lists onboarding support, Basic ticket support, and Pro priority support. The published progression does not establish measured response times.
Suitability
The relevant preference is preserving an existing SPF X-ray or DNS-monitoring workflow. Match the alert requirement to Basic rather than assuming Mini includes it.
Who should use DMARCDKIM.com
- Administrators already using DMARCDKIM.com's SPF X-ray during DNS changes.
- Non-commercial single-domain users whose needs fit the free volume and retention limits.
Pricing structure
- Free: non-commercial use only, one domain, up to 5,000 emails, unlimited seats, and 14 days of retention.
- Mini: EUR 4/month billed as EUR 48/year, with two domains, up to 10,000 emails, and one month of history.
- Basic: EUR 20/month or EUR 15/month billed annually, with up to 20 domains, 200,000 emails, and three months of history.
- Pro is EUR 80/month or EUR 60/month billed annually, with up to 120 domains and five million emails. Paid dashboard plans have a seven-day trial; taxes are extra.
Strengths
- The plan cards identify the point where actionable alerts become available.
- Reported spoofed and forwarded mail is excluded from the stated email-volume quota.
Trade-offs
- Free has a non-commercial restriction and cannot retain the 90-day window.
- Mini excludes actionable alerts and TLS reporting; a low entry price does not establish a complete digest replacement.
Verdict
View DMARCDKIM.com alternatives
07.
PowerDMARC
4.9 / 5(234)PowerDMARC documents hosted DMARC and RUA/RUF processing, with hosted transport services on Basic. The ongoing free tier is for personal domains and retains ten days of data.
#7
our rank
$8/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Basic includes sender identification, DNS history, hosted DMARC, hosted MTA-STS/TLS-RPT, and scheduled basic PDF reports. Hosted SPF is an add-on.
User experience
Raw XML upload and download on Basic support aggregate-report investigation. Its scheduled PDF reports differ from Postmark's email digest, so confirm the intended review cadence.
Support
Basic lists tutorials and demos, with several assistance options sold as add-ons. Enterprise lists email support; confirm the package's onboarding and service terms.
Suitability
An existing PowerDMARC hosted-policy deployment is a concrete migration consideration. Compare the Basic limits and alert entitlement before expanding a free personal account.
Who should use PowerDMARC
- Administrators already maintaining hosted DMARC policies within PowerDMARC.
- Personal-domain users evaluating the free RUA/RUF workflow with ten days of history.
Pricing structure
- Free: personal domains only, one active domain, 10,000 compliant emails per month, one user, and ten days of history.
- Basic starts at $8/month for the 10,001 to 50,000 compliant-email band; the 100,000-email band is $15/month.
- Basic includes five active domains, two users, and one year of history. Its published monthly price range is $8 to $250, depending on volume.
- Basic has a 15-day trial. Hosted SPF and several assistance options cost extra; Enterprise and Partner pricing are Not publicly listed.
Strengths
- Basic's one-year history covers the shared monitoring window.
- The published volume basis excludes phishing attacks and invalid messages.
Trade-offs
- Free is personal-use only, with short history and no scheduled PDF reporting.
- Basic excludes alert management and hosted DKIM, while hosted SPF and several support services are add-ons.
Verdict
View PowerDMARC alternatives
08.
EasyDMARC
4.8 / 5(165)EasyDMARC's paid Plus plan includes weekly reports and sender identification. Free has only 14 days of history, and alert management is listed on Premium.
#8
our rank
$44.99/month
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Plus documents aggregate and failure reports, managed DMARC, and vendor identification. Premium adds alert management, TLS reports, and managed MTA-STS in the published plan information.
User experience
Weekly reports connect to paid sender investigation. Confirm the current invitation and permission allowances during signup because packaging changes affect the handoff to colleagues.
Support
Premium lists email support and a customer success manager on annual billing. G2 feedback varies; it does not establish a response-time commitment.
Suitability
An existing EasyDMARC managed-record setup is a narrow workflow consideration. Review its domain and volume limits before treating the free account as an equivalent weekly-report service.
Who should use EasyDMARC
- Administrators already maintaining managed DMARC records through EasyDMARC.
- Existing accounts checking whether Plus weekly reports or Premium alerts cover the switching requirement.
Pricing structure
- Free: one domain, 1,000 monthly emails, 14 days of history, and aggregate reporting in the published free-plan details.
- Plus starts at $44.99/month, or $35.99/month billed annually, for two domains, 100,000 monthly emails, and three months of history.
- Premium starts at $89.99/month, or $71.99/month billed annually, for four domains, 100,000 monthly emails, and one year of history.
- Higher volume changes the paid price. Confirm current team entitlements, extra-domain terms, and quoted Enterprise or MSP scope before purchase.
Strengths
- Plus explicitly retains weekly email reporting as part of a paid DMARC workflow.
- The published plans distinguish three-month monitoring history from longer paid retention.
Trade-offs
- Free does not provide the retention needed for the 90-day framework.
- Plus includes two domains at its entry volume; alert management and some hosted protocols require a different package.
Verdict
View EasyDMARC alternatives
09.
DMARCEye
4.8 / 5(3)DMARCeye's free tier provides one-domain reporting with 30 days of history. It excludes email notifications, making it materially different from a free weekly email digest.
#9
our rank
$4/domain/month billed annually
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Paid Scale adds smart alerts, email notifications, team collaboration, and one year of history. Multi-tenant account separation is listed on Agency.
User experience
G2 reviewers describe sender-level detail, while two request in-platform DNS or policy management. Validate the current DNS workflow rather than assuming reporting changes the policy.
Support
Priority support is listed on paid plans and excluded from Free. Public plan information does not provide a measured response time.
Suitability
The relevant preference is an existing DMARCeye domain-slot subscription. A digest-dependent buyer needs paid notifications, with each separately monitored domain accounted for.
Who should use DMARCEye
- Administrators already using DMARCeye domain slots and sender-detail views.
- Single-domain users who accept checking free reporting without email notifications.
Pricing structure
- Free: one domain, 5,000 tracked emails per month, and 30 days of history; email notifications are excluded.
- Scale: $4 per domain per month billed annually, or $48 per domain per year, with up to 50 domains and one year of history.
- Published Scale volume descriptions have differed between 500,000 and one million emails per domain per month; confirm the live limit before committing.
- Agency pricing is Not publicly listed. Paid plans have a 14-day trial; separately added subdomains can consume domain slots.
Strengths
- Annual per-domain pricing and slot reuse are explicitly described.
- Scale retains the full monitoring window and adds email notifications.
Trade-offs
- Free email notifications are absent, so Free does not preserve the weekly inbox review.
- Scale lacks multi-tenancy, and published volume allowances have required clarification.
Verdict
View DMARCEye alternatives
10.
SimpleDMARC
4 / 5(4)SimpleDMARC lists weekly aggregate reporting and email alerts on Free. Its published lower-tier details do not establish retention or every hosted-protocol entitlement.
#10
our rank
$99/year
starting price
Yes
free tier
Feature set
Free includes DMARC monitoring and basic reporting. Micro retains weekly reporting; Small lists daily reports, and Medium lists team access.
User experience
Report cadence changes by tier. Confirm source drilldowns and retention using the forwarding and unknown-sender cases before relying on a weekly summary alone.
Support
Support progresses from basic on Free to standard on Micro and priority on Small. These labels do not establish specific response times.
Suitability
The narrow preference is preserving weekly aggregate emails with a published low-volume allowance. Confirm investigation depth before making it the destination for enforcement work.
Who should use SimpleDMARC
- Users whose immediate requirement is a documented weekly aggregate email and basic alerts.
- Existing SimpleDMARC accounts checking the change between weekly and daily reporting.
Pricing structure
- Free: one active domain, no passive domains, 10,000 monthly emails, basic reporting, and email alerts.
- Micro: $99/year, one active domain, one passive domain, and 25,000 monthly emails.
- Small: $149/year, two active and two passive domains, and 100,000 monthly emails. Medium: $249/year, four active and four passive domains, and 250,000 monthly emails.
- Paid plans have a 14-day trial. Lower-tier retention and several feature-matrix entitlements are not established by the published text.
Strengths
- The documented free report cadence matches a weekly-review habit.
- Paid plan cards distinguish active and passive domains.
Trade-offs
- A full 90-day history cannot be assumed from the published lower-tier details.
- The feature matrix does not reliably establish each plan's hosted SPF, failure-report, or enforcement entitlements.
Verdict
View SimpleDMARC alternatives
11.
VerifyDMARC
0 / 5(0)VerifyDMARC is a paid option with a 30-day trial, rather than an ongoing free digest. All public tiers list 90-day report history and source enrichment.
#11
our rank
$1/month
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
Public plans include RUA processing, source enrichment, policy suggestions, regression alerts, and TLS reporting. MTA-STS setup validation is distinct from policy hosting.
User experience
Bulk import and setup history support a DNS handoff. Confirm the scheduled digest's cadence and the SPF/DKIM drilldown during the trial.
Support
Priority support is listed only on Large. The public pricing information does not establish response-time commitments on the lower tiers.
Suitability
The relevant preference is an existing VerifyDMARC API or regression-alert workflow. Its entry price still requires checking reported-email volume rather than domain count alone.
Who should use VerifyDMARC
- Administrators already using VerifyDMARC's domain-management API or setup history.
- Buyers willing to pay for ongoing monitoring after a temporary evaluation period.
Pricing structure
- No ongoing free tier; the 30-day trial does not require a credit card until it ends.
- Personal: $1/month or $10/year, ten domains, 2,000 reported emails per month, one administrator, and 90 days of history.
- Starter: $25/month or $250/year, 25 domains, 500,000 reported emails per month, and unlimited administrators.
- Medium is $50/month for 100 domains and two million reported emails; Large is $100/month for 200 domains and five million reported emails. Taxes are extra.
Strengths
- The plan information explicitly includes 90-day history and source enrichment.
- Published volume thresholds make the point at which processing stops identifiable.
Trade-offs
- There is no ongoing free workspace after the trial, and the entry volume allowance is only 2,000 reported emails.
- Processing temporarily stops after the monthly email allowance is exceeded until an upgrade or the next calendar month.
Verdict
View VerifyDMARC alternatives
12.
Mail Tower
0 / 5(0)Mail Tower publishes paid aggregate-report plans with longer retained history. A permanent free plan is not listed, and employee bands determine the applicable package.
#12
our rank
EUR 120/year
starting price
No
free tier
Feature set
The entry package lists five active domains, ten inactive domains, unlimited aggregate reports, 180 days of data access, and two-factor authentication.
User experience
Published retention covers the 90-day framework. Weekly digest scheduling, sender classification, alerts, and hosted authentication management need confirmation before a reporting migration.
Support
The public plan information does not establish a support SLA or managed onboarding entitlement. Request the operational scope with the subscription terms.
Suitability
The relevant consideration is an existing Mail Tower aggregate-report archive. Its employee-based plan eligibility and included users must be checked before comparing the entry price.
Who should use Mail Tower
- Administrators already retaining aggregate-report history in Mail Tower.
- Buyers evaluating paid report storage who can confirm employee-band eligibility and digest requirements.
Pricing structure
- Entry package: EUR 10/month in the published monthly pricing evidence, with an annual listing of EUR 120/year, for organizations with fewer than 50 employees.
- The next published package is EUR 20/month, with ten active domains, 25 inactive domains, 180 days of data access, and two users.
- The highest standard package is EUR 50/month, with 25 active domains, 50 inactive domains, 365 days of data access, and four users.
- Custom MSP pricing is Not publicly listed. No ongoing free plan is published; confirm the live billing term and API entitlement.
Strengths
- The entry package publishes longer history than a seven-day digest window.
- Aggregate report volume is uncapped in the published paid packages.
Trade-offs
- A paid subscription is required, and the applicable employee band is binding.
- The public pricing detail does not establish weekly digests, automated alerts, or a complete hosted enforcement workflow.
Verdict
View Mail Tower alternatives
Replace the weekly digest with a Suped investigation workflow
Suped
Get started
Continue past the summary
Use summary emails to start a review, then inspect verified and unverified sources and detailed authentication records in Suped.
Connect findings to DNS fixes
Resolve authentication issues and manage hosted DMARC, SPF, and DKIM after the initial DNS setup. Review fresh reports before tightening policy.
Plan domain coverage explicitly
Choose published domain, volume, and retention allowances, with negotiated enterprise terms and separate MSP client organizations when required.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from another platform?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
How we keep this ranking honest
Suped is our product, and we apply the same domain framework and authentication cases to every entry. We check documented functionality against plan eligibility, billing units, retention, and the operational work required after a weekly digest identifies a problem. Public prices and free-plan limits come from published product information; unresolved details require checkout or contractual confirmation. G2 averages and counts are attributed to G2, and entries without reviews have no review evidence. Our review process keeps source claims separate from protocol expectations and revisits packaging conflicts without turning undocumented capabilities into assumed inclusions.
Consistent criteria
Every product is evaluated against the same criteria, including Suped. We compare capabilities, costs and practical trade-offs.
Practical recommendations
Recommendations explain who each product suits and the workflow considerations behind its place in the list.
Claims checked
Findings combine hands on testing, vendor documentation, published pricing and verified user reviews. Pricing reflects public plans as of the dates shown.
Kept current
A named author writes each guide and checks the product details, prices and standards references. We recheck pages on a fixed schedule.
