Summary
Since February, many email senders have observed a significant decline in engagement rates for their large broadcast campaigns, while automated or transactional emails seem unaffected. This trend has sparked discussions among marketers and experts alike, suggesting that recent shifts in mailbox provider policies and filter sensitivities are likely contributors.
Key findings
- Specific timing: The drop in engagement is often reported to have begun around February, coinciding with the implementation of new sender requirements by major mailbox providers like Gmail and Yahoo.
- Broadcast-specific impact: The issue predominantly affects large, mass email campaigns, indicating that these sends are being evaluated differently than automated or transactional messages. Automated emails generally maintain previous engagement levels.
- Deliverability shift: Many emails are likely landing in spam folders or promotional tabs, rather than the primary inbox, which directly impacts measured engagement rates. Understanding what causes a sudden drop in open rates is crucial.
- Engagement measurement: Mailbox providers are increasingly focusing on recipient engagement as a key signal for inbox placement, and a lack of positive interaction with broadcast sends can negatively impact sender reputation.
- Authentication impact: Changes or implementations of email authentication protocols like DKIM and DMARC around this period may have temporarily affected or reset domain reputation, contributing to deliverability issues. This is a common aspect when troubleshooting email deliverability issues.
Key considerations
- Domain-level analysis: Break down engagement data by recipient domain (e.g., Gmail, Yahoo, Outlook) to pinpoint where drops are most severe. This can help identify specific provider-related issues.
- Inbox testing: Regularly test inbox placement for your large broadcast sends to understand if they are reaching the primary inbox, spam, or promotions tabs.
- Authentication review: Ensure that your SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are correctly configured and aligned, especially if changes were made recently. Proper authentication is a fundamental aspect of email deliverability.
- Send patterns: Consider if the volume or speed of your broadcast sends might be a factor. Experimenting with slower send speeds for large campaigns could potentially improve engagement.
- Content relevance: Re-evaluate the content and targeting of your broadcast emails to maximize recipient engagement and minimize negative signals like spam complaints or low opens.
What email marketers say
Email marketers across various industries have reported a noticeable decline in engagement metrics, particularly open rates, for their large-scale broadcast emails. This phenomenon seems to have a common timeline, with many noticing the shift starting in February, leading to questions about underlying causes that differ from typical campaign fluctuations. The consensus points to a combination of factors, including evolving ISP filtering algorithms and changes in sender reputation dynamics.
Key opinions
- Widespread issue: Many marketers are independently reporting similar declines, suggesting a broader industry trend rather than isolated incidents.
- Timing of drops: The drops are frequently tied to the period after February 1st, aligning with the rollout of new sender requirements from Google and Yahoo, as well as general ISP filter adjustments.
- Campaign differentiation: A key observation is that automated or triggered emails continue to perform well, implying that broadcast sends are subject to different, possibly stricter, filtering criteria.
- Open rate decline: While the primary concern is open rates, some marketers are seeing a broader drop across all engagement metrics, including clicks and even unsubscribes.
Key considerations
- Investigate by domain: It's important to segment data by recipient domain (e.g., Gmail, Yahoo, Outlook) to identify specific areas of underperformance. For instance, understanding why Gmail open rates are dropping for new subscribers is vital.
- Holistic view: Look beyond just open rates. Analyze click-through rates, spam complaints, and unsubscribe rates to get a comprehensive picture of engagement and deliverability health.
- Content relevance: Ensure your content is highly relevant and valuable to your audience to encourage positive engagement. Low content relevance often leads to a significant drop in open rates.
- Historical data: Compare current performance to pre-February benchmarks to quantify the extent of the drop and understand the scale of the issue. This helps in understanding why email open rates decrease.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes a clear trend: they've received reports from several people about significant drops in email engagement rates, specifically for large broadcast sends. Interestingly, automated messages do not show this decline, maintaining their usual good rates. This suggests a differentiated filtering approach for mass campaigns.The pattern has been observed across various volumes of sends, indicating it's not merely a fluke of one particular campaign but a broader systemic issue affecting how large broadcasts are perceived by mailbox providers.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks confirms the timing of the observed engagement drops. They explicitly state that these declines started occurring after the 1st of February. This precise timeline is a crucial piece of information, as it links the observed phenomenon to the period when major mailbox providers rolled out new email sender requirements.This temporal correlation strengthens the hypothesis that recent industry-wide changes, rather than isolated sender-specific issues, are contributing to the reduced engagement for bulk sends.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts largely confirm the observation of declining engagement rates for large broadcast sends, especially since February. They attribute this trend to a combination of factors, including the fine-tuning of ISP filters, the widespread implementation (and potential misconfiguration) of new authentication standards, and a heightened emphasis on user engagement signals by mailbox providers. This indicates a maturing email ecosystem where reputation is more dynamically assessed.
Key opinions
- ISP filter evolution: Mailbox providers are continually refining their spam filters, and Q1 often sees significant updates. These changes can impact how bulk mail is handled, pushing more messages to spam or promotional folders.
- Authentication impact: The increased push for DKIM and DMARC adoption means many senders are making authentication changes. If not done correctly, or if there's a perceived 'reset' of domain reputation by ISPs, this can lead to deliverability issues.
- Engagement as a factor: Mailbox providers, notably Yahoo, are heavily weighing recipient engagement (or lack thereof) when determining inbox placement. Low interest in past campaigns can lead to future emails being filtered to spam.
- Behavioral fingerprinting: ISPs may differentiate between automated, transactional emails and large broadcast sends based on sending speed, volume, and header information. Large, fast bursts of mail may be flagged more readily.
- Privacy changes: Changes like Apple's Mail Privacy Protection have already skewed open rate data, making it harder to accurately gauge engagement based solely on opens. This means marketers need to focus on other signals, as highlighted by VerticalResponse concerning open rates dying.
Key considerations
- Granular analysis: It is essential to break down deliverability data by domain and understand specific mailbox provider responses. This includes checking for spam folder placement.
- Authentication standards: Rigorously implement and monitor email authentication protocols, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM can help ensure proper setup.
- Adjust send speed: For large broadcast sends, consider gradually increasing volume or slowing down the send speed to mimic more organic sending patterns, which might positively influence ISP filters.
- Engagement strategy: Implement strategies to improve recipient engagement. This includes list hygiene, segmentation, and providing highly relevant content to avoid negative signals. These are vital technical solutions for deliverability.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests breaking down email performance by domain to identify specific spam folder placements. They highlight that if DKIM/DMARC was implemented or changed around February, it might have temporarily reset domain reputation at major providers like Gmail or Yahoo, impacting deliverability and engagement.This points to the critical role of email authentication in sender reputation and how missteps or even correct, but recent, implementations can cause fluctuations as ISPs re-evaluate the sending domain.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks notes that the user's observation is not unique, as another client reported similar issues beginning in February. In that specific case, emails were indeed going to spam at Yahoo due to low engagement or perceived low interest from recipients, as measured by Yahoo's filtering systems.This underscores Yahoo's emphasis on user engagement signals for inbox placement and suggests that a decline in these signals can quickly lead to punitive actions, such as direct routing to the spam folder for otherwise legitimate senders.
What the documentation says
Recent updates in documentation from major email service providers and industry bodies highlight a shift towards more stringent requirements for bulk senders, particularly emphasizing email authentication and consistent positive recipient engagement. These changes are designed to combat spam and improve user experience, but they can inadvertently impact legitimate broadcast sends that don't fully align with the new standards.
Key findings
- Evolving privacy measures: Privacy features like Apple's Mail Privacy Protection (MPP) have altered the reliability of traditional open rates as a metric, making them less accurate for gauging true engagement.
- Engagement as a primary signal: Documentation increasingly stresses that consistent positive engagement (clicks, replies, non-deletions) is crucial for email deliverability, outweighing simple opens in many cases.
- Strict sender requirements: New guidelines from providers like Gmail and Yahoo enforce strict authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) and low spam complaint rates for bulk senders, with non-compliance leading to messages being rejected or sent to spam.
- Bounce rates impact: High bounce rates, especially hard bounces, signal poor list hygiene and can negatively affect sender reputation and inbox placement. Agencies need to minimize bounce rates to improve email campaign success.
Key considerations
- Rethink open rates: Given privacy changes, open rates should not be the sole metric for campaign success or deliverability. Focus on clicks, conversions, and other direct engagement signals.
- Prioritize authentication: Ensure your SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are correctly set up and maintained. Pay close attention to DMARC reports from Google and Yahoo to troubleshoot authentication issues. This is key for understanding DMARC reports.
- Manage spam complaints: Actively monitor and minimize spam complaint rates, as this is a critical signal for ISPs. High complaint rates are a major reason why emails go to spam.
- Segment and personalize: Leverage segmentation and personalization for broadcast sends to increase relevance and drive higher engagement, thereby improving overall sender reputation.
- Leverage postmaster tools: Utilize tools like Google Postmaster Tools to gain insights into your domain's reputation, spam rate, and authentication errors directly from the mailbox provider.
Technical article
Documentation from VerticalResponse highlights that email open rates are primarily declining due to changes in privacy settings. Specifically, Apple's Mail Privacy Protection anonymizes tracking data, making it difficult to accurately measure opens. This change fundamentally alters how email engagement is perceived.The implication is that relying solely on open rates can provide a misleading picture of campaign performance, necessitating a shift towards other metrics for a more accurate assessment of recipient interaction.
Technical article
Documentation from ActiveCampaign emphasizes that emails consistently engaging recipients are far more likely to land in the primary inbox, completely bypassing the spam folder. This highlights a direct correlation between positive engagement and improved deliverability, acting as a crucial signal for mailbox providers.It means that a lack of engagement not only reduces perceived success but actively harms future inbox placement, creating a cycle where low interaction leads to even lower visibility.
Related resources
15 resources
Related pages
What causes a sudden drop in email open rates?
Why has Microsoft email engagement dropped and how does throttling affect email deliverability?
Why are Yahoo and AOL email engagement and delivery rates dropping?
Why are email open rates dropping in Gmail, especially for new subscribers and welcome emails?
Why have my email open rates declined since February?
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
Understanding and troubleshooting DMARC reports from Google and Yahoo
How email blacklists actually work: a simple guide
