When email inbox placement drops but engagement metrics remain stable, it indicates a subtle but significant shift in how mailbox providers view your mail. While your most engaged users may still receive your emails in their primary inbox, unengaged segments and spam traps are likely seeing your messages diverted to junk or bulk folders. This scenario often signals a decrease in your sender reputation, even if direct negative feedback (like spam complaints) isn't immediately apparent. Understanding this nuance is critical for maintaining long-term deliverability and avoiding a more severe impact on your email program.
Key findings
Reputation shift: A drop in inbox placement without a corresponding drop in engagement often suggests a decline in sender reputation. Mailbox providers might be sending your emails to spam folders for less engaged recipients, while still delivering to your highly engaged users.
Targeted filtering: ISPs (Internet Service Providers) can apply filtering based on individual recipient engagement, allowing mail to engaged users to pass through while diverting mail to disengaged or probe accounts.
Subtle indicators: Traditional metrics like open rates and click rates (especially for your most active segments) might not immediately reflect this issue. Look for a decline in overall inbox placement rate (IPR) across your entire list.
Long-term impact: Every email diverted to bulk or spam negatively impacts your domain reputation over time. This can lead to more widespread deliverability issues if unaddressed.
Key considerations
Monitor hidden metrics: Beyond open and click rates, pay attention to metrics that reveal where your emails are landing, such as inbox placement rate (IPR) reports if available. Consider how to improve your Gmail inbox placement.
Segment aggressively: Ensure you are segmenting your audience effectively and prioritizing highly engaged users. Sending to less engaged segments can dilute your positive engagement signals.
Clean your list: Regularly remove inactive or unengaged subscribers. This reduces the risk of hitting spam traps and signals better list hygiene to mailbox providers. Learn about different types of spam traps.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often find themselves in a perplexing situation where their reported inbox placement rates decline, yet their core engagement metrics, such as opens and clicks from their active segments, remain consistent. This discrepancy can be a source of confusion, as it suggests a problem that isn't immediately obvious through traditional performance dashboards. Marketers discuss the importance of understanding how mailbox providers interpret signals beyond just direct engagement, especially for less active portions of a mailing list. They emphasize that while your top performers might still be receiving mail, a broader audience could be seeing your emails filtered elsewhere, impacting overall deliverability and potentially long-term sender reputation.
Key opinions
IPR skepticism: Some marketers express skepticism about the reliability of Inbox Placement Rate (IPR) alone, arguing that engagement metrics are more trustworthy indicators of deliverability health, especially when looking at trailing data over 14 days.
Engagement as a priority: A common sentiment is that if engagement remains strong, it's the most crucial factor, suggesting that even with IPR drops, the most valuable part of your audience is still receiving your emails.
Brand-specific observations: Marketers note observing this trend across multiple brands, even when campaigns are sent only to highly engaged users (e.g., 90-day engaged segments), indicating a broader ISP-level shift.
Recovery uplift: There can be a noticeable uplift in inbox delivery rates after a period of lower performance, suggesting that ISP algorithms may adjust over time based on continued positive sending behavior.
Key considerations
Define engagement: It's important to clarify what 'engagement' means in terms of metrics. Is it opens, clicks, replies, or a combination? A clear definition helps in accurate diagnosis, especially when open rates are dropping, but click rates are the same due to template redesigns.
Holistic view: Even if core engagement is stable, a significant IPR drop indicates that some emails are not reaching the inbox. This can still lead to missed opportunities and a reduction in overall reach.
ISP-specific issues: Deliverability can vary greatly between ISPs (e.g., Gmail vs. Microsoft). What works for one may not for another, necessitating ISP-specific monitoring and adjustments.
Proactive monitoring: Relying on third-party tools to measure inbox placement is common among marketers to get an early warning of potential issues, even before traditional engagement metrics show a decline across the entire list. For more on this, check out this guide on improving inbox placement.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks notes an improvement in Gmail open rates over the last week, despite general inbox placement concerns. They also mention that Microsoft (Outlook) deliverability is currently not performing well for their campaigns.
18 Mar 2020 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks indicates that they don't fully trust Inbox Placement Rate (IPR) as a standalone metric. They believe that consistent engagement, such as opens and clicks, is a more critical indicator of successful email delivery.
18 Mar 2020 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability offer a deeper insight into the phenomenon of stable engagement despite declining inbox placement. They explain that this situation often points directly to a nuanced decrease in sender reputation. Mailbox providers, especially sophisticated ones like Gmail, don't just assess your overall sender health but also how individual recipients interact with your emails. When reputation dips, providers might begin to route emails to the bulk or spam folder for subscribers who are less engaged or who are identified as 'probe accounts' (used to monitor spam). Critically, every email diverted to these folders contributes negatively to your sending reputation, creating a downward spiral that can eventually affect even your most engaged recipients.
Key opinions
Reputation is key: The primary cause for a drop in inbox placement with stable engagement is almost always a decline in sender reputation. This is because ISPs prioritize engaged users.
Selective filtering: Mailbox providers will move mail for unengaged recipients, including probe accounts, into the bulk folder, while still delivering to engaged recipients. This creates the observed discrepancy.
Negative feedback loop: Each email that lands in the bulk folder contributes negatively to your sender reputation, which, if left unaddressed, will eventually impact delivery to all recipients, including engaged ones.
Recovery time: Restoring a damaged sender reputation takes time, typically 2-3 weeks of consistent, positive sending practices. Learn more about how long it takes to recover domain reputation.
Key considerations
Segment by true engagement: Relying on broad 'engaged users' segments might not be enough. Experts recommend even stricter segmentation to ensure you're only sending to truly active recipients to rebuild trust.
Proactive list hygiene: Aggressively suppress unengaged subscribers to prevent negative signals from impacting your overall sender reputation. This includes identifying and removing potential blacklist risks.
Content quality: Review email content for any changes that might trigger spam filters, even if engagement for current recipients is good. Small changes can have big impacts, as seen with new email templates.
Domain and IP reputation: Understand that ISPs consider both domain and IP reputation. A drop could be tied to activity on your shared IP, or issues with your domain's authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC). More information is available on factors affecting deliverability.
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks suggests that if inbox placement drops but engagement remains the same, it likely signals a reduction in your sender reputation. They explain that mailbox providers will start sending mail for unengaged recipients, including probe accounts, to the bulk or spam folder.
18 Mar 2020 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks further clarifies that every email diverted to the bulk folder counts as a negative hit against your sending reputation. This accumulation of negative signals will eventually impact your deliverability across the board.
18 Mar 2020 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
Official documentation from major email service providers and industry bodies consistently highlights that inbox placement is a complex outcome influenced by a dynamic array of factors. While user engagement (opens, clicks, replies) is a significant positive signal, documentation clarifies that other less visible metrics, such as complaint rates, bounce rates, and the frequency of hitting spam traps, contribute to a comprehensive sender reputation score. A decline in inbox placement, even with stable engagement from active users, can occur if these other factors deteriorate, causing mailbox providers to reroute mail for inactive or risky recipients. Documentation often advises that providers use sophisticated algorithms that learn from continuous interactions, and any negative signal, no matter how small, can collectively impact overall placement.
Key findings
Holistic reputation: Mailbox providers assess sender reputation using a broad set of criteria, not just direct engagement metrics. These include spam complaints, bounce rates, IP/domain history, and adherence to email standards.
Engagement as one factor: While positive engagement improves deliverability, it cannot fully offset persistent negative signals from other sources.
Adaptive filtering: ISPs employ adaptive filtering, meaning their systems continuously learn and adjust based on real-time sender behavior and recipient feedback. This can lead to subtle shifts in placement.
List quality impact: Sending to a significant number of inactive or invalid addresses, even if they don't immediately bounce, can degrade overall sender reputation and lead to messages being filtered for a broader audience.
Key considerations
Review authentication: Ensure your SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are correctly configured and aligned. Authentication failures can significantly impact deliverability regardless of engagement. Refer to this simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM.
Monitor complaint rates: Even low complaint rates from a small segment can negatively impact your sender score over time. Utilize Postmaster Tools to track these. For Google, see the Ultimate Guide to Google Postmaster Tools V2.
Adhere to best practices: Consistently follow best practices for email content, list acquisition, and sending frequency. ISPs reward senders who demonstrate responsible sending habits. More details on understanding email deliverability are available.
Feedback loops: Sign up for and actively monitor ISP feedback loops to quickly identify and remove users who mark your emails as spam.
Technical article
Documentation from Gmail's bulk sender guidelines states that sender reputation is dynamic and influenced by a variety of signals, including user engagement, spam reports, and bounce rates. A high rate of messages being moved to spam by even a small percentage of recipients can negatively impact future delivery.
22 Feb 2024 - Google Postmaster Tools Help
Technical article
Microsoft's Outlook.com Postmaster guidelines specify that low engagement with email campaigns, particularly among less active users, can trigger stricter filtering for future mailings. They recommend regularly pruning lists to maintain high engagement density.