Summary
The consensus is that email spam testing tools have limitations and shouldn't be the sole focus for achieving optimal deliverability. Experts and marketers recommend a multifaceted approach including strong email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), meticulous list hygiene, proactive sender reputation management, and sending relevant, high-quality content. They also suggest using seed lists to accurately assess inbox placement across various providers, content analysis to avoid spam triggers, and following email provider (Gmail, Outlook) best practices. Evaluating the methodology of testing tools is vital, with some experts believing vendor-provided support offers better insights. Some say that building a good reputation and following best practices is better than relying on email testing tools.
Key findings
- Tool Limitations: Email spam testing tools offer an incomplete picture due to constantly evolving spam filters and individualized criteria.
- Authentication Importance: Strong email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is critical for establishing sender legitimacy and avoiding spam filters.
- List Hygiene Essential: Regularly cleaning email lists and focusing on engaged subscribers improves deliverability rates.
- Reputation Management: Maintaining a positive sender reputation is paramount, requiring proactive monitoring and management.
- Content Quality Affects Deliverability: Sending relevant, engaging content reduces spam complaints and improves deliverability.
- Alternative Testing Methods: Seed lists provide a more accurate snapshot of inbox placement compared to some testing tools.
Key considerations
- Filter Complexity: Individualized and constantly changing spam filters make it difficult for any tool to provide a completely accurate assessment.
- Holistic Strategy Required: Effective email deliverability requires a comprehensive strategy addressing authentication, list management, reputation, and content.
- Tool Evaluation: Carefully evaluate email testing tools, understanding their methodologies and data sources to ensure they provide actionable insights.
- Provider Guidelines: Adhering to specific guidelines from major email providers (Gmail, Outlook) is essential for optimal deliverability.
- Ongoing Monitoring: Deliverability is an ongoing process that requires continuous monitoring and adaptation.
What email marketers say
10 marketer opinions
Experts and marketers generally agree that email spam testing tools have limitations and should not be the sole measure of email deliverability. Instead, focusing on sender authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), maintaining a clean email list, monitoring sender reputation, warming up your IP, optimizing email design, using content analysis tools, validating email lists, and employing seed list testing are recommended as more effective alternatives.
Key opinions
- Tool Inaccuracy: Email spam testing tools are not always accurate due to the dynamic nature of spam filters.
- Authentication: Sender authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is crucial for improving deliverability.
- List Hygiene: Maintaining a clean and engaged email list is essential.
- Reputation Matters: Monitoring and managing sender reputation is critical.
- Alternative Testing: Seed list testing offers a more accurate view of inbox placement.
- Content Analysis: Content analysis tools can help identify spam triggers.
- IP Warmup: Gradually warming up your IP is important for new IPs.
Key considerations
- Dynamic Filters: Spam filters are constantly evolving, rendering testing tools less reliable.
- Holistic Approach: Deliverability requires a holistic approach encompassing authentication, list hygiene, and reputation management.
- Seed List Setup: Seed lists need to be correctly configured across various email providers for accurate testing.
- Content Optimization: Email design and content should be optimized to avoid spam triggers.
- List Validation Cost: Regular email list validation can incur costs but improves deliverability.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email on Acid states that while full spam testing tools have limitations, using content analysis tools to check for common spam triggers (e.g., certain words, excessive use of capitalization) can help improve deliverability.
7 Jun 2022 - Email on Acid
Marketer view
Email marketer from Neil Patel Blog shares that email spam testing tools can provide a general idea but aren't always 100% accurate due to the ever-changing nature of spam filters. Instead, he recommends focusing on building a clean email list, using double opt-in, and monitoring sender reputation.
12 Mar 2023 - Neil Patel Blog
What the experts say
4 expert opinions
Experts generally agree that email spam testing tools have limitations and are not always reliable. They suggest focusing on understanding the methodology and data sources of testing tools, monitoring sender reputation, and analyzing email content for potential spam triggers. Vendors are considered the best source for support and for interpreting testing discrepancies. Spam filters' complexity and individualization make legitimate, universally applicable testing challenging.
Key opinions
- Limited Reliance: Many experts don't heavily rely on spam and inbox testing tools.
- Vendor Support: Email testing tool vendors provide the best support and can interpret discrepancies.
- Content Impact: Content issues, like links, can trigger spam filters; Google uses NLP in filtering.
- Methodology Matters: Understanding the methodology and data sources of testing tools is crucial.
- Reputation is Key: Sender reputation is a crucial factor in email deliverability.
Key considerations
- Tool Complexity: Spam filters are complex and individualized, making universal testing difficult.
- Actionable Insights: Testing tools should provide actionable recommendations for improving deliverability.
- Reputation Management: Actively managing sender reputation by keeping complaint rates low is important.
- Content Scrutiny: Regularly review and optimize email content, especially links, to avoid triggering spam filters.
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that when evaluating email testing tools, it's important to understand their methodology and data sources. They suggest looking for tools that provide insights into inbox placement across a variety of mailbox providers and that offer actionable recommendations for improving deliverability.
19 Jul 2023 - Spam Resource
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that if one message fails spam filtering while another from the same infrastructure passes with the same test addresses, it's likely a content issue. They advise checking links, noting Google uses Natural Language Processing in filtering.
4 Apr 2022 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
Email deliverability relies heavily on adhering to bulk sender guidelines set by major email providers like Gmail and Outlook.com. Key strategies include implementing email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), maintaining a positive sender reputation by sending high-quality content and minimizing spam complaints, ensuring your IP is not blacklisted, and providing easy unsubscribe options.
Key findings
- Authentication is Key: SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are essential for verifying sender identity and preventing spoofing.
- Sender Reputation Matters: Maintaining a good sender reputation is crucial for deliverability to major email providers.
- Content Quality: Sending high-quality, relevant content improves engagement and sender reputation.
- IP Reputation: Ensuring your sending IP address is not on any blocklists is essential.
- Unsubscribe Options: Providing easy unsubscribe options is a requirement for bulk email senders.
Key considerations
- Implementation Complexity: Implementing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC can be technically challenging and requires careful configuration.
- Reputation Monitoring: Regularly monitor sender reputation using tools like Microsoft's SNDS.
- Content Relevance: Ensuring content is relevant and engaging requires understanding your audience.
- Bounce Management: Actively managing bounces and complaints is crucial for maintaining a good sender reputation.
Technical article
Documentation from RFC explains that Sender Policy Framework (SPF) records specify the mail servers authorized to send email on behalf of your domain, helping prevent spoofing and improving deliverability by authenticating your email.
26 Jun 2023 - RFC
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft responds that to improve deliverability to Outlook.com, ensure your sending IP address isn't on any blocklists, authenticate your email, and monitor your sender reputation through Microsoft's Smart Network Data Services (SNDS).
3 Aug 2023 - Microsoft
How accurate is SNDS and Google Postmaster Tools reputation data?
Do SuretyMail and Validity Sender Certification increase inbox reach, and how do they work?
How accurate are seedlists in deliverability platforms like Everest and Glockapps?
Are inbox placement platforms a good strategy for email deliverability?
How reliable are GlockApps deliverability placement reports and what are the alternatives?
How accurate is Microsoft SNDS data for deliverability monitoring?
How can I accurately test and measure email deliverability and sender reputation?
What are good alternatives to Kickbox deliverability tools that support SSO?
How accurate are seed lists for email deliverability testing?
