LetsDMARC, part of the Libraesva suite, offers a comprehensive DMARC reporting and monitoring platform. It provides detailed dashboards that visualize DMARC, SPF, and DKIM authentication results, allowing users to quickly identify email sources and potential spoofing attempts.
The platform focuses on actionable insights, offering tools to manage SPF records, analyze forensic reports, and ensure compliance. We found its feature set to be robust for organizations looking for a managed service that goes beyond basic DMARC aggregation.
Docker DMARC Reports is an open-source, self-hosted solution. It provides the core functionality of collecting and parsing DMARC aggregate reports, making the data accessible through a web interface. Its strength lies in its simplicity and the control it offers to users who prefer to host their own infrastructure.
While it may not boast the advanced analytics or integrated security features of commercial platforms, it effectively presents DMARC data, allowing for basic monitoring of authentication rates and sending sources. Users need to be comfortable with Docker and database management.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
LetsDMARC provides a polished and intuitive user interface. Setting up new domains and configuring DMARC records is guided, making the process relatively straightforward even for those less familiar with DMARC intricacies. The dashboards are well-organized, offering clear visualizations of email traffic and authentication results.
We found navigating through reports and drilling down into specific data points to be a smooth experience. The emphasis is clearly on ease of use and presenting complex data in an understandable format, which is a significant advantage for users who prefer a hands-off approach to infrastructure.
The user experience for Docker DMARC Reports is entirely dependent on your comfort with self-hosting and command-line interfaces. Initial setup involves configuring Docker containers, databases, and DNS records, which requires a good level of technical expertise. Once operational, the web viewer is functional but minimal.
There are no fancy dashboards or guided workflows; it's a utilitarian interface designed to display the parsed DMARC data. For technical users who enjoy building and maintaining their own systems, this level of control can be appealing. However, for those seeking a plug-and-play solution, the initial hurdle and ongoing maintenance can be substantial.
Which product has the best support
Support
LetsDMARC, being a commercial product from Libraesva, offers professional support. This typically includes access to a support team via email or ticketing system, and potentially phone support depending on the service level agreement. Users can expect assistance with setup, configuration, and troubleshooting.
Based on reviews, their customer support is highly regarded, which is crucial for organizations that rely on external assistance to manage their email security infrastructure. The managed nature of the service means you're paying for expertise and assistance when issues arise.
Support for Docker DMARC Reports primarily comes from the open-source community. This means relying on GitHub issues, forums, or other community channels for help. There is no dedicated support team, so problem resolution depends on community engagement and the availability of experienced users.
While the open-source model can foster collaborative problem-solving, it lacks the guaranteed response times and structured assistance of commercial support. Users must be self-sufficient or have internal technical resources capable of diagnosing and resolving issues independently. This DIY approach comes with its own set of challenges and rewards.
Who should use each product
Suitability
LetsDMARC is highly suitable for SMBs, enterprise organizations, and Managed Service Providers (MSPs) that require a robust, managed DMARC reporting and enforcement solution. Its comprehensive features, intuitive interface, and professional support make it an excellent choice for businesses that want to outsource their DMARC monitoring to a reliable provider.
For MSPs, its multi-tenancy capabilities and integration with a broader email security suite could be particularly valuable. Enterprises will appreciate its scalability and detailed reporting for multiple domains, while SMBs benefit from its ease of use without needing dedicated in-house DMARC expertise.
Docker DMARC Reports is best suited for technical users, small development teams, or individuals who are comfortable with self-hosting and managing their own infrastructure. It's a great option for those with a strong preference for open-source software and who need a free, basic DMARC reporting tool.
It is less suitable for non-technical SMBs or enterprises that lack the internal resources for setup and ongoing maintenance. MSPs might find it too cumbersome to deploy and manage across multiple clients without significant custom automation. Its strengths are for those who prioritize control and cost-effectiveness over advanced features and dedicated support.
How does LetsDMARC compare with Docker DMARC Reports?
DMARC report analysis
Aggregates and visualizes DMARC aggregate reports for insights into email authentication.
Comprehensive dashboard and detailed reporting.
Basic web viewer for parsed data.
Source detection
Identifies legitimate and unauthorized sending sources.
Forward detection
Tracks email forwarding chains and their impact on DMARC authentication.
Spoof detection
Alerts on potential email impersonation or brand abuse.
Notifications and alerts
Provides real-time or periodic alerts on DMARC policy changes or anomalies.
Configurable alerts for various events.
Requires custom scripting for alerts.
Reporting
Generates various reports, including compliance, forensic, and trend analysis.
Detailed, user-friendly reports.
Basic reporting via web interface.
API
Offers an Application Programming Interface for programmatic access to data and features.
Available for integration and automation.
No formal API, direct DB access for data.
Multi-tenancy
Supports managing multiple client accounts or domains from a single interface.
Designed for MSPs and large organizations.
Requires separate instances or complex setup.
SPF flattening
Simplifies complex SPF records to avoid the 10-lookup limit.
Often bundled with their DMARC solutions.
Not a DMARC report feature, separate tool needed.
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record hosting and management services.
Fully managed service.
Requires user to host their own records.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).
Part of their comprehensive email security.
Focuses solely on DMARC reporting.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security (MTA-STS) and TLS Reporting (TLS-RPT).
Integrated for advanced email security.
Not included in basic DMARC reporter.
Blocklists and reputation
Integrates with email blocklists or reputation services.
Likely part of broader security offerings.
Out of scope for this DMARC reporter.
AI copilot
Leverages Artificial Intelligence for DMARC analysis or recommendations.
No indication of AI features.
DNS monitoring
Monitors DNS records relevant to email deliverability and security.
Often included for a holistic view.
Requires separate tools or manual checks.
Self hostable
Can be installed and run on user-managed servers.
Cloud-based managed service.
Designed for self-hosting with Docker.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free version or a trial period.
Pricing is custom, contact for a quote.
Open-source and free to use.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
LetsDMARC's primary drawback is its opaque pricing structure, requiring a custom quote rather than transparent tiers. This can make initial evaluation challenging. Docker DMARC Reports, while free, demands significant technical expertise for setup and ongoing maintenance, and lacks professional support or advanced features found in commercial alternatives.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
4.5 / 5(2)
0 / 5(0)
Great tool for SPF/DMARC integration
4.5 / 5
What do you like best about Libraesva LetsDMARC?
Ease of use, useful dashboard. Setup was simple and fast. Customer support is at the top.
What do you dislike about Libraesva LetsDMARC?
At the moment there is nothing to report about what dislike
What problems is Libraesva LetsDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
SPF lookup solved fat with LetsDMARC
Marco P.
System Engineer Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Intuitive and easy-to-use software
4.5 / 5
What do you like best about Libraesva LetsDMARC?
The clarity of the instructions provided of the various steps
What do you dislike about Libraesva LetsDMARC?
some graphic settings are not retained when changing pages
What problems is Libraesva LetsDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
Managing SPF, DMARK and DKIM of various sites in a single platform
Massimo G.
System Administrator Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Pricing
LetsDMARC utilizes a custom pricing model requiring a direct quote, whereas Docker DMARC Reports is a free, self-hosted open-source solution.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free, self-hosted
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free, self-hosted
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free, self-hosted
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free, self-hosted
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with LetsDMARC or Docker DMARC Reports?