Summary
Using comments in publicly viewable email HTML code is a nuanced topic that balances the need for developer readability with concerns about security, file size, and deliverability. Unlike web pages that often undergo build processes to strip comments, email HTML is typically sent as-is, meaning anything in your source code can be viewed by recipients who inspect the email. This can introduce unnecessary bloat and, more critically, potential security vulnerabilities. Therefore, a disciplined approach to comments is essential.
Key findings
- Minimal comments: Most experts agree that publicly viewable HTML, especially for emails, should contain an absolute minimum of comments, if any at all.
- Security risk: Comments can inadvertently expose sensitive information like internal notes, API keys, or even credentials, leading to significant security breaches.
- Performance impact: While often overlooked for smaller emails, excessive comments add to the overall file size, which can affect loading times and potentially trigger message clipping in certain email clients like Gmail. Optimizing email HTML is crucial for effective deliverability.
- Lack of compilation: Unlike compiled programming languages where comments are stripped during compilation, HTML in emails is typically sent directly, making all comments visible in the source code.
- Purpose of comments: If comments are deemed necessary, they should explain the why behind a particular code choice, rather than simply reiterating what the code does, a practice better suited for internal documentation.
Key considerations
- Minification and stripping: Implement automated processes to minify HTML, which includes stripping out comments and unnecessary whitespace, before sending. This improves efficiency and security.
- Source control and documentation: Rely on version control systems and internal project documentation for developer notes and change logs. These are the appropriate places for detailed comments, not the publicly viewable code.
- Security audits: Regularly audit your email templates and production code for any sensitive data that might have accidentally been left in comments. This is crucial for maintaining strong email deliverability and security.
- Development vs. production versions: Maintain separate versions of your code. Keep verbose comments in development or staging environments but ensure they are removed from the production code before deployment.
- Email client compatibility: While rare, badly placed or malformed comments can sometimes interfere with how certain email clients render your HTML. Adhering to standard HTML comment syntax helps mitigate this risk.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often focus on the visual rendering of their campaigns and the metrics that drive business outcomes, rather than the intricate details of the underlying HTML code. While they may not directly manage code comments, the impact of these comments, particularly on file size and potential security issues, can indirectly affect their campaigns, including deliverability and user experience. Understanding these implications is key for effective collaboration with development teams.
Key opinions
- Visual focus: Email marketers prioritize how an email looks across various clients and devices, often leaving the code optimization to developers. Deliverability metrics are paramount.
- ESP abstraction: Many marketers use Email Service Providers (ESPs) that abstract the HTML coding process, reducing their direct interaction with the source code and, by extension, comment practices.
- Deliverability over code cleanliness: Their main concern is ensuring emails reach the inbox, which means focusing on sender reputation, content quality, and compliance rather than minor HTML optimizations like comment removal, unless they directly impact performance. Avoiding the spam folder is a top priority.
Key considerations
- Security awareness: Marketers should be aware that sensitive campaign details or internal notes can be exposed if left in public HTML comments, posing a risk to data security.
- File size impact: Large HTML files, even due to comments, can lead to email clipping in major inboxes, potentially hiding crucial calls to action or legal disclaimers from the recipient.
- Collaboration with developers: Effective communication with development teams is vital to ensure that security and optimization best practices, including comment management, are applied to email templates.
- A/B testing and rendering: While comments rarely break rendering, their presence adds to the overall code complexity, which can sometimes complicate troubleshooting for subtle rendering discrepancies across different email clients. Marketers rely on consistent rendering for their campaigns.
Marketer view
Email marketer from DEV Community highlights that comments in HTML should be clear and concise. They serve as valuable notes for developers to understand the code's purpose or specific logic applied. However, this advice primarily applies to development environments where clarity and collaboration are paramount, rather than the final publicly distributed code.
Marketer view
Marketer from CRONUTS.DIGITAL advises prudence when adding HTML comments, stating that one should not comment merely for the sake of it. The key is to assess whether the comment genuinely adds value and contributes to a better understanding of the code. This implies that comments should be purposeful and not simply decorative elements within the HTML structure.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts take a strong stance on the use of comments in publicly visible email HTML. Their primary concern revolves around security vulnerabilities, potential performance degradation, and the overall professionalism of the code. They advocate for rigorous development and deployment processes that ensure no extraneous or sensitive information is accidentally exposed through comments.
Key opinions
- Minimalism is key: Experts firmly believe that publicly viewed HTML, particularly in emails, should contain minimal to no comments. Any comments are seen as unnecessary additions that can create issues.
- Security paramount: A major concern is the exposure of sensitive information, such as usernames and passwords, in comments. This is a critical security flaw that must be avoided through disciplined coding practices.
- Deployment discipline: Sophisticated organizations should integrate comment stripping as part of their automated deployment process for production code. This ensures that only clean, essential HTML is sent out.
- Email development unique: Email developers are often specialists who picked up their skills outside traditional computer science programs, leading to varied coding standards. This highlights the need for consistent best practices within the email ecosystem. Understanding these unique challenges is key.
- Dynamic environment: The email landscape is constantly evolving, with new client supports (e.g., Gmail) requiring continuous updates to templates. Clean code, free of unnecessary comments, makes these adaptations easier.
Key considerations
- Minification tools: Utilizing minifiers or packers is crucial to automatically strip whitespace and comments from HTML, CSS, and JavaScript before deployment. This is a standard practice for efficient and secure code.
- Source control over comments: Detailed development notes and explanations should reside within source control systems (like Git) or internal documentation, where they are protected and versioned, rather than in public HTML.
- Avoiding sensitive data: Strict policies must be enforced to prevent developers from including any form of sensitive data, such as credentials, in HTML comments. This is a common attack vector.
- Process integration: Implementing software development best practices, such as rigorous testing and deployment pipelines, is essential for email development to ensure production code is clean and secure. These practices contribute significantly to overall email deliverability.
- Standardization: Without a formal standard-driving body like the W3C for email HTML, the ecosystem remains somewhat unregulated. This necessitates self-imposed discipline and adherence to community-driven best practices to maintain quality and security. Understanding client-specific quirks like Gmail CSS becomes even more vital.
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks suggests that publicly viewable code should have minimal comments, if any. The rationale is that there is typically no good reason to include them in production environments. Any comments present in the final HTML code are effectively exposed to anyone who inspects the email, which can be an unnecessary risk.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from Word to the Wise (Matt Bailey) emphasizes that comments should clarify the 'why' behind a code choice, not simply the 'what'. This distinction is crucial, as explaining motivation can be valuable during development, but such commentary should not make it into publicly accessible code. Effective documentation should reside elsewhere, in version control or internal wikis, ensuring code remains lean and secure.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and developer guides provide the foundational understanding of HTML comments. They explain the syntax, purpose, and general best practices for their use. However, these resources often focus on broad web development principles and may not explicitly address the unique considerations of email HTML, where public visibility and file size have disproportionate impacts on deliverability and user experience.
Key findings
- Standard syntax: HTML comments are denoted by <!-- ... --> and are designed to contain notes for developers.
- Public visibility: Documentation confirms that HTML comments are always visible when the page or email source code is inspected, regardless of whether they are rendered by the client.
- Non-rendering: Browsers and email clients are designed to ignore content within comment tags when rendering the visual output.
- Flexible placement: Comments can be inserted almost anywhere within an HTML document, from before the Doctype to within element tags.
Key considerations
- Purposeful use: Comments should be used to explain complex logic, temporary changes, or deprecated sections of code for future maintenance. They are not intended for general informational purposes in a live environment.
- Conciseness: Documentation often stresses that comments should be clear, brief, and provide genuine value to someone reading the code. This applies to internal development comments, which should be removed before public deployment.
- Avoid over-commenting: Excessive comments can clutter the code and make it harder to read, ironically defeating their purpose. For emails, this also adds unnecessary weight.
- Security warning (implicit): While not always explicitly stated as a security warning in general HTML guides, the public visibility of comments inherently carries a risk of exposing sensitive data. This underscores the need for robust authentication mechanisms like DMARC, SPF, and DKIM to mitigate overall email security risks.
- Minification beyond comments: Documentation on optimizing HTML for performance often includes stripping not just comments, but also excessive whitespace and unnecessary attributes. This comprehensive approach is vital for ensuring optimal email delivery and rendering.
Technical article
Developer documentation from MDN Web Docs explains that HTML comments can be placed in various locations within a document, including before and after the Doctype declaration, and within body content. They function primarily as internal notes for developers and are ignored by the browser during rendering. While flexible in placement, their presence in live code adds unnecessary characters that contribute to file size and can be easily viewed by anyone inspecting the source.
Technical article
A guide from DEV Community on HTML comments and best practices emphasizes that comments should be clear and concise. This guideline ensures that internal documentation within the code remains helpful to developers. However, for publicly viewable code, such detailed comments can become a liability, suggesting that this clarity is best confined to development or internal versions.
Related resources
8 resources
Related pages
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
How to Run an Email Deliverability Test: A Proven Checklist
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
How to Improve Domain Reputation Using Google Postmaster Tools [2025 Guide]
Boost Email Deliverability Rates: Technical Solutions from Top Performing Senders
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
Understanding and troubleshooting DMARC reports from Google and Yahoo
How to fix common DMARC issues in Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace
What are common email deliverability issues during new IP and subdomain warmup after ESP migration?
