Summary
The phrase "smart farming" or "farming leads" in email marketing contexts frequently raises concerns among deliverability professionals. While in agriculture, "smart farming" refers to leveraging technology for efficiency, its application in email marketing often implies methods of lead acquisition that deviate from explicit consent and permission-based practices. This can include anything from purchasing lists to using AI to predict potential leads from non-opt-in data. The consensus within the deliverability community is that such terms are often euphemisms for practices that are detrimental to sender reputation and inbox placement.
Key findings
- Misleading terminology: The term "smart farming" in email marketing often masks non-opt-in data acquisition, contrasting with its positive connotation in agriculture.
- Risk to deliverability: Sending to non-opt-in lists, however acquired, significantly increases the risk of emails going to spam or being blocklisted, directly impacting your ability to reach the inbox.
- Reputation damage: Practices associated with "smart farming" can lead to high spam complaints and low engagement, severely harming your sender reputation and domain health.
- Lack of consent: The fundamental issue is the absence of explicit, verifiable consent from recipients, which is the cornerstone of effective and compliant email marketing. This can directly lead to your marketing emails going to spam.
Key considerations
- Prioritize opt-in: Always build your email lists through clear, transparent, and explicit opt-in methods to ensure healthy email deliverability.
- Understand the risks: Be aware that any method of acquiring emails without explicit consent, regardless of its clever name, poses significant risks to your email program and can cause your emails to go to spam.
- Focus on nurturing: True "farming" in email marketing should refer to nurturing existing, opted-in subscribers through relevant content and engagement, not acquiring new ones unethically.
- Long-term strategy: Sustainable email marketing prioritizes building a quality list with engaged subscribers over high-volume, low-quality acquisition methods.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often view terms like "smart farming" or "farming leads" with skepticism. The prevailing sentiment is that such phrases frequently obscure list acquisition methods that bypass genuine opt-in processes. Marketers understand that relying on these non-consensual techniques can severely undermine email campaigns, leading to poor performance, increased spam complaints, and a damaged sender reputation. They emphasize that building a robust email list requires diligent, permission-based strategies rather than shortcuts.
Key opinions
- Sounds like scraping: Many marketers immediately associate "smart farming" with data scraping or purchasing lists, which are widely considered poor practices.
- Euphemism for non-opt-in: The terminology is often seen as an attempt to legitimize list-building methods that do not involve explicit consent, regardless of their supposed technological sophistication.
- Analogy misapplied: While farming suggests cultivation, applying it to lead acquisition implies extracting data rather than growing a relationship based on permission.
- Risks outweigh benefits: Even if such methods offer initial volume, the long-term damage to inbox placement and sender reputation makes them unviable.
Key considerations
- Transparency in acquisition: Marketers should be transparent about how they acquire email addresses, always prioritizing explicit consent from subscribers.
- Focus on list quality: A smaller, highly engaged, and legitimately acquired list will always outperform a large, passively gathered list, particularly for B2B email deliverability.
- Nurturing over acquisition: The true meaning of "farming" in email marketing should be about nurturing existing leads and customers, not finding new ones through questionable means.
- Compliance awareness: Marketers must understand that practices like affiliate marketing email and list farming, if not opt-in based, can lead to spam classification and compliance issues.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks notes: The term "smart farming" for leads immediately raises concerns for email professionals. It often signals practices that bypass legitimate opt-in processes, despite any attempts to make them sound compliant. This can be misleading.Such terminology can create a perception that goes against the core principles of permission-based email marketing. Even if underlying methods claim to be sophisticated, the phrasing itself suggests a non-consensual approach to list building.Ultimately, this can lead to diminished sender reputation and deliverability issues, as recipients are more likely to flag unsolicited emails as spam.
Marketer view
Marketer from a marketing forum states: We've experimented with various lead generation strategies, but anything that sounds like "farming" without explicit opt-in has always backfired. The deliverability hit isn't worth the volume of acquired contacts.It seems that if the user hasn't actively consented, even if they fit your ideal customer profile, they are much more likely to mark your email as spam. This directly impacts our sender score and future campaigns.We've learned that investing in content marketing and clear opt-in forms, even if slower, yields far better long-term engagement and inbox rates.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts largely agree that terms like "smart farming" or "farming leads" in the context of email marketing signify methods that are fundamentally at odds with best practices. They interpret these phrases as attempts to apply sophisticated data techniques to non-opt-in lists, a strategy that inevitably leads to severe deliverability problems. Experts consistently emphasize that consent is paramount, and any method circumventing it, however advanced, will result in emails being blocked or routed to spam folders, ultimately damaging sender reputation.
Key opinions
- Consent is non-negotiable: No amount of data intelligence can replace explicit, verifiable consent for sending marketing emails. It's the absolute foundation.
- Spam trigger: Lists acquired through "farming" methods are highly likely to contain spam traps and generate high complaint rates, leading to immediate spam filtering or blocklisting of your domain.
- Reputation is paramount: Any practice that jeopardizes sender reputation, such as mass emailing non-opt-in addresses, undermines all future email efforts.
- Ethical considerations: Experts view these tactics as unethical and often non-compliant with privacy regulations, leading to both technical and legal repercussions.
Key considerations
- Avoid deceptive terms: Marketers should avoid terminology that sugarcoats non-compliant list acquisition, as it indicates a misunderstanding or disregard for deliverability fundamentals.
- Understand spam traps: Be aware that lists acquired without consent are highly likely to contain spam traps, which are designed to identify senders of unsolicited email.
- Invest in authentication: Focus efforts on proper email authentication like DMARC, SPF, and DKIM, and ensure these are configured correctly to demonstrate legitimacy.
- Long-term deliverability: Sustainable deliverability is built on consistent positive engagement from an opted-in audience, not on volume from dubious sources.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from SpamResource.com confirms: Engaging in practices termed "smart farming" for lead acquisition frequently leads to severe deliverability problems. Unsolicited email, regardless of its source or how "smartly" it was gathered, will ultimately be treated as spam by mailbox providers.The core issue is consent. Without clear, verifiable opt-in from recipients, any attempt to send email introduces significant risk. Mailbox providers prioritize user experience and will block or filter messages that appear uninvited, impacting sender reputation.Long-term email marketing success depends on building a clean, engaged list through legitimate means, focusing on permission and ongoing engagement, rather than attempting to bypass these foundational principles with sophisticated data collection.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from Email Geeks notes: The phrase "smart farming" when applied to email marketing typically refers to lead acquisition methods that lack explicit consent. This often involves collecting public information or using predictive analytics to identify potential contacts, rather than relying on direct opt-in.Such approaches fundamentally undermine the principles of permission-based marketing, which are critical for maintaining a healthy sender reputation and achieving high inbox placement rates. Mailbox providers are increasingly adept at identifying and penalizing traffic from non-opt-in sources.True intelligence in email marketing lies in cultivating genuinely interested subscribers and providing them with relevant content, not in circumventing consent through creative terminology.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and established email standards do not typically include the terms "smart farming" or "farming leads" in their definitions of legitimate email marketing practices. Instead, these resources consistently emphasize the critical importance of consent, transparent data collection, and robust sender authentication. This omission highlights that such "farming" methods are outside the scope of accepted and recommended email deliverability guidelines. Legitimate documentation focuses on building and maintaining a healthy email ecosystem based on user permission and engagement.
Key findings
- Absence from standards: Terms like "smart farming" are not found in RFCs, CAN-SPAM, GDPR, or major ESP best practice guides, which focus on explicit consent.
- Emphasis on consent: Official documentation universally mandates clear and verifiable opt-in for all marketing communications.
- Focus on authentication: Documentation heavily promotes email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) to prove sender legitimacy, which complements consent-based sending.
- Reputation management: Guidelines consistently advise on practices that build and maintain a positive sender reputation through low complaint rates and high engagement.
Key considerations
- Adherence to legal frameworks: Ensure your list acquisition methods fully comply with international and local anti-spam legislation, such as CAN-SPAM and GDPR.
- Consult ISP guidelines: Regularly review specific postmaster guidelines from major mailbox providers like Orange.fr Postmaster, which universally prohibit sending to non-opt-in lists.
- Prioritize recipient experience: Documentation emphasizes that a positive recipient experience, driven by desired content and clear consent, is crucial for improving email deliverability rates.
- Understand spam reporting: Documentation on spam and blocklists underscores that unsolicited mail is the primary reason for being marked as spam.
Technical article
RFC 5321 (SMTP) implies: The underlying protocols of email are designed for consensual communication. Any attempt to send email without explicit permission, even if technically possible, goes against the spirit of internet communication standards.The protocol's design inherently relies on the sender's good faith and the recipient's desire to receive the message. Unsolicited bulk email (UBE) is a violation of this implicit trust.Therefore, practices like "smart farming" for leads, which bypass consent, contradict the foundational principles of email transfer.
Technical article
The CAN-SPAM Act guide outlines: The Act specifically targets commercial email messages and sets requirements for senders, including the need for a clear and conspicuous opt-out mechanism and truthful header information.While it doesn't explicitly require opt-in, it heavily penalizes sending to recipients who haven't explicitly opted out, or who haven't provided consent, by imposing strict rules on unsolicited commercial email.Any "smart farming" method that ignores or complicates these opt-out requirements or sends to lists without prior permission runs afoul of the law.
Related resources
6 resources
Related pages
How to determine if marketing emails are going to spam?
How does email deliverability work in the current email marketing landscape?
How to improve B2B email deliverability and avoid spam folders when nurturing customers?
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
Boost Email Deliverability Rates: Technical Solutions from Top Performing Senders
How long does it take to recover domain reputation from Bad/Low to High
An in-depth guide to email blocklists
Spam traps: what they are and how they work
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
