SendForensics vs.
DMARC Visualizer in 2026
SendForensics
DMARC Visualizer
vs.
We ran both products for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender in scope. SendForensics was easier to operate as a SaaS DMARC reporting product, while DMARC Visualizer was useful when we wanted self-hosted control and accepted the maintenance cost. Our verdict: choose SendForensics for managed reporting and deliverability context, choose DMARC Visualizer only when an operator owns parsing, storage, dashboards, and enforcement decisions.
SendForensics
DMARC reporting with deliverability testing
Starts at
From $49 / month
Best fit
Marketing and operations teams that want SaaS reporting plus inbox testing
In one line
SendForensics gave us clear aggregate report views and useful sender context, while Suped is the third option to compare when guided fixes and hosted records matter.
DMARC Visualizer
Self-hosted DMARC visualization
Starts at
$0 software cost
Best fit
Technical teams that can run parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana
In one line
DMARC Visualizer exposed raw authentication data well after setup, but every workflow depended on our own ingestion and dashboard choices.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Pick SendForensics for managed reporting, DMARC Visualizer for self-hosting
Pick SendForensics if
Best for marketing-led teams that want hosted DMARC reporting
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared as recognizable sources after DNS reports landed.
SendGrid and Mailchimp were easier to separate by domain than in raw dashboards.
The spoof sample surfaced quickly, but enforcement still needed manual policy planning.
From $49 / month
Pick DMARC Visualizer if
Best for operators who want free self-hosted DMARC data
The Docker setup gave us parsed DMARC results without subscription packaging.
Unknown sender classification required manual labels and dashboard cleanup.
Forwarded mail with SPF failure needed our own explanation notes.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Suped as the third option for guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Guided fixes matter when SPF or DKIM passes but the visible from domain fails alignment.
Automated issue detection should separate true spoofing from unknown but legitimate senders.
Published starter pricing helps teams avoid a sales call for basic rollout planning.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
SendForensics
DMARC Visualizer
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate XML processing and domain-level authentication review.
Included
Self-hosted reports
Included
Source detection
Turning source IPs and domains into recognizable sending services.
SaaS source grouping
Manual workflow
Guided source names
Forward detection
Separating forwarding effects from sender misconfiguration.
Manual workflow
Manual inference
Included
Spoof detection
Finding unauthorized traffic that fails aligned authentication.
Included
Manual query
Included
Notifications and alerts
Operational alerts for suspicious traffic and authentication changes.
Included
Operator-built
Included
Reporting
Recurring exports, scheduled summaries, and stakeholder reporting.
Advanced on higher tier
Grafana dashboards
Included
API
Programmatic access or integration surface for reporting workflows.
Unclear
Component APIs
Available
Multi-tenancy
Separate accounts, domains, or client workspaces.
Agency segmentation
Manual Grafana setup
MSP workspaces
SPF flattening
Managed SPF flattening to avoid DNS lookup failures.
Not included
Not included
Hosted SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record hosting and policy updates.
Reporting only
Reporting only
Hosted
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record hosting rather than static DNS text only.
Not included
Not included
Hosted
Hosted MTA-STS
Managed MTA-STS policy hosting for transport security.
Not included
Not included
Hosted
Blocklists and reputation
Blacklist and blocklist visibility tied to sender reputation review.
Blacklist and blocklist visibility
Not included
Blocklist and blacklist monitoring
Automatic issue detection
Flagging misconfigurations and suspicious changes without manual queries.
Partial
Manual workflow
Included
AI copilot
Assistant-style guidance for interpreting and fixing findings.
Not included
Not included
Included
DNS monitoring
Monitoring DNS records for changes that affect authentication.
Non-sending domain checks
Not included
Included
Self hostable
Ability to run the product in your own infrastructure.
No
Yes
No
Free trial/free tier
A free entry point for evaluation or low-volume monitoring.
No public free tier
Free self-hosted
Free plan available
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against the same editorial rubric after the 90-day test. Higher is better in every row, and a 0 means we found no product support for that capability during testing.
SendForensics scores higher for hosted operation, DMARC Visualizer scores higher for self-hosted control
SendForensics moved us faster through setup because the three domains, approved senders, and spoof sample were visible in one hosted workflow. It lost points where enforcement planning, hosted records, MSP handoff, and alert routing stayed manual. DMARC Visualizer gave us full control over parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana, but the unknown sender, forwarded SPF failure, retention, and alerts became operator tasks.
SendForensics score
59.5/100
DMARC Visualizer score
24/100
SendForensics
59.5/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
6.0
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
6.5
Alerting and integrations
5.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
6.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
6.5
DMARC Visualizer
24/100
DMARC enforcement
3.0
Customer support
1.0
Source resolution
4.0
Setup and onboarding
3.5
MSP workflows
2.0
Alerting and integrations
2.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
6.0
Time to enforcement
2.5
Feature set
Managed coverage vs raw control
SendForensics has the broader product workflow, DMARC Visualizer has the cleaner raw stack
SendForensics covered more of the reporting workflow out of the box, especially source grouping, spoof review, alerts, and deliverability context. DMARC Visualizer was stronger when we wanted to inspect the data model directly, but it did not turn findings into next actions. For buyers comparing Suped's product as a third option, guided fixes and automated issue detection should be tested against the same visible from mismatch and unknown sender cases.
SendForensics
Microsoft 365 grouped cleanly
SendGrid filters were usable
Spoof sample surfaced quickly
DMARC Visualizer
Parsedmarc data stayed inspectable
Grafana exposed DKIM subdomain
Unknown sender stayed manual
In SendForensics, Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace normalized into clear source groups after aggregate reports arrived, and SendGrid versus Mailchimp were easy to filter by the corporate domain and marketing subdomain. The aligned SPF and aligned DKIM cases were easy to confirm, while the SPF pass with a visible from mismatch required us to read the details and decide the fix ourselves. The unauthorized spoof sample was easy to find, but the unknown sender needed manual classification before we were ready to move policy.
DMARC Visualizer gave us parsedmarc data in Elasticsearch and Grafana panels, so Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp were visible once ingestion was working. The DKIM pass on a subdomain and forwarded mail with SPF failure were explainable if we queried the right panels, but the product did not package those edge cases into a guided remediation path. The unknown sender stayed a dashboard investigation task rather than a named source workflow.
User experience
Guidance vs assembly
SendForensics was easier day to day, DMARC Visualizer rewarded technical patience
SendForensics had the clearer onboarding path for three domains and did not make us design the reporting workspace before seeing data. DMARC Visualizer was workable after Docker, mailbox ingestion, Elasticsearch, and Grafana were settled, but small questions turned into admin tasks.
SendForensics
Three-domain setup was clear
Unknown sender filters worked
Forwarding needed written context
DMARC Visualizer
Self-hosting steps were explicit
Grafana panels were flexible
Classification stayed operator-led
Adding the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain took one session in SendForensics, with DNS instructions clear enough to hand to an admin. Finding the unknown sender took a few filters and a naming decision, not a dashboard rebuild. The forwarded mail SPF failure was visible in the pass and fail detail, but the explanation still needed our own note for the security team.
DMARC Visualizer felt like a kit of reliable components rather than a finished SaaS workflow. We had to wire ingestion, confirm parsed files, manage Elasticsearch storage, and adjust Grafana panels before the three domains were easy to compare. The unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure were visible, but only after we knew which panels and fields to inspect.
Support
Help desk vs owner-operated
SendForensics offered a support path, DMARC Visualizer put support on the operator
SendForensics had normal SaaS support expectations and clearer enterprise escalation language, even though hands-on DMARC enforcement help still felt limited. DMARC Visualizer had no commercial support package in our review, so DNS handoff, ingestion failures, and onboarding decisions stayed with whoever ran the stack.
SendForensics
DNS handoff was workable
Escalation path existed
Enterprise extras were clearer
DMARC Visualizer
No commercial support found
Operator owns ingestion issues
DNS notes were self-written
During setup, SendForensics gave us enough DNS context to hand TXT changes to an administrator, and the product framed domain activation in user-facing terms. For escalation, the public packaging pointed us toward higher tiers for custom integrations and SAML/SSO, but we still needed our own owner notes for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and the support desk sender. Enterprise onboarding was clearer than DMARC Visualizer because there was an account model and a vendor path.
DMARC Visualizer had no paid onboarding, SLA, or escalation route in the pricing information we reviewed. When mailbox ingestion needed adjustment and the parked domain had no meaningful traffic, the operator had to debug parsing, storage, retention, and Grafana access. DNS handoff was also self-written, because the project gives components rather than a managed rollout process.
Suitability
Team fit vs operator fit
SendForensics fits managed teams, DMARC Visualizer fits builders
SendForensics was the better fit for marketing, security, and operations teams that want a hosted product with account separation and recurring reporting. DMARC Visualizer was the better fit for a technical owner who wants free software and direct control over storage. For buyers comparing Suped's product, MSP workflows and alert quality should be tested before committing, because both products left gaps for repeatable multi-client operations.
SendForensics
Good for active senders
Segmentation starts on Agency
Reports suit monthly reviews
DMARC Visualizer
Good for platform teams
Client grouping is manual
Exports need operator work
SendForensics fit our corporate domain and marketing subdomain better than the parked domain because active senders gave its reports enough context. Account separation was usable on higher tiers through segmentation and multiple analysis addresses, and recurring reports made monthly review easier for non-technical stakeholders. For MSP-style handoff, it still needed clearer client notes around the unknown sender, forwarded SPF failure, and when to move toward quarantine.
DMARC Visualizer fit an SMB or internal platform team that already runs observability tools and accepts maintenance work. Domain grouping in Grafana was flexible, but it was not the same as client-ready account separation, and recurring reporting needed dashboard exports or custom automation. For MSP use, the handoff burden was high because each client needed naming rules, retention choices, and written remediation notes.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
SendForensics
Hosted DMARC reporting for marketing and operations teams
After 90 days, SendForensics felt like the product we would put in front of a marketing operations team that already cares about inbox placement. The primary domain and marketing subdomain stayed easy to review, and the parked domain was useful for spotting non-sending domain protection gaps.
Day to day, the product was less automatic than the first week suggested. The SPF pass with visible from mismatch, forwarded mail SPF failure, and unknown sender all produced enough data to act, but each needed a person to decide the owner, fix, and policy timing.
Where it wins
Fast hosted onboarding for three domains
Clear SendGrid and Mailchimp review
Useful spoof sample triage
Public plan limits are readable
Where it lags
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
Policy movement stayed manual
MSP handoff needed extra notes
Support speed can vary
Pricing
$49 / month
Free tier
No public free tier
Onboarding
Hosted setup
G2 rating
3.8 / 5
DMARC Visualizer
Free self-hosted dashboards for technical owners
After 90 days, DMARC Visualizer felt like a practical internal dashboard for a team that already likes operating open-source components. Once parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana were stable, the raw authentication cases were visible and easy to query.
The cost showed up in maintenance instead of subscription fees. The unknown sender stayed unclassified until we made our own label, forwarded SPF failure needed our own explanation, and recurring reporting required exports or dashboard work outside the base project.
Where it wins
Free self-hosted software
Direct access to parsed data
Flexible Grafana dashboards
No vendor volume gates found
Where it lags
No managed onboarding
No packaged source classification
No hosted records
No built-in client workflow
Pricing
$0 software cost
Free tier
Free self-hosted
Onboarding
Self-hosted setup
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
SendForensics
DMARC Visualizer
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$49 / month
Brand covers this volume with room for a second sending domain.
$0
Software is free; hosting and upkeep remain operator costs.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$49 / month
Brand matches this domain and report volume band on monthly billing.
$0
No public volume cap exists; storage and retention depend on infrastructure.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$129 / month
Estimated from Company plus five public extra-domain add-ons; Agency is $199 / month.
$0
Software remains free; Elasticsearch capacity becomes the main cost driver.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
From $349 / month
Public Enterprise entry covers 30 domains and 20 million reports before optional extras.
$0
There is no subscription tier; infrastructure and support costs are self-managed.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
SendForensics prices are public monthly list prices. The $129 large estimate uses the Company plan plus five public extra-domain add-ons. DMARC Visualizer shows $0 software cost; hosting, storage, backups, maintenance, and staff time are not included. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Guided remediation
SendForensics exposed the visible from mismatch and forwarded SPF failure, but the owner and fix path still needed manual notes. Suped's product maps authentication failures to guided fixes so teams know which DNS, sender, or policy step to take.
Operational alerts
DMARC Visualizer required us to build alerting and noise control around Grafana. Suped's product ships alert workflows for spoofing, unknown senders, and authentication changes, so routine monitoring does not depend on custom dashboards.
MSP-ready handoff
Both products needed extra work for repeatable client handoff: SendForensics relied on higher-tier segmentation, and DMARC Visualizer needed manual dashboard structure. Suped's product includes MSP workflows built around domain groups, ownership notes, and client-ready reporting.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from SendForensics or DMARC Visualizer?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
