Suped

DMARC Director vs Parseddmarc

Choose DMARC Director for a managed service, or Parseddmarc for a self-hosted open-source solution.
Parseddmarc
Compare to Suped
Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Director, as a commercial service, provides comprehensive DMARC report aggregation and analysis. We found its dashboard presents data in an easily digestible format, allowing quick identification of DMARC compliance issues and potential threats. It aims to automate much of the DMARC journey, from initial visibility to enforcement.
The platform integrates various email authentication protocols, offering a consolidated view of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC alignment. This holistic approach is beneficial for those who prefer a managed solution that handles the complexities of DMARC without requiring deep technical dives into raw report data.
Parseddmarc stands out as an open-source Python package designed for parsing DMARC reports. It's essentially a backend utility, focusing on ingesting various report types (RUA, RUF, SMTP TLS Reporting) from sources like IMAP, Microsoft Graph, or Gmail API, and outputting them in structured JSON or CSV formats.
Its strength lies in its flexibility for integration. Users can feed the parsed data into databases or SIEM systems like Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, Splunk, or Apache Kafka, then build custom dashboards for visualization. This provides immense control but requires significant technical expertise for setup and ongoing maintenance.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Director is built for ease of use, particularly for those less familiar with the intricacies of DMARC. Its interface is typically intuitive, offering dashboards that summarise key metrics, identify email sources, and highlight non-compliant senders. This streamlined experience minimizes the learning curve.
We found the navigation to be logical, making it simple to drill down into specific reports or adjust DMARC policies. For organizations seeking a 'set it and forget it' (to an extent) solution with clear visual reporting, DMARC Director generally provides a positive user experience.
Parseddmarc, being a command-line utility, offers a completely different user experience. There's no graphical user interface out-of-the-box. Users interact with it through scripts and configurations. This demands a strong technical background in Python, system administration, and data management.
While highly flexible, setting up Parseddmarc involves configuring IMAP servers, APIs, and potentially integrating with external data visualization tools. The 'user experience' is more about the developer or sysadmin's comfort with scripting and managing a custom data pipeline than interacting with a polished dashboard.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As a commercial offering, DMARC Director typically includes professional support. This usually comes in various tiers, providing access to technical assistance for setup, troubleshooting, and DMARC policy optimization. We anticipate dedicated channels like email, phone, or a ticketing system.
For businesses that require guidance in navigating DMARC enforcement or need immediate help with deliverability issues, the availability of responsive support is a significant advantage. This ensures that expert assistance is readily available to maintain email security and deliverability.
Parseddmarc, as an open-source project, primarily relies on community support. Users will find help through its GitHub repository, documentation, and potentially forums or community channels. There is no official, commercial support team to call or email.
This model suits users who are self-sufficient and comfortable researching solutions or contributing to the project themselves. While the community can be very helpful, it lacks the structured, guaranteed response times that a commercial support package provides. Troubleshooting often requires internal technical expertise.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Director is highly suitable for organizations that prefer a managed DMARC solution. It caters well to SMBs (Small to Medium Businesses) looking for an accessible way to implement DMARC without extensive internal resources. Enterprises also benefit from its robust reporting and policy management capabilities.
For MSPs (Managed Service Providers), DMARC Director can be an excellent addition to their offerings, allowing them to manage DMARC for multiple clients efficiently through a centralized platform. It minimizes the operational burden of DMARC implementation and maintenance.
Parseddmarc is best suited for technically proficient organizations, or individuals within organizations, who have the resources and desire to self-host their DMARC reporting infrastructure. This includes larger enterprises with strong IT departments, or tech-savvy SMBs who prioritize data control and customization.
MSPs could potentially integrate Parseddmarc into their custom toolchains, but it would require significant development and maintenance effort, making it less of an out-of-the-box solution compared to commercial tools. It is not designed for users seeking a simple, plug-and-play experience.

How does DMARC Director compare with Parseddmarc?

Logo
Parseddmarc
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering drawbacks, DMARC Director's main limitation is its lack of transparent pricing, which can make budgeting difficult without direct contact. Parseddmarc, conversely, requires significant technical expertise and infrastructure investment, making it unsuitable for teams without the necessary in-house skills.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Parseddmarc

Pricing

DMARC Director requires contacting their sales team for specific pricing, while Parseddmarc is open-source and free, though it incurs self-hosting costs.
Logo
Parseddmarc
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted costs apply)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted costs apply)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted costs apply)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted costs apply)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC Director or Parseddmarc?
Logo
Parseddmarc
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARC Director vs Parseddmarc DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped