Suped

DMARC 25 vs Fraudmarc Community Edition

Choose DMARC 25 for a hands-on trial, choose Fraudmarc Community Edition for open-source control.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC 25 provides a straightforward approach to DMARC reporting, focusing on essential monitoring and analysis. We found that its interface quickly presents aggregate and forensic reports, allowing users to identify authentication issues at a glance. It covers the core DMARC requirements, helping users move towards a stricter DMARC policy.
The platform aims to simplify DMARC management, which is particularly beneficial for those new to email authentication. While it doesn't boast an exhaustive list of advanced features, what it offers is generally well-implemented and reliable for basic to intermediate DMARC oversight.
Fraudmarc Community Edition (CE) stands out as a completely open-source DMARC reporting tool. Its strength lies in providing full transparency and control over your DMARC data, as it's designed for self-hosting. This means advanced users can integrate it deeply into their existing infrastructure and customize it to their specific needs.
While it offers the raw data and foundational DMARC reporting capabilities, users should be prepared to handle the deployment, maintenance, and potential customization themselves. The feature set is robust for an open-source solution but requires technical proficiency to unlock its full potential.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Navigating DMARC 25 is a relatively intuitive experience. The dashboard is clean and presents key DMARC metrics, such as pass/fail rates and authentication sources, in an easy-to-digest format. We appreciate the clear visual cues that help identify potential issues without requiring deep DMARC expertise.
Setting up DMARC 25 involves a straightforward process, largely guided by their support. The reporting interface is functional, making it easy to access aggregate and forensic reports. For users who prefer a managed service and less hands-on configuration, this product offers a comfortable user journey.
Fraudmarc Community Edition, being a self-hosted open-source solution, offers a very different user experience. While it provides full control, it inherently demands a higher level of technical proficiency for setup, configuration, and ongoing management. This isn't a plug-and-play solution, but rather a robust framework for those who enjoy getting under the hood.
The initial deployment and data ingestion require comfort with server administration and potentially command-line interfaces. Once operational, the interface provides access to raw DMARC data. It's more about the power of customization and direct data access than a polished, guided user interface found in commercial products.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC 25 emphasizes direct customer engagement for support, particularly for pricing inquiries and technical assistance. We found that their support model leans towards direct contact via phone or web form during business hours. This personalized approach can be beneficial for users who prefer direct communication with a support team.
While there isn't an extensive public knowledge base or community forum, the availability of direct support ensures that users can get assistance for setup and troubleshooting. This model suggests a more hands-on, guided experience for their clientele.
Fraudmarc Community Edition, true to its open-source nature, offers support primarily through its community forum. This means users rely on peer-to-peer assistance, shared knowledge, and self-help resources. For those familiar with open-source ecosystems, this collaborative model can be very effective.
Direct one-on-one support from Fraudmarc is not part of the Community Edition offering. Users needing dedicated or managed support would need to explore Fraudmarc's other (paid) products. We appreciate the clear demarcation of support channels, aligning with the self-managed aspect of CE.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC 25 is best suited for SMBs and organizations that need a clear, easy-to-use DMARC reporting solution without extensive technical overhead. It's a good fit for companies just starting their DMARC journey or those with limited IT resources. For enterprises, its feature set might be a bit too lean, especially concerning scalability and advanced integrations.
MSPs could find DMARC 25 useful for managing a smaller portfolio of clients, but for a large number of domains, the lack of multi-tenancy and advanced features might become a limitation. It serves as a reliable entry point into DMARC enforcement.
Fraudmarc Community Edition is ideal for technically proficient individuals, developers, and organizations that prioritize complete control, transparency, and self-hosting. It's an excellent choice for those who are comfortable with server management and want to integrate DMARC reporting deeply into their existing, perhaps custom, security infrastructure. It's particularly appealing to those who champion open-source solutions and have the resources to maintain them.
For enterprises with strong in-house technical teams, Fraudmarc CE offers the flexibility to scale and customize. MSPs with development capabilities could leverage it to build tailored DMARC solutions for their clients. SMBs without dedicated IT staff might find the self-hosted nature too demanding, making it less suitable for them.

How does DMARC 25 compare with Fraudmarc Community Edition?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Both DMARC 25 and Fraudmarc Community Edition come with their own set of considerations. DMARC 25, while user-friendly, lacks transparent pricing, which can be a hurdle for budget planning. Its feature set might also be less comprehensive than some enterprise-grade tools. Fraudmarc Community Edition, conversely, requires significant technical expertise for setup and maintenance, and its support is community-driven rather than direct. This can lead to a steep learning curve and reliance on self-sufficiency.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARC 25 requires direct contact for pricing after its free trial, while Fraudmarc Community Edition is a free, self-managed open-source solution, with other paid Fraudmarc offerings requiring contact for specific pricing.
Logo
Logo
Small
1 month free trial, then contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing (for other Fraudmarc products)
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing (for other Fraudmarc products)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing (for other Fraudmarc products)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC 25 or Fraudmarc Community Edition?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARC 25 vs Fraudmarc Community Edition DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped