Migrating to a new email service provider (ESP) can sometimes lead to unexpected deliverability issues, even for addresses that were successfully reached by your previous ESP. A common scenario involves new ESPs blocking addresses with an "invalid domain" reason, despite those domains having valid MX records and previously accepting mail. This often signals a shift in how your new ESP validates recipient domains or reflects nuances in their deliverability policies, especially concerning new IP addresses or sender reputations.
Key findings
Stricter validation: New ESPs often employ more stringent validation rules than previous providers, leading to blocks on domains that might have been accepted before. This can include checks for specific DNS records or real-time connectivity.
IP reputation impact: When moving to a new ESP, particularly with a new dedicated IP, your sender reputation might be starting fresh or be influenced by the IP's prior history, affecting initial deliverability.
Preemptive suppression: Some ESPs may preemptively suppress (or block) recipient addresses based on internal heuristics, even before attempting delivery to the recipient's mail server. This can lead to an invalid domain block reason without an actual bounce from the receiving end.
DNS record verification: The new ESP might be performing more thorough checks for valid MX records or other DNS configurations for both the recipient domain and (less commonly) the sender's from domain.
Deliverability reporting variations: Different ESPs have varying reporting standards; some may count suppressed or blocked addresses as delivered in their metrics, masking underlying issues. Always review your ESP's bounce and block notifications carefully.
Key considerations
ESP internal logic: It is crucial to engage directly with your new ESP to understand their specific classification logic for invalid domain blocks. They can often provide more detailed insights into why a particular domain is being flagged.
Recipient domain checks: Verify that the blocked recipient domains genuinely have active MX records and are configured to receive email. Small, private domains can sometimes have unusual or temporary DNS setups.
Sender domain authentication: Ensure your sending domain (the from address domain) has a proper MX record, even if it is not typically used for receiving mail directly. Some receiving servers may check this as a basic spam prevention measure.
List hygiene: While a past ESP might have been lenient, the new ESP may be enforcing stricter list hygiene. Regularly clean your email lists to remove invalid or unengaged addresses. This is critical for maintaining a healthy sender reputation.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often face unexpected challenges when switching ESPs. One recurring issue is the discrepancy in how different ESPs handle invalid domain block reasons for previously deliverable addresses. Marketers frequently attribute this to the new ESP's (Email Service Provider) stricter validation, new IP reputation, or differing internal suppression rules. The key takeaway for marketers is the need for proactive communication with the new ESP and a thorough understanding of their specific email validation processes.
Key opinions
ESP variance: Marketers frequently observe that different ESPs have varying approaches to validating recipient domains, leading to inconsistencies in deliverability. What was once accepted might now be blocked.
New IP reputation: The use of a new dedicated IP, even if warmed up, can result in different blocking patterns as its reputation is still being established with various ISPs.
Recipient domain checks: Concerns are raised about whether the recipient domains genuinely lack proper MX records, or if the new ESP is simply being more aggressive in its pre-delivery checks.
Misclassification by ESP: There's a strong sentiment that some ESPs might misclassify valid domains as invalid due to internal system quirks or overly broad filtering rules.
Reporting discrepancies: Marketers are wary that previous ESPs might have reported suppressed recipients as delivered, which would mask underlying deliverability issues that only become apparent with a new, more transparent provider.
Key considerations
Direct ESP communication: The primary recommendation is always to contact the new ESP's support to gain clarity on their specific invalid domain block reasons and internal processes.
Validate recipient domains: For specific problematic domains, conduct independent checks (e.g., using MX lookup tools) to confirm their existence and mail-receiving capabilities.
Review list acquisition: Re-evaluate how the email addresses were acquired. Poor list acquisition can lead to issues that surface with a more scrutinizing ESP. Regularly removing invalid addresses is crucial for good email deliverability.
Sender domain health: Ensure that your own sending domain (the one in the From header) has a properly configured MX record, as some receiving servers may check this.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes that they are observing several addresses being blocked due to an invalid domain reason with their new ESP, even though the same addresses were successfully delivered by their previous provider just last week.
19 Apr 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Campaign Refinery states that Email Service Providers (ESPs) often provide notifications if addresses are blocked due to reasons such as high bounce rates or spam complaints, which can indirectly relate to domain validity issues if not managed.
08 Jan 2025 - Campaign Refinery
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts highlight that an invalid domain block reason from a new ESP, especially for addresses previously deliverable, points to several technical and policy-based factors. These include differing ESP validation logic, issues with recipient MX records (or their perceived absence), and the newness of sender IP reputation. Experts underscore the importance of distinguishing between pre-emptive ESP suppression and actual recipient server rejections, often advising direct consultation with the ESP for clarification.
Key opinions
MX record presence: Some ESPs or receiving mail servers will suppress or reject emails if the recipient's domain does not have a properly configured MX record in its DNS, even if an A record exists.
ESP misclassification: The issue is often a misclassification by the new ESP rather than a genuine problem with the recipient domain, necessitating direct engagement with the ESP.
Sender domain validation: Receiving servers may check for an MX record on the sender's From domain (RFC 5321.From or RFC 5322.From) as a spam prevention measure, rejecting mail if one is absent.
Preemptive vs. rejection: It's important to differentiate if the ESP is preemptively suppressing the address or if the block reason is derived from a hard bounce (rejection) by the recipient's MX server.
Previous ESP reporting: A key consideration is that the previous ESP might have included suppressed or invalid recipients in their delivered reports, masking the true deliverability status of those addresses.
Key considerations
Engage ESP support: The most effective step is to contact the new ESP to understand their specific invalid domain definition and what criteria trigger this block reason for specific addresses. This can help diagnose and fix deliverability issues.
Verify recipient domains: Independently verify the MX records of the blocked recipient domains. Tools can confirm if a domain is genuinely configured to receive mail.
IP warming strategy: For new dedicated IPs, ensure a proper IP warming strategy is in place. Initial low volume or problematic sends can negatively impact early reputation, leading to stricter filtering by ISPs.
Header review: Examine the full SMTP response for the invalid domain blocks. The actual error message (e.g., 550 5.2.0 invalid domain) can reveal whether the block originated from the recipient's server or the ESP's internal system. This is a crucial step when you are facing IP or domain blocklist issues.
Sender policy enforcement: Implement and maintain strong email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) for your sending domains. This improves your sender reputation and reduces the likelihood of legitimate mail being flagged.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks inquires if the sample domain lacks an MX record but only has an A record in its DNS, noting that some providers might suppress (not send) in such cases.
19 Apr 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that a common reason for emails failing deliverability is recipient servers blocking the sender's domain or IP due to suspicions of spam, or if the sending domain itself is not properly configured.
12 Mar 2024 - wordtothewise.com
What the documentation says
Technical documentation on email protocols and deliverability best practices provides a foundational understanding of why a new ESP might block addresses with an invalid domain reason. These standards, such as RFCs (Requests for Comments), outline the proper configuration of DNS records like MX records, which are essential for mail exchange. Compliance with these standards, along with robust sender authentication like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, is crucial for maintaining a good sender reputation and ensuring deliverability across diverse email ecosystems. Any deviation or perceived anomaly can lead to blocking by recipient servers or even the ESP itself through its internal validation systems.
Key findings
MX record necessity: RFC 5321 (SMTP) mandates that a recipient domain must have an MX (Mail Exchange) record to specify where its mail should be delivered. The absence or misconfiguration of this record often leads to invalid domain rejections.
RFC compliance: Modern ESPs and receiving mail servers increasingly enforce compliance with RFCs. This includes checking not only the recipient domain's MX but also potentially the sender's (envelope From/RFC 5321.From) domain for valid MX records to prevent backscatter and unauthorized sending.
Domain authentication: Proper implementation of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is critical. While not directly about invalid domains, a lack of authentication can lead to emails being filtered or blocked by strict recipient policies.
Spam trap avoidance: Documentation often advises against sending to old or unverified lists, as these may contain spam traps, including those on domains that no longer accept mail, which can damage sender reputation and trigger blocklisting (also known as blacklisting).
Key considerations
DNS health check: Before migration, perform a comprehensive DNS health check for both your sending domains and frequently used recipient domains to identify any missing or incorrect MX records.
Validate list before sending: Utilize email validation services to clean your list and remove addresses associated with invalid or problematic domains before sending, especially when moving to a new ESP. This is a common practice to avoid being placed on an email blocklist.
Monitor SMTP responses: Pay close attention to SMTP bounce codes. A 550 5.2.0 invalid domain indicates a hard bounce, meaning the receiving server explicitly rejected the mail. This differs from an ESP's internal suppression.
IP warming rigor: Follow a diligent IP warming schedule. A cold IP with a sudden surge in problematic sends (even to what appear to be valid domains) can trigger strict filtering or blocks by ISPs, as outlined in postmaster guidelines.
Understanding RFCs: Familiarize yourself with relevant RFCs and industry best practices for email sending, as new ESPs are more likely to enforce these standards rigorously.
Technical article
Documentation on SMTP states that for an email to be successfully routed, the recipient's domain must have a properly configured Mail Exchanger (MX) record in the Domain Name System (DNS). The absence of such a record results in a permanent failure, often indicated by an invalid domain error.
10 Apr 2023 - RFC 5321
Technical article
Email deliverability best practices documentation indicates that email senders should ensure their own domains used in the RFC 5321.From (envelope sender) and RFC 5322.From (header From) addresses also possess valid MX records. Many receiving mail servers perform these checks as an anti-spam measure, rejecting mail from domains that cannot accept bounces.
22 Jun 2024 - Messaging, Malware and Mobile Anti-Abuse Working Group (M3AAWG)