Summary
Migrating to a new Email Service Provider (ESP) and warming up a new IP address are critical phases for any email sender. During this transition, it is common for emails to experience deliverability issues, including landing in the spam folder, even when sending to an engaged audience. The primary reason for this lies in the reset of sender reputation when a new IP address is introduced. Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and mailbox providers rely heavily on the sending history and engagement metrics associated with a specific IP and domain combination to determine email placement.
Key findings
- Reputation reset: When you move to a new ESP, you typically get a new IP address, which effectively resets your sender reputation to zero. This lack of historical data makes ISPs more cautious.
- ISP scrutiny: Mailbox providers' filters are particularly sensitive to sudden increases in email volume from new or cold IPs, which can trigger spam filters and lead to blockages or rejections.
- Engagement signals: During warming, ISPs watch for user interactions like opens, clicks, and whether messages are moved from spam to inbox. Positive engagement helps build trust.
- Data hygiene importance: Sending to invalid or unengaged addresses, or those that might be spam traps, can severely damage a new IP's reputation, as there's no long-standing positive history to offset negative signals.
Key considerations
- Gradual volume increase: Implement a structured IP warming plan that slowly increases sending volume over time, starting with your most engaged subscribers. This allows ISPs to gradually learn and trust your new sending patterns.
- High-quality data: Focus on sending only to highly engaged and recently active subscribers. A clean, well-maintained list is paramount during this sensitive period.
- Consistent messaging: Ensure your content remains consistent with what your audience expects to encourage positive interactions. Avoid drastic changes in email content or frequency during the warming period. For more on this, see best practices for email frequency and volume management.
- Monitoring: Closely monitor your deliverability rates and any bounce or blacklist issues. Adjust your sending strategy as needed based on feedback from ISP feedback loops and postmaster tools.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often find the transition to a new ESP and the subsequent IP warming process challenging. They frequently report unexpected dips in deliverability, even when following established best practices like sending to engaged audiences. The core frustration stems from the perceived inconsistency, as strategies that worked well with a seasoned IP on a previous ESP don't yield the same results immediately on a new, unproven IP address. This highlights the dynamic nature of sender reputation and the need for adaptability during migration.
Key opinions
- Unexpected spam placement: Many marketers observe emails going to spam when warming up a new IP, a problem that wasn't present with their old ESPs.
- Previous strategies fail: The belief that sending to an engaged audience from a previous ESP will automatically guarantee good deliverability on a new IP often proves incorrect.
- Need for external communication: Some consider using push campaigns or other non-email channels to tell users to check their spam folders during the warming phase.
- Confusion on new things: Marketers are often unclear about what specific changes in email program strategy are required when migrating to a new ESP and warming an IP.
Key considerations
- Adapting program strategy: It's crucial to understand that simply replicating past sending habits on a new IP won't suffice; a higher standard for engagement and data quality is necessary. This is especially true for how email reputation transfers.
- Managing expectations: Marketers need to be prepared for initial deliverability challenges and understand that warming is a process that builds new trust.
- Holistic migration: Treating ESP migration like a flick of a switch is a major mistake; proper planning and dedicated warm-up time are essential for a smooth transition, as detailed by Centric Squared.
- Strategic warming: Warming should be done with the new email program in mind, not just replicating the old one, to ensure the IP builds reputation for the intended sending patterns.
Marketer view
A marketer from Email Geeks observed that filters often deliver messages in a mix of inbox and spam during warming, then monitor user interactions to see if messages are moved between folders. This indicates that ISPs are actively testing user responses to new sending patterns. The initial placement is a signal for the system to learn from subscriber behavior.
Marketer view
A marketer from Email Geeks asked if push campaigns have been used to prompt people to check their spam folders. This query suggests a proactive approach marketers consider when emails unexpectedly land in spam during a new ESP migration, recognizing that direct communication outside of email might be necessary to guide subscribers. It highlights the challenge of ensuring message visibility during transitional phases.
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability consistently emphasize that moving to a new ESP or a new IP address fundamentally changes how mailbox providers evaluate your email streams. Unlike a long-standing IP that has accumulated years of positive sending history, a new IP lacks this crucial reputation. This absence of history means that ISPs apply stricter scrutiny, requiring senders to adopt even higher standards for engagement, data quality, and relevance to successfully reach the inbox. The past performance on an old IP does not automatically transfer, necessitating a renewed focus on best practices.
Key opinions
- Higher standards for new IPs: You cannot expect to perform the exact same way on a new ESP or new IP. Senders must meet a higher standard for engagement, data quality, and relevance to reach the inbox.
- No history for new IP/domain: When sending from a new IP address or domain combination, mailbox providers lack the historical data of past positive interactions, making them more suspicious initially.
- Importance of current user engagement: Mail sent to the exact same user population can look worse on new IPs because the long-term interaction history is not immediately recognized.
- Data hygiene beyond bounces: Confirming that an email address belongs to the customer who supplied it is crucial, not just that it won't bounce. Many tools only verify deliverability, not ownership, which can lead to problems like hitting spam traps.
Key considerations
- Refining sending strategy: It's essential to adapt your sending approach when migrating, focusing on the most engaged segments and optimizing content for relevance and recipient desire.
- Proactive list cleaning: Before warming, rigorously clean your email list to remove inactive or questionable addresses. This prevents negative engagement signals that could harm your new IP's reputation.
- Prioritizing true customer engagement: Focus on sending to addresses confirmed to belong to active customers, which significantly reduces the risk of hitting spam traps or generating complaints. For diagnosing deliverability issues, diagnosing issues is key.
- Continuous monitoring and adaptation: Regularly review performance metrics and be prepared to adjust your warming schedule and sending patterns based on real-time feedback from ISPs, a practice often supported by tools like Google Postmaster Tools.
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks stated that you cannot do the exact same things you did on an ESP where you've been mailing for many years on a new ESP. This emphasizes that established reputation allows for more leniency, while a new IP requires a more stringent approach to email practices. Past behavior doesn't guarantee future success with a new sender identity.
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks explained that if you move ESPs, you have to change what you're doing, even after a correct warmup, to meet a higher standard of engagement and relevance. This highlights the evolving nature of deliverability requirements and the need for senders to consistently improve their practices, particularly when establishing a new sending reputation. It is not just about the technical warmup, but the entire email program.
What the documentation says
Technical documentation from leading email service providers and industry bodies consistently outlines the necessity and methodology of IP and domain warming. They clarify that warming is a process designed to build sender reputation with ISPs by gradually increasing email volume over a period, allowing filters to assess the legitimacy and quality of the new sending source. The consensus is that skipping or rushing this phase leads to immediate deliverability penalties, as automated systems flag unproven high-volume senders as potential threats. Proper authentication is also a non-negotiable component.
Key findings
- Reputation building: Warming introduces a new (cold) IP to ISPs, allowing them to establish a positive sender reputation based on sending volume, frequency, and recipient engagement.
- Gradual increase is key: Starting with low volumes and slowly scaling up is crucial. ISPs' filters are designed to detect suspicious high-volume sends from unknown IPs.
- Engagement dictates speed: The speed and success of IP warming are directly tied to positive recipient engagement, such as opens, clicks, and lack of complaints or blocklist listings.
- Authentication importance: Proper configuration of authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is foundational for trust and deliverability, especially with new IPs.
Key considerations
- Segment your list: Start by sending to your most active and engaged subscribers to generate positive signals during the initial warming phases.
- Monitor performance: Utilize available tools, such as ISP postmaster tools, to track deliverability rates, spam complaints, and reputation scores. Google Postmaster Tools V2 can be particularly useful.
- Maintain consistent sending: Consistency in sending volume, frequency, and content type helps ISPs build a reliable profile of your new IP.
- Be patient: IP warming is not an instant process. It takes time, often several weeks to months, to build a strong sending reputation across all major mailbox providers. Rushing can lead to long-term deliverability issues.
Technical article
Documentation from Amazon Web Services (AWS) explains that IP and domain warming involves slowly increasing sending volume to build a good sender reputation. This process allows mailbox providers to learn legitimate sending patterns. It is crucial for ensuring smooth deliverability and avoiding reputation penalties associated with sudden volume spikes from new, untrusted IPs. The guide emphasizes the importance of planning the transition carefully.
Technical article
Documentation from EmailLabs cautions that Microsoft's spam filters are particularly sensitive to sudden increases in email volume from new IPs, potentially leading to blockages. This highlights the specific vigilance of major mailbox providers and the need for a carefully paced warming strategy. Ignoring these sensitivities can result in immediate and severe deliverability problems, underscoring the importance of gradual volume escalation.
Related resources
14 resources
Related pages
What are common email deliverability issues during new IP and subdomain warmup after ESP migration?
Does a new dedicated IP for transactional emails fix existing deliverability problems?
How to Identify Email Spam Traps?
What are the best strategies for warming email sending IPs by individual ISP?
Best practices for email frequency and volume management after IP warming
How to consolidate email sending platforms and warm up a new IP for improved deliverability?
How to diagnose email deliverability issues and prevent emails from going to spam?
How does email reputation transfer during IP warming with a new ESP, and how to resolve deliverability issues?
An in-depth guide to email blocklists
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
