Summary
Email marketers occasionally observe perplexing patterns in their deliverability data, and one such mystery is a consistent, sudden drop in engagement metrics, specifically with Gmail, around a particular day each month. This phenomenon, often reported around the 5th of the month, prompts questions about underlying causes, especially when other indicators like spam rates or IP/domain reputation remain stable. While it might feel like an arbitrary filter test, understanding potential factors and proactive strategies can help mitigate the impact of such recurring dips.
Key findings
- Monthly consistency: The core issue is a highly consistent monthly drop in Gmail engagement, occurring on or near the 5th of the month, with unique open rates plummeting significantly (e.g., from 25% to under 5%).
- Metrics impacted: Not just opens, but all engagement metrics, including click-through rates (CTR) and conversions, are affected during this period for both engaged and unengaged recipients.
- Reputation stability: Crucially, the sender's IP and domain reputation remain high in Google Postmaster Tools (GPT), with no preceding spikes in spam rates, which is unusual for a deliverability issue. You can learn more about this in our ultimate guide to Google Postmaster Tools.
- No identifiable triggers: There are no apparent external or internal triggering events aligning with the 5th of each month, such as new content releases, list segment changes, or marketing campaigns.
- Quick recovery: The sender's metrics typically recover within 3-5 days after adjusting sending strategies, such as focusing on engaged recipients and removing unengaged ones.
Key considerations
- Segmented sending: Consider proactively sending only to the most engaged segments on or around the 5th of the month. This might help mitigate the drop and potentially diagnose underlying deliverability problems.
- Hidden sending sources: Investigate if there are any other unknown or forgotten email sending sources associated with your domain that might be conducting campaigns (e.g., cold emails, sales pushes) towards the end of the previous month, which could impact the 5th.
- DMARC monitoring: Implement DMARC (with a p=none policy for reporting only) to gain visibility into all email sources sending on behalf of your domain, potentially uncovering unknown senders or misconfigurations.
- Auditing monthly activities: Perform a thorough audit of all marketing, sales, and transactional email activities that occur monthly, especially towards month-end or early month, even if they seem unrelated, to identify any subtle patterns.
What email marketers say
Email marketers frequently discuss the perplexing challenges of maintaining consistent deliverability, especially with Gmail. The community often shares anecdotal evidence of peculiar drops in engagement that defy standard troubleshooting. While some attribute these dips to hidden sending practices or monthly algorithmic adjustments, most agree on the importance of vigilant monitoring and adaptable sending strategies to maintain sender reputation and inbox placement.
Key opinions
- Consistent pattern: Marketers note the uncanny consistency of the engagement drop, specifically affecting Gmail addresses on or around the 5th of each month, despite typical deliverability checks showing no red flags.
- Widespread impact: The issue extends beyond just open rates, impacting all key engagement metrics like click-through and conversions, suggesting a broader deliverability challenge rather than a simple reporting anomaly.
- Gmail filter speculation: Many marketers hypothesize that Gmail might be implementing a monthly 'filter test' or algorithmic adjustment around this time, though concrete proof is elusive.
- Reputation disconnect: A common frustration is the lack of correlating data in Google Postmaster Tools; even with significant engagement drops, IP and domain reputation might inexplicably remain high, making diagnosis challenging.
- Engagement-driven recovery: The strategy of segmenting and focusing sends on highly engaged subscribers often leads to a quick recovery in metrics, reinforcing Gmail's emphasis on positive engagement signals. This is a common strategy to mitigate a sudden drop in email open rates.
Key considerations
- Proactive segmentation: Marketers consider proactively sending only to the most engaged segments around the 5th of the month to prevent a significant drop and potentially short-circuit the pattern.
- Investigate all sending paths: It's crucial to confirm that no other email sources, known or unknown, are sending a high volume of emails from your domain towards the end of the previous month, which could negatively influence the reputation for the next cycle. This is critical for avoiding emails going to spam.
- Monitor subtle changes: Even if major metrics seem stable, marketers recommend scrutinizing all variables around the specific date to identify any subtle shifts in audience behavior, content strategy, or list management.
- Engagement measurement: Rely on a combination of open rates, click-through rates, and conversion data to get a holistic view of engagement, as relying solely on opens can sometimes be misleading due to privacy features.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes a persistent problem over the past year with sudden drops in email engagement for Gmail addresses, consistently occurring around the 5th of each month. This pattern is perplexing as typical deliverability indicators, like spam rates and bounces, remain stable. Unique open rates for marketing emails can plummet from over 25% to below 5%.
Marketer view
Marketer from Inbox Collective suggests that if open and click rates drop, it could indicate a deliverability problem requiring investigation. They recommend analyzing recent changes in sending volume, content, or list quality to pinpoint the issue and restore performance.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts acknowledge that while highly specific, recurring drops like the 5th of the month Gmail issue are rare, they often point to subtle shifts in sending patterns, list hygiene, or algorithmic responses. Experts advise a deep dive into data beyond typical metrics, emphasizing the importance of list quality, consistent sending behavior, and robust authentication protocols. The consensus is that even without clear Postmaster Tools warnings, a consistent engagement decline signals a need for proactive intervention to prevent long-term damage to sender reputation or potential blocklist issues.
Key opinions
- Behavioral shifts: Experts suggest that recurring drops could be tied to subtle, month-end shifts in subscriber behavior or internal marketing processes that culminate in a reputation impact early the following month.
- List quality importance: Maintaining a clean and engaged list is paramount. Even if new sign-ups or content don't directly align with the drop date, the overall health of the list significantly influences Gmail's filtering decisions. This can also cause sudden spikes in bounces.
- Hidden sending analysis: A thorough audit of all email sending sources associated with the domain is crucial. Unforeseen transactional emails or marketing efforts from other departments could inadvertently affect reputation.
- Algorithmic adjustments: While not publicly disclosed, ISPs like Gmail continuously refine their filtering algorithms. A monthly pattern could indicate a specific, automated, engagement-testing cycle that aligns with financial or reporting periods.
- DMARC reporting value: Experts highly recommend using DMARC reporting, even with a policy of p=none, to identify unauthorized sending or misconfigured systems that might be impacting deliverability without direct knowledge. This helps monitor your domain reputation.
Key considerations
- Deep data analysis: Go beyond superficial metrics. Analyze engagement by domain, segment, and specific campaign types around the problematic dates. Look for micro-trends that might not appear in aggregate data.
- Engagement strategy refinement: Continuously refine segmentation strategies to prioritize highly engaged users, especially during periods of observed drops. Suppress or re-engage less active subscribers strategically.
- Authentication checks: Regularly verify SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records to ensure proper authentication, as misconfigurations can subtly impact deliverability even if not immediately evident as hard failures.
- Avoid blocklists: Consistent low engagement can lead to gradual reputation decay and potential listing on email blacklists or blocklists. Proactive measures are crucial to prevent this.
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource advises that consistent monitoring of delivery rates and open rates is essential, as sudden, unexplained drops often signal underlying issues. A consistent drop around a specific date suggests a cyclical problem that may be tied to subscriber behavior or periodic list changes.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests that marketers should meticulously check for any differences in sending patterns or list segmentation around the problematic dates, as even minor changes could trigger an algorithmic response from Gmail. No variable should be left unexamined.
What the documentation says
Official documentation from major mailbox providers, while not explicitly detailing monthly engagement drops, consistently emphasizes the importance of maintaining high sender reputation, which is largely driven by positive user engagement. Gmail's filtering algorithms prioritize user experience, heavily weighing factors like opens, clicks, and whether users mark emails as 'not spam,' versus complaints or deletions. The documentation outlines best practices for senders to avoid filters, including managing list hygiene, sending relevant content, and ensuring proper authentication, all of which contribute to a consistent and healthy sending profile.
Key findings
- Engagement signals: Documentation confirms that ISPs like Gmail use positive and negative engagement signals to determine inbox placement. High open and click rates improve standing, while low engagement or spam complaints can lead to filtering to spam or even blacklisting (also called blocklisting).
- Sender reputation: Gmail's Postmaster Tools provides reputation dashboards (IP and domain reputation), which reflect overall sending health. While a specific monthly drop might not always immediately appear as a reputation plunge, consistent low engagement will eventually impact it. Learn how to improve your domain reputation.
- Algorithm focus: Gmail's algorithms are dynamic and constantly learning from user interactions. While no fixed monthly 'test' is described, changes in user behavior or sending patterns can trigger new algorithmic responses, potentially leading to varied inbox placement.
- List hygiene importance: Documentation consistently advises removing unengaged subscribers and invalid addresses to maintain high deliverability and avoid spam traps, which can negatively impact reputation.
Key considerations
- Authentication standards: Ensure full compliance with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. These are foundational for establishing trust with mailbox providers and ensuring your emails are not mistaken for spam or phishing attempts. Proper configuration helps prevent issues such as DMARC verification failures.
- Content relevance: Deliver relevant and anticipated content. Documentation implies that content that consistently generates low engagement or is perceived as unwanted by recipients will likely be filtered more aggressively.
- Monitoring engagement: Beyond open rates, monitor clicks, replies, forwards, and unsubscribes. These collective signals provide a more accurate picture of how recipients interact with your emails, which directly influences filtering decisions.
- Consistent sending patterns: Avoid drastic, sudden changes in sending volume or frequency without warming up. Erratic sending can trigger filters, as it deviates from established trusted patterns.
Technical article
Documentation from Google's Bulk Sender Guidelines emphasizes that senders must maintain consistently high engagement to ensure optimal deliverability. Low open rates, click-through rates, and high spam complaint rates contribute negatively to sender reputation, leading to increased filtering or rejections.
Technical article
Documentation from major ISPs (internet service providers) outlines that their filtering systems learn from user behavior. If emails are consistently ignored or deleted by recipients without being opened, the system infers a lack of interest and will progressively deliver fewer messages to the inbox.
Related resources
4 resources
Related pages
How to troubleshoot a sudden drop in Gmail open rates?
What causes a sudden drop in email open rates?
Ultimate guide to Google Postmaster tools V2
How to improve domain reputation using Google Postmaster tools [2025 Guide]
What causes a sudden drop in Gmail email deliverability to spam?
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024 and how to fix it
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
Why am I seeing more Gmail hard bounces today?
Why your emails fail: expert guide to improve email deliverability [2025]
