DMARC bounces and authentication issues, particularly when using platforms like SendGrid, are a common challenge for email senders. These problems often stem from misconfigurations of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records, leading to emails failing authentication checks and being rejected or sent to spam by recipient mail servers. Understanding the specific nature of these failures, whether temporary (TempError) or permanent, is crucial for effective troubleshooting and maintaining strong email deliverability.
Key findings
Common cause: DMARC bounces are frequently caused by issues related to SPF and DKIM authentication, or a misalignment between the 'From' domain and the authenticated domains.
Platform-specific issues: Email service providers (ESPs) like SendGrid can sometimes experience internal incidents that lead to widespread authentication failures for their users, even with correct DNS setup.
Header inspection: Checking email headers is vital to identify if an ESP's domain is appearing in authentication headers (like DKIM-Signature or Return-Path) instead of your own, which can trigger DMARC failures.
Policy impact: A DMARC policy set to 'reject' (p=reject) will result in hard bounces for emails that fail authentication, rather than them being quarantined or sent to the spam folder.
Temporary vs. permanent: Some authentication issues might be temporary (DMARC TempError), indicating transient network problems or server-side glitches, while persistent failures point to configuration errors.
Key considerations
DNS configuration: Ensure that your SPF, DKIM, and DMARC DNS records are correctly published and aligned with your sending domain, especially when using a third-party sender. For more details on common issues, see how to fix common DMARC issues.
ESP status: Regularly monitor the status pages of your email service provider for any reported incidents that might affect email authentication or delivery, as these can cause unexpected bounces.
Header analysis: Learn to analyze email headers thoroughly to pinpoint the exact authentication failure point. This can reveal if your domain or the ESP's domain is being used for authentication.
DMARC reporting: Utilize DMARC reports (RUA and RUF) to gain visibility into your email authentication performance and identify domains or IPs causing failures. Our guide to troubleshooting DMARC reports can help.
Incremental policy enforcement: Consider starting with a p=none or p=quarantine DMARC policy before moving to p=reject to gradually implement DMARC and monitor its impact without immediately causing hard bounces. Learn more about how to know and fix DMARC failure errors.
Email marketers often face immediate, tangible consequences from DMARC bounces and authentication issues: reduced deliverability, decreased campaign effectiveness, and a general sense of frustration when perfectly configured setups suddenly fail. Their experiences highlight the practical challenges of maintaining compliance and ensuring messages reach the inbox, often leading them to seek quick solutions and explanations.
Key opinions
Unexpected failures: Many marketers report experiencing sudden DMARC bounces or authentication failures on domains that have been properly set up for years, indicating external factors at play.
Widespread impact: Failures can affect all domains used by a marketer, not just isolated instances, suggesting a broader issue with their sending infrastructure or email service provider.
ESP connection: There's a strong correlation between DMARC issues and the use of specific email service providers, particularly when multiple users report similar anomalies.
Header discrepancy: Marketers often identify that their ESP's domain appears in authentication headers instead of their own, leading to DMARC misalignment failures.
Urgency for resolution: When DMARC bounces occur, marketers prioritize opening support tickets with their ESPs due to the immediate impact on their email campaigns and business operations.
Key considerations
Proactive monitoring: Marketers should implement continuous monitoring for DMARC failures and deliverability anomalies, rather than waiting for bounce reports or recipient complaints.
Internal communication: Establish clear communication channels with technical teams or ESP support to swiftly address authentication issues.
Impact assessment: Understand the immediate impact of DMARC rejections (emails not delivered at all) versus quarantine or 'none' policies (emails possibly landing in spam).
Documentation readiness: Keep records of your DNS configurations and historical deliverability data to provide to support teams when troubleshooting. Our guide on email deliverability issues can offer further insight.
Sender reputation: Be aware that consistent DMARC failures, even temporary ones, can negatively affect your sender reputation over time, impacting future deliverability. For SendGrid-specific issues, consult their documentation on DMARC delivery failures.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks observed a surge in DMARC bounces, specifically with a reject policy, suggesting a widespread issue affecting multiple domains. This unexpected behavior pointed towards a larger, systemic problem rather than isolated incidents, prompting an investigation into potential causes beyond their immediate control.
23 Jul 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks questioned if the observed bounces were related to DMARC reports or authentication failures of outgoing emails, highlighting the need for clarification. Understanding the exact type of bounce is critical for accurate diagnosis, as different bounce reasons point to distinct underlying problems with email setup or transmission.
23 Jul 2024 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability emphasize a methodical approach to diagnosing DMARC and authentication issues, often starting with a deep dive into email headers and DMARC reports. They understand that while some problems are systemic (e.g., ESP incidents), many are rooted in subtle misconfigurations or a lack of understanding regarding how DMARC, SPF, and DKIM interact and align.
Key opinions
Specificity of issues: Experts suggest that DMARC bounces are typically specific to a particular sending domain or, less commonly, to a particular receiving mailbox provider, rather than being universal.
Header analysis importance: Checking email headers is crucial for experts to determine if third-party ESP domains are inadvertently appearing in authentication headers, causing alignment failures.
Root cause identification: Identifying the precise cause of DMARC failure requires distinguishing between temporary (TempError) and permanent issues, as they point to different troubleshooting paths.
Alignment is key: Experts consistently highlight the importance of SPF and DKIM alignment with the 'From' domain, as merely passing SPF and DKIM checks isn't enough for DMARC to pass.
DMARC policy impact: The chosen DMARC policy (p=none, p=quarantine, p=reject) directly dictates the recipient's action upon DMARC failure, ranging from monitoring to outright rejection.
Key considerations
Comprehensive diagnostic tools: Utilize DMARC reporting tools for aggregated data to identify patterns and scale of authentication failures across various mailbox providers. For more information, see our page on how to debug DMARC authentication failure.
Understanding authentication flow: Grasping how SPF, DKIM, and DMARC interact at each step of the email journey is fundamental to troubleshooting complex issues. Our simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM can clarify this.
Beyond basic checks: Don't rely solely on SPF and DKIM "pass" statuses. Instead, focus on strict DMARC alignment requirements for both SPF and DKIM, as highlighted in Outlook's new sender requirements.
Vendor incidents: Acknowledge that even well-configured systems can experience issues due to incidents at a third-party email service provider (like SendGrid), requiring external vigilance.
Proactive monitoring: Set up alerts for DMARC failures and changes in authentication rates to detect issues quickly and minimize impact on deliverability.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from Email Geeks noted that DMARC bounces are usually specific to a particular sending domain or, less commonly, a particular receiving mailbox provider. This specificity suggests that widespread, non-targeted DMARC issues are rare and often point to broader infrastructure problems when they occur.
23 Jul 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Deliverability expert from SpamResource cautions that even temporary DMARC authentication issues, like a TempError, can still lead to deliverability problems if not addressed promptly. While not immediately a hard bounce, a pattern of TempErrors can degrade sender reputation over time and impact inbox placement.
22 Jun 2024 - SpamResource.com
What the documentation says
Official documentation from major email service providers and industry standards bodies provides the authoritative framework for DMARC, SPF, and DKIM implementation. It outlines the technical specifications, common failure scenarios (like DMARC TempError), and recommended troubleshooting steps, often emphasizing precise DNS record configuration and proper alignment.
Key findings
DMARC failure causes: Documentation attributes DMARC failures to issues with email authentication (SPF, DKIM), domain alignment, or incorrect DNS configurations.
TempError definition: DMARC TempErrors are defined as temporary authentication issues related to SPF and DKIM policies, which can lead to transient validation failures.
ESP domain in headers: Some documentation highlights scenarios where an ESP's domain may appear in authentication headers, potentially causing DMARC misalignment if not properly handled by the sender's configuration.
Policy actions: Official guidelines specify that a DMARC 'reject' policy will cause non-compliant emails to bounce, preventing them from reaching the inbox or spam folder.
Asynchronous bounces: Certain ESPs document "asynchronous" or "delayed bounces" as predominantly caused by recipient servers, even if they appear to originate from the sending platform's infrastructure.
Key considerations
Adherence to RFCs: Ensure your implementation adheres to relevant RFCs (Request for Comments) for DMARC, SPF, and DKIM to ensure proper interoperability and authentication. Our what RFC 5322 says vs. what actually works article can provide context.
Domain authentication setup: Follow your ESP's specific documentation for setting up custom domain authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC records) to ensure proper alignment and avoid common pitfalls.
Troubleshooting guides: Utilize troubleshooting guides provided by ESPs (like SendGrid's support documentation) for common delivery failures, including those related to DMARC. For example, refer to the Twilio SendGrid Support Deliverability Guide.
DMARC policy details: Understand the implications of each DMARC policy type (none, quarantine, reject) as detailed in official DMARC specifications. Our guide on transitioning DMARC policy offers practical steps.
Automated security features: Be aware of any automated security features offered by your ESP that might impact DMARC alignment, and ensure they are configured to support your custom domain.
Technical article
Documentation from SendGrid Support states that DMARC failures can result from the adoption of DMARC practices by mailbox providers, leading to message failures. This indicates that as more recipients enforce DMARC, senders must ensure their configurations are robust to prevent delivery issues.
01 Aug 2023 - support.sendgrid.com
Technical article
DuoCircle's documentation defines DMARC TempErrors as temporary authentication issues concerning DKIM and SPF policies, which are transient in nature and require fixing. These temporary errors, while not immediately fatal, can signal underlying instability in DNS resolution or authentication processes.