A sudden and significant drop in your DMARC success rate, as seen in tools like Google Postmaster Tools, can be a cause for concern for any email sender. While it might initially seem directly linked to a surge in user-reported spam and subsequent blocklist appearances, the relationship is often more nuanced than a direct cause-and-effect. Understanding the underlying reasons for such a drop requires a deep dive into your DMARC reports to distinguish between legitimate sending issues and potential spoofing attempts.
Key findings
Authentication issues: A DMARC success rate drop typically indicates that mail originating from your domain is not correctly authenticated, which could be due to legitimate but misconfigured sending sources or unauthorized spoofing. Troubleshooting DMARC failures is key.
User awareness: End-users are generally unaware of DMARC, so a DMARC failure itself does not directly lead to an increase in user-reported spam complaints from their perspective.
Blocklist criteria: Most public blocklists (or blacklists), especially less selective ones like SORBS, do not list domains or IPs solely based on DMARC authentication mismatches. They typically react to spam complaints or observed spamming behavior.
Shared IP risks: If you are on shared IP addresses, a blocklist entry (like SORBS) might be due to the actions of other senders on that shared IP, rather than issues with your domain's authentication or direct sending practices. This can also affect your general domain reputation.
Root cause: The simultaneous drop in DMARC success, spike in spam reports, and blocklist appearance points to a likely increase in sending volume (e.g., cold outreach) through unauthenticated channels or a significant spoofing event. Identifying the specific source is critical. More information on email deliverability issues can be found here.
Key considerations
DMARC reports: The most effective way to diagnose the problem is by analyzing your DMARC aggregate reports. These reports (XML files sent by receiving mail servers) will detail the source IPs, authentication results (SPF and DKIM pass/fail), and alignment status for all mail claiming to be from your domain. This information will clarify if the failing mail is from a legitimate, but misconfigured, source or from an unauthorized sender.
Identify unauthorized senders: Use DMARC reports to pinpoint any third-party services or internal departments sending email on your behalf without proper SPF or DKIM alignment. Ensure all legitimate sending sources are correctly authenticated.
Distinguish issues: Separate the DMARC failure issue from the blocklist issue. While DMARC failure can affect inbox placement, a shared IP blacklisting is a distinct problem that needs to be addressed with your ESP or hosting provider.
Monitor spam rates: A sudden spike in user-reported spam in Google Postmaster Tools often indicates a content or recipient engagement issue, or that problematic mail (legitimate or spoofed) is reaching inboxes and being marked as spam. Review content and list hygiene.
Email marketers frequently encounter sudden shifts in deliverability metrics, and a drop in DMARC success rates alongside increased spam complaints and blocklistings can feel like a perfect storm. Their perspectives often highlight the immediate observations from tools like Google Postmaster Tools and the challenge of correlating various symptoms to a single root cause.
Key opinions
Google Postmaster Tools as primary data source: Many marketers rely heavily on Google Postmaster Tools for initial insights into DMARC, spam rates, and domain reputation, especially if they lack dedicated deliverability platforms. Understanding Postmaster Tools data is crucial.
Discrepancies in data: It can be confusing when Postmaster Tools shows a problem (like DMARC drop or spam spike), but an ESP's internal reports show no unusual uptick in complaints or unsubscribes.
Internal sending risks: There's a common suspicion that unmonitored internal teams (e.g., sales sending cold outreach) might be contributing to unauthenticated mail or higher spam rates. This can severely impact sender reputation.
Impact of shared IPs: Marketers on shared IPs often worry about being negatively affected by the sending practices of others on the same IP, leading to unexpected blocklistings.
Seeking expert guidance: The complexity of these issues often drives marketers to seek advice from deliverability experts or communities like Email Geeks for specific troubleshooting steps.
Key considerations
Holistic view: While Postmaster Tools is valuable, marketers should seek to combine its insights with data from their ESPs and DMARC reports for a complete picture. Sometimes, a drop in gmail deliverability can have multiple causes.
Internal audit: Proactively audit all departments that send email using your domain to ensure they are using properly authenticated channels and adhering to best practices.
Prioritize issues: Not all blocklists carry the same weight. Marketers should learn to differentiate between impactful blacklists that significantly hinder delivery and less relevant ones that might not require immediate attention.
DMARC report access: Ensure you have access to DMARC aggregate reports and understand how to interpret them. This requires either direct access to the email address receiving the reports or using a DMARC monitoring tool.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks asks about a sudden drop in DMARC success rate, falling from 100% to 63%, and seeks to understand how this change impacts user-reported spam rates and potential blocklist appearances.
01 Dec 2020 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks indicates they are currently experiencing a 'when it rains, it pours' situation, observing a DMARC drop, a significant spike in user-reported spam, and listings on several blocklists simultaneously, leading to uncertainty about which issue to address first.
01 Dec 2020 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Deliverability experts bring a nuanced understanding to DMARC success rate drops, spam spikes, and blocklistings. They focus on precise diagnostics through DMARC reports and differentiating between various contributing factors, rather than jumping to conclusions based on symptoms alone.
Key opinions
DMARC report imperative: The single most crucial step is to access and analyze DMARC reports, as they provide exact details on which emails are failing authentication, from what IPs, and why (SPF/DKIM pass or fail).
Authentication vs. complaints: DMARC authentication status does not directly correlate with user-reported spam complaints, as users generally don't interact with or understand DMARC failures.
Blocklist significance: Many public blocklists, particularly those not widely adopted, are not primary indicators of deliverability issues and often do not account for DMARC authentication status in their listing criteria. Email deliverability causes and fixes are complex.
Shared IP complexities: Being on a shared IP can lead to blocklistings unrelated to your domain's DMARC setup or your own sending practices, as the actions of other senders on that IP can impact its reputation.
Domain vs. IP reputation: Gmail's complaint metrics are domain-based, meaning they reflect the reputation of your sending domain, not necessarily the specific IP address from which mail was sent.
Key considerations
Identify failing sources: Use DMARC reports to determine if the failing mail is from a legitimate source (e.g., a marketing platform or sales tool not correctly configured) or if your domain is being spoofed by unauthorized entities. This helps in understanding DMARC fluctuation.
Prioritize diagnostics: Address the DMARC issues by reviewing and correcting SPF and DKIM authentication for all sending services. Once authentication is solid, monitor DMARC reports for improvements.
Contextualize blocklistings: For IP-based blocklistings on shared IPs, communicate with your ESP to understand and mitigate the impact of other senders. For domain-based blocklistings, review your sending content and list quality. Information on inbox troubleshooting can be a great help.
Address content/list issues: If user-reported spam spikes are noted, focus on improving email content relevance, list segmentation, and reducing unwanted mail to decrease complaint rates.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests that a DMARC success rate drop occurs because someone is sending mail from your domain that is not correctly authenticated, which could either be an internal sending source or someone actively forging your domain. The key is to examine DMARC reports for details.
01 Dec 2020 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks clarifies that users typically do not perceive DMARC authentication status, meaning a DMARC failure is unlikely to directly influence the number of user complaints about your email messages.
01 Dec 2020 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
Official email authentication and deliverability documentation provides the foundational principles behind DMARC, SPF, and DKIM. This documentation outlines how these protocols are designed to combat email fraud and improve trust in email communication, indirectly impacting spam rates and blocklistings through their enforcement by mailbox providers.
Key findings
DMARC purpose: DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) is designed to give domain owners the ability to protect their domain from unauthorized use and to receive feedback on email purporting to originate from their domain.
Authentication standards: DMARC builds upon SPF (Sender Policy Framework) and DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail), requiring at least one of them to pass and align with the 'From' header domain for DMARC authentication to succeed.
Reporting mechanism: DMARC includes a reporting mechanism (RUA for aggregate reports and RUF for forensic reports) that allows domain owners to receive data on how their email is being authenticated and handled by receiving mail servers.
Policy enforcement: A DMARC policy (p=none, p=quarantine, p=reject) instructs receiving servers on how to handle emails that fail DMARC authentication. A 'reject' policy indicates that such emails should be blocked. This is also how Gmail blocks emails.
Blocklisting influence: While DMARC failures don't directly lead to generic blocklist entries, consistent DMARC failures (especially combined with a stronger DMARC policy) can severely degrade sender reputation and increase the likelihood of emails being flagged as spam or rejected by ISPs, leading to implicit blocklisting.
Key considerations
Proper setup: Ensure your DMARC record is correctly published in DNS, including valid SPF and DKIM records, to enable receivers to perform authentication checks. Our guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM explains this simply.
Report analysis: Regularly review DMARC aggregate reports to monitor authentication success rates, identify unauthorized senders, and confirm that all legitimate sending sources are properly aligned. Our guide to understanding DMARC reports can help.
Alignment importance: Pay close attention to DMARC alignment requirements, as both SPF and DKIM must align with the organizational domain in the 'From' header for DMARC to pass, even if SPF or DKIM technically pass.
Policy progression: Start with a 'p=none' policy to gather data without impacting email delivery, and gradually move to 'p=quarantine' or 'p=reject' only after confident that all legitimate mail sources are authenticated and aligned.
Technical article
Documentation from DMARC.org states that DMARC is an email authentication protocol designed to protect email senders and receivers from fraudulent email activities such as spoofing, phishing, and other forms of cybercrime, thereby increasing trust in email.
01 Jan 2023 - DMARC.org
Technical article
RFC 7489, the DMARC specification, specifies that DMARC enables a domain owner to indicate to email receivers that their emails are protected by SPF and/or DKIM, and to provide instructions on how to handle emails that fail these authentication checks.