Summary
When validating purchased email lists, a sudden surge in "unknown" rates can be alarming. While email validation services aim to filter out invalid addresses, a high percentage of unknowns often signals deeper issues with the list's origin and quality rather than just technical errors in validation. This indicates that a significant portion of the addresses cannot be definitively confirmed as valid or invalid, often due to aggressive server responses, B2B domains, or ISP blocking during the validation process itself. Crucially, purchased email lists are generally considered ineffective and harmful for email deliverability, leading to poor sender reputation and low engagement, irrespective of validation results.
Key findings
- Inherent list quality: High unknown rates are a strong indicator of a poor-quality, potentially purchased email list, which often contains outdated, invalid, or non-existent addresses. This is a common characteristic of such lists, regardless of validation efforts.
- Validation service limitations: An "unknown" status means the validator could not determine the address's validity, often due to SMTP timeouts or the recipient server's anti-abuse measures.
- ISP blocking: Internet Service Providers (ISPs) may actively block validation attempts if they suspect the activity is related to spamming or probing for valid addresses. This is especially true for B2B domains.
- Spam trap risk: Purchased lists are notorious for containing spam traps, which are specifically designed to catch senders who do not have permission, regardless of their validation status.
- Limited effectiveness of purchased lists: Even after validation, purchased lists rarely yield positive results. They can significantly harm sender reputation, increase bounce rates, and lead to poor engagement, as recipients have not opted in to receive communications.
Key considerations
- Deliverability impact: Sending to a purchased list, even after validation, can lead to your emails going to spam or being blocked, negatively impacting your overall sender reputation.
- ESP policies: Most legitimate Email Service Providers (ESPs) explicitly prohibit the use of purchased lists in their terms of service due to the risks they pose to their shared infrastructure and overall deliverability.
- Ethical and legal compliance: Using purchased lists is not compliant with permission-based marketing principles and can lead to legal issues in jurisdictions with strict anti-spam laws.
- Alternative strategies: Instead of purchasing lists, focus on building an organic, opt-in email list through ethical means to ensure higher engagement and better deliverability. This aligns with modern permission marketing practices.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often encounter high unknown rates when validating email lists, particularly those that are purchased. Their experiences highlight the fundamental problem with bought lists: even with validation, they remain a significant risk. Marketers frequently point out that such lists lead to poor deliverability, wasted effort, and potential damage to sender reputation, ultimately undermining email marketing efforts rather than enhancing them.
Key opinions
- Purchased lists are inherently problematic: Many marketers immediately associate high unknown rates with purchased lists, signaling a consensus that these lists are often of poor quality and pose substantial risks.
- Validation tools have limitations: While validation services identify some bad addresses, they cannot fix the core issue of a non-permission-based list. Some also report that these tools can be unreliable or even inaccurate when frequently pinging bad emails.
- ESP policies against purchased lists: Many marketers note that most ESPs have strict policies against purchased lists, often leading to account suspension if detected. Even if some ESPs appear lenient, it's typically an oversight, not approval.
- Unknowns reflect ISP blocking or B2B domains: A common explanation for high unknown rates is that ISPs are actively blocking validation attempts or the list contains a high proportion of business-to-business (B2B) domains that are harder to validate.
- Negative ROI for purchased lists: The consensus is that purchased lists are a net negative, leading to wasted time, annoyed recipients, brand damage, and very poor return on investment (ROI), as emails often do not even reach the inbox.
Key considerations
- Prioritize permission-based marketing: Marketers should focus on building lists organically. The high ROI often cited for email marketing applies to permission-based engagement, not cold prospecting with purchased data. This helps improve deliverability stats.
- Impact on sender reputation: Even with list validation, purchased lists can contain spam traps and lead to high complaint rates, severely damaging an ESP's or sender's sender reputation and impacting others using shared IP addresses.
- Address acquisition transparency: Marketers should always be transparent about their address acquisition process. Using purchased lists can result in ESPs taking action, including account termination, regardless of whether the practice is technically legal in a given jurisdiction.
- Long-term vs. short-term gains: While purchased lists might offer quick cash flow, they are detrimental to Customer Lifetime Value and sustainable growth. Focusing on quality leads to better long-term results.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks suggests that encountering a high unknown rate during email validation is often a clear sign that the email list in question was purchased rather than organically grown.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks advises that the unreliability of a validation service does not diminish the fact that a purchased list is inherently poor quality. This insight can be used to persuade clients to abandon the practice of sending spam.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts consistently caution against the use of purchased email lists, irrespective of validation results. They emphasize that high unknown rates from validation services often reveal inherent issues within these lists that cannot be fully mitigated. The focus shifts from the validation outcome to the fundamental problem of acquiring email addresses without explicit permission, which inevitably leads to negative consequences for sender reputation and inbox placement.
Key opinions
- Fundamental flawed approach: Experts universally agree that purchasing email lists is a poor practice that violates permission-based marketing principles and will almost always lead to deliverability problems.
- Validation can't fix inherent issues: Even with validation, purchased lists carry significant risks like spam traps, low engagement, and high complaint rates that validation services cannot detect or prevent.
- Impact on sender reputation: Sending to purchased lists quickly degrades sender reputation, leading to blocklisting and filtering into spam folders by mailbox providers.
- ESPs generally prohibit them: Most reputable ESPs have clear Acceptable Use Policies (AUPs) that forbid sending to purchased lists, and violations can result in immediate account termination.
- Unknown status is multifaceted: The "unknown" classification from validators can be due to various reasons, including catch-all domains, aggressive server responses, or the validator itself being blocked by the receiving ISP.
Key considerations
- Focus on organic list growth: The most effective long-term strategy for high deliverability is building an organic, opt-in list, ensuring recipients genuinely want your emails.
- Understand validation limitations: While email validation can reduce hard bounces, it does not guarantee inbox placement, nor does it address the lack of recipient permission, which is crucial for engagement and reputation.
- Hidden costs of bad data: The apparent cost-saving of purchased lists is deceptive. The hidden costs include damage to brand reputation, lost deliverability, and potentially higher marketing expenses due to needing to switch ESPs or recover from blacklistings.
- ISP detection sophistication: Mailbox providers are highly sophisticated in identifying and mitigating spam, often detecting patterns indicative of purchased lists even if they've been superficially 'cleaned'.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise notes that the vast majority of successful ESPs (Email Service Providers) have strict policies banning the use of purchased email lists, and they will enforce these policies with account action when violations are discovered.
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource suggests that while email validation services are a useful tool for list hygiene, they cannot fully eliminate the inherent dangers of purchased lists, which often include insidious spam traps and disengaged recipients that validation alone cannot address.
What the documentation says
Documentation from various sources highlights that high unknown rates during email validation are often tied to the technical limitations of the validation process or the inherent nature of the email addresses, particularly those on purchased lists. These sources generally discourage the use of purchased lists, emphasizing the negative impact on deliverability and sender reputation. They advocate for permission-based marketing and proper list hygiene as fundamental for email success.
Key findings
- Technical limitations of validation: High unknown rates can be caused by SMTP timeouts or recipient mail servers not providing a clear response about an address's validity, classifying it as an "accept-all" or "catch-all" domain.
- Purchased lists are risky: Documentation consistently warns that purchased lists frequently contain outdated, irrelevant, or non-existent contacts, including spam traps, leading to significant deliverability challenges.
- Impact on sender reputation: Using unvalidated or poor-quality lists results in high bounce rates, low engagement, increased spam complaints, and can severely damage a sender's reputation, potentially leading to being blacklisted or blocklisted.
- Importance of email hygiene: Effective email list hygiene and continuous verification are crucial for maintaining good sender reputation and deliverability, regardless of how the list was acquired.
Key considerations
- Preventative measures: To prevent high bounce rates and deliverability issues, marketers should prioritize obtaining explicit consent for email communication and regularly verify their email lists.
- Understanding bounce types: Distinguishing between hard and soft bounces is important for understanding deliverability issues and implementing appropriate strategies for list management.
- Legal and reputational risks: Documentation often underscores that using purchased lists, even if legally permissible in some contexts, carries significant reputational and deliverability risks that can negatively impact a business.
Technical article
Documentation from Quora mentions that a primary cause for a high unknown email rate following list validation is often an SMTP timeout, a common challenge encountered by many email validation platforms when attempting to verify addresses.
Technical article
Documentation from Campaign Monitor explains the crucial differences between hard and soft bounces, detailing why they occur and providing insights into how to prevent and resolve issues related to high bounce rates.
Related resources
15 resources
Related pages
Are pristine spam traps real and do email validation services improve deliverability?
What are recommended email list cleaning services for high bounce rates?
What are the deliverability stats for rented email lists?
What are the best tools and practices for email database cleansing and verification?
What are the costs of email list validation tools and best practices for maintaining list validity?
How can I accurately verify my email list and identify potentially harmful domains?
Why am I still having deliverability issues after cleaning my email list?
Why did my email go to spam after a high bounce rate from an old list?
Spam traps: what they are and how they work
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
