Email marketing is a cornerstone of digital strategy, yet it's full of nuances that can surprise even seasoned professionals. Many commonly held beliefs about email's effectiveness or its limitations often turn out to be misconceptions, while seemingly intuitive ideas might hide unexpected complexities. Understanding these surprising truths is key to navigating the modern email landscape and achieving superior deliverability.
Key findings
CAN-SPAM Act: Unlike GDPR, the U.S. CAN-SPAM Act doesn't mandate explicit opt-in for commercial emails. Its primary focus is on clear opt-out mechanisms.
Email's enduring power: Despite ongoing rumors of its decline, email marketing consistently outperforms many other digital channels in terms of return on investment (ROI) and customer acquisition.
Welcome email impact: Welcome emails achieve remarkably high open rates, often setting the tone for future subscriber engagement and acting as a critical initial touchpoint.
Gmail tab placement: For some marketers, emails landing in Gmail's promotions tab can lead to lower engagement than if they went straight to the spam folder, as users might overlook them there.
Key considerations
Understand regulations: Always verify compliance with local and international email regulations, as requirements can vary significantly.
Invest strategically: Recognize email's strong ROI and dedicate appropriate resources to your email marketing infrastructure and strategy.
Optimize onboarding: Focus on creating compelling welcome sequences to capitalize on initial subscriber interest and maximize engagement.
Refine inbox placement: Develop strategies that aim not just to avoid the spam folder but also to achieve optimal inbox placement, particularly within Gmail's primary tab.
Engagement matters: Successful email marketing relies heavily on user engagement, which is a stronger indicator of deliverability than many other factors.
What email marketers say
Marketers frequently encounter surprising realities in their day-to-day email campaigns that defy common myths. These insights often stem from direct experience with audience behavior, platform algorithms, and the practical application of email best practices. Their observations often highlight areas where traditional advice might fall short or where unexpected opportunities lie.
Key opinions
ROI superiority: Many marketers find email to be significantly more effective for customer acquisition and ROI than social media platforms.
Subject line myths: The mere presence of words like FREE!!! in subject lines does not automatically trigger spam filters; context and sender reputation are more influential.
Mobile dominance: A large percentage of emails are opened on mobile devices, making mobile-first design essential.
Scanning behavior: Most email recipients only scan content, emphasizing the need for concise, scannable layouts.
Promotional tab impact: Emails landing in Gmail's promotional tab often face lower engagement compared to the primary inbox, underscoring that delivery isn't the only metric.
Key considerations
Prioritize email ROI: Focus on email as a primary channel for customer acquisition and revenue generation.
Enhance mobile experience: Ensure all emails are responsive and optimized for mobile viewing to cater to the majority of users.
Craft scannable content: Design emails with clear headings, bullet points, and concise paragraphs to facilitate quick information absorption.
Beyond spam avoidance: Develop strategies not just for avoiding spam filters, but also for achieving prime placement within various inbox tabs to maximize visibility and engagement.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes that the CAN-SPAM Act focuses more on providing a clear opt-out mechanism for recipients rather than requiring an explicit opt-in, a detail that often surprises those unfamiliar with its specifics.
22 Oct 2020 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks points out that using words like FREE!!! in a subject line does not automatically mean an email will be flagged as spam; context and sender reputation are much more critical factors.
22 Oct 2020 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Deliverability experts bring a deeper, more technical understanding to the table, often revealing truths about how email systems actually work, rather than how they're perceived to work. Their insights frequently debunk common misconceptions, emphasizing the nuanced factors that determine whether an email reaches the inbox.
Key opinions
Engagement as a priority: Positive subscriber engagement (opens, clicks, replies) is the most critical factor for inbox placement, often superseding traditional IP reputation.
Domain reputation importance: The reputation of your sending domain is increasingly vital, sometimes even more so than the IP address itself, for deliverability to major mailbox providers.
Authentication necessity: Implementing robust email authentication protocols such as SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is no longer optional but a fundamental requirement for sender trust.
Gradual sending scale: Attempting to send large volumes of email to new lists or from new IPs too quickly can trigger spam filters, necessitating a gradual warming-up process.
Key considerations
Focus on user value: Prioritize sending relevant and valuable content that drives positive engagement to improve inbox placement over time.
Monitor domain health: Continuously monitor your domain reputation through tools like Google Postmaster Tools.
Implement DMARC: Ensure proper email authentication by setting up and monitoring DMARC, SPF, and DKIM records.
Plan warming strategies: For new sending infrastructures or large new lists, always implement a carefully planned IP and domain warming schedule.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from Email Geeks suggests that focusing solely on IP reputation is an outdated approach, as domain reputation now plays a more significant role with major mailbox providers for inbox placement.
25 Oct 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Deliverability expert from Email Geeks indicates that even a minimal spam complaint rate can be highly damaging if it originates from highly engaged users, signaling a deeper issue with the quality of the mailing list.
10 Apr 2024 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
Official documentation, ranging from government regulations to technical RFCs (Request for Comments) and ISP guidelines, provides the definitive truths about how email should function and be treated. These authoritative sources often clarify legal obligations and technical requirements that directly impact email deliverability, sometimes revealing surprising differences from popular assumptions.
Key findings
CAN-SPAM vs. GDPR: The U.S. CAN-SPAM Act focuses on an opt-out mechanism for commercial email, contrasting with GDPR's explicit consent requirements for personal data processing in the EU.
Authentication standards: Technical specifications define the mandatory requirements for email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) to verify sender identity and combat spoofing.
ISP guidelines: Major mailbox providers explicitly outline best practices for senders, emphasizing the importance of strong authentication, low complaint rates, and a positive sender reputation for reliable inbox placement.
Key considerations
Adhere to regulations: It is crucial to understand and comply with the specific consent and opt-out requirements for all target audiences.
Implement authentication: Correctly configuring SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is a non-negotiable baseline for achieving good deliverability and demonstrating sender trustworthiness.
Prioritize sender reputation: Official documentation consistently highlights that a positive sender reputation, built through consistent good practices and high engagement, is paramount for inbox success.
Technical article
Quote from the FTC website clarifies that the CAN-SPAM Act establishes requirements for commercial email messages, grants recipients the right to stop receiving emails, and outlines severe penalties for non-compliance.
20 Apr 2024 - FTC Website
Technical article
Quote from the European Commission's GDPR page states that consent must be freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous under GDPR, with the provision that it must be as easy to withdraw consent as to give it.