Summary
Setting up DMARC is a crucial step in improving email security and deliverability. However, it's not uncommon for senders to experience unexpected issues, such as a drop in campaign performance, immediately after implementation. This section summarizes the common reasons why a DMARC setup might seem to negatively impact email campaigns, even when configured with a relaxed policy like p=none.
Key findings
- DMARC Policy A p=none DMARC policy itself should not directly cause deliverability issues because it instructs recipient servers to take no action on failed emails, only to report them. If performance drops, it points to underlying issues.
- Underlying Authentication Failures The primary reason for poor performance after DMARC setup is often not DMARC itself, but rather pre-existing SPF or DKIM authentication and alignment failures that DMARC reports bring to light. Prior to DMARC, these failures might have gone unnoticed by the sender.
- Lack of Data Analysis Many senders set up DMARC reports but do not analyze the XML data they receive. These reports contain crucial information about email authentication results, which are essential for diagnosing deliverability problems.
- Misconfigured SPF and DKIM High bounce rates and low open rates after DMARC setup strongly suggest that SPF, DKIM, or both, are not correctly configured for the sending domain or that their alignment with the DMARC 'From' domain is failing. This means emails are not passing authentication checks at recipient servers.
Key considerations
- Thorough Authentication Check Before and after DMARC implementation, always verify the proper setup and alignment of SPF and DKIM. Ensure that the domains used in your SPF and DKIM records align with your email's From: header domain.
- Analyze DMARC Reports Even with p=none, DMARC aggregate reports (rua) are crucial. They provide visibility into which emails are passing or failing authentication, and why. Refer to our guide on how to troubleshoot DMARC failures.
- Review Bounce Messages Detailed bounce messages often contain specific reasons for rejection, which can pinpoint the exact authentication or policy failure. Always investigate these messages carefully.
- Understand DMARC's Role DMARC is designed to help identify unauthorized use of your domain and to enforce policies based on SPF and DKIM authentication. While it doesn't directly cause deliverability issues with a p=none policy, it exposes existing flaws. For a clear understanding, review a simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM. Further insights on DMARC deployment can be found in this eSecurity Planet article on DMARC failures.
- Dedicated DMARC Report Address Avoid using active inboxes like orders@example.com for receiving DMARC reports, as these can be overwhelming and filled with extraneous messages.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often find themselves in a challenging situation when implementing new authentication protocols like DMARC. Their primary concern is usually campaign performance, measured by open and click rates, and avoiding the spam folder. When a DMARC setup coincides with a sudden drop in these metrics, it raises immediate alarms and questions about the configuration or its side effects.
Key opinions
- Direct Correlation Concerns Marketers frequently attribute immediate campaign performance drops directly to a recent DMARC implementation, even with a passive p=none policy.
- Focus on Outcomes The immediate impact observed by marketers typically involves high bounce rates and significantly reduced open rates, indicating emails are either being rejected or filtered to spam.
- Technical Interpretation Challenges Many marketers struggle to interpret the technical details of bounce messages or DMARC reports (the XML data), which are crucial for diagnosing the root cause of deliverability issues.
- ESP Reliance Marketers often rely heavily on their Email Service Provider (ESP), like Klaviyo, for authentication setup and reporting, sometimes lacking the granular visibility needed for advanced troubleshooting.
Key considerations
- Define Poor Performance Clearly define what poor performance means: are emails bouncing, being sent to spam, or experiencing low engagement? This directs troubleshooting efforts. For insights on this, consider why your emails are going to spam.
- Retrieve Specific Bounce Information Work with your ESP to obtain the full, unredacted bounce messages. These messages are critical for understanding why emails are not being delivered.
- Understand DMARC Policy Impact While a p=none policy is observational, transitioning to p=quarantine or p=reject can cause deliverability issues if authentication is not perfect. Learn more about DMARC policy changes and their impact. DMARC's effect on email marketing is detailed in this TechTarget article.
- Comprehensive Authentication Ensure that SPF and DKIM are fully implemented and aligned for your sending domain, as DMARC relies on their successful authentication.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks reports a significant drop in campaign performance after setting up DMARC, seeking insights into potential causes. Their initial campaign after implementing DMARC performed unexpectedly poorly, leading them to suspect a connection with the DMARC configuration.They are actively seeking advice from the community to understand what specific factors might have contributed to this sudden deliverability issue, particularly after a supposed improvement through DMARC.
Marketer view
An email marketer from a marketing forum observes that sometimes DMARC implementation can unexpectedly lead to emails landing in spam folders.They emphasize the importance of carefully monitoring inbox placement immediately after DMARC goes live, even if the policy is set to 'none'.The marketer suggests that while DMARC aims to improve security, misconfigurations or underlying issues revealed by DMARC can negatively impact deliverability.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts highlight that DMARC, especially with a p=none policy, is primarily a reporting and monitoring mechanism. It's designed to provide visibility into authentication failures rather than cause them directly. When campaign performance suffers after DMARC setup, experts invariably point to underlying issues with SPF, DKIM, or their alignment, which DMARC reports merely expose.
Key opinions
- DMARC Policy Impact Experts consistently state that a p=none DMARC policy should not cause deliverability issues. Its purpose is to monitor and report, not to enforce immediate rejection or quarantine.
- Authentication as Root Cause The core problem when performance drops is almost always a failure in SPF or DKIM authentication, or a lack of alignment with the DMARC 'From' domain. DMARC merely reveals these pre-existing flaws.
- Importance of Detailed Bounce Messages Without specific, unredacted bounce messages, it's very difficult for experts to diagnose the precise reason for email delivery failures, as they contain critical diagnostic information. More details can be found in this Email Security Geek guide on bounce messages.
- DMARC Reports are Key DMARC aggregate reports (rua) are emphasized as the primary tool for gaining insight into authentication failures. These reports show exactly which emails are failing and why across different receiving domains.
Key considerations
- Analyze DMARC Reports Properly Do not attempt to manually parse XML DMARC reports. Use specialized tools that can process and present this complex data in an understandable format. This allows for effective monitoring and troubleshooting of your email streams. Learn more about understanding and troubleshooting DMARC reports.
- Verify SPF and DKIM Alignment Ensure that your SPF and DKIM records are not only valid but also correctly aligned with your From: header domain. A common reason for DMARC failure is a mismatch in these domains.
- Dedicated Reporting Email Set up a separate, dedicated email address for DMARC reports (rua) that is not used for customer communications, such as orders@example.com. This prevents report overload and ensures proper handling.
- Proactive Monitoring Monitor your DMARC success rate regularly, even with a p=none policy. Any drop in this rate, even if not immediately affecting deliverability, indicates underlying authentication issues that need to be addressed before moving to stricter DMARC policies. Consult our guidance on why your DMARC success rate is dropping.
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks emphasizes that the specific DMARC policy chosen is critical for diagnosing performance issues.A p=none policy should not block emails, but p=quarantine or p=reject certainly can if authentication fails.Understanding the policy's enforcement level is the first step in troubleshooting unexpected deliverability problems post-DMARC.
Expert view
An expert from SpamResource confirms that DMARC is critical for brand protection against spoofing and phishing attacks, which indirectly improves deliverability.They emphasize that by making it harder for unauthorized parties to impersonate your domain, DMARC helps maintain trust with recipients and ISPs.This protection indirectly contributes to a stronger sender reputation and, over time, better inbox placement for legitimate mail.
What the documentation says
DMARC documentation outlines its role as an email authentication protocol designed to protect domains from fraudulent use, such as spoofing and phishing. It works by building upon SPF and DKIM, adding a layer of policy enforcement and robust reporting. The documentation emphasizes that DMARC itself does not introduce new authentication mechanisms but rather coordinates the existing ones to ensure alignment and provide feedback to domain owners.
Key findings
- Purpose of DMARC DMARC's primary goal is to provide a standardized way for email senders to indicate that their emails are protected by SPF and/or DKIM, and to specify how recipient mail servers should handle unauthenticated emails.
- Dependency on SPF and DKIM DMARC does not replace SPF or DKIM. Instead, it relies on these two protocols for authentication and adds a crucial component: alignment checking. Emails must pass either SPF or DKIM authentication, and the authenticated domain must align with the From: header domain.
- Policy Enforcement DMARC records include a p= tag that defines the policy for messages that fail DMARC. These policies can be none (monitor only), quarantine (send to spam/junk), or reject (block entirely).
- Reporting Mechanisms DMARC provides two types of reports: aggregate (rua) and forensic (ruf). These reports offer valuable insights into email authentication results and potential abuse of your domain.
Key considerations
- Phased Implementation Documentation recommends starting with a p=none policy to gather data and identify legitimate sending sources before moving to stricter enforcement like quarantine or reject. This minimizes the risk of inadvertently blocking legitimate emails.
- Correct Record Syntax Ensure your DMARC DNS TXT record adheres to the specified syntax and includes all necessary tags for proper functionality. Errors in the record can lead to DMARC not being recognized or working incorrectly. Refer to our list of DMARC tags and their meanings for details.
- Monitoring and Analysis Actively monitor DMARC aggregate reports to gain visibility into your email ecosystem. These reports provide invaluable data for identifying authentication failures and potential unauthorized sending sources. Review our DMARC record and policy examples.
- Importance of Alignment Always ensure that your SPF and DKIM authenticated domains are aligned with the From: header domain. DMARC will fail if this alignment is not met, even if SPF or DKIM individually pass. You can find steps to implement DMARC in this Mailgun article on DMARC implementation.
Technical article
DMARC documentation from eSecurity Planet emphasizes that DMARC builds upon SPF and DKIM, adding a layer of policy and reporting for domain owners.This means that for DMARC to be effective, both SPF and DKIM must be correctly implemented and functional within your email sending infrastructure.The protocol ensures that these authentication methods are aligned with the visible From: domain, which is crucial for preventing email spoofing.
Technical article
Official DMARC documentation states that a DMARC policy guides recipient mail servers on how to handle emails that fail authentication.The policy, specified by the p= tag, determines whether non-compliant emails are delivered, quarantined, or rejected.This provides domain owners with control over how their brand is protected against unauthorized use.
Related resources
15 resources
Related pages
How to troubleshoot DMARC failures and their impact on email deliverability?
Why do my emails go to spam due to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM alignment failures?
Why did changing DMARC policy to quarantine send emails to spam, and how to fix it?
Why is my DMARC success rate dropping?
Why does legitimate email fail DMARC even when doing everything right?
How do I troubleshoot DMARC reject policies and improve email deliverability?
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
How to safely transition your DMARC policy to quarantine or reject
Understanding and troubleshooting DMARC reports from Google and Yahoo
Why your emails are getting a 'DMARC verification failed' error
