Summary
Implementing DMARC is a critical step for email authentication and security, yet some senders report a perceived drop in email reputation and open rates shortly after adoption. This section summarizes the common understanding and insights regarding this phenomenon.
Key findings
- Indirect impact: DMARC itself, especially with a p=none policy (reporting only), does not directly cause a drop in reputation or open rates. Its primary function is to provide an indicator for receivers to base reputation decisions on, but it doesn't inherently influence the reputation score itself.
- Underlying issues: A sudden drop in performance after DMARC implementation often points to pre-existing deliverability issues, particularly with audience engagement or list hygiene, that DMARC makes more apparent. If open rates were already declining, the DMARC implementation might coincide with an ongoing trend.
- Policy enforcement: If a DMARC policy is incorrectly implemented, or if a restrictive policy like p=quarantine or p=reject is deployed prematurely without proper authentication alignment, legitimate emails could be sent to spam or blocked. This can, in turn, affect open rates and perceived reputation.
- Shared IP ESPs: Senders using shared IP email service providers (ESPs) might have previously benefited from the ESP's overall aggregate reputation. Once DMARC is implemented, particularly with stricter policies, the sender's own domain reputation becomes more directly attributed, potentially exposing underlying issues.
Key considerations
- Verify DMARC setup: Ensure your DMARC record is correctly configured and that your SPF and DKIM records are properly aligned. Even a p=none policy should still be validated to avoid unexpected issues.
- Monitor DMARC reports: Utilize DMARC reports (RUA and RUF) to gain visibility into your email streams and identify any legitimate mail that might be failing authentication. This is crucial for troubleshooting DMARC failures.
- Review sending practices: Independently evaluate your email sending practices, including list hygiene, content quality, and engagement levels. A drop in open rates often signals recipient disengagement, regardless of DMARC.
- Isolate variables: If DMARC was implemented around the same time as other changes (e.g., new ESP, altered content, changed sending volume), consider if those changes are the true cause of the observed deliverability decline. Always analyze if you've made other changes that could impact deliverability.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often find themselves navigating complex deliverability issues, and the introduction of a new technical protocol like DMARC can sometimes seem to coincide with unexpected performance drops. Marketers generally look for direct causation, but the reality is usually more nuanced, pointing to broader engagement and list health issues.
Key opinions
- Perceived correlation: Many marketers initially perceive a direct link between DMARC implementation and a drop in open rates or reputation, especially if the changes occur around the same time.
- Pre-existing issues: There is a strong understanding that a drop in open rates, particularly a sustained one, is more likely due to audience disengagement, poor list hygiene, or content issues, which can impact domain reputation.
- Shared IP ESPs: Marketers on shared IP ESPs recognize that their deliverability can be influenced by the aggregate reputation of the shared IP. DMARC might expose their individual domain's reputation more clearly.
- Impact of p=none: Most marketers understand that a DMARC p=none policy (monitoring only) should not directly affect mail delivery or reputation, as it does not instruct receiving servers to take action on failing emails.
Key considerations
- Beyond DMARC: Focus on core deliverability factors, such as list quality and recipient engagement, as these are more likely culprits for significant drops in open rates.
- Analyze reports: Regularly check Google Postmaster Tools and DMARC reports for anomalies. A 100% authentication success rate generally indicates DMARC is set up correctly, even if other metrics are declining.
- Audience signals: Low open rates signal to ISPs that recipients are not engaging, which can severely impact sender reputation and lead to messages being filtered to spam. This is a primary indicator of deliverability issues.
- Proactive hygiene: Suppressing inactive segments of your list, like non-openers, is a fundamental step to improve overall deliverability and sender reputation. This can help prevent emails from landing in the spam folder.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks shared their observation that since implementing DMARC, they achieved 100% DMARC and SPF authentication success on Google Postmaster, yet simultaneously their reputation dropped from High to Low. They had never experienced a 'Low' reputation before this. This was accompanied by a significant drop in Gmail open rates, plummeting by over 50% overnight following the DMARC implementation. They questioned if DMARC was the cause or a mere coincidence, especially given their continued use of a shared IP ESP.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks suggested that if an organization was previously sending on a shared IP ESP, they might have been riding on the better aggregate reputation of that shared IP. After implementing DMARC, the sending reputation may become more directly attributed to the sender's own domain.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts consistently highlight that while DMARC is a vital authentication protocol, it does not directly manipulate sender reputation in the way content or engagement might. Instead, it provides the framework for mailbox providers to assign reputation more accurately.
Key opinions
- DMARC's true role: Experts agree that DMARC primarily functions as a signal or indicator for receivers to evaluate and assign domain reputation. It does not inherently alter the reputation itself but enables more precise attribution of sending behavior to a domain.
- Reputation's nature: Email reputation is cumulative and built over time based on consistent sending practices, engagement metrics, and complaint rates. Sudden drops are usually indicative of a more fundamental issue than DMARC itself, unless a p=reject or p=quarantine policy is mishandled (see implementing DMARC p=reject safely).
- Root causes for drops: If a domain shows 100% DMARC authentication success but reputation drops, experts suggest looking at audience engagement and list quality issues. Recipients signaling they don't want mail (e.g., low opens, complaints) is a primary driver of poor reputation.
- Complexity of fixes: Deliverability problems rarely have simple, quick fixes. They often require a comprehensive diagnostic approach that goes beyond technical configurations alone.
Key considerations
- Policy enforcement: Understand that a p=none DMARC policy is observational and typically ignored by most email systems regarding enforcement actions. This means it's unlikely to cause direct deliverability issues on its own.
- Holistic diagnosis: When troubleshooting deliverability drops, especially when DMARC authentication is successful, treat it as a general deliverability problem. Review all aspects of your sending, including list acquisition, content, and sending frequency.
- Shared ESP risks: Even with DMARC, if you're on a shared IP ESP, monitor your Google Postmaster Tools IP reputation and ensure the ESP adheres to best practices, as their overall reputation can still impact your deliverability.
- Coincidence vs. causation: Acknowledge that the timing of DMARC implementation with a deliverability drop might be coincidental, especially if other business or technical changes occurred concurrently, or if reputation was already deteriorating. As DMARC typically enhances trust, it's crucial to look for other factors.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks clarified that DMARC's primary role is to act as an indicator for the receiver, allowing them to attribute reputation to a domain. They stressed that DMARC itself does not directly influence or change that reputation, but rather provides the mechanism for it to be accurately assigned.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks advised that if open rates have been declining for a period (e.g., since early spring), the underlying problem is likely related to audience engagement or list quality. They suggested that the emails being sent are causing recipients to signal to Gmail that they do not want the mail, leading to reputation issues.
What the documentation says
Technical documentation and authoritative sources consistently explain DMARC as an authentication and reporting protocol designed to protect domains from spoofing and phishing. They clarify its role in email ecosystems and how it interacts with sender reputation.
Key findings
- Authentication enforcement: DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) builds upon SPF and DKIM to provide a policy for email receivers on how to handle emails that fail authentication and alignment checks.
- Reputation enhancement: Proper DMARC implementation can significantly improve sender reputation by verifying the legitimacy of emails, reducing spam, and building trust with mailbox providers. It helps ensure that messages originate from authorized sources.
- Visibility and reporting: DMARC provides valuable aggregate (RUA) and forensic (RUF) reports that offer insights into email authentication results, allowing senders to identify legitimate and unauthorized sending sources for their domain. This helps diagnose DMARC authentication drops.
- Policy progression: Documentation typically recommends a gradual progression from p=none (monitoring) to p=quarantine and then p=reject, ensuring all legitimate mail is authenticated before enforcement actions are taken.
Key considerations
- Initial policy: Starting with a p=none policy is standard practice to avoid negative impacts on legitimate email flows, as it only collects data without affecting delivery. This allows senders to gain the benefits of implementing DMARC without immediate risk.
- Compliance with standards: DMARC ensures compliance with modern email authentication standards, which mailbox providers increasingly require for bulk senders. Failure to implement DMARC can lead to decreased deliverability.
- Brand protection: Beyond deliverability, DMARC is crucial for protecting brand reputation by preventing unauthorized parties from sending emails using your domain. Ignoring DMARC can jeopardize brand trust and increase the risk of spoofing.
- Impact on deliverability: Implementing DMARC, along with SPF and DKIM, is a foundational step to improve email deliverability, as it helps verify message authenticity and build domain trust with receiving mail servers, rather than causing drops. Threatcop's blog notes that DMARC enhances both deliverability and domain reputation.
Technical article
Documentation from 101domain Blog states that DMARC implementation can significantly and positively affect sender reputation. This is achieved by building trust with mailbox providers and reducing issues related to spam and fraudulent emails.
Technical article
Documentation from Engage.Guru explains that the DMARC protocol is an effective method for improving the deliverability of email campaigns. Additionally, it helps prevent unauthorized parties from sending emails disguised as originating from your domain.
Related resources
12 resources
Related pages
How to implement DMARC p=reject policy safely to avoid email deliverability issues?
How does Google Postmaster Tools IP reputation affect deliverability when open rates are stable?
What causes a sudden drop in email open rates?
What are the key considerations and challenges for DMARC implementation?
How do email sending practices impact domain reputation and deliverability?
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
The benefits of implementing DMARC
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024 and how to fix it
How long does it take to recover domain reputation from bad/low to high
How can I recover my email domain reputation after a drop in open rates?
