Summary
DMARC failures significantly impair email deliverability, often causing legitimate emails to be rejected, quarantined, or relegated to spam folders, ultimately damaging sender reputation. These failures primarily stem from a misalignment between the 'From' header domain and the domains authenticated by SPF or DKIM. Troubleshooting involves a systematic approach, beginning with analyzing DMARC aggregate reports, which are crucial for identifying unauthenticated mailstreams and pinpointing specific SPF or DKIM authentication or alignment issues. It is vital to ensure all legitimate sending services are correctly configured and aligned to pass DMARC checks before enforcing stricter policies.
Key findings
- Deliverability Impact: DMARC failures directly lead to emails being rejected, quarantined, or sent to spam folders, severely harming deliverability and sender reputation.
- Alignment is Key: The primary cause of DMARC failure is misalignment, where the 'From' header domain does not match the domain authenticated by SPF or DKIM.
- Third-Party Senders: Many DMARC failures arise when third-party services, such as marketing automation platforms or CRMs, send emails on your behalf without proper SPF or DKIM configuration and alignment for your domain.
- DMARC Report Value: DMARC aggregate reports are indispensable tools for diagnosing issues, providing comprehensive data on which sending sources are failing authentication and precisely why.
- Phased Policy Deployment: Effective DMARC implementation requires a phased approach, starting with a 'p=none' policy to observe failures without immediately impacting mail flow, progressing to stricter policies only after all legitimate sending sources are properly authenticated and aligned.
Key considerations
- Analyze Aggregate Reports: Regularly analyze DMARC aggregate reports (RUA) to identify unauthenticated mail streams and pinpoint specific SPF or DKIM authentication and alignment issues.
- Verify SPF and DKIM: Ensure all legitimate sending sources have correctly configured SPF records, including all authorized IP addresses and adhering to the 10-lookup limit. Also, confirm valid DKIM signatures that align with your 'From' domain, especially for third-party senders.
- Understand DNS Propagation: Be aware that DMARC or other DNS changes require time for propagation across the internet, so allow sufficient time before expecting changes to take full effect.
- Monitor Continuously: Establish a routine for daily review of DMARC reports to proactively catch and correct authentication issues, such as missing SPF entries or incorrect DKIM setups for new sending services, before they impact your sender reputation.
- Seek Expert Help: DMARC implementation and troubleshooting can be highly specialized. It is strongly advised not to publish DMARC policies stronger than 'p=none' without ensuring all legitimate mail streams are correctly authenticated and aligned.
What email marketers say
11 marketer opinions
Troubleshooting DMARC failures is essential for maintaining strong email deliverability, as these issues frequently lead to legitimate messages being blocked, quarantined, or delivered to spam. The diagnostic process begins with examining email headers for authentication results and leveraging DMARC aggregate reports, which are invaluable for pinpointing specific SPF or DKIM failures and alignment problems. A common root cause involves third-party sending services not being correctly authenticated for your domain, either due to missing SPF records, SPF lookup limits, or incorrect/expired DKIM keys. Resolving these issues typically involves updating DNS records to ensure all authorized senders are properly configured, pass authentication checks, and align with your 'From' domain, often starting with a relaxed DMARC policy like 'p=none' to observe failures without immediate impact.
Key opinions
- Direct Deliverability Harm: DMARC authentication failures directly cause legitimate emails to be rejected, quarantined, or sent to spam folders, severely impacting email deliverability and damaging sender reputation, especially under strict 'quarantine' or 'reject' policies.
- Header Analysis as First Step: A fundamental first step in troubleshooting DMARC failures is examining email headers, specifically the 'Authentication-Results' field. This provides immediate insights into whether SPF or DKIM failed and the nature of the authentication problem.
- Common Causes Identified: Frequent causes of DMARC failure include third-party senders not being properly authenticated with SPF or DKIM for the domain, SPF records exceeding the 10 DNS lookup limit, or DKIM keys being expired, incorrect, or misaligned with the 'From' header domain.
- Alignment Over Authentication: An email can technically pass SPF or DKIM authentication but still fail DMARC if the 'From' header domain does not properly align with the authenticated domain. Understanding this DMARC alignment requirement is crucial for effective troubleshooting.
- DMARC Reports Are Key: DMARC aggregate reports are invaluable for diagnosing and resolving deliverability issues caused by DMARC failures. These reports provide comprehensive data on all email traffic, pinpointing exactly which sources are failing authentication and the specific reasons why.
Key considerations
- Start with P=None: When diagnosing DMARC failures or during initial DMARC implementation, always begin with a 'p=none' policy. This allows for observation and diagnosis of authentication issues without immediate negative impact on email delivery.
- Utilize DMARC Reporting Tools: Leverage DMARC report analyzers and dedicated tools to effectively parse and interpret complex aggregate reports. These tools simplify identifying which sending sources are failing DMARC, the specific failure types (SPF/DKIM misalignment), and their originating IP addresses.
- Configure Third-Party Senders: Ensure that all third-party services, such as marketing automation platforms or CRMs, sending emails on behalf of your domain are correctly configured. This often involves adding their IP ranges to your SPF record and setting up their recommended DKIM CNAME records, ensuring alignment with your 'From' domain.
- Thorough DNS Record Check: Routinely verify your SPF and DKIM DNS records for accuracy, completeness, and proper alignment. Common issues include SPF records exceeding the 10 DNS lookup limit, incorrect syntax, or expired/improperly set up DKIM keys.
- Monitor DNS Propagation: Be aware that any changes made to DMARC, SPF, or DKIM records in DNS require time for global propagation. Allow sufficient time for these updates to take effect before retesting or expecting immediate changes in DMARC compliance.
- Proactive Monitoring: Implement a routine for continuous monitoring of DMARC aggregate reports. This proactive approach helps in quickly catching and correcting new or recurring authentication problems, thereby preventing significant harm to your sender reputation and deliverability.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains how to diagnose DMARC issues by checking email headers in Gmail and reviewing DMARC reports, noting that DMARC reporting might require DKIM alignment.
27 Jun 2021 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains DMARC policy logic, provides specific DMARC record examples, advises on using p=none when emails are failing DMARC, clarifies DNS propagation for DMARC changes, and recommends using DMARC reporting tools. He also explains that DKIM signing issues often arise from domain changes and are crucial for building domain reputation.
8 Jul 2024 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
4 expert opinions
DMARC failures continue to pose a significant threat to email deliverability, often resulting in emails being quarantined or rejected outright, particularly under stricter DMARC policies. These failures primarily stem from a critical misalignment where the 'From' header domain does not match the domains authenticated by SPF or DKIM. Effective troubleshooting involves a continuous process of analyzing DMARC reports, which are vital for revealing unauthenticated mail streams and diagnosing specific authentication or alignment issues. It is crucial to meticulously verify that all sending services, including third-party platforms, are properly configured with SPF and DKIM records, ensuring the 'From' domain consistently aligns to pass DMARC checks. Given the complexity, DMARC implementation and rectification are highly specialized tasks, requiring careful attention to detail and ongoing monitoring.
Key opinions
- DMARC Misalignment: The core issue leading to DMARC failures is the critical misalignment between the 'From' header domain and the domains used for SPF or DKIM authentication, a fundamental requirement for DMARC to pass.
- Impact of Policy: When DMARC policies like 'quarantine' or 'reject' are active, unaligned or unauthenticated mailstreams are highly likely to be junked or blocked, directly impacting deliverability and sender reputation.
- Authentication Scope: DMARC success hinges on strong authentication, meaning SPF and DKIM must be correctly configured and their domains must align with the 'From' header to verify the email's sender.
- Common Failure Causes: Failures frequently arise from unauthorized third-party senders, email forwarding that breaks authentication, or simple configuration errors such as DNS record typos, incorrectly configured aliases, and subdomains.
- DMARC Reports for Diagnosis: Daily review of DMARC aggregate reports is essential to pinpoint unauthenticated sources and identify specific SPF or DKIM alignment issues, providing the necessary data for targeted remediation.
Key considerations
- Daily Report Review: Implement a routine of daily DMARC report analysis by all relevant teams to quickly identify and address new or ongoing authentication failures, proactively preventing deliverability issues.
- Verify All Sending Services: Meticulously check and verify that SPF and DKIM are correctly set up and aligned for every service sending email on behalf of your domain, including third-party platforms and marketing automation tools.
- Address DNS Record Typos: Proactively inspect DNS records for SPF and DKIM for any typos or configuration errors that could lead to authentication failures, as even small mistakes can have significant impacts.
- Ensure Consistent Domain Alignment: Continuously ensure that the 'header From' domain consistently matches the authenticated domains in SPF and DKIM to achieve DMARC pass, as misalignment is a primary cause of failure.
- Avoid Premature Strong Policies: Refrain from publishing DMARC policies stronger than 'p=none' until all legitimate email streams are fully authenticated and correctly aligned, to prevent unintended mail blocking.
- Seek Expert Guidance: Recognize that DMARC implementation and troubleshooting is a highly specialized field. Do not hesitate to consult experts, especially when dealing with complex configurations or persistent issues.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks advises on the importance of daily review of DMARC reports by all relevant parties.
8 Jun 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that DMARC reports reveal unauthenticated mailstreams, emphasizes the need to identify and authenticate such streams, and clarifies that DMARC failures often lead to mail being junked when a policy like "quarantine" is active. She precisely diagnoses the DMARC failure as a misalignment between the From: header domain and the authenticated SPF or DKIM domain, explaining that DMARC requires strong authentication and domain alignment to pass. She strongly advises against publishing DMARC policies stronger than p=none without correct authentication and stresses that DMARC implementation is highly specialized, even for experienced professionals.
24 Sep 2022 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
3 technical articles
Addressing DMARC failures is paramount for maintaining robust email deliverability, as these issues can lead to legitimate messages being rejected or quarantined. A primary diagnostic tool is the DMARC aggregate report (RUA), which offers detailed insights into which sending sources are failing SPF or DKIM authentication. Such reports enable administrators to identify unauthenticated mail streams and correct underlying issues, such as incomplete SPF records or misaligned DKIM signatures for authorized senders. A recommended strategy involves progressively adjusting DMARC policies, starting from a monitoring-only 'p=none' to gather data, before moving to more restrictive 'quarantine' or 'reject' policies once all legitimate traffic is properly authenticated and aligned.
Key findings
- Centrality of DMARC Reports: DMARC aggregate reports are indispensable for diagnosing failures, offering precise data on authentication successes and failures across all sending sources.
- Common Technical Roots: DMARC failures frequently arise from incorrectly configured SPF records, which may omit authorized sending IP addresses, or DKIM signatures that lack proper alignment with the 'From' header domain.
- Phased Policy Progression: Successful DMARC implementation and troubleshooting involve a gradual shift in policy, commencing with 'p=none' to monitor and gather data, then moving to stricter 'quarantine' or 'reject' policies only after all legitimate traffic consistently passes DMARC checks.
- Risk to Legitimate Mail: Misconfigured DMARC can lead to legitimate emails being unjustly rejected or quarantined, significantly harming deliverability and the sender's reputation.
- Holistic Sender Configuration: It is critical to ensure proper SPF and DKIM configuration and alignment for all legitimate email sending services, not just primary ones, to prevent DMARC failures.
Key considerations
- Prioritize Aggregate Report Analysis: Consistently analyze DMARC aggregate reports (RUA) to pinpoint failing sending sources and specific authentication issues, such as SPF or DKIM errors.
- Ensure Complete SPF Records: Verify that SPF records include all legitimate IP addresses and sending services, as incomplete records are a common cause of DMARC failure.
- Confirm DKIM Alignment: Meticulously check that DKIM signatures align correctly with the 'From' header domain, as misalignment is a frequent issue leading to DMARC rejection.
- Implement Phased Policy Updates: Begin with a 'p=none' DMARC policy to gather comprehensive data and identify issues without impacting deliverability, gradually progressing to 'quarantine' or 'reject' only after all legitimate email streams pass.
- Address All Legitimate Senders: Systematically ensure every authorized email sender, including third-party services, properly authenticates and aligns with your domain to prevent unexpected DMARC failures.
Technical article
Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools Help explains that analyzing DMARC aggregate reports (RUA) is crucial for troubleshooting DMARC failures. These reports provide data on which sending sources are failing SPF or DKIM authentication, allowing administrators to identify unauthenticated mail streams and adjust their DMARC policy progressively from 'none' to 'quarantine' or 'reject'.
13 Sep 2021 - Google Postmaster Tools Help
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft Learn shares that DMARC failures in Microsoft 365 environments often stem from incorrect SPF records not listing all authorized sending IPs, or DKIM signatures not aligning with the domain in the From header. Troubleshooting involves reviewing DMARC aggregate reports to pinpoint the failing sources and ensuring proper SPF and DKIM configuration for all legitimate senders.
14 Mar 2024 - Microsoft Learn
How can I troubleshoot DMARC failures and identify the cause of authentication issues?
How do I troubleshoot and fix SPF and DMARC settings for email deliverability issues?
How do I troubleshoot DMARC failures and potential DKIM replay attacks affecting email deliverability?
How do I troubleshoot DMARC reject policies and improve email deliverability?
How to diagnose DMARC failures using DMARC reports?
What are the steps to troubleshoot DMARC reject policy causing low email delivery rates after implementation?
