Summary
Many email marketers and deliverability professionals have recently observed a noticeable increase in spam rates for emails sent to Outlook and other Microsoft domains. This trend suggests a broader shift in how Microsoft's filtering systems evaluate incoming mail, leading to more messages landing in junk or quarantine folders, even for senders with previously strong reputations. The changes appear to be impacting a wide range of senders, prompting a re-evaluation of current email strategies and compliance with evolving sender requirements.
Key findings
- Seed list performance: Many report significant drops in seed list inbox placement rates for Microsoft properties (e.g., Hotmail), with some seeing decreases from 100% to 80% or lower.
- Increased spam confidence: Senders note a jump in their spam confidence level (SCL) scores, indicating Microsoft's filters are assigning higher spam probabilities to their messages without changes to email content or templates.
- Broad impact: The issue appears widespread across the email community, suggesting system-wide adjustments rather than isolated sender problems.
- New sender requirements: Microsoft has implemented new bulk email restrictions that mirror those from Google and Yahoo, emphasizing strong email authentication.
Key considerations
- Email authentication: Ensure robust DMARC, SPF, and DKIM implementations. Microsoft has warned businesses about the necessity to authenticate your emails to avoid the spam folder.
- Auditing sends: Review your email sending practices, especially any changes made up to seven days prior to the observed spam rate spike. This includes content, volume, and list quality.
- List hygiene: Regularly clean your email list to remove inactive or invalid addresses, which can lead to higher bounce rates and negatively impact sender reputation. Learn more about why your emails are going to spam.
- Monitoring deliverability: Utilize deliverability tools and analytics to closely monitor inbox placement, bounce rates, and complaint rates for Microsoft domains. Understanding why emails go to spam in Outlook.com is key.
What email marketers say
Email marketers have widely reported experiencing significant drops in Outlook and Hotmail inbox placement rates. Many point to sudden changes in spam confidence levels, indicating that Microsoft's filtering is becoming more aggressive without apparent changes to their sending practices. The community consensus suggests this is a systemic shift rather than isolated incidents.
Key opinions
- Sudden drops: Marketers are seeing abrupt declines in deliverability to Microsoft domains, often within a week or so, disrupting established sending patterns.
- Spam confidence level increase: Despite no changes to their email content or templates, SCL ratings have jumped from low levels (e.g., 1) to thresholds (e.g., 5+) that typically lead to the junk folder.
- Community-wide issue: The problem is not isolated, with many marketers confirming similar dips in Hotmail performance when comparing against community benchmarks.
- Comcast also affected: Some marketers have also noted concurrent spikes in spam rates for Comcast, suggesting a broader trend among mailbox providers.
Key considerations
- Re-warming Microsoft addresses: Consider a re-warming strategy for Microsoft recipients to rebuild trust and engagement, as suggested by some marketers facing these issues. This can help with low deliverability with Hotmail.
- Impact of old seed lists: Some deliverability services (e.g., Validity/Everest) have updated their seed lists, noting that older seeds were no longer accurately reflecting filtering technology, leading to observed drops.
- Sender reputation management: Maintaining a clean email list is crucial. Sending emails to invalid or inactive addresses can lead to higher bounce rates and negatively impact sender reputation, affecting deliverability to Microsoft Outlook.
- Monitoring SCL changes: Actively monitor Microsoft's spam confidence levels for your sending domains to detect any sudden shifts that might indicate filtering changes.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks observes that their Outlook/Microsoft spam rates have recently spiked over the last week, prompting them to investigate the cause of this sudden change.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks reports a significant drop in their Everest/Validity seed list deliverability for Hotmail, from 100% to 80%, noting it's still ahead of the community but clearly a dip.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts interpret the recent Microsoft spam rate spikes as part of evolving email security landscapes. They suggest that mailbox providers are continuously refining their filtering algorithms, which can sometimes lead to an initial increase in spam classifications for legitimate senders. Emphasis is placed on proactive monitoring and adherence to best practices.
Key opinions
- Algorithm updates: Mailbox providers, including Microsoft, frequently update their filtering algorithms to combat new spam techniques, which can inadvertently affect legitimate email streams.
- Seed list adjustments: Changes in seed list technology or the age of seed addresses can impact reported inbox rates, giving a skewed view of actual deliverability if not properly understood.
- Focus on authentication: Robust SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are more critical than ever, especially with new bulk sender requirements being enforced by major providers.
- Engagement metrics: Microsoft's filtering heavily considers engagement signals. Low engagement can quickly lead to higher spam classifications.
Key considerations
- Proactive support contact: Experts advise contacting Outlook support if bounce or deferral rates spike, providing them with detailed sending data.
- Reviewing content and templates: Even without explicit changes, certain content patterns might trigger new filters. It's important to audit your email content for anything Microsoft might flag. Learn about Microsoft email deliverability issues.
- Understanding DMARC reports: Utilize DMARC reports to identify authentication failures, especially those specific to Microsoft, and diagnose underlying issues. This helps with understanding DMARC reports.
- IP and domain reputation: Continually monitor your IP and domain reputation. Any negative shifts can trigger increased spam classifications, emphasizing the importance of a strong domain reputation.
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource highlights that senders often overlook subtle changes in their sending patterns or subscriber engagement, which can gradually erode reputation and lead to sudden spam spikes at providers like Microsoft.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise advises that robust email authentication, including proper SPF, DKIM, and DMARC alignment, is fundamental to maintaining trust with major mailbox providers and mitigating spam folder placement.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and industry reports highlight Microsoft's ongoing efforts to enhance email security and combat spam. Recent updates, including new bulk sender requirements, indicate a stricter stance on email authentication and sender reputation. This means senders must align with these evolving standards to ensure optimal deliverability.
Key findings
- New bulk sender requirements: As of April 2025, Microsoft has announced its own restrictions on high-volume senders, which largely mirror those already put in place by Google and Yahoo.
- Mandatory authentication: Microsoft explicitly warns that businesses must authenticate their emails (via SPF, DKIM, DMARC) or risk their messages being sent directly to the spam folder.
- Security updates impact: Microsoft's continuous updates to its email security protocols can lead to sudden changes in how emails are evaluated, potentially causing shifts in inbox placement or click patterns (e.g., bot activity).
- Complaint over-reporting: Some reports suggest a potential bug at Outlook.com might be over-reporting complaints, which could artificially inflate spam rates for senders.
Key considerations
- Compliance is key: Senders must adapt to the new rules for bulk email senders from Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft to ensure their messages reach the inbox. Understanding how to comply with Outlook's requirements is critical.
- Strong authentication setup: Implementing and correctly configuring email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is no longer optional for deliverability success. Dive deeper into DMARC, SPF, and DKIM.
- Monitor for bugs/anomalies: Be aware that sometimes platform-specific issues, like a bug over-reporting complaints, can contribute to observed spam rate spikes.
- Adapt to security enhancements: Microsoft's continuous security updates (including those affecting bulk email senders) can influence deliverability, requiring senders to stay agile and responsive to changes.
Technical article
Documentation from MarTech states that in April 2025, Microsoft announced its own restrictions on high-volume senders, which essentially mirror the requirements already put in place by Google and Yahoo.
Technical article
Documentation from CX Today indicates that Microsoft Outlook has officially issued a warning to businesses, stating they must authenticate their emails or face the consequence of messages consistently landing in the spam folder.
Related resources
7 resources
Related pages
Why are my emails suddenly going to spam in Outlook and Hotmail?
Why are emails going to spam in Outlook.com?
Why has Microsoft email deliverability suddenly decreased and how can it be fixed?
How to comply with Outlook's new sender requirements
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024 and how to fix it
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
Why your emails fail at Microsoft: the hidden SPF DNS timeout
Diagnosing and reducing DKIM temporary error rates with Microsoft
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
What is an email blacklist and how does it work?
