Summary
Intermittent DKIM validation failures with Office365 are a common challenge that can significantly impact email deliverability. These issues often extend beyond a simple invalid key, pointing instead to more nuanced problems related to how email bodies are handled in transit or inconsistencies within DNS configurations.
Key findings
- Key validity vs. intermittent failure: A DKIM key that passes standard validity checks can still experience intermittent failures, suggesting the problem lies elsewhere, not with the key itself.
- Mail body modification: Emails being altered during transit by intermediate systems or services can invalidate the DKIM signature upon arrival at the recipient.
- DNS inconsistencies: Partial DNS misconfigurations, such as one name server having a valid DKIM record and another missing it or having an incorrect one, can lead to approximately 50% failure rates.
- The "n=" tag: The presence of an n= tag in Office365-provided CNAME records, while valid for human-readable notes, is uncommon and typically absent in newer 2048-bit keys.
- Older setups: The presence of the n= tag or older key formats may indicate an outdated DKIM setup that could benefit from being regenerated.
Key considerations
- Verify DKIM record validity: Always use a reliable tool to ensure your DKIM record is correctly published and syntactically valid.
- Examine email headers: Analyze DMARC failure reports and email headers to pinpoint the exact reason for DKIM failure, looking for dkim=none or dkim=fail.
- Check for in-transit modification: Investigate if email content or headers are being modified by intermediate systems or services after the DKIM signature has been applied. This can often lead to a DKIM temperror.
- DNS consistency across servers: Confirm that all authoritative DNS servers for your domain host the correct and identical DKIM CNAME records to prevent intermittent resolution issues.
- Review Office365 DKIM setup: Ensure DKIM is correctly enabled for both custom and default domains in Microsoft 365, considering the latest best practices and key lengths (e.g., 2048-bit). Microsoft's own TechCommunity blog often provides valuable insights into their specific requirements.
What email marketers say
Email marketers frequently encounter the practical difficulties of intermittent DKIM failures, particularly the challenge in diagnosing issues that are not consistently reproducible. Their experiences underscore the frustration when email authentication tools indicate validity, yet delivery remains inconsistent, leading to messages landing in spam folders.
Key opinions
- Frustration with intermittent errors: Marketers find intermittent DKIM issues particularly challenging to diagnose because standard checks often show the record as valid, creating confusion about the actual problem.
- Impact on deliverability: Even partial DKIM failures (like 50%) significantly impact inbox placement and DMARC alignment, pushing emails into spam.
- DNS as a common culprit: Many marketers suspect DNS configuration inconsistencies as a primary reason for such intermittent authentication behavior, especially when dealing with multiple name servers.
- Misleading DMARC reports: Sometimes, DMARC reports might show dkim=none even when a signature exists, indicating a problem before the validation check occurs.
- Focus on CNAME records: Marketers using Office365 often focus on the specific CNAME records provided, noting unusual formats like the n= tag, which can be a source of confusion.
Key considerations
- Beyond initial validation: Marketers should look beyond a simple "valid" status for their DKIM records and investigate deeper into potential issues that cause intermittent failures. This can involve using more advanced email deliverability troubleshooting techniques.
- Observing DMARC reports closely: Utilize DMARC aggregate and forensic reports to identify specific failure modes and recipient domains experiencing intermittent issues.
- Understanding header modifications: Be aware that various email systems or services can alter mail headers or bodies, inadvertently breaking DKIM signatures and causing intermittent validation problems.
- Regular DNS checks: Implement routine checks for DNS record consistency across all name servers to ensure that DKIM records are uniformly published and accessible.
- Coordination with IT/Admin: Effective troubleshooting often requires close collaboration with IT administrators responsible for DNS and Office365 configurations, as highlighted by discussions on platforms like the Auth0 Community.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks reported a significant issue where their client's outgoing emails from Microsoft servers were experiencing approximately 50% DKIM authentication failures. This high rate of intermittent failure was causing concern, as it directly impacted their email deliverability and reputation. The marketer was trying to understand the root cause of this inconsistent authentication performance within an Office365 environment, given that DKIM was supposed to be properly set up.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks expressed their surprise at encountering a DKIM CNAME Public Key provided by Office365 that included an "n=" tag. They noted that this was the first time they had seen such a record generated from the Exchange admin portal with this specific tag. This observation led them to question the uniqueness of the record format and whether it contributed to the reported 50% DKIM authentication failure rate for outgoing emails.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts agree that intermittent DKIM failures, especially with Office365, rarely stem from a fundamentally invalid key if it passes initial validation. Instead, they point to more complex issues like in-transit modifications of email content or subtle, intricate DNS replication problems that cause inconsistent record lookups. Diagnosing these requires a detailed understanding of mail flow and DNS propagation.
Key opinions
- Transit modification is primary suspect: If a DKIM key is valid, the problem is more likely due to the mail body or headers being modified while in transit between the sending and receiving servers.
- The "n=" tag's role: The n= tag in a DKIM record is purely for human-readable notes and does not impact the actual validation process, so its presence is not a cause for failure.
- DNS inconsistencies (50% rule): A consistent 50% failure rate often strongly indicates a DNS configuration problem, where one of two DNS servers might have an incorrect or missing DKIM record, leading to intermittent lookups. This pattern is a key diagnostic clue.
- New vs. old DKIM setups: Older DKIM CNAME records from Office365 might include the n= tag and be 1024-bit, while newer ones are typically 2048-bit and lack this tag, suggesting evolution in Microsoft's key management.
- Not a signature problem if valid: If a DKIM signature passes a basic validity check using a tool like Word to the Wise's checker, the issue is not with the signature itself but with how it's being processed or preserved through the mail flow.
Key considerations
- Deep dive into mail flow: Thoroughly examine the entire mail flow path to identify any points where email content might be modified, leading to DKIM signature breakage. This includes looking for intermediate email security solutions or mailing list managers.
- Check all authoritative DNS servers: Ensure that all DNS servers for your domain are serving identical and correct DKIM records to prevent intermittent resolution issues that could lead to intermittent email delivery failures.
- Understand Office365 key generation: Be aware of the characteristics of DKIM keys generated by Office365, including expected key length and the presence or absence of specific tags like n=.
- Regularly rotate keys: Consider regular DKIM key rotation as a best practice, as this can also help in refreshing potentially problematic older configurations and ensuring up-to-date security.
- Monitor DMARC aggregate reports: Use DMARC aggregate reports to gain insight into which receiving domains are failing DKIM validation and the reasons why (e.g., dkim=none, dkim=fail), assisting in diagnosing and reducing DKIM temporary error rates with Microsoft.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks advised using online tools, such as the one available at `tools.wordtothewise.com`, to verify the validity of a DKIM key. They underscored that if the key itself passes these validity checks, the intermittent nature of the failure suggests the root cause is not an inherently invalid key. Instead, their intuition pointed to the mail body being modified while in transit as the more probable explanation. This type of modification would break the DKIM signature, leading to authentication failures even if the initial key setup was correct.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks clarified the function of the "n=" tag within a DKIM record. They explained that this tag is designated for human-readable notes, serving purely an informational purpose. Critically, they stated that while it is a valid element, it plays no part in the actual DKIM validation process itself. This clarification is important for troubleshooting, as it confirms that the presence or absence of the "n=" tag should not be the direct cause of DKIM authentication failures.
What the documentation says
Official documentation for email authentication protocols like DKIM, SPF, and DMARC provides the technical specifications crucial for proper implementation. These resources consistently emphasize the critical role of accurate DNS records and the preservation of email content integrity during transit. Understanding these guidelines is paramount for ensuring successful DKIM validation, particularly within complex email environments such as Office365.
Key findings
- DKIM record structure: DKIM records are typically stored as TXT records or CNAME records in DNS, containing the public key and other essential tags such as v=, k=, p=, and s=.
- Key validity and length: Modern DKIM recommendations favor 2048-bit keys for stronger cryptographic security, although 1024-bit keys are still technically supported but are considered less secure and are being phased out by major mailbox providers.
- Canonicalization: DKIM utilizes canonicalization algorithms (relaxed or simple) for headers and body to minimize invalidations caused by minor formatting changes in transit. Failures occur if modifications exceed these defined canonicalization rules.
- Office365 specific setup: Microsoft 365 requires specific CNAME entries for DKIM to function, which point to Microsoft's own key management infrastructure. Enabling DKIM for both custom and default domains is essential for comprehensive coverage.
- DMARC interaction: DMARC relies on the successful authentication of either SPF or DKIM (and their alignment with the From: domain) to pass. Intermittent DKIM failures will directly impact DMARC's success rate, potentially leading to policy actions like quarantine or rejection.
Key considerations
- Adherence to RFCs: Ensure that your DKIM implementation aligns with RFC 6376, which defines the DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures standard, to avoid non-compliant configurations that can cause validation issues.
- Proper CNAME setup for Office365: Verify that the CNAME records provided by Microsoft for DKIM are correctly configured in your DNS, without any accidental alterations or omissions that could disrupt validation.
- Monitoring DMARC reports: Regularly review DMARC aggregate reports to identify trends in DKIM validation results and diagnose intermittent issues over time.
- Header signing: Understand which headers are included in the DKIM signature. If critical headers are modified post-signing by intermediate systems, validation will fail.
- Troubleshooting tools: Utilize commonly available online tools for DKIM record validation and email header analysis to diagnose issues, such as those that check for "invalid DKIM signature" errors, as suggested by DuoCircle's guidance.
Technical article
Microsoft Learn documentation specifies that DKIM within Microsoft 365 leverages CNAME records to publish the public key component of your DKIM signature. It elaborates that enabling DKIM for a custom domain necessitates the creation of two specific CNAME records, which are designed to point to Microsoft's own DKIM signing infrastructure. This setup is critical for Office 365 to properly sign outbound emails with your domain's DKIM key, ensuring authenticity.
Technical article
RFC 6376, the standard for DKIM Signatures, states explicitly that the "n=" tag found within a DKIM-Signature header field is intended for human-readable notes. It clarifies that this tag is entirely ignored by DKIM verifiers, meaning it does not influence the authentication process in any way. The RFC defines it as an optional field primarily for administrative purposes or debugging, confirming that its presence should not cause validation failures.
Related resources
13 resources
Related pages
Troubleshooting Office 365 DKIM and SPF email authentication failures
Decoding DKIM temperror: what it is and how to fix it
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024 and how to fix it
Ultimate guide to Google Postmaster Tools V2
How to troubleshoot intermittent email delivery failures caused by SPF and DNS issues?
Diagnosing and reducing DKIM temporary error rates with Microsoft
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
How to fix common DMARC issues in Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace
Why does DKIM fail for Outlook.com and Hotmail.com?
How to comply with Outlook's new sender requirements
