When it comes to SORBS (Spam and Open Relay Blocking System) listings, the absence of timestamps for entries has been a persistent issue. Initially, timestamps were inaccurate before disappearing entirely, which SORBS has confirmed was an unintended consequence of system maintenance with plans for future restoration. However, a deeper look reveals that SORBS, much like many older and real-time DNS-based blacklists, is primarily engineered for efficient, real-time identification of currently active spam sources, rather than providing detailed historical logs with precise listing times. This focus on current status over historical detail means that granular information like specific timestamps is often not a primary feature, and systemic reliability problems with SORBS may also contribute to data inconsistencies. To identify senders on SORBS despite these limitations, several methods are available. The most common approach involves performing a direct IP address lookup using tools on the SORBS.net website, such as their 'Check your IP' tool, or by conducting DNS queries with the IP address in reverse order. Various online IP blacklist lookup tools also query the SORBS database and provide a 'listed' or 'not listed' status. For more specific details, particularly when timestamps are unavailable, email marketers have found success by opening support tickets directly with SORBS to request redacted header information, which can help pinpoint the client or source of the listing. It is crucial to remember that SORBS typically lists IP addresses or entire IP ranges, meaning identifying the sender requires associating the listed IP with the responsible entity or organization.
10 marketer opinions
The absence of specific timestamps on SORBS listings has been a notable challenge for email marketers seeking to identify the exact timing of an IP address's flagging. While SORBS has acknowledged that these missing timestamps were an unintended result of system maintenance and are slated for eventual restoration, the core reason for their typical scarcity lies in SORBS's fundamental design. Unlike systems that provide detailed historical logs, SORBS operates primarily as a real-time, DNS-based blacklist, emphasizing the current status of an IP as an active spam source rather than comprehensive historical data. This design means that granular details, such as precise timestamps for when an IP was added, are generally not a central feature of its output. Despite this limitation, identifying senders on SORBS remains achievable through several direct methods. The most common approach involves utilizing online IP blacklist lookup tools, such as those provided by SORBS itself, mxtoolbox.com, Kitterman.com, or general blacklist checking services, where an IP address lookup quickly reveals a 'listed' or 'not listed' status. For situations requiring more in-depth information when timestamps are unavailable, opening a direct support ticket with SORBS to request redacted header information has proven to be an effective workaround. This allows administrators to gain insights into the source of the listing, even without a specific timestamp.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains that SORBS listing timestamps were initially incorrect and then completely gone, confirming with SORBS that the missing timestamps were an unintended consequence of maintenance and will eventually be fixed.
6 Dec 2021 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks shares a workaround for identifying senders on SORBS listings when timestamps are missing, suggesting opening tickets with SORBS to request redacted header information.
14 Nov 2023 - Email Geeks
1 expert opinions
The absence of specific timestamps on SORBS listings stems from the service's significant, long-standing reliability issues, which encompass poor data quality, frequent listing errors, and a general lack of responsiveness. These systemic problems lead to inconsistencies, such as missing detailed data like timestamps. Regarding sender identification, SORBS primarily lists IP addresses or entire IP ranges, not specific sender names. To identify the responsible sender, users must perform a lookup of the listed IP address to determine the entity or organization associated with it, as the SORBS listing itself typically lacks direct sender identification details.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that SORBS has a long-standing history of significant reliability problems, including poor data quality, frequent listing errors, and a general lack of responsiveness. This systemic unreliability can lead to inconsistencies, such as missing listing timestamps, as the service often struggles with accurate and detailed data management. Regarding how to identify senders on SORBS, the service primarily lists IP addresses or entire IP ranges rather than specific sender names. Therefore, identifying a sender involves looking up the listed IP address to determine the entity or organization associated with that IP, as the SORBS listing itself does not typically provide direct sender identification details.
9 May 2022 - Word to the Wise
5 technical articles
The reason specific timestamps are often missing from SORBS listings is fundamentally tied to the design of DNS-based blacklists. Services like SORBS are engineered for performance and efficiency, prioritizing real-time detection and rapid lookups of an IP's current threat status over maintaining detailed historical logs with precise timestamps for individual incidents. This focus means that the system is optimized to provide a straightforward 'listed' or 'not listed' status, reflecting a current state rather than a historical timeline. Consequently, detailed historical data, such as exact listing timestamps, is generally not a primary feature of their public interface. To identify senders on SORBS, the process is direct: users should perform an IP address lookup, either directly on the SORBS.net website using their 'Check your IP' tool or by conducting DNS queries with the IP address in reverse order. These methods will confirm if an IP is currently listed, thereby identifying the associated sender via their IP.
Technical article
Documentation from SORBS.net explains that senders can be identified on SORBS by performing an IP address lookup directly on their website using the 'Check your IP' tool or by conducting DNS queries with the IP address in reverse order, which will return an A record if the IP is listed.
5 Jun 2022 - SORBS.net
Technical article
Documentation from SORBS.net implicitly suggests that specific timestamps for individual listings are not a primary feature of their public interface because the system is designed to provide a real-time status check of an IP's current listing for spam, rather than a detailed historical log of every specific incident with precise timestamps.
21 Dec 2021 - SORBS.net
How do I deal with a SORBS listing affecting email deliverability?
How severe is a SORBS listing impact on email delivery?
What do the timestamps in Spamhaus SBL advisory listing represent?
Why are my emails bouncing and is my sending IP on the SORBS spam blocklist?
Why is a reputable sender getting informational listings or active listings at Spamhaus?
Why is Sender Score reporting inaccurate data?