Email bouncing can be a frustrating experience for any sender, often pointing to underlying issues with sender reputation or technical configuration. When bounce messages explicitly mention a specific blocklist, such as the Spam and Open Relay Blocking System (SORBS), it indicates that your sending IP address has been flagged for potentially malicious or unwanted email activity. While SORBS is not as universally adopted as some other major blocklists (or blacklists), its impact can still be significant, particularly for specific recipient domains that actively consult it. It is crucial to understand that a SORBS listing often correlates with broader deliverability challenges, suggesting that the root cause lies in general sending practices that may lead to listings on other, more impactful blocklists as well.
Key findings
Selective impact: SORBS is not universally used by all mail servers or internet service providers (ISPs), meaning its impact on email deliverability might be limited to a subset of your audience. Some senders may see only a 2-5% impact from a SORBS listing, particularly in B2B contexts.
Correlation over causation: A listing on SORBS often indicates broader issues with sending practices. Even if SORBS itself does not cause widespread blocks, the behaviors that led to that listing (such as poor list hygiene or sending to spam traps) are likely to trigger other, more impactful blocklists and deliverability problems. This highlights the importance of addressing the underlying issues rather than just focusing on a single blocklist entry.
Bounce message details: Many times, the specific blocklist causing a bounce will be explicitly mentioned in the bounce message itself. This makes the bounce message a critical first step in diagnosing why your emails are bouncing.
Persistence of listings: A SORBS listing can persist for a long time, potentially years, before it begins to actively block emails at specific domains. This underscores the need for continuous blocklist monitoring.
Key considerations
Analyze bounce messages: Before panicking about a specific blocklist, always examine the bounce messages for specific reasons and mentions of the blocking entity. The bounce message is your primary source of diagnostic information.
Understand the true cause: A SORBS listing is often a symptom, not the root cause, of your deliverability issues. Focus on identifying and resolving the underlying sending practices that led to the listing, such as poor list acquisition, high complaint rates, or spam trap hits.
Check for shared IP impact: If you are sending through a service provider that uses shared IP addresses, a listing might be due to the actions of another sender sharing your IP, rather than your own sending behavior. Understanding why your IP address is blacklisted is important.
Proactive monitoring: Regularly check your sending IP and domain against various blocklists. While SORBS may have limited impact, other lists can severely affect deliverability. Utilize tools like online blacklist checkers to stay informed.
Email marketers often find themselves in a challenging position when facing email bounces, especially when a blocklist like SORBS is implicated. Their perspectives frequently highlight the practical impact of such listings and the common misinterpretations that arise. Many emphasize that while a SORBS listing might not single-handedly cripple deliverability for all campaigns, it serves as a strong indicator of deeper issues within their sending practices. Marketers are concerned with the direct impact on their campaigns, particularly during high-volume sending periods like holidays, and seek clear actionable steps to restore their sending reputation and ensure their messages reach the inbox.
Key opinions
Volume sensitivity: Marketers sending high volumes of promotional email, especially around holidays, are particularly susceptible to issues that could lead to blocklist listings, including SORBS. The increased sending volume can amplify any underlying issues.
Diagnostic importance: The immediate reaction to bounces is often to check blocklists, but marketers acknowledge that the actual rejection message from the receiving server is the most important diagnostic tool. This message specifies who is blocking and why.
Limited direct impact: Some marketers observe that SORBS itself may not be the primary cause of widespread blocks. Rather, it is used by specific domains, leading to targeted rather than global deliverability issues.
Shared IP risks: If using shared IPs, marketers recognize that their deliverability can be impacted by the sending practices of other users on the same IP. This adds a layer of complexity to diagnosing bounce issues, as explored in articles like why am I getting soft bounces.
Key considerations
Focus on the bounce message: Always prioritize reviewing the bounce message to understand the exact reason for rejection and which ISP or filter is causing the bounce. This information is more actionable than a general blocklist check.
Proactive list hygiene: Given the risk of spam trap hits and complaints, marketers should maintain rigorous list hygiene practices. This includes regularly cleaning lists, removing inactive subscribers, and implementing robust consent processes.
Understand ISP specific bounces: If bounces are specific to certain ISPs (like those seen with Optonline and other ISPs), investigate their specific filtering mechanisms and how they interact with blocklists like SORBS.
Delisting processes: If a listing is confirmed to be causing bounces, understand the process for email blacklist removal for that specific blocklist.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that they are experiencing very high bounce rates on one of their email brands. Upon contacting support, they were informed that their sending IP is listed on the SORBS SPAM blocklist, which is causing a significant number of block bounces. This situation raises questions about whether their Email Service Provider (ESP) uses SORBS to block their campaigns or if the ESP itself blocks customers who exhibit spam-like sending behavior. The core concern for the marketer is to understand the mechanism behind these blocks and identify the true source of the problem. They need to determine if the ESP is enforcing SORBS, or if recipient mail servers are independently using SORBS to reject their emails. This distinction is crucial for devising an effective strategy to resolve the issue and improve deliverability.
08 Jan 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks observes that they send a large volume of promotional emails, particularly for women's apparel. They are curious if this high volume, especially around the holidays, could be a factor in their IP getting blocked on SORBS. The nature of their email content—promotional, mass-sent—could inherently trigger spam filters if not managed carefully.This highlights a common challenge for marketers: balancing high-volume sending with deliverability best practices. During peak seasons, email activity surges, increasing the risk of spam complaints, hits to spam traps, or exceeding unwritten volume thresholds, which can lead to blocklist listings. Understanding the relationship between sending patterns and blocklist activity is key for sustained deliverability.
08 Jan 2024 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability offer nuanced insights into SORBS listings and their actual impact, often challenging common misconceptions. They stress that while SORBS might not be the most widely used blocklist, a listing on it is almost always indicative of underlying issues that are likely to cause problems with other, more influential blocklists. Their advice focuses on rigorous diagnostics, understanding the chain of causation, and prioritizing fundamental deliverability best practices over chasing individual blocklist removals. Experts emphasize data-driven decision making and a holistic approach to sender reputation management.
Key opinions
Limited adoption: Experts generally agree that SORBS is not as widely used by major email providers to block mail as some other blocklists (blacklists). This means its direct impact might be less severe than initially perceived by senders.
Indicator, not sole cause: A SORBS listing is frequently a symptom or a correlating factor rather than the sole cause of widespread email blocks. The practices that lead to a SORBS listing (e.g., sending to spam traps, poor consent) are very likely to cause issues with other, more impactful blocklists and general inbox placement. This is a common point of discussion, as seen in how severe is a SORBS listing impact.
Diagnostic priority: The most critical step when facing bounces is to examine the actual rejection message received from the recipient server. This message provides concrete evidence of who is blocking and the specific reason, rather than relying on general blocklist lookups.
Spam trap data sharing: SORBS does share a subset of its spam trap data with corporate entities, suggesting that a listing could lead to issues with services that subscribe to that data feed. This creates indirect impacts beyond direct SORBS lookups.
Key considerations
Don't panic over 'idiot lookup sites': Experts caution against panicking simply because an IP appears on a blocklist via a generic IP lookup tool. These tools often show listings on less impactful RBLs. The focus should be on actual bounce messages and the specific RBLs cited by recipient servers.
Prioritize rejection messages: The first step in any troubleshooting process should be obtaining and analyzing the exact rejection message. The second step is identifying which entity (ISP, spam filter) is rejecting the mail based on that message.
Address underlying sending issues: If you are listed on SORBS, it's highly probable that your sending practices are problematic. Experts advise focusing on fixing the root causes, such as list quality, consent practices, and content relevance, to prevent future blocklist entries and improve overall deliverability. This aligns with advice found in how to deal with a SORBS listing.
Consider the spam trap connection: If a SORBS listing accompanies spam trap hits, as discussed on Arik Yavilevich's blog, this points to poor list hygiene as a primary issue that needs immediate attention.
Expert view
An email deliverability expert from Email Geeks explains that spam filters are the entities that use blocklists like SORBS to block incoming mail. This clarifies the role of blocklists in the email ecosystem, where they serve as a critical intelligence feed for spam filtering systems. The expert's statement highlights that the block isn't coming from your Email Service Provider (ESP) itself, but rather from the recipient's mail server which consults these lists.This insight directs senders to investigate the recipient side of the equation when encountering bounces related to blocklists. Understanding that it is the spam filter making the blocking decision, based on blocklist data, empowers senders to focus on improving their sending reputation to satisfy these filters. It underscores that deliverability is ultimately about meeting the expectations and security requirements of the various receiving mail systems.
08 Jan 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks suggests that if you are a B2B sender, a SORBS listing usually has a limited impact, typically not more than 2-5%. This provides a practical perspective on the severity of a SORBS listing, particularly for specific sending contexts. While any block is undesirable, this indicates that SORBS may not be a major blocker for all types of email traffic.This insight helps senders prioritize their remediation efforts. If a blocklist has a minimal impact on their overall deliverability, resources might be better allocated to addressing more impactful issues or blocklists that affect a larger percentage of their audience. However, even a small impact can be significant for critical B2B communications, so monitoring remains essential.
08 Jan 2024 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
Official documentation and technical explanations about blocklists (or blacklists) like SORBS provide foundational knowledge on how these systems operate and why IP addresses or domains get listed. This information is crucial for senders to understand the rules of the game and implement robust email sending practices. Documentation typically covers the types of listings, the criteria for inclusion, and the recommended steps for remediation and prevention. It often emphasizes the role of unwanted mail, open relays, and spam trap hits as primary triggers for being placed on a blocklist. Adhering to these documented principles is key to maintaining a healthy sender reputation.
Key findings
Purpose of blocklists: Email blocklists, including SORBS, are designed to identify and list IP addresses or domains associated with spamming, malware distribution, or other abusive email practices. They serve as a crucial tool for protecting recipients from unwanted messages.
Listing triggers: Common triggers for blocklist inclusion include sending unsolicited commercial email, high complaint rates from recipients, hitting spam traps, operating open relays, or being compromised by malware. Understanding how your email address ends up on a blacklist is essential.
DNS-based operation: Many blocklists, including SORBS, operate as DNS-based blocklists (DNSBLs). Receiving mail servers query these DNSBLs in real-time to check if an incoming IP or domain is listed before accepting the mail. This is detailed in what is a DNSBL and its effect.
Remediation pathways: Documentation typically outlines the steps required for delisting, which often include stopping the problematic behavior, submitting a request, and sometimes providing evidence of remediation. The process varies by blocklist.
Key considerations
Preventative measures: The best way to avoid blocklists is through preventative measures, including maintaining clean and opt-in email lists, sending relevant content, monitoring complaint rates, and implementing proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC).
Understanding blocklist types: Different blocklists (like SORBS) target different types of threats (e.g., spam, compromised servers, open relays). Understanding these distinctions, as outlined in a guide to the different types of email blocklists, helps in targeted troubleshooting.
Regular reputation checks: Regularly checking your IP and domain status on key blocklists is essential, even if you are not experiencing immediate bounces. Early detection can prevent widespread deliverability issues. Documentation on what email blacklists are often supports this.
Impact of spam traps: Many blocklists use spam trap data as a primary input. Documentation often highlights that hitting a spam trap is a strong signal of problematic list acquisition or hygiene, leading to immediate listing. For more, see spam traps: what they are.
Technical article
Documentation from MailChannels Blog explains that your IP address will end up on a blacklist if you or your customers are sending spam to spam traps or if there are public complaints that you are sending spam. This clearly outlines common triggers for blocklist inclusion, emphasizing both technical violations (spam traps) and user feedback (complaints). This documentation points to the dual nature of reputation monitoring, where automated systems detect patterns (like hitting spam traps) and human feedback directly influences reputation (spam complaints). For senders, this means a multi-faceted approach to deliverability is needed, ensuring clean lists to avoid traps and relevant content to minimize complaints.
10 Sep 2023 - MailChannels Blog
Technical article
Documentation from Selzy Blog states that if your IP address or domain gets added to a blacklist, your emails are more likely to be rejected, end up in spam, or be blocked entirely. This highlights the direct consequences of a blocklist listing on email deliverability, providing a clear warning for senders about the practical impact. This general statement from documentation confirms that blocklists are effective tools for mail providers to filter unwanted mail. It underscores the urgency for senders to address blocklist issues promptly to prevent significant disruptions to their email communication, which could otherwise lead to lost reach and potential revenue.