Email deliverability is significantly impacted by how links are managed within your campaigns. While generic public link shorteners, such as Bitly or TinyURL, are widely discouraged due to their frequent abuse by spammers and the resulting negative impact on sender reputation, Email Service Providers (ESPs) employ a distinct and generally safe method for link tracking. ESPs like Mailchimp, SendGrid, and ActiveCampaign automatically rewrite links with their own reputable tracking domains to provide analytics. This practice is considered safe because these domains are actively managed for deliverability and are trusted by major mailbox providers, unlike the less controlled, generic shorteners that often trigger spam filters.
15 marketer opinions
The impact of link shorteners on email deliverability largely depends on the type of shortener used. Generic public services, such as Bitly or TinyURL, are widely advised against because their domains are frequently abused by spammers. This can lead to these links being flagged as suspicious by spam filters, negatively affecting your sender reputation and increasing the likelihood of your emails landing in the spam folder or being blocked entirely. In contrast, Email Service Providers (ESPs) typically use their own proprietary, carefully managed domains for click tracking. This process, while also involving a redirect, is considered a standard and safe practice because ESPs actively maintain the reputation of these domains, ensuring they are trusted by mailbox providers and do not harm deliverability. Marketers are strongly encouraged to leverage their ESP's native click tracking functionality or to set up custom tracking domains for improved brand trust and inbox placement.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that public link shorteners are problematic because they can obscure malicious links, leading to negative scores from spam filters, with the reputation issue specific to the shortener used. She also notes that double-redirects can cause browsers to display security errors.
11 Nov 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that link shorteners themselves aren't the issue, but rather public link shorteners used for obfuscation, such as bit.ly, are the concern for email deliverability.
21 Jan 2025 - Email Geeks
3 expert opinions
The question of whether link shorteners impact email deliverability, particularly with ESP click tracking, has a clear distinction: generic shorteners are a risk, but ESPs' built-in tracking systems are not. Email Service Providers (ESPs) commonly utilize their own sophisticated click tracking mechanisms that rewrite the original destination URL with a tracking domain. This process, while effectively 'shortening' or obscuring the original link, is distinct from using public link shorteners. Experts confirm that ESPs' internal click tracking generally does not negatively affect deliverability. This is primarily because ESPs control and diligently manage the reputation of their tracking domains, ensuring they are trusted by mailbox providers, unlike the frequently abused domains of many third-party shortening services.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks clarifies that at many ESPs, link tracking does indeed obscure the destination URL by replacing it with a tracking domain and parameters.
17 Apr 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that while generic link shorteners can be problematic for email deliverability due to their frequent use by spammers, Email Service Providers' (ESPs) own click tracking systems typically do not negatively impact deliverability. ESPs use their own domains for tracking links, and because they actively manage the reputation of these domains, they are generally considered safe by mailbox providers, unlike many third-party link shortening services.
2 Apr 2024 - Spam Resource
4 technical articles
Major Email Service Providers (ESPs) and leading mailbox providers consistently confirm that while generic link shorteners can harm deliverability, an ESP's own click tracking mechanisms are generally safe and even beneficial. ESPs like SendGrid and Mailchimp automatically rewrite all links with their proprietary tracking domains for analytics purposes. This practice does not negatively impact email deliverability because these ESPs actively manage and maintain the strong reputation of their tracking domains, ensuring they are trusted by mailbox providers. In contrast, using external, generic link shorteners is strongly discouraged. Mailbox providers, including Google and Microsoft, view these third-party shorteners with suspicion due to their frequent association with spam and malicious content, potentially causing deliverability issues.
Technical article
Documentation from SendGrid explains that they automatically rewrite all links in emails to their own tracking domain (e.g., u[numbers].sgiz.net) for click tracking purposes. This standard ESP practice provides analytics and implicitly ensures deliverability, as SendGrid carefully manages the reputation of these domains, differentiating them from potentially harmful generic shorteners.
25 Aug 2024 - SendGrid
Technical article
Documentation from Mailchimp details that they track clicks by replacing original URLs with Mailchimp tracking URLs. They explicitly state that enabling this click tracking, which involves link rewriting, is generally safe for deliverability because Mailchimp actively manages the reputation of its tracking domains, implicitly advising against using third-party shorteners within email content.
14 Apr 2023 - Mailchimp
Are Bitly links bad for email deliverability?
Are link shorteners bad for email marketing?
Are URL shorteners like bit.ly bad for email deliverability?
Does using redirected URLs in email CTAs impact deliverability?
How do HTTP tracking links affect email deliverability and user experience?
How do URL shorteners and domain reputation impact email deliverability?