Suped

Summary

Email tracking pixels, commonly used to gauge open rates, do not inherently degrade email deliverability. While their presence might raise questions, issues typically stem from the underlying reputation of the pixel's hosting domain, the sender's broader email practices, or configuration errors. Reputable Email Service Providers (ESPs) widely incorporate tracking pixels as a standard functionality, confirming their general safety and effectiveness when used appropriately and in conjunction with sound sending habits.

Key findings

  • Pixels Not the Direct Cause: Email tracking pixels themselves do not inherently harm email deliverability. They are a standard and widely accepted method for measuring email opens.
  • Domain Reputation is Key: The most critical factor influencing deliverability in relation to tracking pixels is the reputation of the domain hosting the pixel. If this domain is associated with spam or has a poor reputation, it can cause deliverability issues.
  • Misuse by Spammers: Tracking pixels have sometimes garnered a poor reputation because spammers misuse them to verify email addresses. However, this does not reflect on legitimate marketing uses by reputable senders.
  • ESPs Use Safely: Leading Email Service Providers (ESPs) like SendGrid, Mailchimp, Postmark, and Campaign Monitor widely use and recommend tracking pixels as a standard feature, indicating their safety when integrated correctly and used within a legitimate system.
  • Overall Practices Matter More: Email deliverability is primarily influenced by the sender's overall reputation, the quality and relevance of the email content, and the engagement of recipients, rather than the mere presence of a tracking pixel.

Key considerations

  • Branded Tracking URLs: Properly setting up branded URLs or CNAME branding for tracking links and pixels is crucial. This helps prevent shared URL reputation issues and avoids messages being flagged as spam, especially important for cold email tools.
  • TLS/SSL Pixels: It is advisable to use TLS/SSL for tracking pixels to enhance security and improve deliverability.
  • GDPR Compliance: When emailing recipients in the EU, ensure explicit permission is obtained to comply with GDPR regulations concerning data tracking via pixels.
  • Email Client Privacy: Be aware that some email clients, such as Apple Mail, have introduced privacy features that can interfere with the effectiveness of open tracking, though this does not mean the pixel itself harms deliverability.
  • Holistic Deliverability: Focus on overall good sending practices, including maintaining a clean email list, providing quality content, and fostering a strong sender reputation, as these are the primary drivers of inbox placement, far outweighing any minor impact from the pixel itself.

What email marketers say

15 marketer opinions

Building on the idea that pixels are generally safe, it's worth noting that issues with email deliverability related to tracking pixels are almost always indirect. They often stem from a poor reputation associated with the pixel's hosting domain, a consequence of misconfigurations, or problematic sending behaviors. When implemented by reputable Email Service Providers and used by legitimate marketers, tracking pixels remain a standard, benign tool for campaign analytics, emphasizing that the sender's overall practices and domain integrity are paramount for inbox placement.

Key opinions

  • Pixel Functionality: Tracking pixels, integral for open rate measurement, generally do not degrade email deliverability on their own.
  • Host Domain Reputation: The reputation of the domain hosting the tracking pixel is a primary determinant; a compromised or poorly regarded domain can lead to deliverability issues.
  • Spammer Association: The negative perception of tracking pixels often stems from their misuse by spammers for list verification, rather than their inherent function.
  • Standard ESP Practice: Most legitimate Email Service Providers (ESPs) routinely employ tracking pixels as a secure and accepted method for performance analytics.
  • Sender Reputation Dominance: A sender's overall reputation, coupled with high-quality content and strong recipient engagement, remains the most significant factor in achieving inbox placement, far outweighing the pixel's impact.

Key considerations

  • Branding for Tracking: Establishing custom CNAMEs or branded URLs for tracking links and pixels is vital to avoid shared reputation pitfalls and enhance deliverability, particularly for cold email strategies.
  • Secure Pixel Implementation: Implementing tracking pixels with TLS/SSL encryption is recommended to bolster security and support reliable email delivery.
  • Privacy and Consent: Adhering to data privacy regulations like GDPR is essential when using tracking pixels for EU recipients, requiring explicit consent for data collection.
  • Impact of Client Privacy Features: Be mindful that privacy features in certain email clients, such as Apple Mail, can limit the accuracy of open rate tracking without necessarily harming deliverability itself.
  • Comprehensive Deliverability Strategy: True deliverability success relies on a broad approach, encompassing meticulous list hygiene, engaging content, and a consistently positive sender reputation, rather than isolated concerns about tracking pixels.

Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks explains that adding a tracking pixel can drop deliverability only when the CNAME branding is messed up, noting this was the most common issue seen in ESP support and emphasizing the importance of proper branding setup.

24 Oct 2023 - Email Geeks

Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks advises setting up a branded URL for tracking links to avoid messages being flagged as spam or rejected, especially with cold email tools.

30 Jul 2021 - Email Geeks

What the experts say

3 expert opinions

Email tracking pixels are a common analytical tool and generally do not directly impact deliverability. Instead, any associated deliverability challenges usually stem from the reputation of the domain hosting the pixel, a shared reputation of tracking URLs, or the sender's broader email practices. Legitimate marketers using good sending habits can employ tracking pixels without issue, as spam filters primarily evaluate a multitude of factors beyond the pixel's mere presence.

Key opinions

  • Pixel's Direct Impact Minimal: Email tracking pixels themselves are not a direct cause of deliverability issues; they are a standard component for open tracking.
  • Reputation of Hosting Domain: The reputation of the domain hosting the tracking pixel is crucial. If this domain is blacklisted or associated with spammers, it can negatively affect deliverability.
  • Shared URL Reputation: Tracking pixels, especially those using shared URLs, can inherit a shared reputation, making proper configuration and branding essential to prevent deliverability problems.
  • Poor Sending Practices are the Root: Deliverability problems linked to tracking pixels often originate from underlying poor sending habits, such as using unverified lists or having a low sender reputation, not the pixel itself.
  • Filters Consider Multiple Factors: Spam filters assess numerous elements of an email. While spammers may use hidden pixels, their presence alone does not automatically trigger a spam classification; overall email quality and sender behavior are more significant.

Key considerations

  • Brand Your Tracking URLs: Implement branded URLs or custom CNAMEs for tracking pixels and links to establish independent reputation and avoid issues from shared tracking domains.
  • Maintain Strong Sender Reputation: Focus on foundational deliverability practices, including using clean, opt-in lists and maintaining high engagement, as these factors overwhelmingly influence inbox placement.
  • Monitor Pixel Hosting Domain: Ensure the domain hosting your tracking pixels maintains a clean reputation and is not blacklisted to prevent indirect deliverability penalties.
  • Understand Privacy Implications: While not a direct deliverability factor, be aware that hidden tracking pixels can raise privacy concerns among recipients and email clients, even if legitimate.
  • Configuration is Key: Proper configuration of tracking pixel URLs is vital to avoid potential flags from spam filters that might associate poorly configured or shared URLs with suspicious activity.

Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks explains that shared URLs, like those for tracking pixels, can carry a shared reputation, therefore proper branding and configuration are essential.

23 Aug 2022 - Email Geeks

Expert view

Expert from Spam Resource explains that email tracking pixels themselves do not inherently harm deliverability. While they are a standard method for open tracking, issues arise from poor sending practices, such as using bad lists or having a low sender reputation. Spam filters might flag emails if the pixel's URL is associated with known spammers, but the pixel is not the direct cause of deliverability problems.

26 Apr 2023 - Spam Resource

What the documentation says

4 technical articles

The consensus among leading Email Service Providers (ESPs) indicates that email tracking pixels, which are standard for open rate measurement, do not negatively affect deliverability. Major platforms like SendGrid, Mailchimp, and Postmark integrate these pixels as core features without warnings, affirming their safe and routine use. While services like Google Workspace address user privacy regarding image loading, the presence of a tracking pixel itself is not cited as a direct deliverability impediment.

Key findings

  • ESPs Validate Pixel Use: Major Email Service Providers such as SendGrid, Mailchimp, and Postmark extensively use and endorse 1x1 tracking pixels as standard features for open rate measurement, confirming their non-detrimental effect on email deliverability when properly integrated.
  • Routine Industry Practice: The widespread adoption and recommendation of tracking pixels by leading ESPs solidify their status as a common, acceptable, and safe practice within the email marketing industry.
  • Absence of Direct ESP Warnings: Documentation from prominent ESPs does not include direct warnings or disclaimers indicating that tracking pixels inherently harm deliverability when utilized through their platforms following recommended guidelines.
  • Gmail's Privacy-Centric Approach: Google Workspace's handling of images, including tracking pixels, emphasizes user privacy and image loading preferences, but it does not suggest that the pixel itself negatively impacts an email's deliverability to the inbox.
  • Designed for Safe Integration: The inclusion of tracking pixel functionality as a built-in, recommended tool by ESPs implies that these elements are designed to be used safely without compromising email deliverability, provided other best practices are followed.

Key considerations

  • Ensure Branded Tracking: Utilizing branded CNAMEs or custom URLs for tracking pixels and links helps establish an independent sender reputation, avoiding potential deliverability issues tied to shared tracking domains.
  • Prioritize Secure Pixel Delivery: Employing TLS/SSL encryption for tracking pixel URLs is a best practice that enhances the security of email content and supports reliable deliverability.
  • Address Privacy Regulations: Compliance with data privacy regulations like GDPR is crucial when using tracking pixels, especially for recipients in the EU, necessitating explicit consent for data collection.
  • Understand Client-Side Privacy Features: Be aware that contemporary email clients, such as Apple Mail, incorporate privacy enhancements that can obscure open rate metrics, though these features do not indicate that the pixel itself causes deliverability failures.
  • Maintain Overall Deliverability Hygiene: True email deliverability success depends primarily on comprehensive strategies including a clean, engaged subscriber list, relevant content, and a strong sender reputation, which collectively outweigh isolated concerns about tracking pixels.

Technical article

Documentation from SendGrid, a major Email Service Provider (ESP), describes how their open tracking feature works by embedding a single pixel image. The inclusion and recommendation of this standard feature imply that, when used within their system and following best practices, it does not negatively impact deliverability as a standalone component.

5 Aug 2021 - SendGrid Documentation

Technical article

Documentation from Mailchimp details their open tracking mechanism, which utilizes a 1x1 pixel. Their description of this standard feature, without any direct warnings about its negative impact on deliverability, indicates that tracking pixels are generally considered safe and standard practice when managed by a reputable Email Service Provider.

11 Sep 2024 - Mailchimp Documentation

Start improving your email deliverability today

Sign up