Summary
The traditional advice around maintaining a specific image-to-text ratio in emails, often cited as 60/40 or 80/20 (text to images), has been a long-standing guideline in email marketing for deliverability. This guidance aimed to prevent emails from being flagged as spam by older, simpler filters that might view image-heavy emails with suspicion. However, as email ecosystems have evolved, the criteria for spam filtering have become significantly more sophisticated, shifting focus from static content ratios to dynamic sender reputation, engagement metrics, and authentication protocols.
Key findings
- Evolving filters: Modern spam filters prioritize sender reputation and engagement over strict content ratios.
- Brand influence: Large, reputable brands with strong engagement often send image-only emails with good deliverability.
- Accessibility matters: Alt text for images remains crucial for accessibility and ensures that screen readers and email clients that block images can still interpret content.
- User experience: The overall user experience and perceived value of the content are more critical than pixel-perfect ratio adherence.
Key considerations
- Sender reputation: Focus on building a strong sender reputation through consistent engagement and proper email authentication (like DMARC, SPF, and DKIM) rather than obsessing over content ratios.
- Content quality: Ensure your content is valuable and relevant to your audience, driving positive engagement. This often outweighs stylistic rules.
- Alternative text: Always include descriptive alt text for images to improve accessibility and provide context for recipients whose images may not load. This is also important for services that read email content, such as voice assistants.
- Testing: Regularly test your email campaigns across various email clients and providers to understand how your specific audience receives your messages, especially when using new email templates.
- Balance, not rule: While a strict ratio might not be a primary deliverability factor anymore, maintaining a reasonable balance between text and images can still contribute to a well-designed, user-friendly email. Consider insights from Email on Acid on this topic.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often find themselves navigating a balance between visually appealing, image-rich emails and the perceived deliverability risks associated with them. The common sentiment among marketers is that while the image-to-text ratio was once a significant concern, its impact has diminished considerably in the face of more advanced filtering mechanisms. Many observe that successful, engagement-driven campaigns from reputable senders frequently feature heavily visual content, challenging older assumptions about what constitutes a 'safe' email design.
Key opinions
- Deliverability shift: Many marketers believe the text-to-image ratio is no longer a primary deliverability criterion, though some older anti-spam filters might still consider it.
- Reputation over ratio: Sender reputation and recipient engagement are widely seen as far more influential factors than content ratios.
- Brand exception: Well-known brands with high engagement rates frequently send image-only emails without experiencing deliverability issues.
- Accessibility focus: Alt-tags for images are essential for accessibility, ensuring content is readable by screen readers and in situations where images are blocked.
- Content demand: If content is highly desired by subscribers, traditional ratios become less critical, suggesting that user preference can override technical guidelines.
Key considerations
- Prioritize engagement: Focus on creating emails that resonate with your audience and drive positive interactions, as this is a stronger signal to ISPs than content layout.
- Alt text implementation: Ensure all images have descriptive alt text to improve the user experience for all recipients, including those with visual impairments or image blocking enabled.
- Monitor performance: Continuously monitor your deliverability and engagement metrics. If you see dips, investigate other factors beyond image-to-text ratio, such as spam trigger words or list quality.
- Contextual design: Design emails with a fall-back plain text version and ensure the core message is conveyed even without images loaded. This aligns with advice from AWeber regarding image-only emails.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes a shift in email design towards image-heavy content. They have recently observed many legitimate promotional emails that are almost entirely images, with only basic alt-tags. This raises questions about the continued relevance of traditional image-to-text ratio rules.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks emphasizes the importance of alt-tags for accessibility. While some anti-spam filters might still consider the text/image ratio, they find it's not a primary deliverability factor in their experience. The focus should be on ensuring content is accessible to all users.
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability generally agree that the significance of the image-to-text ratio has waned over time. While legacy anti-spam systems might still assign some weight to this factor, sophisticated modern filters, particularly those employed by major ISPs like Gmail and Outlook, place far greater emphasis on dynamic sender reputation, engagement signals, and authentication records (DMARC, SPF, DKIM). The consensus is that a good sender reputation can largely negate concerns about content ratios, allowing for more flexible and visually rich email designs.
Key opinions
- Reputation is king: Sender reputation is the most critical factor influencing deliverability, often overriding content-based filter rules like image-to-text ratio.
- Outdated metrics: While some older or less sophisticated content filters might still consider the ratio, most modern ISPs have moved to more complex analytical methods.
- Engagement drives: Positive user engagement signals (opens, clicks, replies) are far more indicative of legitimate mail than content layout.
- Contextual filtering: Filters now assess the overall context of an email, including its sending infrastructure, authentication, and recipient interaction history.
Key considerations
- Prioritize domain health: Invest in maintaining a healthy domain and IP reputation. This includes managing your email list and avoiding spam traps.
- Authentic content: Ensure your emails are properly authenticated with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. These technical foundations are far more influential than image ratios.
- Audience behavior: Focus on content that your subscribers genuinely want to receive and interact with, leading to strong engagement metrics that benefit deliverability. This aligns with advice on deliverability best practices.
- Holistic view: Instead of hyper-focusing on one element like image ratio, adopt a holistic approach to email deliverability that encompasses all technical and content aspects.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests that while the text/image ratio might still influence some content-based filters, it is almost always outweighed by sender reputation. This highlights a shift in filter technology towards more dynamic, reputation-based assessments.
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource.com indicates that modern spam filters are sophisticated and look beyond simple content ratios, focusing more on sender reputation and engagement metrics. This evolution means that basic design rules are less critical than overall sending behavior.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and research often provide the technical basis for understanding how email filters operate. While direct, explicit rules about image-to-text ratios from major ISPs are rare, historical documentation (like that from SpamAssassin) shows that it was once a considered factor. More recent documentation emphasizes factors such as overall email size, code integrity, and, crucially, accessibility standards, which indirectly support the inclusion of meaningful text, such as alt attributes for images. The trend in documentation points towards a more sophisticated understanding of legitimate email, moving beyond simplistic content analysis to encompass a wider range of technical and behavioral signals.
Key findings
- Historical relevance: Older spam filtering systems, such as SpamAssassin, historically factored in image-to-text ratios.
- Accessibility mandate: Legal rulings and guidelines increasingly mandate web accessibility, which extends to emails and underscores the importance of alt text for images.
- Text-only processing: Voice assistants and some email clients only process the text content of emails, ignoring images and their HTML attributes (if alt text is missing).
- Email size: The total size of an email, including images, remains a factor for optimal deliverability, with recommendations often below 100KB.
Key considerations
- Semantic HTML: Build emails using semantic HTML, ensuring that the core message is conveyed through readable text, even if images are disabled or not loaded. This can help with Microsoft deliverability.
- Alt text best practices: Prioritize descriptive and relevant alt text for all images. This not only aids accessibility but also helps ISPs understand the content of your email. Learn more about alt text and deliverability.
- Image optimization: Optimize image file sizes to keep the overall email size manageable, as large emails can sometimes face deliverability challenges, especially to certain providers like Yahoo Mail.
Technical article
Documentation from Apache SpamAssassin historically considered image-to-text ratios when scoring emails. While these specific tests may be outdated or less prominent now, they indicate that content balance was once a defined factor in spam detection.
Technical article
Documentation from Blueshift states that many ISP filters have implemented the image-to-text ratio as an important factor in determining the fate of an email. This suggests that some providers still use this metric to safeguard users, influencing email placement.
Related resources
6 resources
Related pages
How to protect email deliverability for image-only emails?
Why do new email templates affect deliverability with Gmail?
What email template changes affect Microsoft deliverability and spam scores?
How do email image sizes affect deliverability and Gmail promotions tab placement?
What are the best practices for email image file sizes and design tradeoffs for user engagement?
Does using HTTPS/SSL for email links and images improve deliverability or performance?
How does email deliverability work in the current email marketing landscape?
Are email spam trigger words still relevant for deliverability?
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
