Emails with a high image-to-text ratio, especially those that are image-only, can negatively impact deliverability and are often flagged by spam filters. This is largely because spammers frequently embed messages in images to bypass text-based content analysis, making such emails appear suspicious. While a high image ratio alone may not always trigger a spam filter, it can contribute to a higher spam score, particularly when combined with other negative factors or a lack of strong sender reputation and positive engagement. The impact can vary depending on the recipient's ISP and whether the audience expects image-rich content. Furthermore, image-heavy emails significantly hinder accessibility for users who cannot view images or rely on assistive technologies. Experts recommend maintaining a healthy balance of text and images, often suggesting an 80% text to 20% image ratio, to ensure proper scanning by filters and improve overall deliverability and user experience.
14 marketer opinions
An imbalanced image-to-text ratio, particularly when an email is heavily image-based or entirely composed of images, consistently emerges as a critical factor in email deliverability. Spam filters view such content with suspicion, as it often mimics tactics used by spammers attempting to bypass text-based analysis. These filters rely heavily on textual content to assess legitimacy; consequently, emails with minimal text offer insufficient data for thorough scanning, increasing their likelihood of being flagged as suspicious. While some specific filter rules, like those in SpamAssassin, may only add a small score increase, this can combine with other negative factors to trigger spam filtering. The impact can also vary significantly based on the recipient's email provider and whether the audience is accustomed to image-rich communications. Furthermore, a high image ratio severely compromises accessibility for users unable to view images or those relying on assistive technologies. Industry experts generally advise maintaining a healthy balance, with a common recommendation of around 80% text to 20% images, along with the consistent use of descriptive alt text, to optimize both deliverability and user experience.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that SpamAssassin tests include a rule for "HTML has a low ratio of text to image area" and advises against ignoring this, even if it doesn't always trigger default spam filtering, as eliminating known triggers helps protect campaigns from unknown ones.
18 Apr 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that the impact of image-based emails on deliverability largely depends on the audience; if they expect such emails, deliverability may not be affected, and in some cases, even with SpamAssassin, senders might be whitelisted. Shares personal experience with clients who send image-only emails without deliverability problems, but acknowledges poor accessibility.
6 May 2025 - Email Geeks
2 expert opinions
An excessive image-to-text ratio, particularly in image-only emails, significantly elevates the risk of being flagged by spam filters. This practice is a well-known spamming tactic, allowing malicious actors to embed hidden content or illicit promotions that bypass standard text-based analysis. Inbox providers, therefore, regard such emails with deep suspicion, as they offer minimal textual data for legitimate content assessment. While the impact can vary, a high image ratio often contributes to a higher spam score, especially when combined with other negative signals. This also severely compromises accessibility for recipients who cannot view images. Email marketing experts consistently advise a healthy balance of text and images, often recommending around 80% text to 20% images, to optimize deliverability and ensure content clarity for all users.
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that using a high image-to-text ratio, or emails consisting solely of images, can be a red flag for spam filters. Spammers often embed their content in images to evade text-based filters, so legitimate senders should ensure their emails have sufficient text alongside images to avoid being flagged.
18 Oct 2022 - Spam Resource
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise shares that sending image-only emails or emails with a very high image-to-text ratio is a common spamming tactic used to bypass text analysis. Inbox providers view these emails with suspicion, as they are often used to hide malicious content or illicit promotions, making them more likely to be flagged as spam. It's generally advised to balance images with a good amount of descriptive text.
17 Sep 2021 - Word to the Wise
7 technical articles
Email service providers universally recognize that a disproportionately high image-to-text ratio, especially in image-only emails, significantly impacts deliverability and increases the risk of being filtered as spam. This design approach mimics a common spammer tactic used to bypass text-based analysis, as images can conceal malicious content from traditional scanning methods. Consequently, emails lacking sufficient visible text provide inadequate data for spam filters to assess legitimacy, raising immediate red flags. Maintaining a healthy balance of text and images, along with providing a text-only alternative, is crucial for improving deliverability and ensuring your messages reach the inbox.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailchimp explains that an email with too many images and too little text can resemble spam to filters. Spammers often use image-only emails to bypass text-based content filters, making a high image-to-text ratio a red flag for deliverability.
22 Sep 2024 - Mailchimp Knowledge Base
Technical article
Documentation from HubSpot shares that a high image-to-text ratio can negatively impact deliverability as spam filters look for a healthy balance. They suggest that having enough visible text is crucial for emails to be properly scanned and delivered to the inbox.
16 Oct 2022 - HubSpot Blog
Are image-only emails bad for deliverability?
Do images in email and PDF attachments affect email deliverability?
Do images in emails affect deliverability?
Does using images instead of text affect email deliverability?
How does the image to text ratio in email affect deliverability?
Is image-to-text ratio still important for email deliverability?