Summary
The question of whether image-only emails are detrimental to email deliverability is a long-standing one. While once considered a major red flag for spam filters due to a perceived text-to-image ratioissue, current expert consensus and observations from widespread marketing practices suggest a more nuanced reality. Modern email service providers (ESPs) and spam filters have evolved to prioritize user engagement and behavior over static content ratios. However, this doesn't mean image-only emails are without their risks; accessibility and user experience remain significant concerns that can indirectly impact overall campaign performance and deliverability metrics. It's crucial to understand these distinctions to make informed decisions for your email strategy.
Key findings
- Deliverability impact: Direct deliverability consequences from a high image-to-text ratio are often exaggerated, particularly for major B2C email providers like Gmail, Outlook, and Yahoo.
- Spam filters: Some older or simpler spam filters, such as SpamAssassin, might flag emails that are exclusively image-based. However, this flagging does not consistently result in outright blocking by modern ISPs.
- User engagement focus: Major B2C email providers prioritize how users interact with and react to your emails over strict adherence to image-to-text ratios.
- B2B vs. B2C: Sending to B2B audiences might expose you to less sophisticated, internal filters that are more sensitive to image-only content, compared to the data-rich filters used by consumer ISPs.
Key considerations
- Accessibility barriers: Image-only emails can create significant accessibility issues for users with visual impairments or those who have images disabled by default. This can violate WCAG guidelines.
- Loading times: Large image files can slow down email loading times, leading to a negative user experience and potentially abandoned emails before content is fully seen.
- Image blocking: If images are blocked or fail to display, the entire message of an image-only email can be lost without adequate alt text or fallback HTML.
- Conversion impact: Poor rendering, slow loading, or accessibility issues can directly impact user engagement, leading to lower click-through rates and conversions, even if the email lands in the inbox.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often find themselves in a challenging position when it comes to image-only emails. The ease of creating visually appealing content with tools like Canva and the observation that many large, successful brands appear to use image-heavy layouts lead to questions about the long-standing advice against them. While some acknowledge accessibility and rendering challenges, the primary focus often remains on efficiency and perceived campaign performance, sometimes leading to a dismissal of traditional deliverability warnings in favor of perceived market trends.
Key opinions
- Widespread practice: Many marketers observe and are influenced by large brands successfully sending image-only emails, which prompts them to question traditional deliverability advice.
- Ease of creation: The availability and popularity of design tools like Canva, combined with platforms such as Klaviyo, make it simple to produce and send image-heavy or image-only email content.
- Revenue focus: Marketers often prioritize time-cost efficiency and direct revenue impact. If opens and conversions appear satisfactory, concerns about accessibility or strict image-to-text ratios may become secondary.
- Outlook rendering concerns: There are acknowledged issues with how image-only emails render in email clients like Outlook, especially when images fail to display and adequate alt text is missing.
Key considerations
- Client pressure: Clients may insist on image-only campaigns, influenced by the visible practices of large brands, often without insight into the internal metrics or long-term strategies of those companies.
- Accessibility trade-off: Despite prevailing deliverability discussions, marketers acknowledge that accessibility remains a valid concern for image-only emails, especially when images are blocked or not downloaded.
- Conversion impact: Even if emails reach the inbox, poor rendering or accessibility issues can reduce engagement and ultimately harm conversion rates.
- Design challenges: Creating responsive image-only emails that look good across diverse devices (mobile vs. desktop) requires careful design, sometimes necessitating multiple versions or complex layouts to ensure a positive user experience. This relates to the broader discussion on good image-based email practices.
- Big brand visibility:Marketers may focus on the visibility of big brands sending image-only emails, overlooking the hidden metrics that influence whether those emails are truly optimal.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes that for a long time, the understanding was that 100% image-based email campaigns were bad for deliverability. However, with the rise of tools like Canva and platforms like Klaviyo, it feels like this long-held belief is being challenged, leading to a need for re-evaluation of text-to-image ratios.
Marketer view
Marketer from AWeber highlights that emails with a high ratio of images to text are frequently flagged by spam filters, which can reduce the likelihood of them reaching the recipient's inbox. This suggests that maintaining a balance is important for deliverability.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts generally hold a nuanced view on image-only emails. While acknowledging that some traditional spam filters might flag them, the prevailing opinion is that major B2C email providers prioritize user behavior and engagement signals over simple content ratios. For these sophisticated systems, the direct impact on deliverability from image-only content is often minimal. Instead, the focus shifts heavily to accessibility and user experience. Experts also highlight a key distinction between B2B and B2C email environments, where B2B filters might be less advanced and therefore more sensitive to such content.
Key opinions
- Limited deliverability impact: Experts largely agree that image-only emails do not inherently lead to widespread deliverability problems, especially with the advanced filtering mechanisms employed by major ISPs.
- ISP focus: Major B2C providers such as Gmail, Outlook (formerly Hotmail), and Yahoo are more concerned with how users react to emails than with their image-to-text ratio.
- Accessibility takes precedence: The primary concern with image-only emails often shifts from deliverability to fundamental issues of accessibility and overall user experience.
- B2B vs. B2C filters: Simpler, less data-driven B2B email filters might still penalize image-only emails more readily than the sophisticated filters used by consumer-facing ISPs.
- Myth dispelled: The notion that a specific image-to-text ratio is a critical factor for spam filtering is largely considered a myth by many deliverability experts.
Key considerations
- Graceful degradation: Emails should be designed to maintain legibility and meaning even when images are blocked or fail to load, typically by providing robust alt text and fallback HTML. This can help prevent them from being flagged as spam.
- User experience: Poor rendering across different devices (e.g., mobile vs. desktop) due to image-only designs can significantly detract from the user experience, irrespective of deliverability.
- Visual balance: If not executed well, an image-only email designed for mobile devices may appear disproportionately large or "shouting" on larger desktop screens, negatively impacting perceived professionalism.
- Thorough testing: It is critical to test image-heavy emails across a wide range of email clients and devices to ensure optimal rendering and a consistent user experience.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks notes that while some spam filters may penalize emails that are entirely image-based, this doesn't necessarily translate into widespread deliverability issues. They observe that many marketers successfully send 100% image emails without being blocked, though accessibility remains a concern.
Expert view
Expert from Email on Acid states that splicing image-only emails can lead to numerous potential deliverability problems. They explain that spam filters, much like digital assistants, may struggle to detect the content of such emails, increasing the risk of them being flagged.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and widely accepted best practices from email platforms and industry bodies underscore the importance of balancing images with text. The emphasis is not solely on avoiding spam filters, but also on ensuring emails are accessible to all recipients and provide an optimal user experience across various devices and email clients. These guidelines often highlight the necessity of fallback content, alt text, and responsive design to mitigate the potential drawbacks of image-heavy emails, particularly when images are not displayed.
Key findings
- Accessibility guidelines: Documentation consistently stresses the importance of accessible content, which is severely compromised in image-only emails lacking proper alt text or text alternatives.
- Loading performance: Official guidelines acknowledge that larger image files can increase email load times, a crucial performance metric for user engagement and experience within email clients.
- Spam filter logic: While explicit image-to-text ratio thresholds aren't always detailed, documentation implies that overall content quality, user interaction, and the presence of readable text are critical signals for spam filters.
- Fallback content: Recommendations frequently include providing sufficient text-based fallback or descriptive alt text for images to ensure the message is conveyed even if images are disabled or fail to load.
Key considerations
- User experience focus: Documentation often emphasizes creating a positive and consistent user experience, which can be hindered by image-only emails for recipients using different devices or with varied settings.
- Content flexibility: Diverse content, encompassing both text and images, offers greater adaptability across various email clients and user preferences, ensuring wider readability.
- Reduced engagement risks: Emails with poor rendering or significant accessibility gaps are less likely to generate user engagement, potentially leading to lower open rates and click-throughs.
- Bandwidth implications: Large image files consume more bandwidth for recipients, which can be a notable concern for those with limited data plans, as highlighted by industry publications.
Technical article
Documentation from MyEmma emphasizes that images are considered a design best practice and can boost engagement, but conversely, they also warn that you should never send image-only emails due to potential negative impacts on deliverability and user experience.
Technical article
Documentation from AWeber warns that emails containing a high ratio of images to text are frequently flagged by spam filters. This reduces the chances of emails reaching the inbox, making it a key factor in deliverability assessments.
Related resources
15 resources
Related pages
Is image-to-text ratio still important for email deliverability?
How do email image sizes affect deliverability and Gmail promotions tab placement?
How to protect email deliverability for image-only emails?
Does a high image to text ratio affect email deliverability and spam filtering?
Do images in emails affect deliverability?
Can images in emails cause them to go to spam?
Are image-based emails a good practice, and what are the deliverability and accessibility implications?
How does the image to text ratio in email affect deliverability?
How do GIFs impact email open rates and deliverability?
Does using HTTPS/SSL for email links and images improve deliverability or performance?
