Summary
Maintaining a low spam complaint rate is crucial for email deliverability. Most sources suggest aiming for below 0.1%, with deliverability issues likely above 0.3%. Google recommends staying below 0.10% and avoiding exceeding 0.30%. The spam rate evaluation occurs over a period longer than a day but less than a year. Factors influencing this rate include sender reputation, IP reputation, email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), list hygiene, content relevance, and engaging content. Best practices include using double opt-in, easy unsubscription, permission-based marketing, monitoring sender scores and feedback loops, cleaning email lists regularly, and segmenting audiences. Focusing on reducing actual complaints, not relying solely on probabilities, is more effective. Poor list hygiene, irrelevant/misleading content, and lack of authentication significantly increase complaint rates.
Key findings
- Acceptable Spam Rate: Aim for a spam complaint rate below 0.1%; exceeding 0.3% typically leads to deliverability problems. Google specifically recommends staying below 0.10% and avoiding rates above 0.30%.
- Key Influencing Factors: Deliverability is affected by sender reputation, IP reputation, authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), list hygiene, content relevance, complaint rates, and sending frequency.
- Evaluation Timeline: Spam rate thresholds are evaluated over a period of time that is longer than a day but less than a year.
- Industry Guidance: While a specific threshold is given by Google, overall, the industry lacks consistent guidance, but general consensus is to stay below 0.1%.
- Authentication Importance: Implementing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is crucial for authenticating emails, improving sender reputation, and enabling feedback loops.
Key considerations
- Proactive Monitoring: Consistently monitor sender scores, complaint rates, and feedback loops to identify and address potential issues promptly.
- Ethical Sending Practices: Use permission-based marketing, avoid purchased lists, respect unsubscribe requests, and use clear/honest subject lines.
- List Hygiene: Maintain excellent list hygiene by regularly removing inactive or invalid addresses and segmenting your lists.
- Content Alignment: Ensure email content is relevant, engaging, and aligns with subscriber expectations set during opt-in.
- Remediation Over Metrics: Prioritize reducing high complaint rates directly rather than solely relying on statistical probabilities.
- IP Reputation Management: Implement email best practices to maintain a positive IP address reputation.
What email marketers say
10 marketer opinions
Maintaining a low spam complaint rate is critical for email deliverability. While there's some debate, most sources suggest keeping it below 0.1%, with problems likely above 0.3%. Factors influencing this rate include list hygiene, content relevance, authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and sender reputation. Implementing best practices such as double opt-in, easy unsubscription, and monitoring sender scores can help avoid spam filters and maintain a healthy sending reputation.
Key opinions
- Acceptable Spam Rate: Aim for a spam complaint rate below 0.1%; exceeding 0.3% can lead to deliverability issues.
- Factors Affecting Spam Rate: Poor list hygiene, irrelevant content, deceptive subject lines, and lack of email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) significantly increase spam complaint rates.
- Spam Score: A lower spam score, often on a scale of 0-5, indicates a higher likelihood of inbox placement.
Key considerations
- List Hygiene: Regularly clean your email list to remove inactive or invalid addresses.
- Content Relevance: Ensure your email content aligns with subscriber expectations and opt-in promises.
- Authentication: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to authenticate your emails and improve sender reputation.
- Ease of Unsubscription: Provide a clear and easy way for subscribers to unsubscribe to reduce spam complaints.
- Monitoring: Consistently monitor your sender reputation and spam complaint rates to identify and address potential issues proactively.
- Spike Forgiveness: Mailbox providers may be forgiving of complaint spikes if best practices are followed.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Constant Contact explains that avoiding spam filters involves using permission-based marketing, authenticating your email, sending relevant content, providing an easy way to unsubscribe, and monitoring your sender reputation. They recommend keeping your spam complaint rate below 0.1%.
12 Jun 2022 - Constant Contact
Marketer view
Email marketer from Sender explains how to keep your email spam score low: use double opt-in, clean your email list regularly, use a dedicated IP address, send relevant content, use a familiar ‘From’ name and email address, add an unsubscribe link, and add a text version to your HTML emails.
8 Jan 2022 - Sender
What the experts say
5 expert opinions
Maintaining a healthy email spam rate involves understanding evaluation periods, focusing on reducing complaints, and following best practices. The spam rate is assessed over a period longer than a day but less than a year. Rather than relying on statistical probabilities, directly reducing high complaint rates is more effective. Factors significantly affecting spam rates include sending to purchased lists, ignoring unsubscribe requests, using misleading subject lines, and poor list hygiene. Furthermore, a positive IP reputation is crucial to avoid being flagged as spam. Setting up feedback loops to monitor spam complaints and authenticating mail are key steps in understanding and improving spam rates.
Key opinions
- Evaluation Period: Spam rate thresholds are evaluated over a period longer than a day, but less than a year.
- Complaint Reduction: Focus on reducing actual spam complaints, rather than solely relying on statistical analysis.
- Contributing Factors: Sending to purchased lists, ignoring unsubscribes, misleading subject lines, and poor list hygiene negatively impact spam rates.
- IP Reputation: Maintaining a good IP reputation is crucial for avoiding spam filters.
- Feedback Loops: Feedback loops are used to monitor complaints. Authentication is required to use feedback loops.
Key considerations
- Ethical Sending Practices: Avoid purchased lists, respect unsubscribe requests, and use clear and honest subject lines.
- List Hygiene: Regularly clean your email list to remove inactive or invalid addresses.
- IP Reputation Management: Implement email best practices to maintain a positive IP address reputation.
- Authentication: Authenticate all mail so you are elgible to use Feedback Loops.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks states that the spam rate threshold evaluation period is 'More than a day, less than a year.'
1 May 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that one way to monitor spam complaints is to setup feedback loops, and that senders must authenticate their mail to participate.
24 Dec 2021 - Spam Resource
What the documentation says
6 technical articles
Maintaining a low spam rate is crucial for email deliverability, with Google recommending staying below 0.10% and avoiding exceeding 0.30%. Factors influencing deliverability include sender reputation, email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), list hygiene, complaint rates, and content quality. High complaint rates negatively impact inbox placement and can lead to blocks, necessitating careful monitoring and prompt action. Implementing SPF, DKIM and DMARC are key in preventing domain spoofing, validating mail and specifying policy when authentication fails.
Key findings
- Acceptable Spam Rate (Google): Keep spam rates below 0.10% and avoid exceeding 0.30% to maintain deliverability.
- Deliverability Factors: Sender reputation, authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), list hygiene, complaint rates, and content quality all affect deliverability.
- Complaint Rate Impact: High complaint rates directly impact inbox placement and can lead to blocks.
- SPF Role: SPF (Sender Policy Framework) records authorize mail servers to send emails on behalf of your domain, preventing sender address forgery.
- DKIM Role: DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) verifies the domain of an email sender and message integrity using cryptographic signatures.
- DMARC Role: DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance) builds on SPF and DKIM to provide policy for handling authentication failures, protecting against phishing and spam.
Key considerations
- Proactive Monitoring: Monitor complaint rates and sender reputation to identify and address issues promptly.
- Authentication Implementation: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to improve email authentication and sender reputation.
- List Maintenance: Maintain good list hygiene by removing invalid or unengaged subscribers.
- Content Quality: Avoid spam triggers in your email content.
Technical article
Documentation from Google states that senders should keep the spam rate reported in Postmaster Tools below 0.10% and avoid ever reaching a spam rate of 0.30% or higher. Maintaining rates below 0.10% allows for error margin, and consistent rates above 0.30% will cause deliverability issues.
18 Nov 2022 - Google
Technical article
Documentation from SparkPost mentions that deliverability metrics, including complaint rates, are crucial for maintaining a positive sender reputation. High complaint rates directly impact inbox placement and can lead to blocks. They recommend monitoring and addressing any significant changes in these metrics.
5 Feb 2024 - SparkPost
Do spam complaints from different email domains have different weights in deliverability?
How accurate are email spam testing tools and what are the alternatives?
How are email bounce rates calculated and what is considered a good bounce rate?
How can I accurately monitor complaint rates for email marketing using Google Postmaster Tools, Yahoo FBL, and my ESP?
How do spam complaints and user interaction affect domain reputation?
What is a good spam rate and what does the percentage mean?
