Experts, marketers, and documentation sources agree that using URL shorteners, particularly public ones like bit.ly, can negatively impact email deliverability. These shorteners often have a bad reputation due to their association with spam and malicious content, leading to blocklisting by email providers and security software. Additionally, URL shorteners can be viewed as cloaking, which violates Google's Webmaster Guidelines and triggers spam filters. The use of multiple redirects increases latency and can trigger security warnings, affecting user experience and deliverability. While private or branded shorteners offer some advantages, caution is advised, with recommendations to use full, transparent URLs whenever possible. Relying solely on short URLs for tracking purposes is also risky, as destinations can change, affecting data accuracy. Maintaining a clean sender reputation and building trust with recipients are key considerations in determining whether to use URL shorteners.
15 marketer opinions
Using URL shorteners like bit.ly can negatively impact email deliverability for several reasons. Public URL shorteners often have a bad reputation due to being abused by spammers, leading email providers to flag them as suspicious. This can harm your sender reputation, cause emails to land in the spam folder, and negatively impact click-through rates. It's generally recommended to avoid public URL shorteners altogether. If link shortening is necessary, using a custom branded domain for short links can improve deliverability and build trust with recipients, as it maintains brand consistency and avoids the negative reputation associated with public URL shorteners. It's also important to ensure that any URL shortener you use is properly configured to prevent abuse.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that bit.ly links often have a bad reputation because they are frequently abused, which is generally the case for many third-party domains you have no control over.
20 Jul 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Litmus explains that some email clients view URL shortening as a form of link cloaking, which can trigger spam filters. It is recommended to use full, transparent URLs or branded short links to avoid deliverability issues.
11 Sep 2021 - Litmus
5 expert opinions
Experts generally advise caution when using URL shorteners for email marketing due to long-standing issues with abuse and deliverability. Public link shorteners, like bit.ly, have been problematic for over a decade and are often used in spam to hide the true destination. While private shorteners may be acceptable, relying solely on short URLs for tracking can be risky as destinations can change post-send, impacting data accuracy. When using tracking tools that wrap links in redirects already, adding further redirects via shorteners increases the chance of failure.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise warns against relying solely on short URLs for tracking, as the destination could be changed after the email is sent, leading to inaccurate data. They advise using caution and considering alternative tracking methods.
15 Sep 2023 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that if the sending tool is tracking clicks, it’s wrapping the link in its own redirect already and each additional redirect is a chance for failure.
15 Jun 2024 - Email Geeks
4 technical articles
Documentation sources indicate that URL shorteners can negatively impact email deliverability due to cloaking, blocklisting, excessive redirects, and potential security warnings. Google Search Central identifies cloaking (including sneaky redirects) as a violation of webmaster guidelines, harming site rankings. Spamhaus notes that URL shorteners are frequently used by spammers, leading to blocklisting of these services, which then affects email deliverability. Furthermore, the RFC Editor explains that excessive redirects can slow browsing and trigger security warnings. Similarly, Cloudflare support explains that multiple redirects increase latency and can trigger security warnings, impacting user experience and deliverability.
Technical article
Documentation from RFC Editor explains that excessive HTTP redirections due to short URLs can slow down browsing experience and might be flagged by security software due to potential phishing attempts.
24 Jun 2023 - RFC Editor
Technical article
Documentation from Google Search Central explains that cloaking or sneaky redirects are a violation of Google's Webmaster Guidelines because they present different content to users than to search engine crawlers. This can harm your site's ranking.
7 Oct 2022 - Google Search Central
Are link shorteners bad for email marketing?
Do long URLs affect email spam filtering?
Are Bitly links bad for email deliverability?
How do public URL shorteners affect email deliverability and what are the best practices for app download links in email?
Is it bad to use Bitly links in email marketing?
How do URL shorteners and domain reputation impact email deliverability?
How do multiple or long links affect email deliverability?
© 2025 Suped Pty Ltd