Which tool is better for DMARC beginners?

Centera DMARC Compliance is generally more beginner-friendly with its guided setup and simpler interface. Report-URI requires a greater understanding of DMARC and email protocols.

Can I monitor other security policies with these tools?

Report-URI offers broader monitoring capabilities beyond DMARC, including Content Security Policy (CSP), TLS-Reporting, and Expect-CT. Centera DMARC Compliance primarily focuses on DMARC.

Do these platforms offer SPF flattening?

Centera DMARC Compliance provides tools for SPF flattening to help manage SPF records. Report-URI does not offer this feature directly, requiring manual management.

Which tool is better for MSPs?

Both offer multi-tenancy. Report-URI suits MSPs with technical staff for deep client analysis. Centera is better for MSPs seeking a more streamlined and guided client onboarding and management experience for DMARC.

Compare product functionality

Feature set

Report-URI provides a robust platform for aggregating and analyzing DMARC, SPF, and DKIM reports. It excels in offering granular data visualization, allowing us to drill down into specific sending sources, authentication failures, and overall DMARC compliance rates. The platform is designed for those who prefer to directly interact with their email security data, offering extensive filtering and search capabilities.

Beyond DMARC, Report-URI also supports other security policies like Content Security Policy (CSP), TLS-Reporting, and Expect-CT, making it a versatile tool for web security professionals. Its focus is primarily on detailed reporting and monitoring, giving users the tools to understand complex email flows and identify potential threats or misconfigurations. We find it to be quite powerful if you know your way around DMARC.

Centera DMARC Compliance offers a more guided approach to DMARC implementation and management. Its features are geared towards simplifying the process of achieving DMARC enforcement, especially for organizations that may not have dedicated email security experts. The platform focuses on providing actionable insights and clear recommendations to move domains from monitoring to quarantine or reject policies.

While it provides essential DMARC reporting and analysis, Centera also emphasizes a streamlined user experience, aiming to make complex DMARC concepts more accessible. It often includes features like guided setup wizards and health checks that help users identify and resolve DMARC issues with less manual effort. This makes it a good option for those seeking a more hands-on, supportive journey to compliance.

How easy is each product to use

User experience

Report-URI's user experience caters to a more technical audience. The dashboard provides a wealth of information through various charts and tables, which can be initially overwhelming for newcomers to DMARC. However, for those familiar with email protocols and data analysis, the interface offers deep customization and powerful filtering options, allowing for precise investigation.

Setting up Report-URI involves configuring DNS records, which is standard, but interpreting the initial data and navigating the comprehensive reporting features requires some learning. We've found that once you understand its structure, the system becomes very efficient for identifying specific email traffic patterns or issues. It doesn't hold your hand, but provides the tools you need.

Centera DMARC Compliance aims for a more intuitive and guided user experience. The interface is generally cleaner and less cluttered, making it easier for users to grasp the core aspects of their DMARC posture quickly. We appreciate how it often simplifies complex data into digestible summaries and clear action items, reducing the cognitive load on the user.

The platform frequently incorporates wizards or checklists to guide users through the DMARC journey, from initial setup to enforcement. This approach is particularly beneficial for those who are new to DMARC or have limited technical resources, as it minimizes guesswork and helps prevent common misconfigurations. It's designed to be approachable and to lead you towards compliance.

Which product has the best support

Support

Report-URI typically offers support through documentation and community channels, with paid plans often including more direct email or ticket-based support. Given its technical depth, the extensive documentation is crucial for users to leverage its full capabilities. We've found the self-service resources to be quite thorough, covering many advanced use cases.

For very specific or complex issues, direct support can be effective, but the expectation is that users have a certain level of technical understanding. The support model aligns with its target audience of technically proficient users who can often find answers through detailed guides or by asking specific questions to a responsive support team. You won't find hand-holding here, but expert answers.

Centera DMARC Compliance often emphasizes a more hands-on and consultative support experience. This can include personalized onboarding, guidance through DMARC policy changes, and direct assistance with troubleshooting. Their support is designed to bridge the knowledge gap for users who might be less familiar with the intricacies of email authentication.

We've observed that Centera's support aims to be a partner in achieving DMARC compliance, offering advice and proactive suggestions. This level of engagement can be invaluable for organizations seeking not just a tool, but also expertise to navigate their DMARC journey effectively. Their focus is on ensuring you understand and successfully implement DMARC.

Who should use each product

Suitability

Report-URI is best suited for organizations with in-house technical expertise, such as IT security teams, developers, or network administrators, who need granular control and deep insights into their email and web security policies. It's a powerful tool for those who want to analyze raw data and manage multiple security standards. For MSPs, it offers the technical capability to manage diverse client needs, provided they have the internal resources to configure and interpret the data for each client.

Enterprise-level organizations with complex email environments and a need for detailed, customizable reporting will find Report-URI highly capable. SMBs, however, might find its technical depth challenging without dedicated staff or external consulting, making it less ideal for them unless they have very specific, advanced requirements that outweigh the complexity.

Centera DMARC Compliance is ideal for organizations seeking a more managed and user-friendly path to DMARC compliance, particularly those with limited in-house email security expertise or IT staff. Its guided approach and focus on actionable recommendations make it suitable for companies that want to achieve enforcement without deep technical diving. MSPs can leverage Centera to provide DMARC services to their clients with a simpler onboarding and management overhead, as the platform streamlines many complex steps.

SMBs will likely find Centera a more approachable solution due to its focus on ease of use and supportive resources. Enterprise clients can also benefit from Centera, especially if they prefer a solution that simplifies DMARC management across numerous domains and offers dedicated support to ensure compliance at scale, without requiring their teams to become DMARC experts.

How does Report-URI compare with Centera DMARC Compliance?

DMARC report analysis

Aggregating and visualizing DMARC XML and RUA reports for insights into email traffic.

Source detection

Identifying legitimate and unauthorized email sending sources.

Forward detection

Ability to track and identify email forwarding behavior.

Spoof detection

Detecting email spoofing attempts against your domain.

Notifications and alerts

Automated alerts for DMARC policy changes or critical events.

Reporting

Generating comprehensive reports on DMARC compliance and email security.

API

Programmatic access to DMARC data and management features.

Not a primary feature

Multi-tenancy

Managing multiple domains or client accounts from a single interface.

SPF flattening

Tools to manage and optimize SPF records to avoid lookup limits.

Not offered directly

Hosted DMARC

Managing your DMARC record directly through the platform.

Requires manual DNS management

BIMI

Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).

Not a focus

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Monitoring for MTA-STS and TLS-RPT policies.

Blocklists and reputation

Monitoring email blocklists (or blacklists) and sender reputation.

Out of scope

AI copilot

AI-powered assistance for DMARC analysis and recommendations.

Not available

DNS monitoring

Monitoring DNS records beyond DMARC.

Limited to DMARC

Self hostable

Option to host the DMARC reporting solution on your own infrastructure.

SaaS only

Free trial/free tier

Availability of a free option to try the service.

Offers a free plan

No public free trial/tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Report-URI, while powerful, can be intimidating for those new to DMARC, requiring a higher degree of technical proficiency to extract its full value. Its interface, though information-rich, lacks the guided assistance that some users might prefer. On the other hand, Centera DMARC Compliance, despite its user-friendly approach, might not offer the same level of raw data access and advanced customization that technical users or large enterprises with specific needs might desire. Its focus on simplification could be perceived as a limitation for in-depth analysis.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

5 / 5(1)

0 / 5(0)

Monitoring for PROs

5.0 / 5

What do you like best about Report URI? What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. What do you dislike about Report URI? Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks Recommendations to others considering Report URI: Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you? It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.

Vasilis Filippos S.

Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Neither Report-URI nor Centera DMARC Compliance publicly lists their pricing, requiring direct contact for quotes.

Small

Up to 10k emails / month

Contact for pricing

Medium

Up to 100k emails / month

Contact for pricing

Large

Up to 1 million emails / month

Contact for pricing

Enterprise

Over 1 million emails / month

Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Report-URI or Centera DMARC Compliance?

Try Suped

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services

DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix

Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly

Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail

Get started - free

Suped

Report-URI vs Centera DMARC Compliance

Feature set

User experience

Support

Suitability

How does Report-URI compare with Centera DMARC Compliance?

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

What makes Suped different

Frequently asked questions

Suped