What's the main difference in their DMARC reporting approaches?

MailHardener focuses on user-friendly dashboards and actionable insights with comprehensive email security features. Report-URI provides more raw, granular DMARC data, catering to users who prefer in-depth manual analysis and integration with custom tools.

Which tool is better for DMARC beginners?

MailHardener is generally more suitable for DMARC beginners due to its intuitive interface, guided setup, and clear visualizations that simplify complex DMARC reports.

Can either tool help with SPF or DKIM issues?

Yes, MailHardener offers comprehensive monitoring and tools for SPF and DKIM alongside DMARC, including SPF flattening. Report-URI primarily focuses on DMARC reporting, though issues with SPF and DKIM will be reflected in DMARC failures.

Do they support other email security standards like BIMI or MTA-STS?

MailHardener provides guidance and monitoring for BIMI and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT. Report-URI's focus is more strictly on DMARC reporting and does not include explicit support for these additional standards.

What are the free options for each service?

MailHardener offers a generous free tier for basic DMARC monitoring. Report-URI also has a limited free tier, typically for one domain with basic functionality, but its full pricing details are not publicly listed.

MailHardener vs Report-URI

Choose MailHardener for comprehensive DMARC, or Report-URI for focused monitoring.

0 / 5(0)

Compare to Suped

5 / 5(1)

Compare to Suped

Compare product functionality

Feature set

MailHardener offers a robust suite of tools for email security beyond just DMARC reporting. It provides comprehensive monitoring for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, coupled with an intuitive interface that simplifies complex data. We found its automated analysis particularly useful for quickly identifying sending sources and potential issues.

The platform excels in guiding users through DMARC policy enforcement, helping to achieve a `p=reject` policy with greater confidence. Its features extend to SPF flattening, DNS monitoring, and even BIMI, making it a more holistic email security management solution.

Report-URI, while primarily focused on DMARC, delivers a powerful and highly granular reporting engine. It provides access to raw DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, allowing technical users to dive deep into the data with advanced filtering and search capabilities. We appreciate its commitment to presenting the underlying report data.

This tool is ideal for those who prefer to parse and analyze the raw data themselves, or integrate it with other systems using its extensive API. While its core strength is DMARC, it also offers basic reporting for other security policies, but not with the same breadth as MailHardener.

How easy is each product to use

User experience

MailHardener provides a clean, modern, and highly visual dashboard that makes understanding DMARC reports straightforward. The user interface is designed for clarity, with graphs and charts that quickly highlight trends and issues. We found the guided setup process and tooltips especially helpful for navigating the initial configuration.

Even users who are new to DMARC can get started relatively quickly due to the platform's focus on user-friendliness and actionable insights. It presents complex data in an easily digestible format, reducing the steep learning curve often associated with email authentication protocols.

Report-URI's user experience caters more to the technically proficient audience. While functional, its interface is less visually driven and prioritizes detailed data tables and filtering options over highly graphical representations. We observed that getting the most out of it often requires a solid understanding of DMARC and report parsing.

The strength here lies in its powerful filtering and searching capabilities, which allow for granular investigation. However, for those less familiar with DMARC specifics, the sheer volume of raw data can feel overwhelming, leading to a steeper learning curve compared to more guided solutions.

Which product has the best support

Support

MailHardener offers responsive customer support, typically through email, and sometimes live chat. We found their team knowledgeable and quick to assist with configuration challenges and DMARC policy adjustments. They also provide a comprehensive knowledge base and detailed guides.

The quality of support is often crucial when implementing DMARC, and MailHardener's team demonstrates a commitment to helping users navigate the complexities of email authentication effectively.

Report-URI's support typically relies on extensive online documentation and community forums. Direct email support is available, but it's often more geared towards technical inquiries rather than guided setup. We've found their documentation to be thorough for those who prefer self-service.

Given its technical focus, users of Report-URI are often expected to have a good grasp of the underlying technologies, and the support model reflects this, emphasizing resources for independent problem-solving.

Who should use each product

Suitability

MailHardener is particularly well-suited for a broad range of users. Small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) will appreciate its guided setup and clear dashboards, which demystify DMARC. Marketing and IT teams benefit from its comprehensive scope, covering SPF, DKIM, and DMARC in one place. For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), MailHardener offers specific multi-tenancy features and plans designed to streamline client management, making it an excellent choice for offering DMARC services.

We recommend MailHardener for organizations seeking a complete, user-friendly email security platform that provides actionable insights without requiring deep technical expertise in every aspect of DMARC.

Report-URI is best for organizations with dedicated security teams or highly technical administrators who prefer direct access to raw DMARC data. It shines for enterprise-level deployments where granular control and custom integration with existing security systems are priorities. For SMBs without dedicated security personnel, its less visual interface and raw data focus might present a steeper learning curve. MSPs might find it less efficient for managing multiple clients due to a lack of explicit multi-tenancy features.

We believe Report-URI is an excellent fit for those who want to build their own analysis tools on top of robust DMARC data, or who require the most detailed view of their email authentication efforts without the interpretation layer provided by other tools.

How does MailHardener compare with Report-URI?

DMARC report analysis

How well each product processes and presents DMARC reports.

Comprehensive, with clear visualization and guided insights.

Raw data focused, with powerful filtering capabilities.

Source detection

Ability to identify email sending sources from DMARC data.

Automated identification of sending sources and classification.

Requires more manual interpretation of aggregate data.

Forward detection

Detection of email forwarding in DMARC reports.

Clearly distinguishes and visualizes forwarded email streams.

Data allows inference, but is less explicitly presented.

Spoof detection

Identifies unauthorized use of your domain.

Highlights potential spoofing attempts and their sources.

Shows unauthorized senders based on DMARC policy results.

Notifications and alerts

System for alerting users to changes or threats.

Configurable alerts for policy changes, threat levels, and more.

Basic email alerts for report reception.

Reporting

Options for generating and exporting reports.

Scheduled, exportable reports with actionable insights.

Aggregated data logs suitable for custom querying and export.

API

Availability of an Application Programming Interface.

Full API for integration and data retrieval.

Comprehensive API for data export and integration.

Multi-tenancy

Features for managing multiple domains or clients.

Dedicated features and plans for MSPs to manage clients.

Not designed for managing multiple client domains easily.

SPF flattening

Tools to manage complex SPF records.

Provides tools to manage and 'flatten' complex SPF records.

Does not offer direct SPF flattening.

Hosted DMARC

Assistance with DMARC record management.

Assistance with DMARC record creation and policy management.

Provides DMARC record guidance as a reporting service.

BIMI

Supports Brand Indicators for Message Identification.

Guidance and tools for BIMI implementation and monitoring.

Focuses purely on DMARC, no BIMI support.

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Support for email encryption and transport security.

Offers monitoring and setup assistance for these protocols.

No support for these transport security protocols.

Blocklists and reputation

Monitors domain reputation and blocklist status.

Integrates some reputation and blocklist checks.

Does not include reputation monitoring.

AI copilot

Leverages artificial intelligence for insights.

AI-powered insights and recommendations for DMARC policy.

No AI features for DMARC analysis.

DNS monitoring

Monitors various DNS records.

Monitors various DNS records beyond DMARC.

Limited to DMARC-related DNS checks.

Self hostable

Option to host the software on your own servers.

Cloud-based SaaS solution only.

Free trial/free tier

Availability of free access to the service.

Generous free tier available for basic DMARC monitoring.

Limited free tier with basic functionality for one domain.

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering drawbacks, MailHardener's primary concern is its relative lack of publicly available reviews, which makes it harder to gauge broad user sentiment. For Report-URI, while it's a powerful tool, its interface can be less intuitive for DMARC newcomers, and we noticed a peculiar issue with one of its public reviews.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

0 / 5(0)

5 / 5(1)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Monitoring for PROs

5.0 / 5

What do you like best about Report URI? What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. What do you dislike about Report URI? Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks Recommendations to others considering Report URI: Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you? It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.

Vasilis Filippos S.

Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)