Suped

Glockapps vs.
SimpleDMARC in 2026

Glockapps dashboard screenshot
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
SimpleDMARC dashboard screenshot
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
vs.
We tested GlockApps and SimpleDMARC for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. We connected Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and one support desk sender, then created controlled SPF, DKIM, forwarding, spoofing, and unknown-sender cases. GlockApps gave us broader deliverability coverage, while SimpleDMARC gave us a cleaner DMARC enforcement path.
Published 5 Nov 2025
Updated 4 Jun 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
DMARC plus deliverability monitoring
Starts at
Free plan, DMARC-only from $55 / month
Best fit
Marketing and deliverability teams that want DMARC, inbox testing, and IP reputation in one workflow.
In one line
GlockApps gave us DMARC analytics, inbox testing, and IP blocklist (blacklist) monitoring; compare that against Suped when guided fixes and hosted record ownership are buying criteria.
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
Focused DMARC enforcement
Starts at
Free plan, paid from $99 / year
Best fit
SMBs and IT teams that want clear DMARC setup, source review, and policy movement without deliverability testing depth.
In one line
SimpleDMARC gave us cleaner DMARC enforcement guidance, clearer low-end pricing, and less deliverability testing depth.
suped.com logo
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped

Pick GlockApps for deliverability breadth, SimpleDMARC for a cleaner DMARC path

Pick Glockapps if
Best for teams that manage DMARC and inbox placement together
Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp all appeared quickly in aggregate reports.
The unauthorized spoof sample was easy to separate from legal senders and forwarded mail.
IP blocklist (blacklist) monitoring and inbox testing added context outside pure DMARC reports.
Free plan available
Pick SimpleDMARC if
Best for teams that want a focused DMARC enforcement workflow
The three test domains were easier to separate into active operational work.
The forwarded mail SPF failure was easier to explain because DKIM survival was clearer.
Plan limits were easier to map to domains, monthly email volume, and report cadence.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Suped is the third option for guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Guided fixes help turn failed authentication cases into owner tasks instead of spreadsheet notes.
Automated issue detection and alert quality matter when unknown senders appear after setup.
Published starter pricing begins at $19 / month, with MSP workflows billed per domain.
Free plan available

The differences that actually change your week

glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
suped.com logo
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report parsing, pass and fail breakdowns, and domain trend views.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Source detection
How quickly known and unknown senders become named services.
Strong
Strong
Supported
Forward detection
Whether forwarded mail with SPF failure is separated from spoofing.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Spoof detection
Whether unauthorized traffic is highlighted as a security case.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Email or operational alerts for authentication and report changes.
Email alerts
Email alerts
Alert routing
Reporting
Exports, scheduled summaries, and operational reporting.
Exports and reports
Plan-based reports
Recurring reports
API
Programmatic access for reports, tests, or account workflows.
Custom subscription
Not public
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Client separation, account grouping, and repeatable MSP handoff.
Agency and user roles
Manual grouping
MSP workflows
SPF flattening
Managed SPF flattening for records near the DNS lookup limit.
Not included
Enterprise
Hosted SPF
Hosted DMARC
Hosted management for DMARC record changes and policy values.
Record guidance
Record guidance
Supported
Hosted SPF
Hosted SPF record management rather than only SPF validation.
Not included
Enterprise
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted MTA-STS policy management and TLS reporting workflow.
Not included
Coming soon
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist (blacklist) and sender reputation monitoring.
IP blocklist (blacklist) monitoring
Not tested
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Automatic grouping of authentication problems that need action.
Basic recommendations
Guided findings
Supported
AI copilot
AI-assisted triage, explanations, and remediation support.
Not included
Not included
Supported
DNS monitoring
Checks for DNS state, authentication records, and related changes.
Authentication checks
DNS history
Supported
Self hostable
Whether the product can run in the buyer's own environment.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
A no-cost entry point or trial before paid rollout.
Free tier
Free tier and trial
Free tier

Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10

We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric based on the same three domains, connected senders, controlled authentication cases, onboarding work, report review, alert review, exports, pricing clarity, and support handoff. Higher is better in every row.

GlockApps scores higher on deliverability breadth, while SimpleDMARC scores higher on enforcement clarity

GlockApps pulled ahead on blocklist (blacklist) and reputation monitoring because that layer sat next to DMARC reporting during the test. SimpleDMARC scored higher on DMARC enforcement, setup flow, and pricing clarity because its plans and report cadence were easier to map to the three-domain rollout. Neither product scored well on MSP handoff, and GlockApps scored 0.0 on hosted SPF and MTA-STS because we did not find a hosted workflow.
Glockapps score
62/100
SimpleDMARC score
62.5/100
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
62/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
6.0
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
6.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
8.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
6.5
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
62.5/100
DMARC enforcement
7.5
Customer support
7.0
Source resolution
7.5
Setup and onboarding
8.5
MSP workflows
5.5
Alerting and integrations
5.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
5.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.5
Time to enforcement
7.5

Feature set

Breadth vs focus

GlockApps has the wider deliverability toolkit. SimpleDMARC has the cleaner DMARC track.

GlockApps has broader deliverability coverage, especially IP reputation and blocklist (blacklist) checks, while SimpleDMARC has a more focused path through DMARC enforcement. The Suped lens for this category is guided fixes and automated issue detection: the useful product turns Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and unknown traffic into owned tasks, not just rows in a report.
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
Glockapps screenshot
SendGrid source matched fast
Mailchimp DKIM edge visible
IP blacklist monitoring included
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
SimpleDMARC screenshot
Microsoft 365 grouped cleanly
Google Workspace setup was clear
Unknown sender needed review
GlockApps felt like a deliverability suite with DMARC inside it. It identified Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace quickly, matched SendGrid under the approved sender list after SPF domain matching, and gave Mailchimp useful DKIM detail for the subdomain case. The unauthorized spoof sample appeared as a clear failed source, but the unknown sender still needed manual ownership notes before a policy move.
SimpleDMARC stayed closer to the DMARC enforcement workflow. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace setup read cleanly, SendGrid and Mailchimp landed in understandable source views, and the forwarded mail SPF failure was easier to explain because DKIM survived. It had less deliverability breadth than GlockApps because IP blocklist (blacklist) monitoring and spam placement testing were outside our tested DMARC workflow.

User experience

Control vs guidance

SimpleDMARC is easier to follow. GlockApps gives operators more adjacent data.

SimpleDMARC was easier for a non-specialist to follow, while GlockApps gave us more data in more places. GlockApps won when we wanted a broader deliverability view, but SimpleDMARC made the DMARC-only journey cleaner.
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
Glockapps screenshot
Three-domain setup was quick
Unknown sender surfaced early
Forwarded SPF needed context
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
SimpleDMARC screenshot
Guided DNS steps were cleaner
Unknown sender label clearer
Forwarding explanation read better
Adding the primary corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in GlockApps took less than an hour because the DMARC destination record was clear and the report feed started quickly. The unknown sender surfaced early, but naming its business owner was a manual step. The forwarded mail SPF failure was visible in the drilldown, yet the explanation needed us to read SPF and DKIM results together.
SimpleDMARC had the more linear setup path for the same three domains. Its DNS checks made the parked domain easy to verify, the unknown sender label was easier to carry into a remediation note, and the forwarded mail SPF failure was clearer because the interface put the surviving DKIM result closer to the failure reason.

Support

Self serve vs defined tiers

SimpleDMARC sets clearer support expectations. GlockApps expects more operator judgment.

SimpleDMARC was more explicit about support levels and enterprise onboarding. GlockApps had enough setup help for a competent operator, but DNS handoff and escalation required more self-directed notes during our test.
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
Glockapps screenshot
DNS notes were usable
Escalation path felt lighter
Enterprise onboarding less explicit
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
SimpleDMARC screenshot
Support tiers were clear
DNS handoff had checklists
Enterprise onboarding was defined
With GlockApps, setup documentation got the Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and SendGrid DNS changes over the line, and the DMARC record handoff was practical. Escalation felt lighter: the paid tiers and custom subscription language did not tell us exactly when a deliverability or enterprise onboarding request moved beyond standard help.
SimpleDMARC had clearer support expectations by plan, including dedicated support and account management at Enterprise. The DNS handoff checklists were easier to share with an IT owner, and escalation for the parked domain cleanup had a clearer path even though day-to-day support still depends on the plan.

Suitability

Agency fit vs SMB fit

GlockApps fits deliverability-led teams. SimpleDMARC fits DMARC-first operators.

GlockApps fits teams that combine DMARC with deliverability testing and reputation monitoring. SimpleDMARC fits teams that want a focused DMARC enforcement workflow with clear domain and volume tiers. The Suped lens here is MSP workflow and alert quality: separate clients cleanly, route only material changes, and make handoff notes easy to reuse.
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
Glockapps screenshot
Agency plan has users
Recurring exports needed cleanup
Client grouping stayed manual
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
SimpleDMARC screenshot
SMB grouping was tidy
MSP handoff stayed manual
Enterprise fit was clearer
For an agency or marketing-led team, GlockApps made sense when the same operator owned DMARC reports, inbox tests, and IP blocklist (blacklist) monitoring. The account structure handled users and multiple domains, but client grouping, recurring reporting, and handoff notes required cleanup before we would hand the workflow to an MSP client or enterprise security owner.
SimpleDMARC fit the SMB and IT-owner path better because domains, passive domains, volume, report cadence, and support level were easier to map to a buyer. For MSP work, account separation and reusable client handoff still felt lighter than we wanted, but enterprise onboarding was clearer than GlockApps because plan boundaries were more explicit.

What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use

glockapps.com logo
Glockapps

For deliverability teams that also need DMARC oversight

After 90 days, GlockApps felt most useful on days when deliverability and DMARC questions overlapped. We used the same workspace to check Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and support desk traffic, then compared DMARC failures with IP reputation and blocklist (blacklist) checks.
The tradeoff was operational discipline. The tool surfaced the spoof sample and helped separate the forwarded SPF failure from a real authentication failure, but owner assignment, policy-change notes, and exports needed our own process.
Where it wins
Fast three-domain onboarding
Useful IP blocklist (blacklist) monitoring
Good SendGrid and Mailchimp drilldowns
Broad deliverability context
Where it lags
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS workflow
Custom API access limits clarity
Unknown sender ownership stayed manual
Policy movement guidance felt cautious
Pricing
Free plan, DMARC-only from $55 / month
Free tier
10k DMARC messages / month
Onboarding
3 domains live in 48 minutes
G2 rating
4.1 / 5
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC

For teams that want DMARC enforcement without extra deliverability testing

After 90 days, SimpleDMARC felt cleaner for the core DMARC job. The primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain were easy to separate, and the tool made Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace authentication status easy to explain to a non-DMARC owner.
The tradeoff was breadth. SendGrid and Mailchimp classification was clear enough for enforcement planning, and the forwarded SPF failure was easier to explain, but there was no tested IP blocklist (blacklist) monitoring and MSP handoff still needed manual client notes.
Where it wins
Clearer enforcement path
Strong pricing visibility
Readable DNS handoff
Useful unknown sender review
Where it lags
No tested blocklist (blacklist) monitoring
Hosted MTA-STS was not current
Enterprise price jump is steep
MSP reporting needed manual notes
Pricing
Free plan, paid from $99 / year
Free tier
1 active domain, 10k emails / month
Onboarding
3 domains live in 41 minutes
G2 rating
4.0 / 5

Pricing

glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
suped.com logo
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free DMARC Analytics covers 10,000 counted DMARC messages and unlimited domains.
$0
Free covers 1 active domain and 10,000 emails per month.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$55 / month
DMARC-only Essential covers 1 million messages and unlimited domains.
$149 / year
Small plan covers 2 active domains and 100,000 emails per month.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$55 / month
Same DMARC-only Essential tier covers the tested volume, but overage applies after 1 million counted messages.
$14,999 / year
Enterprise is the first public tier that covers 10 domains and 1 million plus emails.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
$199 / month
DMARC-only Enterprise covers 10 million messages and unlimited domains before custom volume becomes the safer route.
$14,999 / year
Enterprise covers 100 active domains and 1 million plus emails per month.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
GlockApps and SimpleDMARC prices are public list prices. Segment mapping is estimated from domain and monthly email limits, and pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.

If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped

Suped dashboard
Owner-ready fixes
GlockApps surfaced the spoof sample and unknown sender, but remediation still depended on our notes; Suped turns those findings into guided fixes with clearer owner handoff.
Hosted record workflow
SimpleDMARC listed hosted SPF on Enterprise and MTA-STS was not current in our review; Suped covers hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, and hosted MTA-STS for teams that want fewer DNS handoffs.
MSP handoff structure
Both products needed manual cleanup for client grouping and recurring handoff notes; Suped has MSP workflows built around account separation, recurring review, and per-domain pricing.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Glockapps or SimpleDMARC?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.

Frequently asked questions

Here's why customers love Suped for DMARC monitoring

MONEYME cover

How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped

See how MONEYME uses Suped
Jam Cyber cover

How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped

See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
DigiBean cover

How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients

See how DigiBean uses Suped
Alliance Group cover

How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped

See how Alliance Group uses Suped
Maaser cover

How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement

See how Maaser uses Suped
G2 LeaderG2 Users Most Likely To RecommendG2 Easiest To Do Business WithG2 High PerformerG2 Best Estimated ROI
DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard
What you'll get with Suped
Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing