Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark vs.
Eunetic in 2026

Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark

Eunetic
vs.
We ran both products for 90 days across a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender feeding DMARC reports. Postmark's free weekly digest worked as a lightweight email checkpoint, and Eunetic gave us a broader free analyzer; neither product gave us enough guided enforcement workflow on its own.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Email-only DMARC weekly reporting
Starts at
$0
Best fit
Personal domains and small teams that want a no-cost weekly checkpoint
In one line
It summarized our top sending sources by email, but teams that need guided fixes, source ownership, and published starter pricing should compare that workflow with Suped's product.
Eunetic
Free DMARC report analyzer
Starts at
$0
Best fit
SMBs that want free in-app DMARC analysis and can handle manual triage
In one line
It gave us a usable analyzer for SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and source review, with less clarity around alerts, handoff, and enforcement steps.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
The blunt route to the right product
Pick Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark if
Choose Postmark's free weekly digest for a low-risk domain that only needs a periodic DMARC pulse
The primary corporate domain verified quickly after we added the DMARC reporting address.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared in the weekly summary without a dashboard setup step.
The parked domain's lack of mail was easy to confirm, but deeper investigation stopped at the email report.
Free plan available
Pick Eunetic if
Choose Eunetic when a free dashboard matters more than guided remediation
SendGrid and Mailchimp were easier to compare in one screen than in Postmark's weekly email.
The unknown sender was findable in the analyzer, although we still had to classify ownership manually.
The SPF failure on forwarded mail was visible with authentication detail, but the explanation needed operator judgement.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Use Suped as the third option when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Guided fixes turn unknown senders, mismatched visible domains, and forwarding failures into owner-ready tasks.
Automated issue detection and alert quality matter when weekly summaries create too much delay.
Published starter pricing and MSP workflows make multi-domain rollout easier to budget and hand off.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Eunetic
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Whether aggregate reports are parsed into usable sender and authentication views.
Weekly email only
Dashboard analyzer
Supported
Source detection
Whether the tool identifies sending services instead of only showing raw IPs.
Top sources only
Sender identification
Supported
Forward detection
Whether forwarded mail with SPF failure gets separated from real sender failure.
Manual workflow
Partial
Supported
Spoof detection
Whether unauthorized use is called out clearly enough to investigate.
Email digest only
Unauthorized use flagged
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Whether alerts arrive when something changes, not only as a periodic report.
Weekly notification
Not tested
Supported
Reporting
Whether recurring summaries or report views are available for review.
Weekly reporting
In-app reporting history
Supported
API
Whether report or account data can be accessed programmatically.
Metadata only
Not publicly listed
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Whether agencies or MSPs can separate client accounts cleanly.
Not supported
Not publicly listed
Supported
SPF flattening
Whether SPF lookup limits can be managed through the product.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Whether the product can host or manage the DMARC record workflow.
Record setup only
Record setup only
Supported
Hosted SPF
Whether the product hosts managed SPF records.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Whether the product hosts MTA-STS policy and related TLS reporting workflow.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Whether blocklist or blacklist monitoring is part of the DMARC workflow.
No blocklist monitoring
Adjacent product only
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Whether the tool automatically calls out authentication or policy problems.
Email recommendations
Issue detection
Supported
AI copilot
Whether natural language help is available for DMARC investigation and fixes.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
DNS monitoring
Whether DNS record changes and misconfigurations are monitored after setup.
Verification only
Not publicly listed
Supported
Self hostable
Whether the product can be deployed and operated on your own infrastructure.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
Whether a free entry point is available for the DMARC reporting product.
Free tier
Free analyzer
Free tier
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric covering setup, source resolution, enforcement readiness, support, operations, pricing clarity, and adjacent security workflow. Higher is better in every row, and a 0.0 means the product did not support that capability in our test scope.
Postmark wins on quick setup and price clarity; Eunetic wins on analyzer depth and sender review.
Postmark's free weekly digest was faster to start, but the email-only workflow limited source ownership, alerting, and policy movement. Eunetic gave us a better place to review SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the unknown sender, but support boundaries, alert routing, and enterprise handoff stayed unclear. Both scored 0.0 where the DMARC reporting product did not include hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, or blocklist monitoring.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark score
30/100
Eunetic score
36.5/100
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
30/100
DMARC enforcement
2.5
Customer support
3.0
Source resolution
4.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
0.0
Alerting and integrations
1.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
9.0
Time to enforcement
2.5
Eunetic
36.5/100
DMARC enforcement
4.0
Customer support
4.0
Source resolution
6.5
Setup and onboarding
6.5
MSP workflows
2.0
Alerting and integrations
2.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
4.5
Feature set
Digest vs analyzer
Eunetic has the broader DMARC analysis surface; Postmark is the cleaner weekly checkpoint.
Eunetic gave us more room to inspect the Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp streams, especially when the unknown sender needed classification. The buying criterion is whether detection turns into guided fixes: our visible-from mismatch and spoof sample still needed owner assignment and clear repair steps, which is where Suped's product belongs in the comparison.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark

Microsoft 365 appeared by week two
Top ten source cap mattered
Forwarded SPF needed manual explanation
Eunetic

SendGrid and Mailchimp grouped clearly
Unknown sender needed review
Subdomain DKIM was visible
Postmark's free weekly digest worked best when the source list was already familiar. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared as expected, SendGrid was visible once the marketing subdomain started sending, and the unauthorized spoof sample appeared as a failed source in the email summary. The cap on top sources and IP detail mattered after Mailchimp, the support desk sender, and the unknown sender all produced traffic in the same week.
Eunetic gave us a fuller review surface for the same traffic. We compared SendGrid and Mailchimp, confirmed the DKIM pass on the marketing subdomain, and inspected the SPF pass with visible-from mismatch without waiting for a weekly email. The unknown sender was easier to find than in Postmark, but Eunetic still left the final classification and owner handoff to us.
User experience
Speed vs working room
Postmark gets you started faster; Eunetic gives you more room to investigate.
Postmark had the lightest onboarding because the workflow was mostly DNS setup and a weekly email. Eunetic took more attention during setup, but it paid back when we needed to find the unknown sender and explain the forwarded mail SPF failure.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark

Three domains verified quickly
Unknown sender hid in email
Forwarding context was thin
Eunetic

Parked domain stayed readable
Unknown sender easier to find
Forwarding still needed context
Postmark was quickest across the three test domains. The primary domain verified first, the marketing subdomain followed after its DMARC record was added, and the parked domain was easy to confirm as quiet. The downside appeared during triage: the unknown sender was buried inside the weekly email context, and the forwarded SPF failure needed a separate explanation before a non-specialist could understand why DKIM still saved the message.
Eunetic asked for more setup input, then gave us a steadier workspace. The parked domain stayed clean in the analyzer, the marketing subdomain's DKIM pass was easy to separate from the root domain, and the unknown sender was easier to isolate. The forwarded SPF failure was visible in authentication results, but Eunetic did not turn it into a plain-language handoff note.
Support
Self serve boundaries
Both products fit self-serve setup better than complex support handoff.
Postmark's free weekly product gave us enough DNS setup guidance for a small rollout, but escalation expectations were narrow. Eunetic's setup path was clear for the analyzer, yet public support and enterprise onboarding detail for the DMARC tool were not specific enough for a high-stakes migration.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark

DNS steps were simple
Escalation path was limited
Enterprise onboarding not defined
Eunetic

Setup copy was direct
Support SLA was unclear
Enterprise handoff not documented
Postmark's support expectations matched a free weekly product. The DMARC TXT record instructions were easy to hand to DNS owners, and the primary domain was receiving weekly reports without a support ticket. When we modeled an enterprise handoff, the gaps were account separation, escalation path, and a clear way to package the forwarded SPF failure for an internal help desk.
Eunetic's DMARC analyzer setup copy was direct, and we did not need help to add the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, or parked domain. The support question came later: public pages did not give us a DMARC-specific SLA, DNS handoff template, or enterprise onboarding path for moving a team toward stricter policy. That left us writing our own escalation notes for the spoof sample and unknown sender.
Suitability
Single domain vs operator workflow
Postmark fits one-domain monitoring; Eunetic fits SMB analysis with manual ownership.
Postmark is the sharper fit when a small team wants a free weekly check on one low-risk domain. Eunetic is better when an SMB operator wants a free analyzer and accepts manual owner assignment. If MSP workflows or alert quality drive the purchase, require client grouping, account separation, recurring reports, and noise-controlled alerts during evaluation; Suped's product is built for that operational pattern.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark

Best for one-domain checks
Weak for client handoff
Recurring report is automatic
Eunetic

Better SMB analyzer fit
Manual client grouping
No recurring handoff notes
Postmark did not feel like an MSP or enterprise product in this test. The weekly digest was useful for a single corporate domain, but account separation, client grouping, and recurring client handoff notes were absent. For the marketing subdomain and parked domain, we had to keep our own tracker to explain which sender belonged to which owner.
Eunetic fit an SMB operator better because the analyzer made domain review less dependent on inbox history. It still did not give us the client grouping, recurring reporting, or handoff structure an MSP would expect. For enterprise use, the missing alert routing and ownership workflow mattered more than the free price.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Best for teams that want a free weekly DMARC pulse, not daily operations
After 90 days, Postmark's free weekly digest felt like a useful check-in rather than a daily DMARC workspace. It told us whether Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender were showing up, and it gave enough signal to spot the unauthorized spoof sample.
The limits were practical. When the unknown sender appeared, we had to wait for the digest, compare it against our own sender inventory, and write a separate owner note. The parked domain was easy, but the marketing subdomain and forwarded SPF failure needed more context than the email could carry.
Where it wins
Fastest setup across the three domains
Clear weekly rhythm for low-risk monitoring
Free price is easy to approve
Useful first signal for spoofing
Where it lags
No working dashboard in the free product
Top-source limits affected busy weeks
Weak fit for MSP account separation
Forwarded mail explanation stayed manual
Pricing
$0
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Fast DNS setup
G2 rating
4.6 / 5
Eunetic
Best for SMB operators who want a free analyzer and can own the follow-through
After 90 days, Eunetic felt more useful when we were actively investigating. The analyzer made SendGrid, Mailchimp, Microsoft 365, and Google Workspace easier to compare, and it gave us a better path to find the unknown sender than searching a weekly email.
The product still depended on an operator to close the loop. We had to explain why the forwarded message failed SPF, decide whether the subdomain DKIM pass was acceptable, and create our own handoff notes for the spoof sample. For a free analyzer, that is workable; for a formal enforcement program, it leaves work on the table.
Where it wins
Better investigation surface than email summaries
Good visibility into authentication results
Free entry point for DMARC analysis
Unknown sender was easier to isolate
Where it lags
No clear MSP handoff workflow
Alert routing was not proven
Enterprise onboarding detail was thin
Policy movement still needed planning
Pricing
$0
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Simple form and DNS update
G2 rating
5.0 / 5
Pricing
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Eunetic
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free weekly email reporting fits one monitored domain with limited source and history detail.
$0
The DMARC analyzer is free to register, with no public paid DMARC tier shown.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
The free weekly product did not publish a 2-domain plan or volume tier.
$0
Public pages did not show a paid volume step for this DMARC analyzer usage.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No public multi-domain tier was listed for the free weekly product.
$0
No public volume price was shown; validate operational limits before relying on it at this scale.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No public enterprise tier was listed for this free weekly product.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
The free analyzer page did not publish enterprise DMARC pricing, limits, or support terms.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
The $0 entries are public list prices for the free DMARC products. Postmark medium, large, and enterprise entries are marked not publicly listed because the free weekly product did not publish multi-domain tiers. Eunetic large-scale and enterprise notes are estimates of fit based on public pages, with pricing checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started

Owner-ready fixes
Postmark's weekly email and Eunetic's analyzer both surfaced the visible-from mismatch, but our test still needed a human to assign SendGrid ownership and write the DNS fix. Suped turns those findings into guided repair work.
Noise-controlled alerts
Postmark relied on weekly email and Eunetic did not give us the alert routing we wanted for the spoof sample. Suped focuses alerts on authentication changes and unauthorized senders instead of routine report noise.
Client handoff
Both products required manual notes for the marketing subdomain, parked domain, and support desk sender. Suped adds MSP workflows for account separation and recurring client reporting.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark or Eunetic?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions

How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped

How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped

How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped

How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped

