Eunetic positions itself primarily as a DMARC report analysis tool, offering a free platform for aggregating and interpreting DMARC reports. Its strength lies in its simplicity and accessibility, making DMARC data understandable for users without deep technical expertise. We found it provided essential insights into email authentication, showing us which sources were passing or failing DMARC, SPF, and DKIM.
While effective for basic DMARC monitoring, Eunetic focuses narrowly on reporting. It provides a clear overview of DMARC compliance and potential issues, but it generally lacks advanced features such as proactive policy enforcement, custom alerts for specific threats, or integration with other email security protocols like BIMI or MTA-STS.
Centera DMARC Compliance aims for comprehensive DMARC management, extending beyond basic reporting to provide a full suite of tools for large organizations. It integrates advanced features for deep analysis, policy enforcement, and proactive threat detection. From our experience, Centera offers more granular control and automated workflows, which are crucial for complex email infrastructures.
We observed that Centera provides capabilities for managing DMARC policies at scale, including features like SPF flattening and hosted DMARC services. It's designed to give administrators a powerful platform to not only monitor DMARC but also to actively manage and enforce policies, reducing spoofing and phishing risks effectively. It often includes support for other standards like BIMI and MTA-STS.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Eunetic's user experience is straightforward and highly intuitive, reflecting its focus on DMARC report analysis. We found the interface to be clean and uncluttered, making it very easy for new users or those less familiar with DMARC to quickly grasp their domain's email authentication status. The setup process for receiving DMARC reports is also quite simple.
The simplicity, however, means fewer customization options for reporting dashboards or alert configurations. While we appreciated the ease of use for initial setup and monitoring, those looking for advanced data manipulation or integration with existing security operations might find it somewhat limited in flexibility.
Centera DMARC Compliance offers a more robust and feature-rich user interface, tailored for administrators managing complex email environments. We experienced a comprehensive dashboard that provides extensive data visualization and numerous configuration options. The initial learning curve is steeper compared to Eunetic, but the depth of control it offers justifies this.
While powerful, the sheer number of features and settings can be overwhelming for users who only need basic DMARC monitoring. However, for those requiring granular policy adjustments, detailed forensic analysis, and advanced reporting, Centera's user experience provides the necessary tools and flexibility, albeit with a bit more navigation.
Which product has the best support
Support
Eunetic, being a free DMARC report analyzer, typically offers community-driven support or a more limited set of direct support channels. Our experience suggests that while basic queries can be answered, complex troubleshooting might require more self-service or reliance on general DMARC knowledge.
For a free service, the support is adequate for its intended purpose of simple report analysis. Users needing in-depth guidance on DMARC implementation or advanced policy adjustments might need to consult external resources or upgrade to a more comprehensive DMARC solution.
Centera DMARC Compliance, targeting enterprise clients, is expected to provide comprehensive support services, including dedicated account managers, technical support, and potentially 24/7 assistance. While we don't have direct access to their full support infrastructure, the nature of their offering necessitates robust customer service.
For complex DMARC deployments, advanced configurations, or when dealing with critical email deliverability issues, having access to expert support is invaluable. We would anticipate Centera to offer multiple tiers of support, ensuring that even the most demanding enterprise needs are met with timely and knowledgeable assistance.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Eunetic is best suited for small businesses (SMBs) and individuals who need a straightforward and free tool to start monitoring their DMARC reports. It's an excellent entry point for understanding email authentication without a financial commitment. Managed Service Providers (MSPs) might find it useful for basic client onboarding, though its limited features would not suffice for comprehensive managed DMARC services.
For enterprise-level organizations, Eunetic's capabilities would likely fall short. Enterprises typically require advanced reporting, automated policy enforcement, and integrations that Eunetic does not offer. Its value is primarily for those with simpler email infrastructures or as a preliminary DMARC monitoring tool.
Centera DMARC Compliance is designed for medium to large enterprises and Managed Service Providers (MSPs) that require a robust, scalable, and feature-rich DMARC management platform. Its advanced capabilities in policy enforcement, detailed reporting, and support for multiple domains make it ideal for organizations with complex email ecosystems and stringent security requirements.
SMBs might find Centera's extensive feature set and probable pricing structure to be overkill for their needs. However, for MSPs looking to offer white-label DMARC services or enterprises needing an all-encompassing solution to combat advanced phishing and spoofing attacks, Centera offers the depth and control required.
How does Eunetic compare with Centera DMARC Compliance?
DMARC report analysis
Aggregating and interpreting DMARC aggregate reports (RUA).
Core offering, free and straightforward
Comprehensive analysis with advanced features
Source detection
Identifying all sending IP addresses and email sources.
Basic identification of senders
Detailed source identification and categorization
Forward detection
Ability to identify email forwarding within reports.
Limited visibility
Advanced forwarding insights
Spoof detection
Identifying malicious emails impersonating your domain.
Basic spoofing visibility
Sophisticated spoofing and threat detection
Notifications and alerts
Automated alerts for DMARC changes or threats.
Minimal alerting capabilities
Customizable alerts for various events
Reporting
Customizable reports and dashboards.
Standard, predefined reports
Advanced, customizable reports and views
API
Programmatic access to DMARC data and functionality.
No public API
API for integration with other systems
Multi-tenancy
Managing multiple domains or client accounts.
Single-domain focused
Designed for multi-domain, multi-client management
SPF flattening
Technique to bypass the 10-lookup SPF limit.
Not included
Integrated SPF flattening service
Hosted DMARC
Managing DMARC DNS records directly through the platform.
Not offered
Hosted DMARC record management
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Not supported
BIMI record management and reporting
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Monitoring and reporting for email encryption standards.
Not supported
MTA-STS and TLS-RPT monitoring
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring domain reputation and blocklist (blacklist) status.
Focus on DMARC only
Reputation monitoring and blocklist checks
AI copilot
AI-driven insights and recommendations.
No AI features
No explicit AI copilot
DNS monitoring
General monitoring of critical DNS records.
Limited to DMARC DNS
Comprehensive DNS health monitoring
Self hostable
Option to host the software on your own servers.
Cloud-based only
Cloud-based only
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free version or trial period.
Completely free DMARC analyzer
Typically offers free trial
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
When considering Eunetic, while its free DMARC report analysis is a clear benefit, we find its scope to be quite narrow. It's excellent for initial insights but doesn't scale well with growing organizational needs or offer the advanced security features demanded by modern email threats. For Centera DMARC Compliance, the primary drawback is the lack of public pricing and user reviews, which makes an informed decision harder without direct engagement. Its enterprise-focused nature also means it might be overly complex and expensive for smaller operations.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
5 / 5(3)
0 / 5(0)
protection at all times
5.0 / 5
What do you like best about EuropeanMX?
I like that it is very lightweight, very easy to use, and it doesn't freeze my computer. It is very intuitive and keeps me protected at all times. I recommend it 100%.
What do you dislike about EuropeanMX?
Everything seems very good to me and I wouldn't change anything, I highly recommend it, as it helps us keep everything protected and thus not have to worry about security, it's one of the best.
What problems is EuropeanMX solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps us keep all emails clean and free of malware or spyware, our computers are protected all the time and that gives us confidence to be able to work.
Jose G.
Analista Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Great Service
5.0 / 5
What do you like best about EuropeanMX?
With EuropeanMX I have finally managed to effectively protect my business from spam and viruses in mail attachments. Setting up the spam filter was easy and took very little time. After switching the MX records to Eunetic's filter cloud, I no longer received any spam. The admin panel of the filter offers lots of setting options, but this is not necessary, as the filter already works great with the default settings.
What do you dislike about EuropeanMX?
Currently I can't think of anything negative about EuropeanMX.
What problems is EuropeanMX solving and how is that benefiting you?
With EuropeanMX I have managed to get my business spam free. The setup was quick and straightforward, which is especially useful for non-professionals. With EuropeanMX we save a lot of time, because we don't have to clean our mailboxes from unwanted messages. Also, the effective filter has reduced the likelihood of accidentally clicking a link to a hacked site, as such mails are directly sorted out. This increases the IT security of my company.
Andreas G.
CEO Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Great email security solution
5.0 / 5
What do you like best about EuropeanMX?
The spam filter works perfectly. Very easy to set up, just change the MX records. No false positives found so far. Personal and fast support :)
What do you dislike about EuropeanMX?
No problems so far, which I hope will stay that way.
Recommendations to others considering EuropeanMX:
Use the 30 day trial to try the spam filter for free.
What problems is EuropeanMX solving and how is that benefiting you?
In the past we had hundreds of SPAM mails in our mailboxes every day. With EuropeanMX we get almost no SPAM / malware anymore.
Verified User in Real Estate
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Pricing
Eunetic offers its DMARC report analyzer free of charge, making it highly accessible, while Centera DMARC Compliance requires direct contact for pricing tailored to enterprise needs.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Free
Contact for pricing
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Free
Contact for pricing
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Free
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Free
Contact for pricing
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with Eunetic or Centera DMARC Compliance?
5 / 5(3)
