Summary
It can be perplexing when your Email Service Provider (ESP) assures you that all email authentication is in order, yet tools like MXToolbox report various errors. This discrepancy often stems from how different tools interpret complex DNS configurations and authentication protocols, particularly with SPF macros. Simultaneously, a common deliverability challenge arises from automated bot activity leading to an unusual surge in unsubscribes, prompting questions about the safety of one-click unsubscribe processes.
Key findings
- Conflicting reports: Testing tools like MXToolbox may show errors (e.g., no SPF or DMARC records) even when your ESP confirms everything passes. This is a common issue that deliverability tools and Postmaster tools often face due to differing interpretation methods.
- SPF macros: Some tools may not correctly interpret advanced SPF configurations, such as those using SPF macros (e.g., exists:%{i}._.spf.sparkpostmail.com). This can lead to false negatives in their reports, suggesting a problem where none exists.
- DMARC alignment: A DMARC record can still pass authentication via DKIM alignment, even if the SPF (RFC5321.From) domain doesn't match the Header From (RFC5322.From) domain. This means your emails are authenticated despite what some tools might imply about SPF.
- Bot unsubscribes: Automated anti-spam checkers or bots can trigger unsubscribes if your unsubscribe link leads directly to an unsubscribe action without an intermediate confirmation step on a web page.
Key considerations
- Thorough DNS verification: Ensure your DNS records, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, are correctly configured. Tools like dnsviz.net can help visualize DNS resolution paths and identify issues like DNSSEC problems.
- Understand ESP implementation: Be aware of how your ESP implements email authentication, especially if they use SPF macros or different subdomains for sending. This knowledge helps reconcile external tool reports with your ESP's claims.
- Implement two-step unsubscribes: Transition from single-click unsubscribes to a process where users click an unsubscribe link in the email, which then takes them to a landing page to confirm their choice with a second click. This mitigates automated unsubscribes.
- Multiple tool validation: Do not rely on a single tool for authentication validation. Cross-reference results with your ESP's diagnostics and, if possible, analyze email headers from delivered emails.
- Check email deliverability: Focus on actual inbox placement and engagement rates rather than just tool warnings. A good overview of improving deliverability can be found in Email Deliverability: How to Dodge the Spam Folder.
What email marketers say
Email marketers frequently encounter baffling discrepancies in email authentication reports, leading to confusion and frustration. The core challenge often lies in reconciling external tool warnings with assurances from their Email Service Provider (ESPs). Furthermore, mysterious bot-driven unsubscribes add another layer of complexity, directly impacting list health and campaign performance.
Key opinions
- Trust issues with tools: Many marketers question the trustworthiness of tools like MXToolbox when their reports contradict their ESP's internal diagnostics, especially concerning SPF and DMARC.
- Troubleshooting difficulty: Without clear, actionable documentation, it's hard for marketers to troubleshoot complex DNS or authentication issues, especially when clients are quick to blame the ESP.
- Bot unsubscribe surge: A significant concern is the inexplicable increase in unsubscribes, suspected to be caused by anti-spam bots rather than human actions, pointing to vulnerabilities in the unsubscribe mechanism.
- One-click unsubscribe risks: The convenience of a single-click unsubscribe, while seemingly user-friendly, is increasingly seen as a liability that leads to these unwanted bot unsubscribes and can affect domain reputation.
Key considerations
- Validating authentication: How to effectively validate email authentication settings when different tools provide conflicting results, and whether to prioritize ESP feedback or external diagnostics.
- Preventing bot activity: The necessity of re-evaluating and modifying unsubscribe flows to prevent automated systems from unintentionally opting out legitimate subscribers, which can be a common unsubscribes and tracking issue.
- Client communication: Strategies for explaining complex technical discrepancies and proposed solutions (like a two-step unsubscribe) to clients who may not fully grasp the underlying technicalities.
- Prioritizing fixes: Deciding which deliverability issues demand immediate attention, especially when resources are limited and the impact on campaign performance is significant.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks questions the reliability of testing tools. "I've run a check on our subdomain, and it's showing multiple issues like no SPF or DMARC, but our ESP's test email says everything passes. This conflicting information makes it incredibly hard to trust any single source."
Marketer view
Email marketer from a community forum explains the confusion of deliverability reports. "It's baffling when different tools show contradictory results for the same domain's authentication. One tool says SPF is broken, another says it's perfect, leaving you guessing about your actual deliverability status."
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts offer critical insights into why monitoring tools might present conflicting authentication reports and how to correctly diagnose issues. They emphasize understanding the nuances of SPF macros, DMARC alignment, and the practical implications of unsubscribe flow design to maintain sender reputation and ensure messages reach the inbox, avoiding common pitfalls that lead to a blocklist or blacklist placement.
Key opinions
- DNS and DNSSEC issues: Experts suggest that conflicting reports can often be traced back to underlying DNS problems or DNSSEC configuration issues.
- SPF macro interpretation: Some tools, like MXToolbox, may not correctly process SPF records that utilize macros, leading them to report non-existent issues.
- DMARC passing through DKIM: It's common for DMARC to pass via DKIM alignment, even if SPF does not align. This indicates that the emails are properly authenticated despite SPF's non-alignment.
- MXToolbox specificity: While MXToolbox is useful, experts note that some of its interpretations and recommendations can be overly cautious or incorrect, particularly regarding advanced configurations.
- Unsubscribe best practices: The consensus is that unsubscribe links should lead to a web page requiring a user click to confirm opt-out, preventing bot-triggered unsubscribes. Single-click unsubscribes are considered bad practice.
- No confirmation emails for unsubscribe: Requiring a confirmation email for an unsubscribe is generally not allowed by law in many places and creates an unnecessary barrier for users.
Key considerations
- Diagnosing reporting vs. configuration: It's crucial to distinguish between a tool's reporting limitation (false negative) and an actual misconfiguration. If mail is delivering, it's likely a reporting issue.
- Understanding SPF and DMARC nuances: A deep dive into how SPF macros function and how DMARC aligns with either SPF or DKIM is essential for accurate troubleshooting. This can help with issues like SPF authentication fluctuating.
- Legal compliance for unsubscribes: Ensure unsubscribe processes comply with legal requirements (e.g., CAN-SPAM, GDPR) that prohibit confirmation emails for opting out. Addressing this can improve overall email deliverability issues.
- Leveraging expert opinions: Use expert consensus on best practices to justify necessary changes and secure resources for implementing improved unsubscribe flows.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests exploring DNS issues. "Conflicting authentication reports often point to underlying DNS or DNSSEC problems. These foundational issues can cause different tools to interpret your records differently, leading to varied results."
Expert view
Email deliverability expert from WordtotheWise explains tool discrepancies. "Deliverability tools provide snapshots, and their accuracy can vary based on how they parse specific DNS records or complex authentication setups. What one tool flags as an error, another might correctly interpret as compliant."
What the documentation says
Official email authentication documentation, including RFCs for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, provides the foundational rules for email sending. These standards dictate how email senders should verify their identity and how recipients should validate incoming mail. Understanding these documents is crucial for deciphering conflicting reports and for implementing compliant and effective unsubscribe mechanisms, which are vital for maintaining good sender reputation and avoiding a blocklist or blacklist.
Key findings
- SPF record purpose: SPF (Sender Policy Framework) records are designed to specify which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of a domain, helping to detect forged sender addresses.
- DKIM functionality: DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) uses cryptographic signatures to ensure that an email message has not been altered in transit and that it originates from the claimed sender.
- DMARC alignment requirement: DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) requires either SPF or DKIM to align with the domain in the Header From (RFC5322.From) address to pass authentication, providing stronger anti-spoofing protection.
- Unsubscribe mechanism: Email sending best practices and some regulations recommend clear, easily accessible unsubscribe options, typically a link that leads to a confirmation page rather than an immediate opt-out.
- DNSSEC importance: DNSSEC (DNS Security Extensions) adds security to DNS lookups, which is foundational for email authentication protocols like SPF and DMARC. Failures here can impact authentication.
Key considerations
- Adherence to RFCs: Ensure that your email authentication configurations strictly adhere to the relevant RFCs (Request for Comments) to guarantee interoperability and proper validation across mail systems.
- DMARC policy implementation: Carefully define and implement your DMARC policy (p=none, p=quarantine, p=reject) to gain visibility into email authentication failures and protect your domain from abuse. Consider using a DMARC record generator.
- Secure unsubscribe flows: Design unsubscribe processes that are robust enough to prevent automated unsubscriptions while remaining user-friendly and compliant with privacy regulations.
- Monitoring DMARC reports: Regularly review DMARC reports to identify authentication failures, potential spoofing attempts, and insights into how different recipients are validating your emails.
Technical article
Official RFC 7208 (SPF) documentation states: "SPF helps to protect the sender's domain against spoofing and phishing by authorizing specific hosts to send mail on behalf of that domain. Mechanisms like 'exists' allow for dynamic lookups based on aspects of the email, such as the sending IP address."
Technical article
The DMARC.org documentation explains alignment: "DMARC requires either SPF or DKIM to 'align' with the RFC5322.From domain to pass authentication. This alignment ensures that the domain visible to the end-user (Header From) is authenticated, preventing brand impersonation."
Related resources
5 resources
Related pages
Why do email deliverability tools and Postmaster tools report conflicting authentication results?
Why does DMARC authentication fail when SPF and DKIM pass, and how can it be fixed?
What could cause unusual clicks and unsubscribes in SendGrid, and how can I troubleshoot it?
Demystifying the SPF TempError in your DMARC reports
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
What could cause Gmail SPF/DKIM issues and how to check authentication results in email headers?
Understanding and troubleshooting DMARC reports from Google and Yahoo
How to Run an Email Deliverability Test: A Proven Checklist
What happens when your domain is put on a blocklist?
