Summary
Signal Spam is a public-private partnership in France designed to fight against unsolicited commercial emails, or spam. Its primary function is to collect spam reports from internet users and forward them to senders (through their ISPs or directly) for action. While it plays a crucial role in the French email ecosystem, its direct impact on improving an individual sender's email delivery to French domains is often misunderstood. It is not a certification program that, once joined, automatically boosts your inbox placement.
Key findings
- Misconception: Signal Spam is not a certification system that provides a 'whitelist' or guaranteed inbox placement in France. Joining it does not automatically improve your deliverability.
- Purpose: Its main goal is to facilitate the reporting of spam by French internet users to the relevant authorities and email senders.
- Feedback Loop: It acts as a feedback loop mechanism, allowing legitimate senders to receive complaints about their mail, which they can then use to clean their lists and improve practices. This indirectly supports deliverability improvements by helping senders identify issues.
- Eligibility: If a sender already has poor email delivery to French domains, they may not be accepted into the Signal Spam program, as it's designed for legitimate senders to manage complaints, not as a fix for existing deliverability problems.
Key considerations
- Holistic approach: Improving email delivery requires a comprehensive strategy that goes beyond just one feedback loop. Focus on overall improving your email reputation.
- ISP-specific requirements: French mailbox providers like Orange, SFR, and Laposte.net have specific requirements and best practices. Adhering to these is more critical for direct deliverability improvements than relying solely on Signal Spam. You can find out more on this through Mindbaz's guide on Orange.
- Sender behavior: Focus on email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), list hygiene, engagement, and relevant content to ensure your emails reach the inbox. If your emails are going to spam, direct remediation of these issues is necessary.
- Communication: Contacting Signal Spam can be challenging due to outdated contact information. Seek current and reliable channels if direct communication is necessary.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often look for quick fixes or certifications to improve their deliverability, especially when facing issues in specific regions like France. While the intention behind exploring Signal Spam is valid (to improve email delivery), marketers' understanding of its true function can sometimes be skewed. They may perceive it as a direct solution for poor inbox placement rather than a tool for managing abuse complaints.
Key opinions
- Seeking direct alliance: Some marketers try to forge a direct alliance with Signal Spam, believing it will grant them preferential treatment or a deliverability boost in French domains.
- Poor delivery concerns: Marketers frequently notice poor email delivery specifically to French domains and consider Signal Spam as a potential remedy for these issues.
- Contact difficulties: Many marketers report difficulty in contacting Signal Spam, often encountering hard bounces from listed email addresses or a lack of responsiveness.
- Certification confusion: There's a common misconception that Signal Spam is a certification system, similar to some other industry accreditations, which is incorrect.
Key considerations
- Address underlying issues: Before considering external programs, marketers should first address fundamental deliverability challenges like domain warm-up and list hygiene. A clean email list and engaged audience are paramount.
- Understand the role of FBLs: While Signal Spam is a feedback loop, it primarily informs senders of spam complaints. It's not a proactive tool for improving inbox placement. Senders should interpret this data to improve their practices.
- Focus on reputation: As noted by Neil Patel, having a good domain reputation can greatly improve deliverability, even if other factors change. This includes maintaining low complaint rates and high engagement.
- Alternative strategies: If facing deliverability issues in France, consider engaging with deliverability experts familiar with the nuances of French mailbox providers. They can provide targeted advice on best practices for Orange, SFR, and Laposte.net.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks asked about others' experiences with Signal Spam and forming an alliance, indicating they were seeing poor email delivery to French domains and hoped to register with Signal Spam to improve this.
Marketer view
Marketer from Mailchimp notes that a good domain reputation is crucial for improving email deliverability, even when changing IP addresses. They emphasize the overall sender reputation over specific programs.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts highlight that Signal Spam serves a specific, but often misunderstood, role in the French email ecosystem. They emphasize that it is not a magical solution for poor deliverability but rather a mechanism for ISPs and senders to manage and respond to user complaints. True deliverability improvement comes from fundamental adherence to best practices and understanding individual mailbox provider requirements.
Key opinions
- Not a certification: Experts clearly state that Signal Spam is not a certification system like CSA; it does not directly certify good senders or guarantee improved delivery.
- Acceptance criteria: If a sender already has poor delivery to French domains, they will likely not be accepted into Signal Spam, as it's designed for managing existing abuse, not onboarding troubled senders.
- Focus on French ISPs: The key to French deliverability lies in understanding and applying best practices specific to major French mailbox providers such as Orange, SFR, and Laposte.net.
- FBL functionality: Signal Spam serves as a feedback loop (FBL) for complaints, which is valuable for legitimate senders to identify issues, but it's not a direct deliverability improvement tool.
Key considerations
- Proactive reputation management: Experts advise focusing on overall sender reputation. This includes maintaining low complaint rates, ensuring high engagement, and adhering to email authentication standards (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) before looking into specific country-level programs. Our guide on Google Postmaster Tools provides further insight.
- Direct ISP engagement: If facing issues with French domains, direct engagement with the postmaster teams of Orange, SFR, and Laposte.net, or working with a deliverability consultant specializing in these ISPs, is more effective.
- Behavioral changes: Improving deliverability to any region, including France, hinges on sender behavior: sending relevant content, obtaining explicit consent, and regularly cleaning email lists. Our article on why your emails fail offers guidance.
- Industry knowledge: Staying informed about the specific requirements and policy updates from major ISPs, like Orange's new sender requirements, is paramount for consistent delivery.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks states that Thomas, a key figure in Signal Spam, left the organization years ago. This explains why previous contact emails might be bouncing, indicating outdated information.
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource explains that maintaining good domain reputation is a continuous effort requiring consistent adherence to best practices. They emphasize that a strong reputation is built over time through positive sending behavior.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and industry insights clarify Signal Spam's role as a feedback mechanism rather than a certification for deliverability. Its purpose is to process spam reports from French internet users and relay them to network operators and email service providers. This allows senders to identify and address sources of complaints, indirectly contributing to better practices, but it does not serve as a direct deliverability improvement program.
Key findings
- Spam reporting: Signal Spam is primarily a platform for French internet users to report emails they consider spam. These reports are aggregated and shared with relevant parties.
- Partnership model: It operates as a public-private partnership, involving governmental bodies, ISPs, and email service providers, to collectively combat spam originating from or targeting French networks.
- Data integration: Some postmaster services, like Postmastery, integrate data from Signal Spam through aggregated Feedback Loops, indicating its role in providing complaint data to senders.
- Not a deliverability solution: Documentation confirms that Signal Spam is not a system designed to directly improve a sender's deliverability or act as a pre-screening for good senders.
Key considerations
- Feedback loop utilization: Senders experiencing poor delivery in France should focus on utilizing feedback loops effectively, including those that integrate with Signal Spam data, to identify sources of complaints and adjust their sending practices accordingly.
- ISP-specific compliance: Adherence to the specific requirements of major French ISPs such as Orange, SFR, and Laposte.net is paramount. Postmastery provides guides on SFR Postmaster requirements and Laposte.net postmaster guidance.
- Domain reputation: As outlined by Cision, robust technical configurations like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are essential for building a trustworthy domain reputation with all mailbox providers.
- Engagement metrics: Documentation from Klaviyo Help Center indicates that inbox providers use spam filters based on engagement and content quality. Optimizing these factors is key to improving deliverability.
Technical article
Documentation from Postmastery indicates that it integrates data from the aggregated Feedback Loop of SFR Grand Public through its monitoring tool and partnership with Signal Spam. This shows Signal Spam's role in providing complaint data.
Technical article
Documentation from Cision states that senders must configure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC information as necessary technical requirements to ensure email security and deliverability. These are fundamental for all email sending.
Related resources
13 resources
Related pages
How can i improve my email reputation and deliverability?
How can i improve email deliverability when emails are going to spam?
Orange.fr postmaster is tightening the screws
Email deliverability issues: getting your messages to the inbox
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024 and how to fix it
An in-depth guide to email blocklists
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
What happens when your domain is on an email blacklist?
How to improve email deliverability with domain warm-up
How do i improve email deliverability to hotmail and avoid spam?
