Summary
Improving email deliverability when messages are landing in the spam folder requires a multi-faceted approach, often starting with a critical review of list acquisition practices and sender reputation. Technical configurations like DMARC, SPF, and DKIM are crucial, but their effectiveness can be undermined by poor sending habits, such as emailing unconsented contacts. Addressing the root cause of high spam complaints and proactively monitoring domain health are key steps to restoring inbox placement.
Key findings
- List quality is paramount: Emails going to spam are often a direct result of recipients not opting in or not expecting your messages, as seen with scraped LinkedIn contacts. This significantly damages sender reputation.
- Technical configurations alone are not a silver bullet: While essential, simply adding DMARC records without addressing underlying issues like poor list quality can be ineffective or even harmful. Proper configuration of DMARC, SPF, and DKIM is foundational.
- Domain reputation is critical: High spam complaint rates, often caused by unsolicited emails, quickly degrade your domain's reputation with mailbox providers like Gmail and Outlook.
- Gmail and Marketo IP implications: When sending through services like Gmail or Marketo, the IP address reputation is typically managed by those providers. Issues are more likely related to your domain's reputation due to content or sending practices, rather than your own PTR records.
- Enterprise filters are less forgiving: B2B spam is particularly detrimental, as enterprise spam filters are often stricter and have longer memory for poor sender behavior compared to consumer ones.
Key considerations
- Review email acquisition methods: Prioritize obtaining explicit consent from recipients. Ceasing practices like scraping LinkedIn profiles for email addresses is crucial to reduce spam complaints and improve engagement. This directly impacts your sender reputation.
- Monitor domain and IP reputation: Utilize tools like Google Postmaster Tools (GPT) to track your domain and IP reputation, spam rates, and DMARC failures. This provides valuable insights into deliverability issues. More information on GPT can be found on Google's official support page.
- Address DMARC configuration carefully: Ensure DMARC is correctly configured to align with your sending sources (SPF and DKIM). An improperly implemented DMARC policy can lead to legitimate emails being rejected or quarantined. Consider starting with a p=none policy to monitor before enforcing stricter policies.
- Understand email service provider limitations: Recognize that sending from personal Gmail accounts or through marketing automation platforms like Marketo involves shared IPs, limiting your control over IP-specific issues. Focus on content and list hygiene.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often find themselves grappling with deliverability issues stemming from a range of factors, from initial list acquisition to content strategy. A common thread in their discussions highlights the critical impact of consent and relevance on inbox placement. Many report that while technical setups are important, they are secondary to ensuring that recipients genuinely want to receive the emails.
Key opinions
- Consent is king: The primary reason emails go to spam is often a lack of recipient consent. If people didn't ask for the mail, it's considered spam regardless of technical setup.
- Scraped lists are toxic: Sending to email addresses scraped from platforms like LinkedIn is a classic cause of poor domain reputation and will almost certainly lead to deliverability problems.
- Domain reputation damage: Consistent sending of unsolicited email trashes a domain's reputation, making it difficult for even legitimate messages to reach the inbox.
- Content relevance: Crafting useful emails that serve the target audience's needs is key to avoiding spam complaints and improving engagement metrics, which in turn boosts deliverability. This is crucial for improving email open rates.
Key considerations
- Prioritize audience needs: Shift focus from aggressive list growth to providing value to an engaged, opted-in audience. This will naturally reduce spam complaints.
- Clean up sending practices: Immediately cease sending to unverified or scraped email addresses. Recovery takes time, but stopping the harmful behavior is the first step.
- Monitor and adapt: Continuously monitor your sender reputation and adjust your email marketing strategy based on feedback and performance metrics. This proactive approach helps diagnose and prevent future issues.
- Understand ESP limitations: While using an ESP (email service provider) is good, marketers should also understand their role in sender reputation. Mailgun advises starting with a reputable ESP and focusing on anti-spam compliance.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains that the main reason mail is marked as spam is often because people did not ask for it. This highlights the importance of consent in email marketing.
Marketer view
Email marketer from EmailTooltester.com suggests that keeping the unsubscribe rate low can significantly help improve deliverability. Lower complaint rates are crucial, as marking emails as spam severely hurts sender reputation.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts consistently emphasize that technical fixes, while necessary, cannot compensate for poor email list hygiene or a lack of recipient consent. They highlight the importance of understanding how mailbox providers view your sending practices and leveraging tools to monitor your sender reputation. A damaged reputation, particularly with enterprise recipients, requires a complete shift in strategy to recover.
Key opinions
- Dodgy PTR records are usually not the cause: Experts agree that while PTR records are part of authentication, they are rarely the primary reason for emails landing in spam, especially when sending through major ESPs (Email Service Providers) like Gmail or Marketo.
- DMARC must be implemented with care: Simply adding a DMARC record without proper alignment or understanding can worsen deliverability if not correctly configured and monitored.
- Context is key: To diagnose deliverability issues, experts often request more information about the sending setup, including the sending platform, email content, and target audience.
- Google Postmaster Tools for diagnosis: Registering your domain with Google Postmaster Tools (GPT) is highly recommended for gaining insight into your domain and IP reputation, helping to identify if the domain's reputation is damaged. Learn more about Google Postmaster Tools V2.
- Reputation recovery takes time: Once a domain's reputation is trashed by sending spam, especially B2B spam, it takes significant effort and time to recover. Enterprise filters are particularly strict.
Key considerations
- Focus on the real cause: Instead of focusing on minor technical details (like some PTR records), address the fundamental issues of consent and sending practices. These are usually the primary drivers of spam classification.
- Leverage analytics tools: Beyond GPT, continuously monitor deliverability metrics. Tools that show inbox placement and identify where emails are landing (inbox, spam, or missing) are invaluable. This proactive monitoring helps ensure emails hit the inbox.
- Understand the impact of B2B spam: Recognize that B2B spam has particularly severe and long-lasting negative effects on sender reputation. Recovery strategies must be robust and sustained.
- Strategic DMARC implementation: If DMARC was added without full understanding, it's crucial to review its policy and ensure it aligns with all legitimate sending sources. A misconfigured DMARC can inadvertently block valid emails.
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks notes that dodgy PTR records are not typically the main cause of emails being marked as spam. He advises focusing on list acquisition practices instead.
Expert view
Email expert from Spam Resource warns that sending to unverified or low-quality lists is a surefire way to damage your sender reputation. It takes consistent effort to build and maintain trust with mailbox providers.
What the documentation says
Official documentation from email service providers and industry bodies consistently highlights key best practices for ensuring email deliverability. These practices largely revolve around strong authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), maintaining a healthy sender reputation, and ensuring recipient engagement through consent-based sending. Deviation from these standards significantly increases the likelihood of emails being flagged as spam.
Key findings
- Authentication is mandatory: All major mailbox providers require proper email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to verify sender identity and prevent spoofing. This is a foundational element for deliverability.
- Sender reputation is paramount: Documentation emphasizes that a positive sender reputation (based on factors like spam complaint rates, bounce rates, and engagement) is crucial for inbox placement. This reputation is continuously evaluated by recipient servers.
- Consent and list quality: Many guidelines stress the importance of permission-based marketing and maintaining clean, engaged email lists to avoid spam traps and reduce unsolicited email complaints.
- Content relevance and value: Documentation often advises senders to provide valuable, relevant content to their audience. Irrelevant or overly promotional content can increase spam complaints even with proper authentication.
- Monitoring is key: Regularly checking deliverability metrics and sender reputation through tools like Google Postmaster Tools is recommended to identify and resolve issues promptly. This includes observing spam rate dashboards.
Key considerations
- Comprehensive authentication setup: Ensure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are correctly published and aligned for all sending domains and third-party senders. Misconfigurations can lead to authentication failures. Refer to advanced email authentication guides.
- Strict adherence to anti-spam laws: Comply with regulations like CAN-SPAM, GDPR, and CASL, which mandate clear opt-in processes and easy unsubscribe options. Mailgun's documentation emphasizes this as a key step to avoiding emails going to spam.
- Proactive list management: Regularly clean your email lists to remove inactive subscribers, hard bounces, and known spam traps. This prevents engagement drops and protects your sender score. Consider how to avoid spam traps and improve deliverability.
- Feedback loop participation: Participate in ISP feedback loops to be notified when recipients mark your emails as spam, allowing you to promptly remove those users from your list.
Technical article
Documentation from Klaviyo Help Center recommends that if emails are going to spam, senders should verify that they meet the latest requirements set in place by major providers like Gmail and Yahoo, which often include strict authentication and content guidelines.
Technical article
Documentation from Twilio advises that maintaining proper IP allocation is a best practice to improve email deliverability, alongside perfecting the opt-in process and writing non-spammy subject lines.
Related resources
14 resources
![Email Deliverability: Avoiding The Spam Folder [2025]](https://moosend.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Email-Deliverability.png)
Related pages
How to diagnose email deliverability issues and prevent emails from going to spam?
What are effective strategies to avoid spam traps and improve email deliverability?
How to recover Gmail email deliverability and sender reputation after emails go to spam?
What are the best practices for email deliverability and avoiding spam filters?
What steps can I take to resolve email deliverability issues and improve my sender reputation?
Why Your Emails Fail: Expert Guide to Improve Email Deliverability [2025]
What does it mean when your email is blacklisted?
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
How to safely transition your DMARC policy to quarantine or reject
Spam traps: what they are and how they work
