Suped

What are the best ways to measure email deliverability and inbox placement rates?

Matthew Whittaker profile picture
Matthew Whittaker
Co-founder & CTO, Suped
Published 8 Jul 2025
Updated 16 Aug 2025
8 min read
Understanding how your emails perform after they leave your server is critical for successful email marketing and communication. It is not enough for an email to simply be 'delivered,' meaning it didn't hard bounce. The true measure of success lies in whether your emails actually reach the recipient's primary inbox, rather than being shunted to spam or promotions folders. This crucial distinction is what we refer to as inbox placement.
Measuring email deliverability and inbox placement rates effectively requires a multi-faceted approach. There is no single magic bullet or a universal metric that gives you a perfect score for all mailbox providers. Instead, we piece together insights from various data points and testing methods.
By combining quantitative metrics with qualitative testing, you can build a comprehensive picture of your email program's health. This allows you to identify issues proactively and optimize your sending practices to consistently land in the inbox.

Utilizing core engagement metrics

One of the most immediate ways to gauge email deliverability is by analyzing your core engagement metrics. These are the numbers you typically see in your email service provider's (ESP) reports and they provide valuable initial insights into how your subscribers are interacting with your emails.
High bounce rates, especially hard bounces, indicate that emails are failing to reach recipients at all. A surge in soft bounces might signal temporary server issues or a full inbox, which can still impact your sender reputation. Similarly, low open rates or click-through rates, particularly for specific domains, can be a strong indicator that your emails are not reaching the inbox or are being filtered into less visible folders like spam or promotions. Keep a close eye on these key performance indicators to spot potential problems quickly.
Spam complaints are another critical metric. When a recipient marks your email as spam, it sends a strong negative signal to the mailbox provider, severely impacting your sender reputation and increasing the likelihood of future emails landing in the spam folder. Monitoring these rates, and ideally keeping them below 0.1%, is essential for maintaining good deliverability. Unsubscribe rates, while not directly about deliverability, can also indicate issues if recipients are opting out due to irrelevant content or excessive sending frequency, indirectly affecting your engagement metrics and, consequently, inbox placement.

Metric

What it Indicates

Target Rate

Delivery Rate
Percentage of emails that did not hard bounce.
98%+ for most campaigns
Bounce Rate
Percentage of emails that could not be delivered.
Below 2%
Open Rate
Percentage of recipients who opened your email.
Varies by industry, but look for trends
Click-Through Rate
Percentage of recipients who clicked a link in your email.
Varies by industry, look for trends
Spam Complaint Rate
Percentage of recipients who marked your email as spam.
Below 0.1%

The true meaning of 'delivered'

It is crucial to differentiate between delivery rate and inbox placement rate. Delivery rate only tells you if an email was successfully accepted by the recipient's mail server. It does not indicate where the email landed. A 99% delivery rate does not guarantee 99% inbox placement.
Inbox placement rate, however, focuses on where the email actually lands within the mailbox: primary inbox, promotions, or spam folder. This is the metric that truly reflects the effectiveness of your email campaigns.

Inbox placement testing with seed lists

While engagement metrics offer a retrospective view, inbox placement testing with seed lists offers a proactive way to estimate where your emails will land. A seed list is a collection of email addresses from various internet service providers (ISPs) and mailbox providers (MBPs), including major ones like gmail.com logoGmail, outlook.com logoOutlook, and yahoo.com logoYahoo. By sending your campaign to these addresses, you can observe where the emails land: inbox, spam, or other folders.
While seed list testing provides a good estimate, it's important to understand that it is a directional indicator, not a precise measurement of your actual inbox rate for all your subscribers. Mailbox providers often employ individualized filtering, meaning two different recipients with the same provider might experience different inbox placement for the same email. However, consistent changes in your seed list results are highly valuable. A sudden drop in inbox placement on your seed list can signal a problem that needs immediate attention.
The key is to run these tests regularly and consistently, especially before major campaigns or after any significant changes to your sending infrastructure or content. Many providers offer tools or services to automate this process. Using these services allows you to identify potential filtering issues before they impact your entire subscriber base, giving you time to adjust your strategy. You can learn more about this approach from resources like this article on seed list testing.
Example of a basic seed list
test@gmail.com test@outlook.com test@yahoo.com test@aol.com test@mail.com

Pros of seed list testing

  1. Proactive insight: Get a snapshot of inbox placement before a large send.
  2. Trend analysis: Track changes over time to identify reputation shifts.
  3. Content testing: Evaluate how different content or subject lines perform.

Cons of seed list testing

  1. Not exact: Results are indicative, not a precise reflection of all recipient inboxes.
  2. Static nature: May not account for dynamic, real-time filtering variations.
  3. Seed list quality: Effectiveness depends on the diversity and maintenance of the list.

Leveraging postmaster tools and feedback loops

Mailbox providers offer valuable (and often free) tools that provide a deeper dive into your sending reputation and deliverability. Google Postmaster Tools, microsoft.com logoMicrosoft SNDS (Smart Network Data Services), and Yahoo Feedback Loop aol.com logo(AOL is now part of Yahoo) provide aggregated data on your sending reputation, spam rates, IP reputation, and authentication status (SPF, DKIM, DMARC).
These tools allow you to see how each major provider views your sending domain and IPs. For instance, Google Postmaster Tools can show you your spam rate, domain reputation, and IP reputation, which directly correlates with your inbox placement at Gmail. Similarly, Microsoft SNDS provides insight into junk mail classifications and IP health for Outlook.com users. Regularly checking these dashboards is a fundamental practice for any sender serious about deliverability.
Feedback loops (FBLs) are another invaluable resource. When recipients click the 'report spam' button, FBLs send automated reports back to you, the sender. This allows you to identify which campaigns are generating complaints and remove those users from your mailing list, preventing further negative impacts on your reputation. Many ESPs integrate with these FBLs, but understanding how to access and interpret this data directly can give you a significant edge in maintaining good sender standing.

Apple Mail privacy protection and inboxing

Apple's Mail Privacy Protection (MPP) has changed how open rates are measured for users on Apple devices by pre-fetching email content, including tracking pixels. While this obscures traditional open rate metrics, it can inadvertently provide a directional signal for inbox placement. If an email receives an MPP open, it suggests the email was likely delivered to the inbox or a primary folder, as images are typically suppressed in spam folders. Conversely, a lack of MPP opens for an Apple user who shows activity with other senders might suggest your email landed in spam for that particular recipient.

Monitoring blocklists and DMARC reports

Beyond direct engagement metrics and MBPs' tools, active monitoring of email blacklists (also known as blocklists) and DMARC reports is paramount for comprehensive deliverability measurement. Being listed on a major email blocklist will almost certainly prevent your emails from reaching their intended recipients, leading to immediate and significant deliverability issues. Regular blocklist monitoring can alert you to problems as soon as they arise, allowing for quick remediation.
DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) is another powerful tool. By implementing a DMARC record, you can receive daily reports from mailbox providers detailing how your emails are being authenticated and handled. These reports reveal how many of your emails are passing SPF and DKIM authentication, and more importantly, how many are failing and what actions (none, quarantine, reject) MBPs are taking as a result. This data is invaluable for identifying legitimate sending sources and unauthorized spoofing attempts.
DMARC reports provide a granular view of your authentication success rates across various receivers. A consistent high percentage of DMARC failures can indicate issues with your email authentication setup or even malicious activity like phishing, both of which severely damage your domain reputation and inbox placement. Regularly reviewing DMARC monitoring is a proactive way to ensure your emails are seen as legitimate by mailbox providers, thereby improving your chances of hitting the inbox.

Public blacklists

These are publicly accessible databases that list IPs or domains known for sending spam or other undesirable mail. Examples include Spamhaus and MXToolbox. Many mailbox providers subscribe to these lists to filter incoming mail. Being listed usually means your emails will be rejected or sent to spam across a wide range of recipients.

Private blocklists

These are internal blocklists maintained by individual mailbox providers (like Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo) based on their own filtering criteria and user feedback. They are not publicly visible and are tailored to each provider's specific needs. Getting on a private blocklist can severely impact your deliverability to that specific provider, even if you're not on any public lists.

Views from the trenches

Best practices
Maintain a clean email list by regularly removing inactive subscribers and bounced addresses.
Segment your audience and tailor content to improve engagement and reduce spam complaints.
Implement strong email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) to build sender trust with mailbox providers.
Monitor all relevant metrics, including bounces, complaints, opens, and clicks, for comprehensive insight.
Warm up new IPs or domains gradually to build a positive sending reputation over time.
Common pitfalls
Ignoring bounce rates: High bounces negatively impact sender reputation and can lead to blacklisting.
Purchasing email lists: These often contain spam traps or invalid addresses, harming deliverability.
Sending inconsistent email volume: Erratic sending patterns can trigger spam filters.
Not monitoring spam complaints: Failure to act on complaints can lead to severe blockages.
Over-reliance on a single metric: No single metric tells the full story of your deliverability.
Expert tips
Use Apple's Mail Privacy Protection as a directional inboxing signal for Apple device users.
Periodically send test emails to a diverse seed list to catch emerging deliverability issues.
Leverage Google Postmaster Tools and Microsoft SNDS for direct insights from major mailbox providers.
Implement DMARC at a 'p=none' policy initially to gain visibility into email authentication failures.
Focus on segmenting your audience and sending targeted, relevant content to improve engagement metrics.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says a seed list is the best available method for measuring deliverability, but supplemental data from metrics like opens, clicks, and bounces are also crucial indicators of problems.
June 14, 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says seed list results should be interpreted carefully, as they provide directional insights rather than an exact inbox rate due to individualistic filtering.
June 14, 2023 - Email Geeks

Concluding thoughts on email deliverability

Measuring email deliverability and inbox placement is not a one-time task; it is an ongoing process that requires vigilance and a layered approach. By combining the insights from engagement metrics, proactive seed list testing, direct feedback from mailbox provider tools, and consistent monitoring of authentication records and blocklists, you can gain a clear and actionable understanding of your email program's performance. This holistic view empowers you to make informed decisions, optimize your sending practices, and ultimately ensure your valuable messages consistently reach the inbox.

Frequently asked questions

DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard

What you'll get with Suped

Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing