Summary
AT&T's email-to-text services, which historically allowed users to send messages to mobile numbers via email, are facing significant challenges and are slated for discontinuation. While initially appearing as a convenient solution for notifications and basic communication, these services were never designed for production-grade or business-critical use. Their inherent unreliability, coupled with increasing security concerns and susceptibility to spam, has led AT&T to phase them out entirely. This necessitates a proactive shift for any individuals or businesses still relying on these outdated gateways to more robust and commercially supported alternatives for dependable messaging.
Key findings
- Service discontinuation: AT&T has officially announced the shutdown of its email-to-text and text-to-email services, effective June 17, 2025. This means suffixes like @txt.att.net and @mms.att.net will no longer function.
- Reliability issues: The services have long been unreliable, experiencing frequent uptime issues, throttling, and transient errors like 452 4.1.0 requested action aborted: try again later.
- Security and spam risks: A primary reason for discontinuation is the service's vulnerability to abuse, acting as a "spam magnet" and enabling "smishing" attacks, posing significant security risks to users.
- Not production grade: These free, consumer-grade services were never intended for bulk or business-critical use, leading to poor performance and lack of dedicated support.
- Industry trend: The shutdown aligns with a broader industry trend where carriers are phasing out outdated email-to-SMS gateways in favor of more secure and robust messaging solutions.
Key considerations
- Migrate to alternatives: Individuals and businesses should immediately transition to commercially supported SMS bulk services or email-to-SMS gateways to ensure reliable message delivery. For more on the compliance requirements of these services, see our article on email to SMS gateway compliance.
- Prioritize reliability: For critical alerts and business communications, prioritizing the reliability and guaranteed delivery of messages should outweigh the perceived convenience or cost-saving of free, unsupported services.
- Proactive planning: Given the June 2025 shutdown date, a prompt migration plan is essential to avoid communication disruptions, as noted in AT&T's official announcement.
- Understand deliverability: The challenges with AT&T's service highlight broader email deliverability issues. Understanding factors that affect email deliverability can help in selecting robust messaging solutions.
What email marketers say
Email marketers and businesses often used AT&T's email-to-text service as a simple way to send critical alerts or notifications. However, their experiences frequently reveal a pattern of unreliability, prompting them to question the service's viability for any professional use. Many marketers, initially drawn to the convenience, are now facing the reality of its limitations, including errors and inconsistent delivery. This situation underscores a growing need for them to shift towards more dependable, commercially supported SMS solutions that guarantee message arrival for essential communications.
Key opinions
- Convenience vs. reliability: Many marketers prioritized the perceived convenience of email-to-text for internal critical alerts, overlooking its lack of reliability and support for business use.
- Error messages: Senders frequently encounter persistent errors, such as 452 4.1.0 requested action aborted: try again later, indicating widespread issues on AT&T's side across various sender IPs and domains.
- Lack of awareness of alternatives: Some marketers were unaware of dedicated third-party email-to-SMS services, highlighting a gap in knowledge regarding professional messaging solutions.
- Spam and blocking: The service's susceptibility to spamming is believed to be a major factor in AT&T's aggressive blocking, which can lead to legitimate emails being caught in blocklists (or blacklists). More on AT&T email domain block bounces.
Key considerations
- Embrace dedicated SMS: Marketers must transition from free, unreliable carrier gateways to commercially supported SMS services for any essential messaging, despite the small cost.
- Avoid free gateways: Relying on free email-to-SMS gateways for business purposes is no longer viable due to their inherent instability and lack of support, leading to potential communication failures.
- Understand industry shifts: The trend among carriers to discontinue these services is ongoing, indicating a permanent shift. Marketers should adapt their strategies accordingly to prevent emails going to spam.
- Seek alternatives: Explore reliable alternatives that offer guaranteed delivery and dedicated support, such as those discussed on the Spiceworks Community forum.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks describes experiencing issues with AT&T's email-to-text service, specifically receiving '452 4.1.0 requested action aborted: try again later' errors. This occurred across multiple systems and different IPs, suggesting a widespread problem rather than an isolated incident related to their sending address. The concern was heightened by a lack of public discussion on the issue across the internet or other mailop forums, making them question if they were uniquely affected. This type of error points to a transient failure, where the server is temporarily unable to accept mail, often due to high load or policy enforcement. The persistence of the issue despite varied 'from' domains strongly implied an underlying carrier problem.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks further clarifies that both txt.att.net and mms.att.net services resolve to the same MX records, confirming that if one service is experiencing issues, the other likely is too. They also explain that while they advise clients to use dedicated SMS bulk services, some clients prefer the perceived convenience of email-to-text for critical alerts to their own personnel. This highlights a common challenge where users prioritize ease of use over robust, supported solutions for essential communications. The marketer notes that this reliance on a less-than-production-grade service for critical functions creates significant vulnerability when outages or policy changes occur.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts consistently view carrier-provided email-to-text services as inherently unreliable and unsuitable for serious applications. Their longstanding history of uptime issues, throttling, and a general lack of support indicates they were never built for robust, business-critical use. Experts emphasize that the ongoing failures are not isolated incidents but part of a larger trend, driven by telcos prioritizing their paid messaging products. Therefore, the consensus is to move away from these free, unsupported gateways towards dedicated, commercially supported SMS solutions that offer guaranteed message delivery and proper support.
Key opinions
- Unsupported nature: Carrier email-to-text services were never considered production grade or intended for bulk or business-critical use, leading to their unreliability.
- Historical issues: These services have faced uptime and throttling issues for many years, indicating a persistent lack of investment and support from carriers.
- Commercial alternatives: Numerous companies provide commercially supported email-to-SMS gateways, offering a more reliable and professional alternative that guarantees message delivery.
- Telco incentives: Telcos have little incentive to improve their free services, preferring users to purchase their robust, paid SMS products for guaranteed message throughput.
- Cost justification: The minimal cost of dedicated SMS services (millicents per message) is a justified investment for reliable and critical communications, far outweighing the risks of free, unsupported options.
Key considerations
- Invest in quality: Businesses should invest in robust, commercially supported SMS gateway services to ensure reliable delivery of critical alerts and notifications. For selecting such platforms, see our guide on SaaS transactional notification platforms.
- Re-evaluate internal processes: Any internal processes relying on free email-to-text gateways need urgent re-evaluation and migration to more stable solutions.
- Understand the value of reliability: The business value of guaranteed message delivery far outweighs the minimal cost of professional SMS services, especially when compared to the impact of missed critical communications.
- Monitor deliverability: Even with alternatives, it is important to continuously monitor deliverability to avoid issues like being put on a email blacklist (or blocklist), as discussed by industry experts.
Expert view
Expert from Simplified Alerts states that AT&T is ending its email-to-text service for several significant reasons, primarily due to it becoming a major security risk. They explain that the service acted as a 'spam magnet' and facilitated 'smishing' (SMS phishing) attempts, which posed a substantial threat to users. This decision underscores the increasing importance of secure communication channels and the need for carriers to mitigate vulnerabilities that can be exploited by malicious actors. The expert's view emphasizes that the discontinuation is a necessary step to protect consumers from widespread abuse.
Expert view
Expert from SignalWire suggests that while AT&T hasn't provided a detailed technical reason, the decision to end email-to-text services is likely due to their outdated nature and inherent vulnerability to spam and abuse. They indicate that this is part of an industry-wide trend where such legacy communication methods are being phased out in favor of more robust and secure alternatives. The expert's perspective highlights that relying on older, unsupported gateways is inherently risky, as they lack the modern security features and deliverability guarantees of dedicated SMS platforms.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and technical advisories from AT&T and related industry sources confirm the imminent discontinuation of the email-to-text service. The rationale behind this decision is consistently cited as a combination of security vulnerabilities, the service's role as a spam vector, and its outdated nature. These official statements provide clear timelines and emphasize the need for users to transition to alternative messaging solutions, solidifying the message that the legacy email gateway is no longer a viable or supported communication method.
Key findings
- Confirmed shutdown date: AT&T's official support documentation confirms the email-to-text and text-to-email services will be discontinued on June 17, 2025.
- Security risks: The service is identified as a significant security risk, frequently exploited as a "spam magnet" to facilitate "smishing" attacks, as stated in various documentation.
- Outdated technology: The email-to-text service is considered outdated and vulnerable to abuse, aligning with an industry-wide move towards more modern and secure messaging infrastructure.
- Impact on addresses: The discontinuation affects both SMS and MMS gateways, meaning addresses like @txt.att.net and @mms.att.net will cease to function.
Key considerations
- Mandatory migration: Official documentation makes it clear that all users must migrate to alternative communication methods before the specified cutoff date.
- Prioritize secure channels: The emphasis on security risks highlights the importance of transitioning to more secure and controlled messaging channels for sensitive communications. This includes adhering to email authentication protocols.
- Technical impact: Businesses and developers relying on these gateways must update their communication flows and systems to integrate new solutions, as highlighted in SignalWire's blog.
- Long-term strategy: This event serves as a reminder to implement long-term messaging strategies that leverage robust platforms to boost email deliverability rates.
Technical article
AT&T Documentation confirms the discontinuation of their email-to-text and text-to-email service, effective June 17, 2025. This official notice clarifies that after this date, customers will no longer be able to use email to send or receive text messages to AT&T numbers. The documentation serves as a definitive statement, urging users to find alternative communication methods. It represents a significant policy change that impacts a broad user base, requiring immediate action for those dependent on the service.
Technical article
Official documentation from Simplified Alerts indicates that the primary reasons behind AT&T ending its email-to-text service include significant security risks. The service had increasingly become a 'spam magnet,' facilitating various forms of abuse, including 'smishing.' This explanation from a security-focused perspective highlights the vulnerabilities inherent in the legacy gateway, which prompted its shutdown. The documentation emphasizes the carrier's move to enhance network security and protect its users from phishing and unsolicited communications, even if it means discontinuing a long-standing feature.
Related resources
15 resources
Related pages
What are the challenges and compliance requirements for sending email to SMS gateways?
What SaaS transactional notification platforms reliably handle scheduled email, SMS, and web/app push?
Why are AT&T email domains experiencing a spike in block bounces?
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
Boost Email Deliverability Rates: Technical Solutions from Top Performing Senders
What happens when your domain is on an email blacklist?
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
How to troubleshoot email connection timeout errors when sending messages?
Why Your Emails Fail: Expert Guide to Improve Email Deliverability [2025]
