Summary
Sending emails to SMS gateways (e.g., 123456@txt.att.net) presents unique and significant challenges, primarily revolving around stringent compliance requirements and high filtering rates by mobile carriers. Unlike traditional email, email-to-SMS is heavily regulated, particularly in regions like the US by the FCC. Senders must secure explicit opt-in consent and be able to prove it, as general email consent often does not suffice. Moreover, even legitimate, opt-in traffic faces substantial deliverability hurdles because telco-provided gateways are often heavily filtered, leading to blocks and undelivered messages at volume. Businesses are encouraged to use dedicated SMS gateway providers for reliable delivery, which handle the direct SMS transmission for a fee, mitigating many of these compliance and deliverability issues.
Key findings
- High Filtering: Telco-provided email-to-SMS gateways are extensively filtered, making it difficult to achieve consistent delivery, even for opt-in messages.
- Strict Consent: The FCC and other regulatory bodies impose very tight constraints, requiring explicit opt-in consent for email-to-SMS, which must be provable by the sender.
- ESP Suppression: Many Email Service Providers (ESPs) preemptively suppress email-to-SMS domains to avoid compliance issues and maintain their own sender reputation.
- Direct SMS Providers: Companies are advised to use dedicated SMS gateway providers who handle direct SMS transmission for a fee, offering more reliable and compliant delivery.
- Carrier Restrictions: Major carriers like AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile have largely ceased support for email-to-text, further limiting the viability of this method.
Key considerations
- Proof of Opt-in: Always maintain clear records that demonstrate explicit consent from users to receive messages via SMS, especially for transactional notifications. For more on consent, consider how GDPR affects email deliverability.
- Gateway Reliability: Relying solely on free telco gateways is highly unreliable due to unpredictable filtering and potential permanent blocklists. Using a dedicated SMS gateway provides greater control and deliverability.
- Compliance Costs: While direct SMS providers incur per-message fees, these costs are often justified by increased deliverability and reduced compliance risks, helping you to align deliverability and revenue goals.
- Recipient Validation: Implement robust signup processes to verify that the provided phone number actually belongs to the user, as liability for misdirected messages is higher than for email. The Federal Communications Commission provides guidance on domain names for wireless devices.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often navigate the complexities of email-to-SMS by seeking clarification on consent requirements and understanding the practical implications of carrier blocking. While the appeal of direct communication via text is high, many quickly learn about the significant technical and regulatory hurdles. Their primary concerns revolve around ensuring message delivery and avoiding penalties, leading them to question the compliance of various sending methods, particularly when users explicitly opt in. They are keenly aware that traditional email deliverability strategies may not apply uniformly to the SMS channel, necessitating a more cautious and informed approach.
Key opinions
- Clarification on Methods: Marketers frequently ask about the different ways to send email to text, such as using telco gateways versus short code operators.
- Consent Validation: There's a strong desire to understand if explicit user consent for text notifications is sufficient for compliance.
- Deliverability Concerns: They recognize that even with opt-in, deliverability to SMS gateways can be unreliable and prone to blocking.
- Seeking Solutions: Marketers are actively looking for effective and compliant alternatives, like dedicated SMS gateway services.
Key considerations
- Explicit Consent: Ensure the consent mechanism specifically covers SMS notifications, as general email opt-in may not suffice for email-to-SMS. This directly impacts whether your emails are considered spam.
- Carrier Blocking Risks: Be aware that major carriers are increasingly shutting down or heavily filtering email-to-text services. SMSEagle discusses alternatives given this trend.
- Proof of Opt-in: You must be able to prove consent for every message sent to avoid fines and legal action, similar to the importance of maintaining a good email domain reputation.
- Alternatives: Consider investing in professional SMS gateway services to bypass the inherent challenges and unreliability of direct email-to-SMS methods, ensuring reliable deliverability.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains their primary method for sending messages to mobile phones is directly to the address assigned to the number, such as 123456@txt.att.net, which is a common approach.
Marketer view
Marketer from OtterText indicates that businesses utilizing SMS marketing must meet strict requirements, including securing express written consent before sending any promotional messages. This ensures compliance with regulations.
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability and compliance consistently warn against the inherent difficulties of sending emails to SMS gateways. They highlight that such practices are fraught with regulatory pitfalls, including strict FCC mandates on consent and potential legal repercussions if not handled meticulously. A core message from experts is that mobile operators heavily filter email-originated messages, leading to poor deliverability even for legitimate, opted-in traffic. They strongly advise using established SMS gateway companies as a more reliable and compliant alternative, emphasizing the importance of robust opt-in proof and careful management of recipient phone numbers.
Key opinions
- Highly Problematic: Sending email to SMS gateways is considered very problematic due to tight FCC constraints and high blocking rates.
- Preemptive Suppression: Many ESPs preemptively suppress messages to these domains to avoid issues for their senders.
- Opt-in Requirements: Email-to-SMS is strictly opt-in only under regulations like CAN-SPAM, requiring senders to prove consent.
- Carrier Filtering: Operator-provided gateways are heavily filtered, meaning even legitimate opt-in emails are unlikely to be delivered at scale.
- Enhanced Responsibility: Senders bear greater responsibility if a provided phone number does not belong to the sender, necessitating defensive signup strategies.
Key considerations
- Regulatory Compliance: Understand and adhere to strict regulatory frameworks, such as those from the FCC, which govern sending messages to wireless devices. Failing to do so can lead to emails going to spam.
- Alternative Solutions: Opt for reputable SMS gateway companies that handle direct SMS sending for a fee, offering a more reliable and compliant service. This is a robust approach to diagnosing deliverability issues.
- Consent Proof: Always maintain verifiable proof of explicit user consent for SMS messages, as this is a critical defense against complaints and blocklisting. For instance, Infobip provides guidance on global SMS compliance laws.
- Defensive Signup: Implement robust signup and verification processes to confirm phone number ownership, as liability for sending to incorrect or unowned numbers is significant.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks states that sending email to telco's free SMS gateways is highly problematic. They warn of tight FCC constraints and the certainty of getting blocked, noting that ESPs typically suppress these domains preemptively.
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource suggests that SMS gateways are subject to intense filtering by mobile carriers, which makes achieving high-volume delivery consistently a significant challenge for senders.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and industry guides frequently highlight the stringent legal and technical requirements for sending messages to SMS gateways. They emphasize the paramount importance of obtaining clear, provable consent from recipients before any messages are sent, especially for marketing communications. Key documents from regulatory bodies often specify which domains are designated for wireless devices, requiring heightened diligence from senders. These sources also underscore the technical verification steps taken by SMS gateways, such as authenticating sender credentials, to ensure legitimate traffic and prevent abuse. The overarching message is a strong push towards compliant and secure messaging practices to protect consumers and maintain network integrity.
Key findings
- Consent Mandate: Official guidelines consistently require prior express written consent for sending SMS marketing messages, along with mechanisms for easy opt-out.
- FCC Lists: The FCC provides lists of domains associated with wireless devices that require specific permission due to their nature.
- Gateway Verification: SMS gateways perform critical checks, including sender ID, username, password, and API key verification, to ensure message authenticity.
- Evolving Regulations: Compliance laws like GDPR are dynamic, requiring businesses to continually adapt their SMS marketing practices.
Key considerations
- Compliance First: Prioritize adherence to legal and industry guidelines to avoid fines, legal action, and potential service suspensions. This includes managing your blocklist monitoring.
- Consent Mechanism: Implement robust consent acquisition methods that explicitly cover SMS communications and provide clear opt-out options. This ties into overall email deliverability issues.
- Gateway Selection: Choose SMS gateway services that comply with all applicable rules and regulations, such as GDPR, to ensure secure and reliable message delivery. For example, SMS Comparison discusses gateway compliance.
- Sender Identity: Ensure your sender credentials (ID, username, password, API key) are correctly configured and verified by the SMS gateway to avoid delivery failures.
Technical article
Documentation from the Federal Communications Commission outlines that it maintains lists of domain names to which marketers should not send unsolicited email, as these messages are directed to wireless devices, including cell phones and pagers. This measure is taken by wireless providers to protect their customers.
Technical article
Documentation from OtterText states that businesses employing SMS marketing must conform to stringent requirements, which include obtaining explicit written consent before dispatching promotional text messages. This is a foundational step for legal compliance.
Related resources
15 resources
![Your Ultimate Guide To SMS Gateways [2025]](https://www.smscomparison.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/FEATURED-IMG-GATEWAY-e1677920906346.png)
Related pages
How does GDPR affect email deliverability and sender reputation?
When is affiliate marketing email considered spam and how does it impact deliverability?
What causes emails to go to spam when migrating to a new ESP and warming an IP?
How to align email deliverability and compliance goals with sales and company revenue objectives?
How to diagnose email deliverability issues and prevent emails from going to spam?
What happens when your domain is on an email blacklist?
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
