Summary
Sending email to SMS gateways presents significant challenges for deliverability and compliance. Telco carriers and Email Service Providers (ESPs) aggressively filter and often block messages sent via these gateways due to tight FCC and other regulatory constraints, and concerns about spam and smishing. This method is highly unreliable, lacks delivery receipts, and offers little control over sender identity or message formatting. Furthermore, commercial messages sent this way are classified as Application-to-Person (A2P) messaging, subjecting them to strict compliance requirements under regulations like CAN-SPAM, TCPA, and CTIA guidelines, which mandate explicit consent and clear opt-out mechanisms. Senders are strongly advised to use dedicated SMS APIs for reliable and compliant messaging.
Key findings
- High Unreliability: Email-to-SMS gateways are highly unreliable for message delivery, primarily due to aggressive filtering by telco SMS carriers and Email Service Providers (ESPs) who often preemptively suppress such domains.
- Strict Filtering & Blocks: Carrier-provided gateways are heavily filtered, making it unlikely for even opt-in email-originated messages to be delivered at volume. Carriers prioritize legitimate A2P traffic and frequently block or delay email-originated messages due to security concerns like smishing and spam.
- Lack of Feedback: This method offers no reliable delivery receipts or direct feedback mechanisms, making it extremely difficult to troubleshoot deliverability issues and confirm message receipt.
- Compliance Complexities: Messages sent via email-to-SMS gateways are subject to strict A2P compliance requirements, including explicit consent, opt-out mechanisms, and content guidelines, similar to direct SMS, which adds significant regulatory burden.
- Operational Limitations: Senders face limitations such as lack of control over sender ID (often appearing as generic numbers), difficulty managing two-way communication, and variability in carrier support and message formatting.
- Not for Critical Communications: Due to inherent unreliability and lack of control, email-to-SMS is deemed unsuitable for mission-critical messages or business-critical alerts.
Key considerations
- Explicit Consent: Obtaining and proving explicit consent for all recipients is paramount, as messages sent via email-to-SMS are subject to strict regulations like CAN-SPAM, TCPA, and GDPR, requiring clear opt-in and opt-out mechanisms.
- Use Dedicated SMS Platforms: For reliable and compliant Application-to-Person (A2P) messaging, it is highly advisable to use dedicated SMS APIs or platforms rather than email-to-SMS gateways. These platforms offer better deliverability, delivery receipts, control over sender ID, and built-in compliance features.
- Defensive Signup Practices: Implement robust signup processes to verify that provided phone numbers genuinely belong to the user, mitigating sender responsibility for misdirected messages and potential legal issues.
- Adhere to A2P Guidelines: Recognize that email-to-SMS, if commercial, falls under A2P messaging, necessitating adherence to stringent CTIA guidelines, carrier registration, throughput limits, and content vetting to avoid blocks and penalties.
- Manage Formatting & Limits: Be aware of varying character limits, potential message truncation, and inconsistent formatting across different carriers, which can compromise message clarity and reliability when using email-to-SMS.
- Maintain Email Deliverability: Ensure the initial email achieves high deliverability by adhering to email best practices, sender reputation, and authentication (SPF/DKIM), as it must first successfully reach the gateway before any SMS conversion can occur.
What email marketers say
12 marketer opinions
Sending email to SMS gateways is fraught with challenges for deliverability and compliance, making it an unreliable method for business communications. Carriers employ aggressive filtering to combat smishing and prioritize legitimate Application-to-Person (A2P) traffic, often blocking or delaying email-originated messages. This method also presents a dual-layer deliverability hurdle, as the initial email must first successfully pass email provider filters. Furthermore, the lack of consistent gateway behavior across carriers, combined with no direct feedback loops, renders troubleshooting nearly impossible. For commercial messages, the classification as A2P messaging imposes strict compliance requirements, including explicit consent, carrier registration, and content vetting under regulations like the TCPA, which email-to-SMS is ill-equipped to handle reliably.
Key opinions
- Aggressive Carrier Filtering: SMS carriers implement aggressive filtering measures to combat smishing and spam, frequently blocking or delaying legitimate email-originated messages due to the method's vulnerability to abuse and their prioritization of legitimate Application-to-Person (A2P) traffic.
- Dual Deliverability Hurdle: Messages sent via email-to-SMS face a dual deliverability challenge: the initial email must first successfully pass Email Service Provider (ESP) spam filters and reach the gateway before any conversion to SMS can occur, adding an initial layer of complexity.
- Inconsistent Gateway Behavior: Deliverability is highly unpredictable due to inconsistencies across carrier gateways, including varying message limits, formatting rules, and filtering policies, leading to unpredictable delivery failures that are difficult to diagnose.
- Lack of Direct Feedback: There is a significant absence of direct feedback loops for email-to-SMS, making it nearly impossible for senders to confirm message delivery, troubleshoot issues, or understand why messages were blocked or delayed.
- Commercial A2P Classification: When used for business communications, email-to-SMS is classified as A2P messaging, which brings stringent compliance requirements, including carrier registration, throughput limits, and content vetting, not typically associated with standard email.
- Security Vulnerability Exploitation: The inherent nature of email-to-SMS makes it susceptible to exploitation for smishing and spam, prompting carriers to enforce stricter filtering which inadvertently impacts legitimate senders.
Key considerations
- Mandatory Opt-in and TCPA Compliance: For any commercial messages sent via email-to-SMS, strict adherence to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) is mandatory, requiring explicit consent, clear disclosure, and easily accessible opt-out mechanisms to avoid severe legal penalties.
- Prioritize Dedicated SMS APIs: For reliable and compliant messaging, particularly Application-to-Person (A2P) communications, it is strongly advised to utilize dedicated SMS APIs and platforms which offer direct control, delivery confirmations, and built-in compliance features, unlike email-to-SMS gateways.
- A2P Requirements - Registration and Vetting: Recognize that commercial email-to-SMS is classified as A2P messaging, necessitating carrier registration, strict throughput limits, and content vetting. This is a complex process often handled by dedicated SMS providers, not easily managed via email gateways.
- Verify Phone Number Ownership: Implement robust signup and verification processes to ensure that provided mobile numbers accurately belong to the user, as senders bear responsibility for messages sent to incorrect or unconsenting recipients.
- Account for Message Limitations: Be prepared for significant limitations including varying character limits, potential message truncation, inconsistent formatting across carriers, and the inability to control sender branding, all of which compromise message integrity and sender identity.
- Not Suitable for Critical Alerts: Due to the inherent unreliability, lack of delivery confirmation, and unpredictable filtering, email-to-SMS should be avoided for time-sensitive, critical, or business-essential notifications where guaranteed delivery is paramount.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that sending emails to mobile phone numbers via telco SMS gateways is very problematic due to tight FCC constraints, leading to blocks and ESPs preemptively suppressing such domains. He notes that operator-provided gateways are heavily filtered, making even opt-in email unlikely to be delivered at volume, and suggests using companies that handle SMS gateways directly for a fee. He also advises that senders are more responsible if a provided number doesn't belong to the user, urging defensive signup practices.
17 Mar 2025 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from EZTexting Blog shares that email-to-SMS faces significant challenges due to increased carrier filtering and the need for stricter compliance. They explain that carriers prioritize legitimate A2P traffic, often blocking or delaying email-originated messages, and emphasize the necessity for explicit consent and clear sender identification to maintain deliverability.
4 Aug 2024 - EZTexting Blog
What the experts say
3 expert opinions
Sending messages from email to SMS gateways comes with significant compliance hurdles and persistent deliverability issues. It mandates explicit opt-in consent, similar to direct email marketing, and senders must be able to verify this permission to comply with regulations such as CAN-SPAM, TCPA, and GDPR. Despite adhering to these consent requirements, carriers often view marketing messages originating from email gateways as undesirable traffic, frequently leading to blocks. This is partly due to the absence of a straightforward reply-to or unsubscribe mechanism that users expect from legitimate SMS communications, making it a challenging and often ineffective channel for promotional content.
Key opinions
- Consent is Paramount: Email to SMS marketing requires explicit opt-in consent, a non-negotiable requirement under regulations like CAN-SPAM in the US and GDPR in Europe.
- Proof of Consent: Senders must maintain clear, verifiable records of recipient consent to demonstrate compliance and avoid legal penalties.
- Carrier Disfavor for Marketing: Even with proper opt-in, carriers frequently block or filter marketing messages sent via email to SMS gateways because they are often perceived as unsolicited and lack direct interaction paths.
- FCC Domain Identification: The FCC identifies specific domains as SMS domains, subjecting them to additional, strict permission requirements beyond standard email consent.
- Lack of Reply Path: A significant deliverability challenge stems from the absence of a direct 'reply to' or easy unsubscribe mechanism for users, which carriers view negatively and can lead to increased blocks.
Key considerations
- Strict Consent Protocols: Implement rigorous processes to obtain and document explicit consent for all SMS recipients, acknowledging that regulations like TCPA (US) and GDPR (Europe) apply.
- Anticipate Deliverability Blocks: Understand that even with compliant opt-in, email-originated SMS messages, especially for marketing, face a high likelihood of being blocked by carrier filters.
- Review FCC Guidelines: Be aware of specific FCC guidelines that may apply to domains identified as SMS gateways, requiring additional permission and compliance efforts.
- Avoid Marketing via Gateways: For marketing purposes, email to SMS gateways are generally discouraged due to their poor deliverability, the risk of blocks, and the inability for users to easily interact or opt out.
- Explore Dedicated SMS Solutions: For reliable and compliant SMS communications, particularly marketing, consider using dedicated SMS short codes or API platforms that provide proper two-way communication and built-in compliance features.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that under CAN-SPAM, email to SMS requires explicit opt-in, and the sender must be able to prove this consent. She clarifies that the FCC list identifies domains as SMS domains, which are subject to additional permission requirements, and warns that even with proper opt-in, using an email gateway for SMS might still result in blocks.
16 Nov 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that sending SMS messages requires explicit consent, similar to email marketing. It is crucial to maintain clear records of consent, as regulations like TCPA in the US and GDPR in Europe apply to SMS as well. This ensures compliance and avoids legal issues.
12 Apr 2025 - Spam Resource
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
Beyond the general unreliability, sending messages via email-to-SMS gateways presents significant technical complexities and stringent compliance demands. This method often struggles with fundamental issues such as character encoding and proper email header parsing, leading to message corruption or failure. Furthermore, these messages are consistently categorized as Application-to-Person (A2P) traffic, subjecting them to strict industry guidelines, including obtaining explicit consumer consent and providing clear opt-out mechanisms. The lack of delivery receipts and control over sender identity further compounds the challenges, rendering this approach unsuitable for any critical or professional communication.
Key findings
- Technical Conversion Flaws: Open-source implementations often highlight issues with character encoding and parsing email headers, which can lead to message corruption or undeliverable content.
- Inherent Unreliability: This method is fundamentally unreliable, lacking crucial features like delivery receipts and consistent carrier support, making it unsuitable for mission-critical messages.
- A2P Regulatory Scrutiny: All messages sent via email-to-SMS are classified as A2P, requiring strict adherence to compliance standards such as CTIA guidelines for consent, opt-out mechanisms, and content rules.
- Limited Sender Control: Users have no control over the sender ID and receive no delivery confirmations, which limits accountability and troubleshooting capabilities.
- Susceptibility to Filtering: Email-to-SMS messages are highly susceptible to carrier filtering due to their lack of authenticity and common association with spam and fraud.
Key considerations
- Prioritize Dedicated SMS Solutions: For any form of reliable or compliant messaging, especially commercial Application-to-Person communications, dedicated SMS APIs are strongly recommended over email-to-SMS gateways.
- Understand A2P Compliance Scope: Be aware that email-to-SMS requires full compliance with A2P messaging rules, including explicit consumer consent, clear opt-out instructions, and content guidelines to prevent blocking.
- Account for Technical Parsing Issues: Recognize that technical challenges like character encoding differences and email header parsing can lead to message failure or corruption.
- Avoid for Critical Communications: Given the unreliability, lack of delivery feedback, and compliance complexities, email-to-SMS is not appropriate for time-sensitive or essential messages.
- No Sender ID Control: Accept that sender identification will be generic, which can negatively impact brand recognition and message trustworthiness.
Technical article
Documentation from Twilio explains that sending email to SMS gateways comes with challenges like unreliability, lack of delivery receipts, and variability in carrier support, making it unsuitable for mission-critical messages. It also highlights that this method falls under A2P messaging, requiring adherence to compliance standards like CTIA guidelines for consent and opt-out.
6 Dec 2022 - Twilio Documentation
Technical article
Documentation from CTIA explains that all Application-to-Person (A2P) messages, including those originating from email-to-SMS gateways, are subject to strict compliance requirements. These include obtaining explicit consumer consent, providing clear opt-out mechanisms (e.g., STOP keywords), and adhering to content guidelines to prevent spam, fraud, and illegal content, which are critical for avoiding blocking and penalties.
12 Oct 2024 - CTIA (Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association)
How do image-heavy emails impact deliverability and accessibility for telecom companies, and what are the legal implications?
What are the best resources for global email sending requirements and best practices?
What are the challenges of working with cold email senders and deliverability?
What are the challenges with email deliverability when switching to Hubspot from SFMC?
What are the deliverability challenges and risks associated with sending cold emails?
What are the specific rules and guidelines to deliver emails to the Chinese market?
