Suped

Summary

Understanding the appropriate DMARC policy for your domain is crucial for email security and deliverability. DMARC, or Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance, allows domain owners to protect their domain from unauthorized use, such as email spoofing and phishing. It works by telling receiving mail servers what to do with emails that fail SPF or DKIM authentication and DMARC alignment checks. The three primary DMARC policies are p=none, p=quarantine, and p=reject, each with distinct implications for your email traffic and security posture. Choosing the right policy involves balancing monitoring needs with enforcement levels.

Suped DMARC monitor
Free forever, no credit card required
Get started for free
Trusted by teams securing millions of inboxes
Company logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logoCompany logo

What email marketers say

Email marketers often navigate DMARC policies with a focus on balancing brand protection against potential deliverability impacts. Many recognize the importance of DMARC for security, particularly against phishing, but express concerns about the complexity and risks associated with moving beyond p=none. Their insights highlight the need for careful planning and monitoring to avoid accidentally blocking legitimate campaigns. Implementing DMARC, especially moving to a p=reject policy, is critical for combating email spoofing effectively.

Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks suggests that without DMARC, particularly for domains frequently targeted by phishing attempts, there's a risk of recipients mistakenly marking legitimate emails as spam. This action, based solely on sender and subject, can significantly harm your domain's reputation, making DMARC a crucial defense.

13 Feb 2019 - Email Geeks

Marketer view

Marketer from DuoCircle advises that implementing DMARC policies like p=quarantine or p=reject is necessary to prevent phishing and impersonation attacks. Simply using p=none does not offer sufficient protection against these malicious activities.

22 Jun 2025 - DuoCircle

What the experts say

Deliverability experts emphasize that while DMARC enforcement policies offer robust protection against spoofing and phishing, their implementation requires a meticulous approach to avoid unintended consequences. They stress the importance of thorough preparation, understanding the nuances of email authentication, and continuous monitoring. Experts also highlight that simply publishing a p=none policy without actively using its reports to fix issues is a missed opportunity and offers minimal value. For best practices, refer to our guide on setting DMARC p=reject policy.

Expert view

Expert from SpamResource highlights that while DMARC provides powerful enforcement capabilities, misconfigurations can lead to legitimate emails being rejected. This underscores the need for thorough testing and validation before moving to a p=reject policy.

10 Aug 2024 - SpamResource

Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks notes that simply having a DMARC record with p=none is not enough; it's the continuous analysis of reports and subsequent fixing of authentication issues that provides real value. Without action, the reports are just data.

20 Feb 2019 - Email Geeks

What the documentation says

Official DMARC documentation and industry standards outline the specific functions and recommended uses for each policy. They generally advocate for a progressive implementation, starting with a monitoring-only policy (p=none) to collect data and ensure proper configuration, then gradually moving to enforcement policies (p=quarantine, p=reject) as confidence in authentication rises. The goal is to maximize protection against email fraud while minimizing disruption to legitimate mail flows.

Technical article

Documentation from RFC 7489 specifies that the 'p=none' policy instructs receiving mail servers to take no action on messages that fail DMARC authentication. Instead, these messages are delivered to the recipient's inbox, and reports are sent back to the domain owner.

10 Mar 2015 - RFC 7489

Technical article

Documentation from DMARC.org explains that the primary purpose of a 'p=quarantine' policy is to direct receiving mail servers to treat emails that fail DMARC checks with suspicion. This often results in placing them in the recipient's spam or junk folder.

01 Jan 2014 - DMARC.org

12 resources

Start improving your email deliverability today

Get started