Summary
Less common or newer domain extensions, known as Top-Level Domains, can indeed affect email deliverability, primarily because they typically start without an established positive sending reputation. Mailbox providers and spam filters may treat these domains with greater initial scrutiny compared to well-established TLDs like .com. While a less common TLD isn't an automatic block, it necessitates a focused effort to build trust. Factors like sender reputation, consistent good sending practices, adherence to anti-spam policies, and proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) are paramount. Some specific TLDs may also develop a poorer collective reputation if widely abused, impacting all legitimate senders using them. Marketers should anticipate the need for a thorough domain warm-up process and continuous positive sending behavior to ensure messages reach the inbox when using these extensions.
Key findings
- Initial Skepticism: Less common or newer Top-Level Domains (TLDs) often start with a neutral or lower reputation score, leading to initial skepticism from Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and spam filters. This makes it harder for them to establish trust compared to established TLDs like .com.
- Reputation is Key: Email deliverability is primarily determined by a domain's established sender reputation, built over time through factors like sending volume, complaint rates, engagement, and adherence to best practices. The TLD itself is less a direct cause of blockage and more a factor in initial reputation establishment.
- No Automatic Block: Less common TLDs are not automatically blocked, but they lack an established positive history. This means senders must be more diligent in following email best practices to build a consistent positive sending history and gain trust.
- Misuse Can Hurt: While the domain extension isn't the sole determinant, some less common TLDs can become associated with spam or abuse if widely misused by bad actors. This can lead to more aggressive filtering by mailbox providers for all emails from that TLD, regardless of individual sender reputation.
- Individual Experiences Vary: Marketers have reported varied experiences. Some noted minor rejections for TLDs like .email, while others found TLDs like .io generally perform well. Even TLDs like .press have shown surprisingly low spam rates according to some analyses, suggesting it's not a universal condemnation.
- Older Domains Can Be OK: An older registered domain with a less common TLD and existing IP history might be used normally, provided it has a good established reputation. The main challenge applies more to completely new domains with new TLDs.
Key considerations
- Domain Warm-up: For new domains, especially those with less common TLDs and no prior sending history, a thorough warm-up process is essential to gradually build trust with mailbox providers and avoid immediate filtering.
- Building Reputation: Regardless of the TLD, consistently sending legitimate, engaged mail to a clean list is crucial for establishing and maintaining a positive sender reputation. This is even more vital for less common TLDs starting with a neutral or lower reputation.
- Robust Authentication: Implementing strong email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is paramount. These help prove your legitimacy to mail servers, which is particularly important for newer domains trying to gain trust.
- Careful Testing: If considering a less common TLD, test it with smaller segments of your audience first and allow the domain to mature before scaling to large volumes. Avoid immediate high-volume sending.
- TLD Reputation Check: Be aware that certain TLDs can gain a poor collective reputation due to widespread spam or abuse, leading to more aggressive filtering by mailbox providers. Research a TLD's general reputation if possible, although individual sender behavior is ultimately more influential.
- Distinguish Use Cases: Understand that the impact of a TLD might vary depending on whether it's in the 'From' header versus an in-message link. Both are areas of concern that require attention to reputation.
What email marketers say
13 marketer opinions
Using a newer or less common domain extension, known as a Top-Level Domain, often presents an initial hurdle for email deliverability. This is primarily due to the absence of an established positive sending reputation, leading mailbox providers and spam filters to treat these domains with greater initial caution compared to older, more common TLDs like .com. While not a permanent barrier to the inbox, using such an extension necessitates meticulous attention to building trust. This involves a crucial domain warm-up process for new senders, unwavering adherence to email best practices, and consistent positive sending behavior over time. Ultimately, a strong sender reputation, built through legitimate sending and robust authentication, remains the most significant factor in overcoming any initial skepticism associated with a less common TLD.
Key opinions
- Initial Trust Deficit: Newer or less common Top-Level Domains generally begin with a neutral or lower reputation score, making it inherently harder for them to establish trust with Internet Service Providers compared to well-established domains like .com.
- Reputation Trumps TLD Alone: While the TLD itself plays a role, a domain's overall sending reputation-built over time through factors like consistent sending, low complaint rates, and high engagement-is the primary driver of email deliverability.
- No Inherent Ban, but Scrutiny: Less common TLDs are not automatically blocked by email providers, but they do face increased scrutiny from spam filters and mailbox providers until a positive sending history is consistently demonstrated.
- Varying TLD Perceptions: Some less common TLDs might be perceived more negatively due to historical association with spam, particularly cheaper ones, while others, even niche ones like .press, might have surprisingly low spam rates according to some analyses.
- Older Domains, Different Rules: An older, already registered domain with a less common TLD and an established IP mailing history may not face the same initial deliverability challenges as a completely new domain, provided it has a good existing reputation.
- Full Domain Reputation Matters: The TLD's impact on reputation applies to both the 'From' header and any in-message links, emphasizing the need for consistent positive reputation management across all aspects of your email campaigns.
Key considerations
- Prioritize Domain Warming: For new domains or those with less common TLDs, a diligent warm-up process is crucial to gradually build trust with mailbox providers and avoid immediate filtering.
- Strict Adherence to Best Practices: Because these TLDs start with a neutral reputation, meticulously following email best practices-including maintaining clean lists, sending relevant content, and ensuring consistent sending volume-is even more vital.
- Implement Strong Authentication: SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are indispensable for verifying sender legitimacy, a critical step for new or less common TLDs seeking to establish trust and signal authenticity to ISPs.
- Strategic Testing and Monitoring: Before deploying at scale, conduct careful testing with smaller segments of your audience and closely monitor deliverability metrics when using a less common TLD to identify and address any potential issues early.
- Assess TLD Reputation (where applicable): While individual sender behavior is paramount, be aware that some cheaper or historically abused TLDs may carry a collective negative perception, potentially leading to more aggressive filtering. Research the general reputation of the TLD if possible.
- Maintain Consistent Sending History: Building a long-term, consistent pattern of positive sending behavior is the most effective way for any domain, especially a less common TLD, to overcome initial skepticism and achieve optimal deliverability.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks shares their experience using .email domains, noting some rejections due to the TLD, but stating it was a tiny fraction and didn't impact major MBPs. They are unsure if this is still an issue.
22 Mar 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that .io TLDs should perform well, but warns that cheaper TLDs tend to get less respect due to higher spam usage.
9 Nov 2021 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
3 expert opinions
Email deliverability can be impacted by the choice of less common domain extensions, or Top-Level Domains. While individual sender reputation and engagement are paramount for how mailbox providers process email, certain less common TLDs can develop a collective negative reputation if they are widely misused by spammers. In such cases, mailbox providers may apply more aggressive filtering to all emails originating from these specific TLDs, even for legitimate senders. Therefore, senders utilizing these extensions must diligently focus on building and maintaining a strong sending reputation through robust authentication, careful domain maturation, and a gradual sending approach to overcome any initial skepticism or pre-existing TLD-based filtering.
Key opinions
- TLD Collective Reputation: Less common Top-Level Domains can acquire a poor collective reputation if widely used for spam, leading to more aggressive filtering by mailbox providers regardless of an individual sender's legitimacy.
- Sender Reputation Primary: Mailbox providers primarily rely on an individual sender's reputation and engagement metrics when processing email, rather than solely on the domain extension itself.
- Misuse Impacts All: Widespread misuse of specific TLDs by spammers can create a negative association for all senders on that TLD, making deliverability challenging even for otherwise good senders.
- Building Trust is Key: For less common TLDs, building a strong, positive sender reputation is critical to counteract any initial skepticism or negative collective associations.
- Any TLD Needs Good Practices: While some TLDs may face more scrutiny, poor sending behavior will negatively affect deliverability for any domain extension, underscoring the universal importance of best practices.
Key considerations
- Avoid Less Common TLDs: For general email marketing, it is often advisable to avoid less common TLDs due to the potential for pre-existing negative associations or increased scrutiny from mailbox providers.
- Strong Authentication: Implement robust email authentication protocols such as SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to prove your legitimacy, which is especially crucial when using newer or less common TLDs.
- Gradual Warm-up: When deploying a new domain, particularly with a less common TLD, always employ a gradual warm-up strategy, sending low volumes initially and slowly increasing over time.
- Allow Domain Maturation: Give new domains time to mature and establish a positive sending history before attempting to send large volumes of email, helping to build trust with mailbox providers.
- Consistent Good Practices: Maintain impeccable sending practices, including strict list hygiene, engaging content, and low complaint rates, as consistent positive behavior is paramount for deliverability on any TLD.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks advises avoiding less common TLDs and emphasizes strong authentication. They also recommend testing new TLDs with segments and allowing domains to mature before sending large volumes, warning against immediate high-volume sending.
9 Oct 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that while some new Generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs) may be associated with spam due to misuse, mailbox providers primarily process email based on sender reputation and engagement, not solely on the domain extension itself. Senders using less common gTLDs must focus on building a strong sending reputation to ensure good deliverability, as bad sending behavior on any TLD will negatively impact deliverability.
2 Apr 2022 - Spam Resource
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
Less common domain extensions can indeed influence email deliverability, primarily due to their initial lack of an established positive sender reputation. Major mailbox providers like Google and Microsoft, alongside industry groups such as M3AAWG, consistently highlight that email deliverability is fundamentally driven by a domain's sender reputation, built over time through factors like sending volume, complaint rates, and adherence to anti-spam policies. While these less common TLDs are not inherently blocked, they start with no historical trust, requiring senders to meticulously build a positive sending history. Robust email authentication protocols-SPF, DKIM, and DMARC-are crucial for any domain, especially newer ones, to prove legitimacy. Furthermore, organizations like ICANN monitor new TLDs for abuse; if a less common TLD becomes widely associated with spam or phishing, its collective reputation can decline, making legitimate emails from that extension more susceptible to cautious filtering by mail servers.
Key findings
- Reputation-Centric: Email deliverability is predominantly determined by a domain's established sender reputation, which encompasses consistent sending practices, low complaint rates, and proper authentication, rather than the domain extension alone.
- Initial Trust-Building: Less common domain extensions typically begin without a pre-existing positive reputation, necessitating a deliberate effort to build trust with mailbox providers and avoid initial filtering challenges.
- Authentication Critical: Strong email authentication protocols, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, are vital for any domain to prove its legitimacy and are particularly important for newer domains or those with less common TLDs to establish trust.
- Collective TLD Impact: If a less common TLD is frequently exploited for abusive activities like spam or phishing, its overall reputation can be negatively affected, leading to increased scrutiny and potential filtering of all emails originating from that specific extension.
- New Domain Challenges: Documentation from major providers like Google and Microsoft implies that any new domain, including those with less common TLDs, must actively build a positive sending history to ensure deliverability, as reputation accumulates over time.
Key considerations
- Prioritize Sender Reputation: Focus intensely on building and maintaining a strong sender reputation through consistent good sending practices, careful list management, and low complaint rates, as this is the most critical factor regardless of TLD.
- Implement Full Authentication: Ensure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are correctly configured and actively monitored for your domain, as robust authentication helps verify your identity and builds trust with mail servers.
- Execute Domain Warm-Up: For any new domain, especially one with a less common TLD, always employ a gradual warm-up strategy to incrementally build sending volume and establish a positive history with mailbox providers.
- Adhere to Anti-Spam Policies: Consistently follow all anti-spam best practices and policies from major mailbox providers to avoid being flagged as suspicious, which is paramount for domains that start with no established trust.
- Monitor TLD's General Use: While individual sending behavior is key, be aware that some less common TLDs may acquire a poorer general reputation if widely used for malicious purposes, potentially leading to more cautious filtering by mail servers.
Technical article
Documentation from M3AAWG explains that email deliverability is primarily determined by established sender reputation, which considers factors like sending volume, complaint rates, and authentication. While less common domain extensions are not inherently blocked, they start with no reputation history, requiring consistent good sending practices to build trust with mailboxes and avoid initial filtering challenges.
16 Aug 2023 - M3AAWG Public Documents
Technical article
Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools indicates that email deliverability for Gmail users is heavily influenced by a domain's reputation. While not explicitly stating that less common TLDs affect deliverability, new domains, which many less common TLDs are, must build a positive sending history and adhere to best practices to establish a good reputation and ensure messages reach the inbox.
29 Jun 2022 - Google Postmaster Tools Help
Do different TLDs affect cold email deliverability?
Do new or uncommon domain extensions (.club, .online, .tech, .app) affect email deliverability?
Does public vs private domain registration affect email deliverability?
Does the top level domain (TLD) affect email deliverability?
Does using a different domain for CDN hosted images in emails affect deliverability?
How do top-level domains (TLDs) impact email deliverability and spam filtering?
