Suped

How does Gmail's compliance status dashboard aggregate spam rate data for root domains and subdomains?

Michael Ko profile picture
Michael Ko
Co-founder & CEO, Suped
Published 5 Jun 2025
Updated 18 Aug 2025
6 min read
Understanding how Gmail's compliance status dashboard aggregates spam rate data can be a bit of a puzzle. It is crucial for anyone managing email deliverability. There's often confusion about how data from root domains and their subdomains interact within this critical tool.
The dashboard provides insights into your sending reputation, but the way it consolidates data can lead to unexpected results, especially when dealing with multiple sending streams. This article aims to clarify the aggregation logic, helping you better interpret your spam rates and maintain strong sender reputation.

How Gmail aggregates spam data

One of the most frequent questions regarding Gmail's compliance dashboard revolves around its data aggregation. While you might send emails from various subdomains (e.g., marketing.example.com and transactions.example.com), the dashboard often rolls up (aggregates) this information to the root domain (e.g., example.com). This means that data derived from your subdomains contributes to the overall status of your primary domain.
According to Google's documentation, the compliance status dashboard uses data from subdomains to determine compliance, but it primarily provides the status for primary domains. This can be confusing because a specific subdomain might be in excellent standing, yet the overall root domain status could show as non-compliant due to aggregation across all related sending properties.
This aggregation to the root domain impacts how Google Postmaster Tools (GPT) calculates your spam rate. If you have multiple subdomains, issues on one could potentially affect the perceived reputation of your entire domain, as seen in GPT's consolidated view. This makes it vital to monitor all sending points.

Understanding data discrepancies

A common point of concern for senders is when the compliance dashboard reports a higher spam rate than what appears on the traditional spam rate graph in Google Postmaster Tools. This disparity arises from the different ways these dashboards calculate and present data.
The compliance status dashboard often reflects a broader view of your sending health, possibly incorporating factors beyond just user-reported spam. While Google states that the compliance status applies to primary domains exclusively, there's an ongoing debate about whether the newer Postmaster Tools v2 dashboard for spam rates also shows data for the primary domain or individual subdomains.
I've personally observed situations where the root domain shows data even when it's not directly used for sending, indicating a clear rollup from its subdomains. This highlights the importance of understanding the nuances of how Postmaster Tools calculates spam complaints and volume, and being prepared to investigate individual subdomain performance even when the top-level view looks problematic.

Understanding the dashboards

Gmail's Postmaster Tools offers multiple dashboards, each providing a different lens on your email performance. Knowing which dashboard to trust for specific data points, especially with the introduction of new versions, is key to accurate assessment.
  1. Compliance Status Dashboard: Focuses on the primary domain, aggregating data from all subdomains to provide an overall compliance status. This can flag a root domain as non-compliant even if only a segment of its subdomains is struggling.
  2. Spam Rate Dashboard (V1): Shows user-reported spam rates, often providing more granular data, including at the subdomain level.
  3. Spam Rate Dashboard (V2):google.com logo Introduced recently, its aggregation method is still a topic of discussion among email deliverability professionals, with some suggesting it leans towards root domain aggregation similar to the compliance dashboard.

Impact on sender reputation

The way Gmail aggregates spam rate data has a direct and significant impact on your overall domain reputation. If spam complaints from one subdomain cause the root domain's aggregated spam rate to spike, it can trigger filters for all emails sent from that root domain, regardless of the individual subdomain's performance. Gmail tracks domain reputation through Postmaster Tools, categorizing it as High, Medium, Low, or Bad.
A low or bad reputation (or being listed on a blacklist or blocklist) will lead to significant deliverability issues, including emails landing in spam folders or being rejected outright. This is why understanding the aggregated view in the compliance dashboard is so important. It gives you a macro-level view of your domain's health, even if it masks granular details at first glance.
Even if your other subdomains are performing perfectly, a single troubled subdomain can cause the entire root domain's reputation to suffer. This can lead to a domino effect where previously well-performing email streams start experiencing deliverability challenges. It really forces a holistic approach to email deliverability.

Aggregated data challenges

  1. Hidden subdomain issues: A high spam rate on the root domain can obscure which specific subdomain is causing the problem.
  2. Broad impact: Reputation issues from one subdomain can negatively affect the deliverability of all emails from the root domain.
  3. Diagnostic difficulty: Pinpointing the exact source of a compliance flag can be challenging with aggregated data.

Best practices for subdomains

  1. Isolate sending streams: Use distinct subdomains for different email types (e.g., transactional, marketing) to contain potential issues.
  2. Monitor each subdomain: Regularly check the individual performance of each subdomain in Postmaster Tools for any red flags.
  3. Address issues quickly: Rapidly respond to spikes in spam complaints on any subdomain to prevent damage to the root domain's reputation.

Strategies for maintaining compliance

Given the aggregation behavior of Gmail's compliance dashboard, proactive strategies are essential. Regularly monitoring all your sending domains and their subdomains in Google Postmaster Tools is the first step. Pay close attention not just to the overall compliance status but also to the more granular spam rate identifiers.
Segmenting your email sending by subdomain is a highly effective strategy. For example, use a dedicated subdomain for marketing emails and another for transactional messages. This way, if your marketing efforts accidentally lead to a spike in spam complaints, they are contained within that specific subdomain, protecting the reputation of your transactional email stream. Subdomain segmentation allows for more precise problem identification and quicker remediation.
Furthermore, a comprehensive understanding of all the data points in Postmaster Tools, as described by various resources, goes beyond just spam rates. Looking at IP reputation, domain reputation, authentication, and delivery errors provides a holistic view. If you see your root domain flagged for compliance, you'll need to dig into the individual subdomain data to find the root cause.

Dashboard

What it tracks

Aggregation behavior

Compliance Status
Overall adherence to Gmail's sender guidelines
Aggregated to root domain, uses subdomain data.
Spam Rate
Percentage of user-reported spam
Primarily root domain for compliance. V1 offers subdomain visibility
IP Reputation
Health of your sending IPs
Rolls up to root domain
Domain Reputation
Overall domain sending health
Aggregates from subdomains and IPs

Views from the trenches

Best practices
Monitor all subdomains diligently, even if the primary compliance dashboard appears fine.
Segment your email streams using different subdomains to isolate potential reputation issues.
Act quickly on any spikes in spam complaints, regardless of which subdomain they originate from.
Regularly review both the compliance status dashboard and the spam rate graphs to identify trends.
Common pitfalls
Assuming a good root domain compliance status means all subdomains are performing perfectly.
Not segmenting email sending by type, allowing one bad campaign to affect overall deliverability.
Ignoring discrepancies between different Postmaster Tools dashboards.
Waiting for a severe compliance flag before investigating email sending practices.
Expert tips
Implement a DMARC policy with reporting to gain deeper insights into email authentication and deliverability.
Conduct regular email deliverability tests to preemptively identify potential issues.
Understand that Gmail's compliance metrics are dynamic and require continuous adaptation.
Leverage private feedback loops (FBLs) if available, for more granular complaint data.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says that the compliance status dashboard primarily applies to primary domains, not subdomains, according to Google's own documentation. This suggests the V2 spam rate dashboard may also be showing data for the primary domain.
2024-11-14 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says that, for V1, subdomain data does roll up to the root domain, and subdomain sending data is visible at both the subdomain and root domain levels in Postmaster Tools.
2024-11-14 - Email Geeks
Understanding how Gmail's compliance status dashboard aggregates spam rate data for root domains and subdomains is crucial for maintaining a healthy sender reputation. While the dashboard primarily presents a consolidated view at the root domain level, it is essential to remember that the underlying data comes from all associated subdomains.
By actively monitoring your Postmaster Tools dashboards, employing strategic subdomain segmentation, and adhering to best practices, you can effectively manage your email deliverability and avoid being caught off guard by unexpected compliance flags. Staying informed about how Google calculates compliance is key.

Frequently asked questions

DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard

What you'll get with Suped

Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing